by MonteQuest » Sun 06 Mar 2005, 16:23:32
$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('drew', '')$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', 'B')ut it would be more effective to give everyone a car and lower the driving age. More people have died in auto crashes than all the wars combined since the Revolutionary War.
Monte, seriously now, I like peakoil.com, I do, but sometimes a challenge is in order with regard to some of the outlandish statements you continue to make. As to the above quote, (2005 02 13) where do you come up with these 'facts'. I did a fairly quick guesstimate of average US auto deaths for last year times 50 years and got a number of around 2 million dead people. Your claims certainly border on hyperbola don't you think, being 55 million people died in WWII alone.
Even world wide the numbers don't add up. The WHO claims that 1.2 million people died last year as a result of traffic accidents. Are you claiming that this number is reflective of the past 50 or 100 years? I think growth of autos would be 'exponential' don't you think. As for war world wide the numbers are staggering and depressing; WWI 22 million, WWII 55 million, Vietnam ~4 million, Ukraine 13 million etc, etc... By my guess at least 100 million have died in the last century due to war and the number is probably much higher, if you run the numbers back to the end of the American Rev.
Sorry Monte, cars don't cut it as an execution tool.
Drew
$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('uNkNowN ElEmEnt', 'T')he world used the war to get out of the depression last time. It would be a seductive way to do so again, with the added benefit of decreasing the population. Anyone care to guess who the target of the next world war would likely be?