by the48thronin » Thu 21 Aug 2008, 00:38:44
$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('emersonbiggins', 'T')his is the angle that needs to be exploited.
I often refer to this graphic when talking about freight rail. It illustrates the total amount of railways that are double-tracked and, thus, free-flowing.

The disparity between modes is well illustrated here, with interstate highways having a patron in the state and federal governments and railroads being wholly privately funded, maintained, expanded and operated, with little federal help outside of their initial grant of operating ROWs.
Hmm where do you figure the railroads get little or no public funding?
Let's be honest, the railroads received billions from public funding over the years from the conrail bailout to the "rentals" of track mileage for amtrack and other "light rails" that share ROW and maintanance not to mention the upgrades at intersections with highways and roads or the grants for "improvments" funded somehow with tax dollars while they burn tax free fuel.
Did you somehow miss the article in the ap
Here I'll repost some of it here.. feel free to read it in it's original at
a train wreck waiting to happen$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('article from a p', '
')A wreck waiting to happen
June 8, 2008
BY MICHAEL TARM Associated Press
CHICAGO -- Railway executive Matthew Rose stood before fellow industry
leaders, pointing to a map meant to tell the future of the U.S. rail freight
network. It was drenched in red -- east to west, north to south.
The blotches illustrated areas where, by 2035, traffic jams could be so
severe trains would grind to a halt for days.
"For those of you who've ever seen a good rail meltdown, this is what it
looks like," said Rose, CEO of Burlington Northern Santa Fe Corp., as the
crowded hall shifted uncomfortably in chairs. "It's literally chaos in the
supply chain."
While the nation's attention is focused on air travel congestion and the
high cost of fuel for highway driving, a crisis is developing under the
radar for another form of transportation -- freight trains used to deliver
many of the goods keeping the economy humming.
The nation's 140,000-mile network of rails devoted to carrying everything
from cars to grain by freight is already groaning under the strain of
congestion.
And it's probably going to get worse during the next two decades, according
to an analysis of government and industry projections by The Associated
Press and interviews with experts.
<snip>
Others suggest the railroads are being alarmist.
Kenneth Kremar, another Global Insight analyst, said
talk of a looming
crisis serves industry interests as rail companies jockey for more money
from Congress. He said investment in larger, high-tech train cars and
computer systems that better pace trains should help avert logjams.
')"It's illogical to assume nothing will be done," he said. "Railroads have an
inherent interest in doing something. There's no reason to think they're
pinch. Its long-distance trains were on time just 42 percent of the time
last year, according to the U.S. Department of Transportation's inspector
general.
traffic has soared. Passenger trains move much faster than most freights,
on side tracks and wait while trains coming in the other direction pass.
A solution won't come cheap.
system would cost $148 billion over 30 years. Private companies would have
of all U.S. rail freight on 180,000 trains a year. And where it can take two
days for trains to wind through the city.
officials and rail executives estimates. David Burns, an independent
$4 billion.