Donate Bitcoin

Donate Paypal


PeakOil is You

PeakOil is You

THE Corn Thread (merged)

What's on your mind?
General interest discussions, not necessarily related to depletion.

Re: Scientists find key to cold tolerance in corn

Unread postby lorenzo » Sun 31 Aug 2008, 15:10:17

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('zoidberg', 'I') dont think there'd be too many biofuel crops coming from that land before the tundra soil is depleted. Try again!


I'm sorry, but energy crops actually increase soil fertility, or build it up from scratch. That's the beautiful thing about these crops - you can expand potential agricultural land by improving soils as you go along.

So you try again too. :)
The Beginning is Near!
User avatar
lorenzo
Intermediate Crude
Intermediate Crude
 
Posts: 2184
Joined: Sat 01 Jan 2005, 04:00:00

Re: Scientists find key to cold tolerance in corn

Unread postby mrobert » Sun 31 Aug 2008, 15:22:12

And building up a large-scale agricultural infrastructure in the Tundra won't be easy. What are the costs and the timeframe to do that?

Or by that time, there will be over 1 billion people willing to work there for a dollar a day.
User avatar
mrobert
Lignite
Lignite
 
Posts: 393
Joined: Thu 06 Apr 2006, 03:00:00
Location: Romania

Re: Scientists find key to cold tolerance in corn

Unread postby zoidberg » Sun 31 Aug 2008, 20:58:24

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('lorenzo', '')$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('zoidberg', 'I') dont think there'd be too many biofuel crops coming from that land before the tundra soil is depleted. Try again!
I'm sorry, but energy crops actually increase soil fertility, or build it up from scratch. That's the beautiful thing about these crops - you can expand potential agricultural land by improving soils as you go along. So you try again too.

Ah thats why corn crops require such large inputs of fertilizer! I'm reminded of something I heard about Australia's forests of giant trees before they were mostly cut down. Upon initial arrival the giant forests looked very fertile, so they we're cut down some crops grown on them and then production collapsed. The soil was too thin. How fast does it accumulate in the tundra? Slowly. How does removing mass from the soil in the form of biomass add to the soil? Its my understanding this depletes the soil, on the farm I grew up in we often left fields lie fallow after a few crops, it was the only way to make sure yields would be consistent over time, otherwise they just kept getting smaller.

Unless they fix their own nitrogen, then we're talking business. Still though it seems to me that amount of biomass taken out cant exceed the amount of biomass going into the soil or its unsustainable.

Ps. I'm giving you a hard time because I'd like you to keep pressing the ideas forth. If true, they'd be stupid profitable....
User avatar
zoidberg
Tar Sands
Tar Sands
 
Posts: 635
Joined: Wed 23 Feb 2005, 04:00:00
Location: Center of north america

Re: Scientists find key to cold tolerance in corn

Unread postby lorenzo » Sun 31 Aug 2008, 23:11:55

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('mrobert', 'A')nd building up a large-scale agricultural infrastructure in the Tundra won't be easy. What are the costs and the timeframe to do that? Or by that time, there will be over 1 billion people willing to work there for a dollar a day.

As I see it, you grow grains close to the existing railroads, so you can export them to markets. The rest of the land you use to grow biomass, which you gasify and turn into Synthetic Natural Gas, which you can feed as is in Russia's extensive natural gas pipeline network.

The Russian Agriculture Ministry has a plan to grow 1 billion tons of biomass for energy, as a first try. Quite impressive.
The Beginning is Near!
User avatar
lorenzo
Intermediate Crude
Intermediate Crude
 
Posts: 2184
Joined: Sat 01 Jan 2005, 04:00:00

Re: Scientists find key to cold tolerance in corn

Unread postby outcast » Mon 01 Sep 2008, 02:38:54

So we're not doomed?
User avatar
outcast
Tar Sands
Tar Sands
 
Posts: 885
Joined: Mon 21 Apr 2008, 03:00:00

Re: Scientists find key to cold tolerance in corn

Unread postby vtsnowedin » Mon 01 Sep 2008, 05:53:39

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('lorenzo', '')$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Southpaw', 'T')he only biofuel that maybe will have a future someday is Oilgae if it ever gets competitive, I believe
I don't think liquid biofuels have a future. Electricity from biomass does. So that excludes algae.

Electric trains yes. Electric planes ? No :)
User avatar
vtsnowedin
Fusion
Fusion
 
Posts: 14897
Joined: Fri 11 Jul 2008, 03:00:00
Top

Re: Scientists find key to cold tolerance in corn

Unread postby davep » Mon 01 Sep 2008, 06:41:54

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('lorenzo', '')$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('zoidberg', 'I') dont think there'd be too many biofuel crops coming from that land before the tundra soil is depleted. Try again!
I'm sorry, but energy crops actually increase soil fertility, or build it up from scratch. That's the beautiful thing about these crops - you can expand potential agricultural land by improving soils as you go along. So you try again too. :)

That depends entirely on how you farm. If you're depleting the soil and destroying it with pesticides and artificial fertilisers, then it doesn't really matter that you're putting humus back into the soil, as you're losing the topsoil too fast anyway.

As for the initial post, peasants have for years been using the natural adaptability of crops in order to adapt them to local climates. A bunch of scientists who take non-biodiverse hybrids etc and build in cold-tolerance are merely tinkering. The crops still require massive external inputs to grow, and they are not adaptable to local environments. As soon as farmers realise that they should be using and evolving heritage crops that do not require massive inputs to stay alive, the better off we will be.
</rant>
What we think, we become.
User avatar
davep
Senior Moderator
Senior Moderator
 
Posts: 4579
Joined: Wed 21 Jun 2006, 03:00:00
Location: Europe
Top

Re: Scientists find key to cold tolerance in corn

Unread postby bruce2288 » Tue 02 Sep 2008, 00:32:04

You might want to do a little research about top soil. Humus is the basic difference between top soil and subsoil. It is created by the interaction, of organisms and organic matter. Organisms being bacteria, molds,fungi,worms, nematodes ect. Organic matter is constantly being destroyed in a healthy soil and must be replenished. Thus the catch of cellulosic ethanol, if you constantly take the crop residue off the soil, you reduce soil organic matter and thus reduce soil fertility.
User avatar
bruce2288
Wood
Wood
 
Posts: 25
Joined: Fri 11 Jul 2008, 03:00:00

Re: Scientists find key to cold tolerance in corn

Unread postby davep » Tue 02 Sep 2008, 04:05:01

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('bruce2288', 'Y')ou might want to do a little research about top soil. Humus is the basic difference between top soil and subsoil. It is created by the interaction, of organisms and organic matter. Organisms being bacteria, molds,fungi,worms, nematodes ect. Organic matter is constantly being destroyed in a healthy soil and must be replenished. Thus the catch of cellulosic ethanol, if you constantly take the crop residue off the soil, you reduce soil organic matter and thus reduce soil fertility.


No shyt! I guess my post wasn't terribly clear, but I was merely saying that modern agricultural practices mean you could be losing the topsoil faster than you add the humus.
What we think, we become.
User avatar
davep
Senior Moderator
Senior Moderator
 
Posts: 4579
Joined: Wed 21 Jun 2006, 03:00:00
Location: Europe
Top

'Ignorant Hillbilly' Corn & Soybean Genius

Unread postby Carlhole » Tue 30 Dec 2008, 13:31:59

King of Bionic Ag Uses Turbocharged Seeds, Precision Chemistry, and a Little TLC

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Wired', 'T')hey came over the prairie in their pickup trucks, in the cool, quiet hours before dawn. They rolled through the gentle foothills of the Ozarks in air-conditioned tour buses with paintings of stagecoaches airbrushed on the black-lacquered side panels. They came wearing mud-smudged 10-gallon hats and frayed John Deere baseball caps. And then they stepped down out of their vehicles, each one of these farmers, and set foot on holy ground.

It is here, on the rust-colored loam of Stark City, Missouri (population 156), that Kip Cullers became the soybean king of the world. In 2007, Cullers harvested 155 bushels of soybeans per acre from a small plot—eclipsing his own world record of 139. (The US average is 40.) It is also here, on another section of his 11,000-acre farm in 2007, that Cullers grew 329 bushels of corn per acre—not a world record but enough for a top prize at the National Corn Yield Contest.

Cullers is 44. He is a devout Baptist who named his two sons Noah and Naaman after people in the Old Testament. He is thin—rail thin—and carries the twitchy, antic vibe of an early David Byrne. He blinks constantly and has a habit of furrowing his brow. When he takes a dip of chewing tobacco, he taps his tin of Copenhagen twice, quickly.


$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', 'C')ullers never went to college, but he rises at 3:30 each morning to study plant genetics online. Right now, he's urging Pioneer to genetically weave a bit of stiffening fiber into soybean stalks. Cullers plants 300,000 soybeans per acre, double the national average. In these super-dense fields, he explains, soy plants grow taller, fighting for sunlight. "They fall down a lot," he says, "and you lose photosynthesis. The trifoliates don't pump nutrients to the beans. And you get disease, too. It's crowded and humid out there, down low."

Cullers learned farming as a kid. His stepfather was a dairy farmer who kept 50 cows on a 400-acre spread, but it was his small patches of corn that thrilled Cullers most. "Corn's my passion," he says with a rare flourish of lyricism. "Soybeans are my backup plan, but corn, it's a robust plant. It's something you gotta mature for a long time. It's a challenge: Basically, you have one week every year when you can't screw it up—mid-June, when it's tasseling and pollinating and everything counts. That week is exciting. It feels like the start of a race."


No one's going to be going hungry anytime soon.
Carlhole
 
Top

Re: 'Ignorant Hillbilly' Corn & Soybean Genius

Unread postby dorlomin » Tue 30 Dec 2008, 14:26:38

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', 'H')e espoused growing techniques that were then revolutionary—super-deep plowing, for instance, and high-dosage fertilizing.
$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', 'M')odern farming is science, awash in crazily capable machinery and in technicalities that can befuddle the average farmer of a few hundred acres. Cullers himself owns some 15 tractors, the fanciest of which costs $185,000 and steers itself with GPS tech. He burns up thousands of cell phone minutes each month talking to Pioneer and BASF technical advisers—chemistry PhDs who can expound on the relative merits of Respect insecticide, formulated from zeta-cypermethrin, and `, which is rich in pyraclostrobin.

Dozens of these experts are on hand for the field day. They set up little teaching stations and stand there—in the 90-degree heat, in stagnant air as humid as an athletic sock—explicating Cullers' strategies. At one station, BASF sales rep Dale Ashby extols Cullers' unusually high herbicide use. "What Kip does, to get early-season weed pressure out of the way," he says, "is spray an herbicide before he plants. Kip likes Extreme, and also Pursuit."
link

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', 'N')o one's going to be going hungry anytime soon.

The world is full of people who suffer from malnutrition and countries with food security issues.

I am at a loss to see how this farmers techniques will help in a word of reducing net energy availability.
User avatar
dorlomin
Light Sweet Crude
Light Sweet Crude
 
Posts: 5193
Joined: Sun 05 Aug 2007, 03:00:00
Top

Re: 'Ignorant Hillbilly' Corn & Soybean Genius

Unread postby Hermes » Tue 30 Dec 2008, 19:11:26

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Carlhole', '
')No one's going to be going hungry anytime soon.


Incorrect.

This guy is a walking, talking chemical factory spokesperson. Wow... he got great yields... by slathering on a chemical stew. Once his source for all his nifty chemicals dries up it's going to become apparent he's killed that soil.

Nope, hunger's definitely in the cards.
Space Ghost: Oh boy, the Shatner's really hit the fan now. I'm up Dawson's Creek without a paddle.
User avatar
Hermes
Lignite
Lignite
 
Posts: 257
Joined: Sat 20 Nov 2004, 04:00:00
Location: Land of the Tonkawa/Karankawa
Top

Re: 'Ignorant Hillbilly' Corn & Soybean Genius

Unread postby dohboi » Tue 30 Dec 2008, 21:57:35

At least 95% of the energy used on a modern industrial farm is from oil. When we run out of that, this guy's gonna be toast.

What is Cantarell's decline rate these days, anyway?
User avatar
dohboi
Harmless Drudge
Harmless Drudge
 
Posts: 19990
Joined: Mon 05 Dec 2005, 04:00:00

Re: 'Ignorant Hillbilly' Corn & Soybean Genius

Unread postby JustaGirl » Wed 31 Dec 2008, 04:32:28

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('dohboi', 'A')t least 95% of the energy used on a modern industrial farm is from oil. When we run out of that, this guy's gonna be toast.


Can you provide a link for that fact please?
Only those who can see the invisible can do the impossible.
JustaGirl
Lignite
Lignite
 
Posts: 208
Joined: Wed 09 Apr 2008, 03:00:00
Location: Petoria
Top

Re: 'Ignorant Hillbilly' Corn & Soybean Genius

Unread postby dohboi » Wed 31 Dec 2008, 09:23:30

I've heard and read that figure a number of times, but I'm having trouble right now finding the sources.

In the mean time here are some sources that give related info:

link

At about seven and a half minutes in the video, Heinberg mentions the near total dependence of modern ag on oil.

The wiki on ag also has a discussion on oil dependence:

link

"Since the 1940s, agriculture has dramatically increased its productivity, due largely to the use of petrochemical derived pesticides, fertilizers, and increased mechanization (the so-called Green Revolution). Between 1950 and 1984, as the Green Revolution transformed agriculture around the globe, world grain production increased by 250%.[77][78] This has allowed world population to grow more than double over the last 50 years. However, every energy unit delivered in food grown using modern techniques requires over ten energy units to produce and deliver, [79] although this statistic is contested by proponents of petroleum-based agriculture.[80] The vast majority of this energy input comes from fossil fuel sources. Because of modern agriculture's current heavy reliance on petrochemicals and mechanization, there are warnings that the ever decreasing supply of oil (the dramatic nature of which is known as peak oil[81][82][83][84][85]) will inflict major damage on the modern industrial agriculture system, and could cause large food shortages.[86]
Modern or industrialized agriculture is dependent on petroleum in two fundamental ways: 1) cultivation--to get the crop from seed to harvest and 2) transport--to get the harvest from the farm to the consumer's refrigerator. It takes approximately 400 gallons of oil a year per citizen to fuel the tractors, combines and other equipment used on farms for cultivation or 17 percent of the nation's total energy use.[87] Oil and natural gas are also the building blocks of the fertilizers, pesticides and herbicides used on farms. Petroleum is also providing the energy required to process food before it reaches the market. It takes the energy equivalent of a half-gallon of gasoline to produce a two-pound bag of breakfast cereal.[88] And that still does not count the energy needed to transport that cereal to market; it is the transport of processed foods and crops that consumes the most oil. The kiwi from New Zealand, the asparagus from Argentina, the melons and broccoli from Guatemala, the organic lettuce from California, the twinkie from Twinkieville--most food items on the consumer's plate travel average of 1,500 miles just to get there.[89]"

Really, if anything, I would say 95% is low. Where does modern industrial ag depend on any other power source for moving its massive machines around? And don't point to corn ethanol which itself requires such oil inputs to produce that the energy return on energy investment may well be below the break even point of one. Are there lots of combines running on wind, solar, geothermal or other sources of energy?
User avatar
dohboi
Harmless Drudge
Harmless Drudge
 
Posts: 19990
Joined: Mon 05 Dec 2005, 04:00:00

Re: 'Ignorant Hillbilly' Corn & Soybean Genius

Unread postby Lanthanide » Wed 31 Dec 2008, 17:54:33

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('dohboi', 'T')he kiwi from New Zealand

Unless you're feasting on our endagered, protected, national bird, I believe you are actually talking about kiwifruit. I wish you yanks would get it right.
User avatar
Lanthanide
Peat
Peat
 
Posts: 158
Joined: Sat 24 Nov 2007, 04:00:00
Location: Christchurch, New Zealand
Top

Corn/grain yields, nutrition

Unread postby rangerone314 » Mon 15 Jun 2009, 11:30:16

I've heard various figures, in articles, including one that has been tossed around, that 450 lbs of corn (8 bushels) provides enough calories to feed a person for a year.

I've seen one figure that a pound of corn gives 1600 calories per pound, which jives with the 450 lbs per person/year, and a different figure of 400 calories per pound of corn?

Is 450 lbs per person enough calories for a year? (I've been researching corn yields and if the 1600 food cal is true, then 7500 sqFt of corn with 4,200 plants should provide about 1,500 lbs of corn, or enough for 3 adults.
An ideology is by definition not a search for TRUTH-but a search for PROOF that its point of view is right

Equals barter and negotiate-people with power just take

You cant defend freedom by eliminating it-unknown

Our elected reps should wear sponsor patches on their suits so we know who they represent-like Nascar-Roy
User avatar
rangerone314
Light Sweet Crude
Light Sweet Crude
 
Posts: 4105
Joined: Wed 03 Dec 2008, 04:00:00
Location: Maryland

Re: Corn/grain yields, nutrition

Unread postby PrestonSturges » Mon 15 Jun 2009, 11:53:02

I think you lost a decimal point. 7500 sq ft is 1/6 of an acre.

75,000 sq ft would be realistic.
User avatar
PrestonSturges
Light Sweet Crude
Light Sweet Crude
 
Posts: 6052
Joined: Wed 15 Oct 2008, 03:00:00

Re: Corn/grain yields, nutrition

Unread postby Ludi » Mon 15 Jun 2009, 11:57:53

Ludi
 

PreviousNext

Return to Open Topic Discussion

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest

cron