by Pops » Tue 08 Jul 2014, 09:50:20
$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('AgentR11', 'I')nteresting that a Democrat partisan can't see his own presidents with imperial tendencies.
I think it is no surprise that as partisanship increases, the power of the presidency increases. Both wings of US politics are authoritarian and a strong executive is fine with them as long as it is Their executive, so short sightedness prevails.
Unfortunately, the things that actually matter; civil rights, right to assemble and freedom of speech, privacy, religious freedom, etc, etc are equally under assault from both the right
and left. The see-saw attack continues with alternating presidents and actual freedom ratchets down with each succeeding attack.
Why would the right want to impeach Obama for an actual infringement - say unilaterally depriving a US citizen of all constitutional rights and executing them; when the folks back home believe that is a good thing. They agree that the POTUS should be that powerful just not a D.
The current problem isn't that Obama is too powerful, it's that a Democrat is that powerful. So they attack
him rather than the office and they do it in a place where they are bound to have the support of the base. So they hit two birds with one stone, the evil IRS, or
Clinton Benghazi - or the "deserter" trade. Just like Gingrich the adulterer impeaching Clinton for adultery, the plot plays in Peoria.
Why would Democrats back a political stunt?
The legitimate object of government, is to do for a community of people, whatever they need to have done, but can not do, at all, or can not, so well do, for themselves -- in their separate, and individual capacities.
-- Abraham Lincoln, Fragment on Government (July 1, 1854)