Donate Bitcoin

Donate Paypal


PeakOil is You

PeakOil is You

Streetcars - the true end of suburbia begins

What's on your mind?
General interest discussions, not necessarily related to depletion.

Re: The true end of suburbia begins

Postby Javaman » Mon 18 Aug 2008, 08:40:14

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('mos6507', '')$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Javaman', 'A')side from the cost of owning a car (which is worth the cost!), tell me, where is the savings from riding the train?
There are some intangibles, like letting go of road rage and being able to just sit back with an ipod or a laptop and not have to focus on the road. Also a monthly pass is a nice "all you can eat" feeling, being able to jump on any time you like without having to rationalize the trip.

Which would be great if the CTrain happened to go where you wanted to go, or if you didn't mind spending hours trying to get to some more distant location in the city on a bus.
User avatar
Javaman
Lignite
Lignite
 
Posts: 261
Joined: Wed 18 Jun 2008, 03:00:00

Re: The true end of suburbia begins

Postby emersonbiggins » Mon 18 Aug 2008, 11:25:36

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Javaman', '
')Now, again, show us how public transit saves fuel.


Sure...
"It's called the American Dream because you'd have to be asleep to believe it."

George Carlin
User avatar
emersonbiggins
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 5150
Joined: Sun 10 Jul 2005, 03:00:00
Location: Dallas

Re: The true end of suburbia begins

Postby CarlosFerreira » Mon 18 Aug 2008, 12:04:38

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('mos6507', 'T')here are some intangibles, like letting go of road rage and being able to just sit back with an ipod or a laptop and not have to focus on the road. Also a monthly pass is a nice "all you can eat" feeling, being able to jump on any time you like without having to rationalize the trip.


Right. I've read many books on the train, and it allowed me to get to work in time while getting up later, because there were no queues. Also, it was cheaper indeed than taking the car.

As for the "all you can eat" feel, a friend of mine usually takes a couple of trains in and out of town on weekends, when she feels bored and just wants to go around. Says it's her favourite place to listen to music, go figure!
Environmental News and Clippings:
http://www.google.co.uk/reader/shared/1 ... 4898696533
Environmental Economics and Systems
http://enviroecon.wordpress.com/
CarlosFerreira
Tar Sands
Tar Sands
 
Posts: 734
Joined: Wed 02 Jul 2008, 03:00:00
Location: Canterbury, UK

Re: The true end of suburbia begins

Postby Javaman » Mon 18 Aug 2008, 12:45:33

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('emersonbiggins', '')$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Javaman', 'N')ow, again, show us how public transit saves fuel.
Sure...

It's already well known that a fully-loaded train, whether freight or passenger, is very efficient. However, for the vast majority of people this is not a practical way to get to work or to run errands. Even for intercity travel the economics often don't make much sense. An Amtrak ticket for a 1200-mile round trip is somewhere around $300 per person. Eurail seems to be about 2/3 price for similar distance. A car that gets 30 mpg highway (not uncommon) would use $160 worth of fuel and once I arrive at my destination, I have a car to drive.

What you seem to have missed is that "trolley buses", "CTrains" and other examples of municipal public transit are either slow or not extensive enough to provide much coverage. You -might- be getting high fuel efficiency, but not for long enough distances to matter, since buses and cars will still be needed to bring the bulk of the riders to the station.
User avatar
Javaman
Lignite
Lignite
 
Posts: 261
Joined: Wed 18 Jun 2008, 03:00:00
Top

Re: The true end of suburbia begins

Postby CarlosFerreira » Mon 18 Aug 2008, 12:51:37

Yes, but taking people to different stations is better than having them all take their cars to work, commuting daily to cities. I live a bit far from the train station, so I took the car to the station, parked there (we have a "Park and Ride" system) and took the train. Easy.

Also, in a nearby town, the train operator started a bicycle lending ideas. The town has some nice bike corridors. I agree it's not practical to have people cross large cities in bikes, especially if they are older folk or if it's raining. But it helped traffic there, they say. Oh, the bike lending is free - you pay a fee when you pick it up, and have the money back when bring it in.
Environmental News and Clippings:
http://www.google.co.uk/reader/shared/1 ... 4898696533
Environmental Economics and Systems
http://enviroecon.wordpress.com/
CarlosFerreira
Tar Sands
Tar Sands
 
Posts: 734
Joined: Wed 02 Jul 2008, 03:00:00
Location: Canterbury, UK

Re: The true end of suburbia begins

Postby emersonbiggins » Mon 18 Aug 2008, 13:17:41

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Javaman', 'W')hat you seem to have missed is that "trolley buses", "CTrains" and other examples of municipal public transit are either slow or not extensive enough to provide much coverage. You -might- be getting high fuel efficiency, but not for long enough distances to matter, since buses and cars will still be needed to bring the bulk of the riders to the station.

--only in cities without robust mass transit options which, sadly, includes most of North America. Your blanket assertion of public transit "not" saving fuel (to which I am contending) is certainly not the fault of transit in general, but the dispersed and sprawling environment which it is charged (and unfairly, I might add) with serving.
"It's called the American Dream because you'd have to be asleep to believe it."

George Carlin
User avatar
emersonbiggins
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 5150
Joined: Sun 10 Jul 2005, 03:00:00
Location: Dallas
Top

Re: The true end of suburbia begins

Postby shortonoil » Mon 18 Aug 2008, 13:49:27

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('alokin', 'I') guess less than one km to a station will be luxury in future. People will be happy to walk only half an hour to the station. But I do really agree that it does not seem to be very realistic to build a brand new tram system under these economic circumstances.

The first causality of PO will be the monetary/financial system. The world’s financial system is already losing $15 trillion per year, and we are only into year three of Peak. When the full impact is felt there will be very little money for any kind of infrastructure improvement.

Expect us to get along with what we have for many decades; probably four at least. The simple answer is that most people just won’t be traveling to distances that they can’t walk to. Kunstler is right, suburbia will die, and much of the population will return to farming just to survive.

There aren’t going to be any shinny new street cars, or many EVs or much that is new at all; for a long, long time. Welcome to the PO world.
User avatar
shortonoil
False ETP Prophet
False ETP Prophet
 
Posts: 7132
Joined: Thu 02 Dec 2004, 04:00:00
Location: VA USA
Top

Re: The true end of suburbia begins

Postby Javaman » Mon 18 Aug 2008, 14:16:38

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('emersonbiggins', '')$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Javaman', 'W')hat you seem to have missed is that "trolley buses", "CTrains" and other examples of municipal public transit are either slow or not extensive enough to provide much coverage. You -might- be getting high fuel efficiency, but not for long enough distances to matter, since buses and cars will still be needed to bring the bulk of the riders to the station.
--only in cities without robust mass transit options which, sadly, includes most of North America. Your blanket assertion of public transit "not" saving fuel (to which I am contending) is certainly not the fault of transit in general, but the dispersed and sprawling environment which it is charged (and unfairly, I might add) with serving.

Oh, I see. suburbanites, most of whom actually have very little need for densely-populated, inner-city areas in the first place, need to move into town, making it even more crowded, just so badly-run, poorly-planned mass transit services can try to save some fuel and maybe show a profit.

OK, so whose historic in-town neighborhood shall we raze to make room for high-density housing for all these former suburbanites?
User avatar
Javaman
Lignite
Lignite
 
Posts: 261
Joined: Wed 18 Jun 2008, 03:00:00
Top

Re: The true end of suburbia begins

Postby shortonoil » Mon 18 Aug 2008, 14:28:31

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Javaman', 'O')K, so whose historic in-town neighborhood shall we raze to make room for high-density housing for all these former suburbanites?

Try reading the “Grapes of Wrath”, for a short tutorial!
User avatar
shortonoil
False ETP Prophet
False ETP Prophet
 
Posts: 7132
Joined: Thu 02 Dec 2004, 04:00:00
Location: VA USA
Top

Re: The true end of suburbia begins

Postby gwmss15 » Mon 18 Aug 2008, 14:38:55

Well my former hometown of Melbourne Australia has one of the largest urban electric tramway "street cars" systems in the world and its still growing even if very slowly.

These Trams are now world famous as an icon of the city of Melbourne and have existed for over 100 years.

The trams form a dense network in the inner city upto 20 km out with rather old electric heavy rail system operating out to 60 km from the city centre. beyond that is a new network of frequent 160kph DMU intercity rail services. operating up to200km from the city.

The Melbourne Tramway system. Total system length: 245 kilometres (152 miles) opened in 1885: Large map of The Melbourne Tramway system

The Melbourne Metro Commuter rail system: Melbourne Metro Commuter rail system

The Interurban and intercity rail system (Vline) Mostly DMU sets: Interurban

Images of typical trams used on Melbourne's tram system.
Flinders St

Thai transit

tram

Melbourne
The point of all this is to illustrate that electric powered street cars or trams can and do have a home in urban cites around the world and will do again. Melbourne is the only city in Australia that did not succumb to the post war ripping up of all tram systems world wide.
User avatar
gwmss15
Peat
Peat
 
Posts: 199
Joined: Wed 13 Oct 2004, 03:00:00
Location: Mahachai City

Re: The true end of suburbia begins

Postby emersonbiggins » Mon 18 Aug 2008, 15:23:59

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Javaman', 'O')K, so whose historic in-town neighborhood shall we raze to make room for high-density housing for all these former suburbanites?

Perhaps we can raze the thousands of acres of elevated urban freeways, which were 'eminent domained' and constructed on the former sites of similar historic in-town neighborhoods, usually where some brown people lived?
"It's called the American Dream because you'd have to be asleep to believe it."

George Carlin
User avatar
emersonbiggins
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 5150
Joined: Sun 10 Jul 2005, 03:00:00
Location: Dallas
Top

Re: The true end of suburbia begins

Postby Javaman » Mon 18 Aug 2008, 15:48:29

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('emersonbiggins', '')$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Javaman', 'O')K, so whose historic in-town neighborhood shall we raze to make room for high-density housing for all these former suburbanites?
Perhaps we can raze the thousands of acres of elevated urban freeways, which were 'eminent domained' and constructed on the former sites of similar historic in-town neighborhoods, usually where some brown people lived?

Do you mean those expressways that are used by the trucks that bring fresh food directly to the grocery stores in your city?
User avatar
Javaman
Lignite
Lignite
 
Posts: 261
Joined: Wed 18 Jun 2008, 03:00:00
Top

Re: The true end of suburbia begins

Postby cube » Mon 18 Aug 2008, 16:00:32

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('emersonbiggins', '.')..
--only in cities without robust mass transit options which, sadly, includes most of North America. Your blanket assertion of public transit "not" saving fuel (to which I am contending) is certainly not the fault of transit in general, but the dispersed and sprawling environment which it is charged (and unfairly, I might add) with serving.
Thank You emersonbiggins
So there's an agreement that public transit is NOT viable in 80% of where Americans live today This place that we call "suburbia".
Therefore, this is not simply a transportation issue but instead a:

(transportation + living arrangement) issue

So here comes my question:
1) Why does "mainstream" environmentalism keep on advocating using tax dollars to extend public transport out to suburbia when it is inherently NOT viable?
2) Why can't they just tell the truth and say:
"Sorry folks we're going back 100 years. A family of 5 will have to live in a 750 sq ft apartment and nobody will be commuting and further then 20 miles to work."
That's the cube version of the Inconvenient Truth. :twisted:
//
I'm not against public transit.
What I am against is this delusional fantasy that we can all live in 2,000 sq ft single family homes (with a front and back yard) and all be within 10 minute walking distance to a train station. THAT is what I am against.
cube
Intermediate Crude
Intermediate Crude
 
Posts: 3909
Joined: Sat 12 Mar 2005, 04:00:00
Top

Re: The true end of suburbia begins

Postby emersonbiggins » Mon 18 Aug 2008, 16:04:56

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Javaman', '')$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('emersonbiggins', '')$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Javaman', '
')OK, so whose historic in-town neighborhood shall we raze to make room for high-density housing for all these former suburbanites?
Perhaps we can raze the thousands of acres of elevated urban freeways, which were 'eminent domained' and constructed on the former sites of similar historic in-town neighborhoods, usually where some brown people lived?
Do you mean those expressways that are used by the trucks that bring fresh food directly to the grocery stores in your city?

Because people didn't eat before the existence of urban freeways, or truck deliveries? [smilie=bduh.gif]
"It's called the American Dream because you'd have to be asleep to believe it."

George Carlin
User avatar
emersonbiggins
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 5150
Joined: Sun 10 Jul 2005, 03:00:00
Location: Dallas
Top

Re: The true end of suburbia begins

Postby emersonbiggins » Mon 18 Aug 2008, 16:12:05

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('cube', 'I')'m not against public transit. What I am against is this delusional fantasy that we can all live in 2,000 sq ft single family homes (with a front and back yard) and all be within 10 minute walking distance to a train station. THAT is what I am against.

Yes, THAT is a fantasy. The notion that a city can be comprised up of 95% single-family detached homes AND have a viable mass transit system over the long term is ridiculous.

Furthermore, the notion that a nation can be made up of 95% of the same and be viable in a post-cheap oil era is equally laughable.
"It's called the American Dream because you'd have to be asleep to believe it."

George Carlin
User avatar
emersonbiggins
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 5150
Joined: Sun 10 Jul 2005, 03:00:00
Location: Dallas
Top

Re: The true end of suburbia begins

Postby Serial_Worrier » Mon 18 Aug 2008, 19:11:59

Bottom line is out of control government spending on Bush's wars and other entitlement programs has bankrupted the USA and no money for infrastructure repair, much less additional capacity.
User avatar
Serial_Worrier
Heavy Crude
Heavy Crude
 
Posts: 1549
Joined: Thu 05 Jun 2008, 03:00:00

Re: The true end of suburbia begins

Postby CarlosFerreira » Mon 18 Aug 2008, 19:23:58

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Serial_Worrier', 'B')ottom line is out of control government spending on Bush's wars and other entitlement programs has bankrupted the USA and no money for infrastructure repair, much less additional capacity.


Naah, that there's s thread out here in the cost of oil's replacement. It's doable, using different solutions in different locations. Problem is, powerdown will be necessary anyway, and that's the thing I can't see happening before real problems strike us all.
Environmental News and Clippings:
http://www.google.co.uk/reader/shared/1 ... 4898696533
Environmental Economics and Systems
http://enviroecon.wordpress.com/
CarlosFerreira
Tar Sands
Tar Sands
 
Posts: 734
Joined: Wed 02 Jul 2008, 03:00:00
Location: Canterbury, UK
Top

Re: The true end of suburbia begins

Postby Javaman » Mon 18 Aug 2008, 19:57:24

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('emersonbiggins', '')$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Javaman', '')$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('emersonbiggins', '')$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Javaman', '
')OK, so whose historic in-town neighborhood shall we raze to make room for high-density housing for all these former suburbanites?
Perhaps we can raze the thousands of acres of elevated urban freeways, which were 'eminent domained' and constructed on the former sites of similar historic in-town neighborhoods, usually where some brown people lived?
Do you mean those expressways that are used by the trucks that bring fresh food directly to the grocery stores in your city?

Because people didn't eat before the existence of urban freeways, or truck deliveries? [smilie=bduh.gif]


Well let's see... a freeway provides easy travel through a city, allowing fast, efficient delivery of fresh food. But then maybe you don't mind empty shelves, waiting in long lines to buy meat or bread, or paying much more for food than you do now.
User avatar
Javaman
Lignite
Lignite
 
Posts: 261
Joined: Wed 18 Jun 2008, 03:00:00
Top

Re: The true end of suburbia begins

Postby cube » Mon 18 Aug 2008, 20:49:24

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('emersonbiggins', '')$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('cube', 'I')'m not against public transit. What I am against is this delusional fantasy that we can all live in 2,000 sq ft single family homes (with a front and back yard) and all be within 10 minute walking distance to a train station. THAT is what I am against.

Yes, THAT is a fantasy. The notion that a city can be comprised up of 95% single-family detached homes AND have a viable mass transit system over the long term is ridiculous.

Furthermore, the notion that a nation can be made up of 95% of the same and be viable in a post-cheap oil era is equally laughable.
Are you ready for the doom and gloom? :twisted:
If there's an agreement that a viable mass transit system can never be fit into suburbia then I guess suburbia's ultimate fate is collapse.
And since 80% of everything in America is essentially "suburbia", well then I guess that means 80% of everything will collapse then.
agreed?
//
BTW emersonbiggins there seems to be a universal agreement that life after PO == a decreased standard of living but exactly how much?
Personally I'm thinking early 1900's maybe (1900 - 1920)
what about you?
cube
Intermediate Crude
Intermediate Crude
 
Posts: 3909
Joined: Sat 12 Mar 2005, 04:00:00
Top

Re: The true end of suburbia begins

Postby shortonoil » Mon 18 Aug 2008, 21:22:43

cube asked:

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', 'B')TW emersonbiggins there seems to be a universal agreement that life after PO == a decreased standard of living but exactly how much?
Personally I'm thinking early 1900's maybe (1900 - 1920) what about you?


I have answered that question previously on another thread; according to predictions that can be derived from the Available Energy model, on energy considerations only, we will return to a standard of living in the US, commensurable to 1915 by 2025.
User avatar
shortonoil
False ETP Prophet
False ETP Prophet
 
Posts: 7132
Joined: Thu 02 Dec 2004, 04:00:00
Location: VA USA
Top

PreviousNext

Return to Open Topic Discussion

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest

cron