Donate Bitcoin

Donate Paypal


PeakOil is You

PeakOil is You

Streetcars - the true end of suburbia begins

What's on your mind?
General interest discussions, not necessarily related to depletion.

Re: The true end of suburbia begins

Postby emersonbiggins » Wed 20 Aug 2008, 12:05:29

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('mos6507', '')$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('emersonbiggins', 'L')et's recall that no suburban lot (and certainly no city lot) is large enough to provide even most of the calorie requirements for those who reside there, though.
That's not true, at least in theory. I've been shopping around for suburban lots in the Boston area myself and I can find some properties with 20K or more square foot of lawn space available, and at no particular price premium. (Buyers I think are mostly fixated on the house, not the lot size right nwo). That's far above and beyond the 1,000 square foot per person that Ludi's book recommendation "One Circle" says can be used.

Most of the lots here are under 7,000 SF, with many under 5,000 SF, often with a 2,000-3,000 SF house sitting atop them, and a not insignificant portion of the lot given over to a concrete drive. This leaves a net of 1,000-2,000 SF (if that) for what is now considered "lawn" in many parts of the country. While the area, in quanity, is substantially better than can be found in dense cities, the quality of topsoil in the suburbs (as well as cities) leaves much to be desired. But nothing is unmanageable, I suppose, with much effort and time devoted to preparing the soil with composting.
$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('mos6507', 'A')lso, if there is a partial abandonment of the burbs, then it would potentially present opportunities for the remaining residents to buy out adjacent properties, tear down the buildings, and expand their growing areas.

True. Or build a small store, a carpentry shop, farmer's market, et. al. The land itself presents lots of opportunities.
"It's called the American Dream because you'd have to be asleep to believe it."

George Carlin
User avatar
emersonbiggins
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 5150
Joined: Sun 10 Jul 2005, 03:00:00
Location: Dallas

Re: The true end of suburbia begins

Postby MarkJ » Wed 20 Aug 2008, 12:37:11

Many people in my region think 1 acre lots are a little too small. Most suburban building lots I've sold are 1-1/2 acres plus.

Since most suburban and rural homes are built on farmland, the lots are large, and the quality of the soil is generally quite good. There's plenty of water in the suburban and rural areas as well.
User avatar
MarkJ
Tar Sands
Tar Sands
 
Posts: 649
Joined: Tue 25 Mar 2008, 03:00:00

Re: The true end of suburbia begins

Postby emersonbiggins » Wed 20 Aug 2008, 12:44:07

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('MarkJ', 'M')any people in my region think 1 acre lots are a little too small. Most suburban building lots I've sold are 1-1/2 acres plus.

Since most suburban and rural homes are built on farmland, the lots are large, and the quality of the soil is generally quite good. There's plenty of water in the suburban and rural areas as well.


43,000+ SF lots are definitely not the norm here, unless you live 45-50 miles out - exurbia, by my definition.

That is a whole different ballgame from your typical 8 DU/acre situation in suburbia.
"It's called the American Dream because you'd have to be asleep to believe it."

George Carlin
User avatar
emersonbiggins
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 5150
Joined: Sun 10 Jul 2005, 03:00:00
Location: Dallas

Re: The true end of suburbia begins

Postby cube » Wed 20 Aug 2008, 13:15:57

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('mos6507', 'B')ut your vision is incomplete.
of course my vision is incomplete. Nobody can see everything.

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('mos6507', 'I')t's fuelled by the Kunstler anti-suburbia manifesto which seems to gloss over more universal overshoot mathematics.
Please do not compare me with Kunstler.

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('mos6507', 'I')t just assumes that we can "game" the system and avoid die-off by shoehorning everybody into close quarters with eachother.
Please do not get lazy by "assuming" things. If there is something that you are uncertain about then all you have to do is ask. I have never said we can "game" the system. I don't know where the hell you got that idea from. I believe in the great die-off / population reduction scenario.
//
Not to sound offensive but I believe your scenario leaves a lot more gaping holes then mine.

The advantage of my scenario is 2 fold:
1) It is actually supported by historical examples.
Even before the advent of a car based economy New York city had already grown to 5 million people. And the population density of Manhattan island was actually higher in 1910 then it is now!
2) A high population density 25,000/sq mi arrangement would solve our transportation problems. Electrified Rail transit starts to make financial sense in such an environment.
Last edited by cube on Wed 20 Aug 2008, 13:33:54, edited 1 time in total.
cube
Intermediate Crude
Intermediate Crude
 
Posts: 3909
Joined: Sat 12 Mar 2005, 04:00:00
Top

Re: The true end of suburbia begins

Postby cube » Wed 20 Aug 2008, 13:31:09

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('mos6507', '')$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('cube', '
')What I am against is this delusional fantasy that we can all live in 2,000 sq ft single family homes (with a front and back yard) and all be within 10 minute walking distance to a train station. THAT is what I am against.


It's also a delusional fantasy that we can comperess all suburban areas back into the nearest cities like sardine cans...
Thank you,
so we have an agreement that suburbia cannot survive without cars.
So how in the world can suburbia survive after PO?
What will cars run on? :?
cube
Intermediate Crude
Intermediate Crude
 
Posts: 3909
Joined: Sat 12 Mar 2005, 04:00:00
Top

Re: The true end of suburbia begins

Postby dohboi » Wed 20 Aug 2008, 15:17:38

Cube and mos are both right. There will be a major contraction of suburbia, but that will include contraction of many suburbs back into the semi-rural towns they were not too long ago.

Also remember that in many recent suburban developments, all that nice farmable soil had been scraped off so the buildings didn't have to cope with the unpredictability of the "organics." Sure, soil can be shipped back in or developed from scratch, but both take time. And of course the skills to garden successfully and preserve some of your harvest for winter months is not instantaneous.

Just to say, it will be a rough adjustment (at least) for many raised to expect instant everything.

Not to sound too technofantastic, but does anyone else see the return of the blimp as a possible replacement for other forms of air travel and for some trucking?

The problem with predicting what year we will go back to as far as living standards is that, on the one hand we know a lot more about what makes people sick...which probably won't all go away right away. On the other hand, we have degraded many life support systems that were more robust in the past. We cannot, for example, expect to turn to the sea any time soon for major sources of protein or other resources any time soon. So we are likely to be better off in some respects but much worse off in others. Long term, well, let's just say I am not optimistic.

(PS, cube has put me on his ignore list, so if some wants to copy this it may allay any paranoia he may have that I am slamming him behind his back.)
User avatar
dohboi
Harmless Drudge
Harmless Drudge
 
Posts: 19990
Joined: Mon 05 Dec 2005, 04:00:00

Re: The true end of suburbia begins

Postby mos6507 » Wed 20 Aug 2008, 15:31:52

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('cube', 'W')hat will cars run on?

Image

Image

Image

Park and Ride (large)
mos6507
 
Top

Re: The true end of suburbia begins

Postby mos6507 » Wed 20 Aug 2008, 16:05:46

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('cube', '2')) A high population density 25,000/sq mi arrangement would solve our transportation problems. Electrified Rail transit starts to make financial sense in such an environment.

It's all theoretical so in the end we have to agree to disagree.

I think the suburbia has become all too loaded with political baggage with different parties trying to push their own vision of the "one true path" so to speak. I don't blame people for criticizing McMansions, big box stores, super-malls, and other aspects of modern suburbia. That can not persist in its current form, but I think at the core of it all, suburbia satisfies some people's need for more breathing room, and some people will stick around and find ways to make it work. You'll be left with something different that may no longer be classifiable under the 'suburbia' epithet.
mos6507
 
Top

Re: The true end of suburbia begins

Postby cube » Wed 20 Aug 2008, 19:54:17

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('mos6507', '')$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('cube', 'W')hat will cars run on?

Image
Park and Ride (large)
and *if* this does not work?
then you agree with me society gets forced into sardine can scenario?
//
You may notice I'm not a fan of gardening.
A lot of city slickers have this idea that if they were given 1 acre of land then they can become food secure.
I TOTALLY DISAGREE.
Producing your own food is MUCH more difficult then that.
In a PO world I do NOT think gardening will be an important source of food production.
cube
Intermediate Crude
Intermediate Crude
 
Posts: 3909
Joined: Sat 12 Mar 2005, 04:00:00
Top

Re: The true end of suburbia begins

Postby Javaman » Wed 20 Aug 2008, 20:04:23

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('emersonbiggins', '')$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Javaman', 'I')f each person, living in a city with a population density of 3500/square mile, ate a pound of food per day, you would need to supply your stores with 24,500 pounds of food per week, assuming each store served a one-square mile area. An 80,000 pound truck carrying 50,000 pounds could supply four of those stores by making two trips per week. With your system, how many smaller trucks are you going to use? How much fuel do you expect to save?

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', 'W')e're going to use 2 smaller trucks for each tractor-trailer, each with a 20-23,000-lb payload and 33,000 GVWR.
Here's one such truck:
Mitsubishi Fuso FM330, which gets about twice the mileage of a tractor-trailer, at 15 MPG. Additional gas expenditures for double the trucks is a net zero, if not slightly in favor of the smaller trucks, as large tractor-trailers do quite well, e.g. Wal-Mart's 'efficient' fleet, to get 7 MPG on the highway.

The FM 330 doesn't seem to be the truck that gets 15 MPG. The 15 MPG truck in the second link is the FG 140 4x4, that has a much lower payload and GVWR. While the FG 140 did get _almost_ 15 MPG on the trip across Asia, it was only carrying a small RV camper on its bed...that's probably not a 23,000 pound payload.

Even if an FM 330 could, somehow, manage to get 15 MPG while hauling 23,000 pounds of groceries, that is still substantially less than half the payload a big-rig might carry. I have seen smaller trucks carrying perishables such as bread and dairy products, but for these items there other reasons for using smaller trucks.
$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', 'N')ow, we are not necessarily hiring more drivers, or buying additional trucks, as we can simply increase the frequency of their delivery trips, so that no additional costs are incurred on the labor front.

Your drivers will spend twice as much time on the road. Do you plan to pay them for that?
$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', 'T')his increased frequency capitalizes on the bonus of added time, as the distribution of goods would also be relocalized and assisted by high-speed bidirectional freight rail to quickly move hundreds of tons of perishable goods inland from the ports,
Also semi-trailers can be piggy-backed on rail cars, if appropriate for the cargo.
$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', 'a')nd not in the form of hundreds of trucks scattered all of the country, with their owners scurrilously trying to stay in the black for another month.
Well, maybe they do use foul language sometimes, but with the price of diesel being what it is, can you blame them?
User avatar
Javaman
Lignite
Lignite
 
Posts: 261
Joined: Wed 18 Jun 2008, 03:00:00
Top

Re: The true end of suburbia begins

Postby dohboi » Wed 20 Aug 2008, 20:07:36

I agree with cube that gardening, especially gardening that can reliably support a family, is a lot harder than it looks. But most people can do some raising of food.

Not all that long ago, into the '50's I believe, most people significantly supplemented their diets with gardens, up to about 40% of their caloric intake if memory serves (I'll see if I can track down the source).

The tragedy is that most of that hands-on, local knowledge has disappeared and continues to disappear as those who were directly involved die off.

I don't know if everyone will need to have a garden in the future, but probably at least half the population will need to be able to source much of their food very, very locally, one way or the other.
User avatar
dohboi
Harmless Drudge
Harmless Drudge
 
Posts: 19990
Joined: Mon 05 Dec 2005, 04:00:00

Re: The true end of suburbia begins

Postby cube » Wed 20 Aug 2008, 20:25:51

I'm not a fan of "commuter rail". aka (park and ride lot) - public transit.

cons:
1) you still NEED a car
2) it's not cheap. about $200 / month to ride the train
3) it's even more expensive than carpooling
pros:
1) less wear and tear on car.
2) a short range EV car (drive to the park and ride lot) becomes possible
3) it is cheaper then solo driving

the cube scenario:
I think in the near term commuter rail will become very popular.
However once the ultimate endpoint of PO is reached, the economy will have contracted so much that society simply will NOT be commuting "long distances" everyday.
In a PO world I don't think J6P will afford $200/month to ride the train.
cube
Intermediate Crude
Intermediate Crude
 
Posts: 3909
Joined: Sat 12 Mar 2005, 04:00:00

Re: The true end of suburbia begins

Postby emersonbiggins » Wed 20 Aug 2008, 21:06:04

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Javaman', 'A')lso semi-trailers can be piggy-backed on rail cars, if appropriate for the cargo.

This is the angle that needs to be exploited.
I often refer to this graphic when talking about freight rail. It illustrates the total amount of railways that are double-tracked and, thus, free-flowing.
Image

Compare this with the amount of limited access highways in the U.S.
Image

The disparity between modes is well illustrated here, with interstate highways having a patron in the state and federal governments and railroads being wholly privately funded, maintained, expanded and operated, with little federal help outside of their initial grant of operating ROWs.

Even a little money thrown in this direction would go a long way in making rail a viable option for all types of freight, including that which is time-sensitive. Until we can expand our rail network from what amounts to one way streets hundreds of miles apart to something a little more expeditious, I cannot be that optimistic about the future for the US.
Last edited by emersonbiggins on Wed 20 Aug 2008, 21:10:01, edited 1 time in total.
"It's called the American Dream because you'd have to be asleep to believe it."

George Carlin
User avatar
emersonbiggins
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 5150
Joined: Sun 10 Jul 2005, 03:00:00
Location: Dallas
Top

Re: The true end of suburbia begins

Postby Javaman » Wed 20 Aug 2008, 21:07:52

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('cube', 'I')'m not a fan of "commuter rail". aka (park and ride lot) - public transit.
cons:
1) you still NEED a car
2) it's not cheap. about $200 / month to ride the train
3) it's even more expensive than carpooling
pros:
1) less wear and tear on car.
2) a short range EV car (drive to the park and ride lot) becomes possible
3) it is cheaper then solo driving
the cube scenario:
I think in the near term commuter rail will become very popular.
However once the ultimate endpoint of PO is reached, the economy will have contracted so much that society simply will NOT be commuting "long distances" everyday.
In a PO world I don't think J6P will afford $200/month to ride the train.

One should be able to get a monthly pass for much less than $200, in most cities. On the other hand Rapid Transit isn't. Carpooling at least cuts costs, and is probably faster. I think many people like the IDEA of mass transit, as long as they themselves don't have to use it.

I did see an interesting idea on TV a few years ago - an electric car whose owner towed a small trailer carrying a gas engine and generator for long trips. Sort of a poor man's plug-in hybrid.
User avatar
Javaman
Lignite
Lignite
 
Posts: 261
Joined: Wed 18 Jun 2008, 03:00:00
Top

Re: The true end of suburbia begins

Postby emersonbiggins » Wed 20 Aug 2008, 21:21:18

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Javaman', '')$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('emersonbiggins', '')$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Javaman', 'I')f each person, living in a city with a population density of 3500/square mile, ate a pound of food per day, you would need to supply your stores with 24,500 pounds of food per week, assuming each store served a one-square mile area. An 80,000 pound truck carrying 50,000 pounds could supply four of those stores by making two trips per week. With your system, how many smaller trucks are you going to use? How much fuel do you expect to save?

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', 'W')e're going to use 2 smaller trucks for each tractor-trailer, each with a 20-23,000-lb payload and 33,000 GVWR.
Here's one such truck:
Mitsubishi Fuso FM330, which gets about twice the mileage of a tractor-trailer, at 15 MPG. Additional gas expenditures for double the trucks is a net zero, if not slightly in favor of the smaller trucks, as large tractor-trailers do quite well, e.g. Wal-Mart's 'efficient' fleet, to get 7 MPG on the highway.

The FM 330 doesn't seem to be the truck that gets 15 MPG. The 15 MPG truck in the second link is the FG 140 4x4, that has a much lower payload and GVWR. While the FG 140 did get _almost_ 15 MPG on the trip across Asia, it was only carrying a small RV camper on its bed...that's probably not a 23,000 pound payload.
Even if an FM 330 could, somehow, manage to get 15 MPG while hauling 23,000 pounds of groceries, that is still substantially less than half the payload a big-rig might carry. I have seen smaller trucks carrying perishables such as bread and dairy products, but for these items there other reasons for using smaller trucks.

I was unable to find further information on the FM 330. ...

Perhaps we are discussing this from slightly skewed angle. I'm not suggesting that we service existing 60,000-200,000 SF grocery stores solely from small trucks, but that we rescale and downsize our stores to minimize the amount of fuel that customers must use to access the store in the first place. This would resemble the more frequent distribution of grocery stores in the US up until about the 1950 era. This implies that overall selection will be affected, but some of this can be mitigated by specialty grocers, general stores and the like. It's a return to what works, when oil is no longer as plentiful and cheap as we'd like. Terribly idealistic, I know.
"It's called the American Dream because you'd have to be asleep to believe it."

George Carlin
User avatar
emersonbiggins
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 5150
Joined: Sun 10 Jul 2005, 03:00:00
Location: Dallas
Top

Re: The true end of suburbia begins

Postby cube » Wed 20 Aug 2008, 23:02:26

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('emersonbiggins', 'I') often refer to this graphic when talking about freight rail. It illustrates the total amount of railways that are double-tracked and, thus, free-flowing.
Image
do you have links to a bigger map, I'd like to read what the color coded sections mean.
//
I've seen rail maps of the USA before and they seemed a bit more extensive....I kinda assumed all lines were "double-tracked".
Image
oops.
I guess that's what happens when you make "assumptions". :roll:
cube
Intermediate Crude
Intermediate Crude
 
Posts: 3909
Joined: Sat 12 Mar 2005, 04:00:00
Top

Re: The true end of suburbia begins

Postby mos6507 » Wed 20 Aug 2008, 23:24:42

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('cube', '
')and *if* this does not work?


You're still thinking all/nothing. I'm not predicting a simple panacea here. I'm saying that there will be adaptations suburbanites can make if they want to stay in the suburbs. I don't think everyone who lives in the burbs will be willing or able to make those adaptations. But some will.

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('cube', '
')then you agree with me society gets forced into sardine can scenario?


I already agree that some degree of reurbanization is going to happen. It's already started. I just don't think every suburb is going to turn into ghost towns with nothing but squatters and meth labs.

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('cube', '
')A lot of city slickers have this idea that if they were given 1 acre of land then they can become food secure.


Think of gardening pre-collapse as a hobby. I play guitar. I'm not that good at it. But I don't have to put food on the table with my guitar skills. If I did, you're damn right I'd be a better player. I'd be practicing till my hands were bleeding.

And if you aren't a fan of gardening, are you assuming that macro level agriculture as it is now can be sustainable post-peak? If not, what exactly are you suggesting? That we reurbanize for the short term and just accept die-off when agriculture fails?
mos6507
 
Top

Re: The true end of suburbia begins

Postby mos6507 » Wed 20 Aug 2008, 23:47:55

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('cube', '
')once the ultimate endpoint of PO is reached, the economy will have contracted so much that society simply will NOT be commuting "long distances" everyday.


Once the ultimate endpoint of peakoil is reached, all sorts of nightmare scenarios can materialize. I can't really make prescriptions for the future that extend beyond the short to medium term. After that the future fades out into a haze of uncertain hardship.

------

All I'm saying is that people have their own way of measuring quality of life. They will power down only when the pain of high prices exceeds the pain of adaptation. The main thrust of anti-suburbia is that suburbia has no intrinsic merits, that nobody really gets anything out of living there. Everyone's been sold some kind of false bill of goods. I do not subscribe to that absolutist notion. Suburbia has its flaws, but the city sure as hell ain't no paradise either.

Image

Image
mos6507
 
Top

Re: The true end of suburbia begins

Postby cube » Wed 20 Aug 2008, 23:57:00

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Javaman', 'O')ne should be able to get a monthly pass for much less than $200, in most cities. On the other hand Rapid Transit isn't. Carpooling at least cuts costs, and is probably faster. I think many people like the IDEA of mass transit, as long as they themselves don't have to use it.
I think the stigma of public transit is only for people who live in suburbia.
People who actually live in the city (and thus depend on it) have a vastly different perception.

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Javaman', 'I') did see an interesting idea on TV a few years ago - an electric car whose owner towed a small trailer carrying a gas engine and generator for long trips. Sort of a poor man's plug-in hybrid.
I'm not a fan of EV cars.
I think the cost of electricity will triple in price post PO at least.
The cost of coal and NG gas can only go up in the long term much like crude oil and that's going to blow the price of electricity up sky high.
Furthermore residential electricity prices are subsidized.
Once the government goes bankrupt and everybody has to pay "fair market value" for EVERYTHING then we will see the true price revealed.
That's going to put an end to this ridiculous fantasy that EV cars are a cheap replacement.
Even if gasoline costs $10/gallon EV cars will still be more expensive.
//
You know what's funny?
You'd think that Europe should be the world premier electric car capitol of the world with it's sky high gasoline prices but it is not.
It's those damn crazy Californians (glad I left the place)....it never made any sense. :roll:
cube
Intermediate Crude
Intermediate Crude
 
Posts: 3909
Joined: Sat 12 Mar 2005, 04:00:00
Top

Re: The true end of suburbia begins

Postby the48thronin » Thu 21 Aug 2008, 00:38:44

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('emersonbiggins', 'T')his is the angle that needs to be exploited.
I often refer to this graphic when talking about freight rail. It illustrates the total amount of railways that are double-tracked and, thus, free-flowing.
Image


The disparity between modes is well illustrated here, with interstate highways having a patron in the state and federal governments and railroads being wholly privately funded, maintained, expanded and operated, with little federal help outside of their initial grant of operating ROWs.



Hmm where do you figure the railroads get little or no public funding?

Let's be honest, the railroads received billions from public funding over the years from the conrail bailout to the "rentals" of track mileage for amtrack and other "light rails" that share ROW and maintanance not to mention the upgrades at intersections with highways and roads or the grants for "improvments" funded somehow with tax dollars while they burn tax free fuel.
Did you somehow miss the article in the ap

Here I'll repost some of it here.. feel free to read it in it's original at a train wreck waiting to happen

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('article from a p', '
')A wreck waiting to happen


June 8, 2008

BY MICHAEL TARM Associated Press
CHICAGO -- Railway executive Matthew Rose stood before fellow industry
leaders, pointing to a map meant to tell the future of the U.S. rail freight
network. It was drenched in red -- east to west, north to south.

The blotches illustrated areas where, by 2035, traffic jams could be so
severe trains would grind to a halt for days.

"For those of you who've ever seen a good rail meltdown, this is what it
looks like," said Rose, CEO of Burlington Northern Santa Fe Corp., as the
crowded hall shifted uncomfortably in chairs. "It's literally chaos in the
supply chain."

While the nation's attention is focused on air travel congestion and the
high cost of fuel for highway driving, a crisis is developing under the
radar for another form of transportation -- freight trains used to deliver
many of the goods keeping the economy humming.

The nation's 140,000-mile network of rails devoted to carrying everything
from cars to grain by freight is already groaning under the strain of
congestion.

And it's probably going to get worse during the next two decades, according
to an analysis of government and industry projections by The Associated
Press and interviews with experts.

<snip>


Others suggest the railroads are being alarmist.

Kenneth Kremar, another Global Insight analyst, said talk of a looming
crisis serves industry interests as rail companies jockey for more money
from Congress.
He said investment in larger, high-tech train cars and
computer systems that better pace trains should help avert logjams.


Please note the use of the word MORE!
$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('article from a p', '
')"It's illogical to assume nothing will be done," he said. "Railroads have an
inherent interest in doing something. There's no reason to think they're
headed for the abyss."

Over capacity
Amtrak, which shares the rails with freight trains, is also feeling the
pinch. Its long-distance trains were on time just 42 percent of the time
last year, according to the U.S. Department of Transportation's inspector
general.
The problem on the shared tracks has worsened in recent years as freight
traffic has soared. Passenger trains move much faster than most freights,
and in many areas there is only a single track, forcing trains to pull over
on side tracks and wait while trains coming in the other direction pass.

A solution won't come cheap.

The chamber says expanding capacity on the more than 150-year-old rail
system would cost $148 billion over 30 years. Private companies would have
to pay most of it, with federal and state tax dollars covering much of the
rest.

Choking point
Any solution will have to include Chicago -- which handles about 40 percent
of all U.S. rail freight on 180,000 trains a year. And where it can take two
days for trains to wind through the city.
Expanding capacity here will cost $1.5 billion over six years, a group of
officials and rail executives estimates. David Burns, an independent
railroad engineering consultant in the Chicago area, put the cost close to
$4 billion.


Note the public funding mentioned.
$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('article from a p', '
')Jacksonville, Fla.-based CSX announced plans this month to spend $300 million on upgrades to allow trains with double-stacked freight cars to run from the East Coast to the Midwest.

That would mean raising clearance on bridges and tunnels on lines through the Appalachian Mountains. CSX would like the federal and state governments to kick in $400 million more.


<snip>

The 500 freight trains moving through Chicago each day also have to share
tracks with -- and yield to, according to protocol -- 700 daily commuter
trains -- including those on the Burlington line that runs from Aurora to
Chicago. In contrast, commuter trains in New York City don't share lines
with freight.

Hard choices
Proposed solutions include building new overpasses to keep trains moving at
track intersections.
Elsewhere, single-line tracks could be expanded to
double or triple.
And some advocates want to restore tracks that fell out of
use in the 20th century.
Expanding capacity to route trains around clogged cities may not sit well
with suburban and exurban towns.

<snip>

And then there's Amtrak. It already operates on tracks owned by the big
railroads
, which will be increasingly reluctant to make concessions to
passenger trains.


back to you!

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('emersonbiggins', '
')Even a little money thrown in this direction would go a long way in making rail a viable option for all types of freight, including that which is time-sensitive. Until we can expand our rail network from what amounts to one way streets hundreds of miles apart to something a little more expeditious, I cannot be that optimistic about the future for the US.

I cant wait to see you show me the private funding avauilable for all that expansion, oh and then there is the point that there is only 1 yes ONE cross country double rail line in existance now...

Compare this with the amount of limited access highways already existant and usable with some adaptation by electric traction vehicles to pull existant trailers. ( can you say low cost conversion) in the U.S.
Image


Can you visualize electric lines suspended over the ROW that also contain distribution grid lines.. windmills providing the energy..


edit added quote about csx and 400 million wanted from public funds and add following credits

Maps cited are from;
Rodrigue, J-P et al. (2006) The Geography of Transport Systems, Hofstra University, Department of Economics & Geography, http://people.hofstra.edu/geotrans.
Last edited by the48thronin on Thu 21 Aug 2008, 04:14:42, edited 4 times in total.
Malthusian Riders Member!

Courtesy and Courage Sincerity and Self-control Honor and Loyalty a Code to Live By!
What do the miners do when the canary dies? EVACUATE THE MINE not argue about the color of it's feathers or buy a parrot instead.

Where is my pitchfork and torch? I need them for a visit to the castle!
User avatar
the48thronin
Tar Sands
Tar Sands
 
Posts: 871
Joined: Fri 30 May 2008, 03:00:00
Location: On the highway, or the water somewhere!
Top

PreviousNext

Return to Open Topic Discussion

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 2 guests

cron