by the48thronin » Thu 21 Aug 2008, 03:28:21
$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('cube', '')$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('the48thronin', '.')..
Can you visualize electric lines suspended over the ROW that also contain distribution grid lines.. windmills providing the energy..
short answer == NO
asphalt is derived from crude oil
Most of the roadways out there were created by laying down asphalt back in the days when oil was $30.
Now imagine trying to do the same thing at ($300 oil post PO) --> impossible
something has to give.
I believe that something just happens to be the freeway interstate system.
Besides long haul trucking is dead. We just haven't burried the corpse yet.
If you want to get a rough idea of where the USA is headed try looking at Russia. Railroads are the dominant form of long distance travel.
They have a railroad interstate system instead of a freeway interstate system.
rail map of Russia
Asphalt isn't the best hi-way construction material, it is simply the one chosen by those designers who wished to insure lucrative contracts for friends of politicians. The majority of construction is concrete with asphalt used for an easily repaired over coat in much of the country. Gravel would work as well if it wasn't for the tire wear..
The road beds are existent.. Tires are at this point made of ...DUH oil. Railroad wheels are made of energy intensive steel. They do however last longer, about a year longer. The average truck drive tire runs 400,000 miles before needing a new tread, care to guess how many miles they get out of a railroad car before they "rehab" the wheels?
Humanity if it intends to maintain a system of mobility and distribution will have to INVENT.. change will have to be made. You postulate an advantage by collective transport, I believe smaller more individually controlled transport is a basic necessity for a free people to continue commercial interaction with distant places.
P O puts a hydrocarbon limit on methode... But not on human invention and adaptation. The real advantage of a PO discussion now is not in gathering crowds of hand wringers, but in alerting a population on the necessity to understand and design adaptation to avoid DIE OFF etc.
Forget bringing back the rail road barons and the closed distribution controlled by a few wealthy.. The grand experiment Ike brought home from Germany has forever changed expectations of people.
While you are bragging on that Russian distribution system of rail roads, ask yourself why so many problems are inherent in that system leading to shortages in the past, and reduced development that still cripples one of the richest in natural resources nations in the world.
Road beds may be gravel in the future, wheels may end in fiber treads.. Neither you nor I can predict where the ingenuity of a people determined to remain mobile and well fed will lead. However the reality of P O is that adapt or die is not just a phrase it is a survival instinct that needs to be activated NOW. The future of road systems may be in fact will of necessity be handled at less than the 90 percent diverted to corruption levels it is now handled at. Rail roads have never proved themselves to be adaptable nor corruption free either, and the scarcity of developed lines of communication/transportation in some of the most important locations in Russia prove my point there.
Long distance trucking the descendant of long distance wagoning has survived since the roman empire. There may be drastic changes in the industry, for hire may lead to for commercial trade as owner operators buy products to sell at destinations due to lack of credit at a distance. But the individual moving goods from where they are abundant to where they have increased value due to scarcity is as old as the camel caravan.
Railroads had their day just as the oil burning ships are having theirs now.
Looking back wards to a failed idea that has proved itself untrustworthy to a large percentage of American rural areas ( when they were abandoned as not worth the effort) and that only survives and prospers in countries where wealth and power is concentrated in a small elite or where power is concentrated to the exclusion of the will of any but the few close to that power...simply is not good enough for people used to actually having some stake holders rights in the eventual solution decided on by the public body.
You go ahead tout your failed ideas, someone ( usually unknowingly thanks to "educated" biases) always does front for those who would gain control over the many by limiting the availability to travel or move goods, even in modern America this still is existent. The future however does not belong to the few elite, but to the majority of those who survive the mess the elites have brought upon us with their corrupt control of finances for personal gain.
Unlike Europe ( east and west) the raucous population here will not accept the collar easily even if the economy is collapsing around their heads due to the actions of the oligarchs poor leadership now.