Donate Bitcoin

Donate Paypal


PeakOil is You

PeakOil is You

THE International Energy Agency (IEA) Thread pt 1 (merged) A

Discuss research and forecasts regarding hydrocarbon depletion.

Re: IEA global production 3Q2006 update: Plateau, or no?

Postby coyote » Sun 29 Oct 2006, 13:45:17

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Starvid', 'T')o keep the old forecasts correct we ignore deep and ultra deep, calling it unconventional. Instead we put the new category on top of the old graph and call the new graph "all liquids".

I'm certainly no expert with the modeling, but doesn't it make sense to do it that way? Considering the greater cost, lead time and risk associated with deepwater drilling, it seems to me that it may not have that drastic an impact on the peak date (peak production, I mean). Just doesn't seem like it could be brought online quickly and safely enough to offset world declines. What it could do, though, is help ease us down the other side somewhat. No?
Lord, here comes the flood
We'll say goodbye to flesh and blood
If again the seas are silent in any still alive
It'll be those who gave their island to survive...
User avatar
coyote
News Editor
News Editor
 
Posts: 1979
Joined: Sun 23 Oct 2005, 03:00:00
Location: East of Eden

Re: IEA global production 3Q2006 update: Plateau, or no?

Postby DantesPeak » Sun 29 Oct 2006, 14:09:57

I think light sweet crude is already past peak (of 2005), but all liquids can continue to increase for a few years.

Essentially the conventional oil that is used to create biofuels, ethanol, oil sands, etc., is mostly double counted - since the oil used to produce alternatives is not excluded from all liquids.

Net liquids - excluding double counting - is probably close to a peak, but may proceed marginally higher over the next few years.

Also, really deep water drilling is not pure oil - but includes a substantial portion of oil equivilents. So I suppose technically all (or some part) can be excluded from conventional oil.
User avatar
DantesPeak
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 6277
Joined: Sat 23 Oct 2004, 03:00:00
Location: New Jersey

Re: IEA global production 3Q2006 update: Plateau, or no?

Postby Zardoz » Sun 29 Oct 2006, 14:19:19

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Starvid', 'N')o, but it's completely new...we ignore deep and ultra deep, calling it unconventional.

As we should. How can you lump this kind of production...

Image

...in with this kind of production:

Image

Image

Granted, those dramatic shots are of "conventional" offshore rig conditions, but the point is that with deep and ultradeep, production conditions become more difficult, perhaps by orders of magnitude.

Why shouldn't deep and ultradeep be classified alongside tar sands and oil shale? They are nothing like "low-hanging fruit" production, which is what our global economy is based upon.
"Thank you for attending the oil age. We're going to scrape what we can out of these tar pits in Alberta and then shut down the machines and turn out the lights. Goodnight." - seldom_seen
User avatar
Zardoz
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 6323
Joined: Fri 02 Dec 2005, 04:00:00
Location: Oil-addicted Southern Californucopia

Re: IEA global production 3Q2006 update: Plateau, or no?

Postby Starvid » Sun 29 Oct 2006, 18:43:18

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('coyote', '')$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Starvid', 'T')o keep the old forecasts correct we ignore deep and ultra deep, calling it unconventional. Instead we put the new category on top of the old graph and call the new graph "all liquids".

I'm certainly no expert with the modeling, but doesn't it make sense to do it that way?

It sure does make sense. I never said it didn't.

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('coyote', 'C')onsidering the greater cost, lead time and risk associated with deepwater drilling, it seems to me that it may not have that drastic an impact on the peak date (peak production, I mean). Just doesn't seem like it could be brought online quickly and safely enough to offset world declines. What it could do, though, is help ease us down the other side somewhat. No?

It will likely get online pretty fast (and decline even faster). There is frenzied drilling wherever we have acess to oil reserves as about 80 % of all reserves are owned by national companies and maybe 50 % of all oil is in OPEC - off limits.

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Zardoz', '')$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Starvid', 'N')o, but it's completely new...we ignore deep and ultra deep, calling it unconventional.

As we should. How can you lump this kind of production...

...in with this kind of production:

Easy. I don't. They can't be included in the old linearizations but need their own, added on top of the old ones. We would have to do the same thing if anyone found oil inside cheese, on the Moon, or wherever.

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Zardoz', '
')Granted, those dramatic shots are of "conventional" offshore rig conditions, but the point is that with deep and ultradeep, production conditions become more difficult, perhaps by orders of magnitude.

Harder and more expensive, yes. But still doable. And profitable, due to the high oil prices. I would be surprised if any but the most daring oil projects have a marginal cost above $40 a barrel.

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Zardoz', '
')Why shouldn't deep and ultradeep be classified alongside tar sands and oil shale? They are nothing like "low-hanging fruit" production, which is what our global economy is based upon.
They should have their own category, but they should absolutely not be put in the same category as shale and tars, as the production profiles are completely different. Shale and tars are much more like mining operations than oil or gas wells.

I can't really see that we have any major disagreements here, you just misunderstood what I meant. :)
Peak oil is not an energy crisis. It is a liquid fuel crisis.
User avatar
Starvid
Intermediate Crude
Intermediate Crude
 
Posts: 3021
Joined: Sun 20 Feb 2005, 04:00:00
Location: Uppsala, Sweden
Top

Re: IEA global production 3Q2006 update: Plateau, or no?

Postby Starvid » Sun 29 Oct 2006, 18:50:37

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('DantesPeak', 'I') think light sweet crude is already past peak (of 2005), but all liquids can continue to increase for a few years.

Essentially the conventional oil that is used to create biofuels, ethanol, oil sands, etc., is mostly double counted - since the oil used to produce alternatives is not excluded from all liquids.

Net liquids - excluding double counting - is probably close to a peak, but may proceed marginally higher over the next few years.

Also, really deep water drilling is not pure oil - but includes a substantial portion of oil equivilents. So I suppose technically all (or some part) can be excluded from conventional oil.

Biofuels and ethanol are pretty irrelevant in all liquids, but even if they weren't they don't need much oil to make. The fossil energy here is also gas or electricity (pesticides and fertilizer).

Almost no oil is used to produce oil from tar sands, gas is, coke and uranium will be used in the future.

I guess you mean NGL, condensates and such when you say not all deepwater oil is oil. But those other things are easy to refine into liquid fuels. As a matter of fact, you can pour them right into your car if you'd like as they are much like gasoline, IIRC. Not recomended though. Safety first.

So I'd say double counting is pretty much irrelevant.

I think we will see a surge from the current plateau and then we hit the peak at 90-95 million b/d in 2010-2015. It's downward from there.

edit: Light sweet crude has probably peaked, yes. That's why there is such a rush to build new refineries that can deal with heavy and or sour gunk.
Peak oil is not an energy crisis. It is a liquid fuel crisis.
User avatar
Starvid
Intermediate Crude
Intermediate Crude
 
Posts: 3021
Joined: Sun 20 Feb 2005, 04:00:00
Location: Uppsala, Sweden
Top

Re: IEA global production 3Q2006 update: Plateau, or no?

Postby DantesPeak » Sun 29 Oct 2006, 19:05:41

I don't have the exact figures but in the US, production of ethanol is energy intensive. I am really not familar with how it is produced elsewhere, except in Brazil.

Not only does it take some form of oil to plant the seeds and work the fields to produce the corn for ethanol, it is shipped quite frequently by tanker truck to mixing locations - although the bulk of it does manage to travel most of the way by diesel powered rail.

Granted mostly natural gas is used in tar sands, and to produce fertilizer for corn, but that's less NG available to be used in condensates, etc., and less energy for other uses.
User avatar
DantesPeak
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 6277
Joined: Sat 23 Oct 2004, 03:00:00
Location: New Jersey

Re: IEA global production 3Q2006 update: Plateau, or no?

Postby coyote » Sun 29 Oct 2006, 19:32:32

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Starvid', '')$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('coyote', '')$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Starvid', 'T')o keep the old forecasts correct we ignore deep and ultra deep, calling it unconventional. Instead we put the new category on top of the old graph and call the new graph "all liquids".

I'm certainly no expert with the modeling, but doesn't it make sense to do it that way?

It sure does make sense. I never said it didn't.

Ah. I misunderstood.
Lord, here comes the flood
We'll say goodbye to flesh and blood
If again the seas are silent in any still alive
It'll be those who gave their island to survive...
User avatar
coyote
News Editor
News Editor
 
Posts: 1979
Joined: Sun 23 Oct 2005, 03:00:00
Location: East of Eden
Top

Higher oil prices coming - IEA World Energy Outlook

Postby skiwi » Tue 07 Nov 2006, 17:20:07

The experts :roll:

Higher oil prices coming - IEA

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', 'C')ONSUMERS face ever higher oil prices in coming decades as investment in new supply is too slow to meet growing demand, the International Energy Agency said today in its annual World Energy Outlook.

A barrel of crude may cost a nominal $US57.79 in 2010 or $US51.50 in real terms, up from a respective $US40 and $US35 expected last year, the IEA said. The nominal price may hit $US97.30 in 2030, up from $US65 expected last year...

It could even reach $US130.30 if investment falls short.

"We have revised upwards our assumptions for oil prices in this Outlook," said the adviser to 26 industrialised countries...
Let us make him who shall nourish and sustain us. What shall we do to be invoked; to be remembered in the earth.
We have tried with our first creatures but we could not make them venerate us.
So let us try to make obedient respectful beings who shall
User avatar
skiwi
Tar Sands
Tar Sands
 
Posts: 673
Joined: Mon 23 Aug 2004, 03:00:00
Location: Frost Free in New Zealand
Top

Re: Higher oil prices coming - IEA World Energy Outlook

Postby smiley » Tue 07 Nov 2006, 18:43:12

The interesting part is that they base their price production on a rise in oil production from 84 now to 116 in 2020.

That's a ~2.5% increase a year.

In the period 1995-2005 the annualised increase in oil production was just below 2% (BP figures).

Last year it was 1%

If these kind of production increases are really needed to maintain some sort of status quo, then we're in a world of trouble starting from now.
User avatar
smiley
Intermediate Crude
Intermediate Crude
 
Posts: 2274
Joined: Fri 16 Apr 2004, 03:00:00
Location: Europe

Re: Higher oil prices coming - IEA World Energy Outlook

Postby AgentR » Tue 07 Nov 2006, 18:46:19

You can probably shorten that view, if we don't reach 90mbpd by 2008 you know something is imminent. The price is high enough to justify any and all efforts to bring produceable crude to market. If we don't get it; it'll be because we can't.
Yes, we are. As we are.
And so shall we remain; Until the end.
User avatar
AgentR
Heavy Crude
Heavy Crude
 
Posts: 1946
Joined: Fri 06 Oct 2006, 03:00:00
Location: East Texas

Re: Higher oil prices coming - IEA World Energy Outlook

Postby joewp » Tue 07 Nov 2006, 19:15:41

And their past price prediction performance is just about as bad as the New York Knicks performance on the basketball court, terrible. I seem to recall a report last year that said this year would average in the 40 dollar range.

This is just pablum greared towards the masses to keep them consuming while the PTB finish up their survival plans.

Is an attitude still cynical if it's based on facts?
Joe P. joeparente.com
"Only when the last tree is cut; only when the last river is polluted; only when the last fish is caught; only then will they realize that you cannot eat money." - Cree Indian Proverb
User avatar
joewp
Intermediate Crude
Intermediate Crude
 
Posts: 2054
Joined: Tue 05 Apr 2005, 03:00:00
Location: Keeping dry in South Florida

Re: Higher oil prices coming - IEA World Energy Outlook

Postby nth » Tue 07 Nov 2006, 20:09:15

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('AgentR', 'Y')ou can probably shorten that view, if we don't reach 90mbpd by 2008 you know something is imminent. The price is high enough to justify any and all efforts to bring produceable crude to market. If we don't get it; it'll be because we can't.


How you come up with 90mbpd by 2008?
Anyone projecting 90mbpd by 2008?
User avatar
nth
Heavy Crude
Heavy Crude
 
Posts: 1978
Joined: Thu 24 Feb 2005, 04:00:00
Top

Re: Plateau, or no? IEA Supply Chart says "maybe"

Postby Zardoz » Sat 03 Feb 2007, 01:05:12

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Zardoz', '.')..You tell me: Are we on the "undulating plateau" of global oil production, or not? Are we peaked, or is there a bit more to be wrung out of the sponge?...

The IEA just updated their chart, posting the 4Q2006 number:

Image

World Oil Supply

That's a frickin' plateau, folks. We're peaked.

Will we ever see 86 million BPD?
"Thank you for attending the oil age. We're going to scrape what we can out of these tar pits in Alberta and then shut down the machines and turn out the lights. Goodnight." - seldom_seen
User avatar
Zardoz
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 6323
Joined: Fri 02 Dec 2005, 04:00:00
Location: Oil-addicted Southern Californucopia
Top

Re: Plateau, or no? IEA Supply Chart says "maybe"

Postby joewp » Sat 03 Feb 2007, 01:26:35

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Zardoz', '
')That's a frickin' plateau, folks. We're peaked.


Who the heck are you, Matt Simmons or something? :P
Joe P. joeparente.com
"Only when the last tree is cut; only when the last river is polluted; only when the last fish is caught; only then will they realize that you cannot eat money." - Cree Indian Proverb
User avatar
joewp
Intermediate Crude
Intermediate Crude
 
Posts: 2054
Joined: Tue 05 Apr 2005, 03:00:00
Location: Keeping dry in South Florida
Top

Re: Plateau, or no? IEA Supply Chart says "maybe"

Postby Tanada » Sat 03 Feb 2007, 05:19:14

Playing with the numbers on your chart the supply grew by 4.26% from 2003-2004, 1.56% from 2004-2005, and only .828% from 2005-2006.

Clearly the room for growth is tightening right down to a nub, unless something huge happens 2007 will be very close to 2006. Next February we will know if it was above or below ;)

When supply growth is only .8 % and demand growth is 2% clearly waste and/or small buyers are being squeezed out of the market. Increasing efficiencies will help, but when true decline sets in then efficiencies will be the only room for growth left. Well I guess technically I should say efficiencies and substitution, if you walk to the corner store instead of driving that is substitution in my book, and a lot healthier.
$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Alfred Tennyson', 'W')e are not now that strength which in old days
Moved earth and heaven, that which we are, we are;
One equal temper of heroic hearts,
Made weak by time and fate, but strong in will
To strive, to seek, to find, and not to yield.
Tanada
Site Admin
Site Admin
 
Posts: 17094
Joined: Thu 28 Apr 2005, 03:00:00
Location: South West shore Lake Erie, OH, USA
Top

Re: Plateau, or no? IEA supply chart says "maybe"

Postby sjn » Sat 03 Feb 2007, 12:49:30

The IEA just need to add something new to the all liquids mix like they did last time to keep it going up... beer perhaps... :roll:
User avatar
sjn
Elite
Elite
 
Posts: 1332
Joined: Wed 09 Mar 2005, 04:00:00
Location: UK

Re: Plateau, or no? IEA supply chart says "maybe"

Postby Tanada » Sat 03 Feb 2007, 22:41:38

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('sjn', 'T')he IEA just need to add something new to the all liquids mix like they did last time to keep it going up... beer perhaps... :roll:


Hmm, if you distill a billion barrels of beer you can generate 50 million barrels of Ethanol.......
$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Alfred Tennyson', 'W')e are not now that strength which in old days
Moved earth and heaven, that which we are, we are;
One equal temper of heroic hearts,
Made weak by time and fate, but strong in will
To strive, to seek, to find, and not to yield.
Tanada
Site Admin
Site Admin
 
Posts: 17094
Joined: Thu 28 Apr 2005, 03:00:00
Location: South West shore Lake Erie, OH, USA
Top

Re: Plateau, or no? IEA supply chart says "maybe"

Postby AirlinePilot » Sun 04 Feb 2007, 00:19:13

There are already a lot of industries where the belt tightening cant go a whole lot farther without big consequences. I know, Im in one. Once the next price spike happens, all the airlines will be screaming bloody murder all over again. I predict that.

If we are at peak, I wonder how long before things start to slide? How long can we keep up the charade?
User avatar
AirlinePilot
Moderator
Moderator
 
Posts: 4378
Joined: Tue 05 Apr 2005, 03:00:00
Location: South of Atlanta

PreviousNext

Return to Peak oil studies, reports & models

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest

cron