by ReverseEngineer » Thu 05 Mar 2009, 14:03:12
$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Byron100', 'W')hat I don't understand why the US couldn't just go ahead and declare default, and go to a command economy a la the Soviet Union of the 40's and 50's? I mean, it worked for them for a time, right? The government would give out food coupons so everyone can eat, all rents would be abolished, all debt would be discharged (essentially "freezing" people in their homes, wherever they happen to be), and most private automobiles can be taken off the road, since so few people would need them to go to work, etc.
Then we could go about the process of restarting the economy at a much lower level than before, perhaps at 30% or 40% of former GDP, with less than 25% labor participation rate. About the only thing we'd have to import is oil from Canada - virtually all other trade would cease, of course. It'd not be a comfortable situation by any shot, but at least Americans would be able to eat and have shelter - the two things that are essential to prevent a total, cataclysmic meltdown.
Patience, Grasshopper. LOL.
Remember what it took for the Soviet Union to come to be in Seven Days in May of 1917. Remember just who it was that got plugged full of lead in a Ruskie basement.
Russia was ruled by the Romanoffs from the time of Peter the Great, who ruled at the same time Newton was Master of the Mint in England. The Ruskies however never really got a foothold in the colonization process and the shared stock companies like the British East India company. As the British Empire was winding down in the early part of the 20th century, economies were crashing all over the place, you will note that the Russian Revolution comes on the heels of the founding of the Fed under Woodrow Wilson. In any event, the international banking families actually funded the Russian Revolution to get a toe hold in that economy, however they ended up funding the wrong faction, there was quite a bit of internal bloodletting there.
Anyhow, a command economy is possible at any time, you just won't see it until after the blood is literally running down the streets. TPTB, whether its the Romanoffs or our Federal Goobermint will not hand over power willingly, its has to be taken from them. The monetary system as structured is what has kept the Banksters running the show worldwide since the founding of the Bank of England in 1694, and they don;t want to let go of that system. Two World Wars and inumerable smaller aggressions have been fought to keep that system in place and in fact extend it into China at long last. Too bad for the Chinese of course, they hitched a ride on the Capitalist bankdwagon a Day Late and a Dollar short.
A command economy will eventually come out of this, because that is how you stop rampant inflation or catastrophic deflation. The main question is whether such a command economy will come at the global level, the national level or whether there will be a breakup into smaller regional units, and how long it will take before this solution is undertaken. It could be another couple of years before you see it unfold, even more perhaps. Naked printing and currency debasement have a ways to go before they completely run out of steam for the Banksters to maintain their grasp on the strings of power.
Reverse Engineer