by Petrodollar » Wed 26 Sep 2007, 14:33:46
Tyler_JC wrote:
$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', 'I')'m sorry, I just don't see the logic.
That's because you don't view the world in a purely binary, ideologically rigid/radical viewpoint. Bush does, and Cheney might as well - its the Manichean paradox - and there is
no room for l
ogic in the fundamentalist/Manichean paradigm.
I just finished reading the best book on this subject,
A Tragic Legacy, and in it the author makes a convincing case that Bush's "Good vs Evil" Manichean worldview is the primary driving force behind all his decisions - a dangerous worldview that is easily manipulated by his neoconservative/Likudite handlers - which bares no resemblence to objective reality, facts, or logic. The author accurately illustrates how Bush sees Iran as pure "Evil," and with that over arching viewpoint, "lunatic" Cheney might be able to goad Bush into the war on this basis alone, arguing that he is fighting for pure "Good" and on the side of God.

Amazon.com
$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', 'B')ush's rise and fall are most evident in the 2002 election, which brought him control of both houses of Congress, and the 2006 election, which reversed that triumph. The president's chosen Manichean worldview and his rigid refusal to consider other viewpoints have resulted in a disastrous administration and damage the nation will be living with for generations, according to Greenwald (
How Would a Patriot Act? 2006).
Greenwald begins by documenting Bush's political collapse and then explores the core beliefs that have driven Bush's decision making, as well as the broader philosophical and political dangers of such strong convictions. He details how the president's absolutist moralistic worldview, the simple identification of good and evil, overshadowed decisions that required more nuanced views in the lead-up to the war in Iraq. Advisors with other points of view were ignored as Bush's strong ends-justify-the-means approach resulted in such decidedly un-American practices as indefinite detentions, use of torture, and preemptive war. This is a compelling examination of how moral beliefs can drive political decisions, with disastrous consequences.
...Indeed, if one carefully examines all the evidence, it is clear that Bush's decisions are
based on logic, and thus a potential war with Iran and its disasterous effects are not evaluated from a logical framework - rather - the world is viewed from a fundamentalist Manichean paradigm. I highly recommend this book, and it even briefly discusses Peak Oil (see the "book review" section on this site for my earlier post on this topic)