Donate Bitcoin

Donate Paypal


PeakOil is You

PeakOil is You

THE House Resolution (HR) Thread (merged)

A forum for discussion of regional topics including oil depletion but also government, society, and the future.

Re: House Resolution Calls for Naval Blockade against Iran

Postby yull » Sat 28 Jun 2008, 07:48:41

I agree with almost all that ozkrenske, but since when has the US acted rationally? Iraq was always going to be a disaster and they went for that. They also show no regard for international law - the Iraq war was illegal, so is Guantanamo Bay and countless other things they've been doing lately. It doesn't make sense, but lots of things don't make sense yet they are done.

Also, how would Iran react if it was just Israel who attacked? Their prime minister has said than an attack is inevitable and they have already rehearsed it with that operation over Greece and Southern Europe earlier this month. Iranians know that the US are massively backing Israel, could Iran retaliate against the US just for an Israeli attack? Perhaps Iran would react to the US by cutting oil exports, attacking ships, blocking the Straits of Hormuz. Who knows.

Perhaps then the US could use these actions as justification for an attack. Then there is the question on how the Russians, Chinese, Arabs, Europe etc react.

I have always been sceptical of an Iran attack but with recent rhetoric and actions nothing would surprise me anymore.
User avatar
yull
Peat
Peat
 
Posts: 124
Joined: Thu 03 Jun 2004, 03:00:00
Location: Great Britain

Re: House Resolution Calls for Naval Blockade against Iran

Postby bkwillia » Sat 28 Jun 2008, 08:27:13

OPEC is not trading US dollars for Euros or Yen, they are trading dollars for oil futures. This is painfully obvious.

The Euro has stalled, the Yen is in a trading range, and even the emerging Canadian petrodollar is well off its highs. Meanwhile, oil futures are soaring all the way into 2016.

This naval blockade and sanctions against Iran are merely a distraction to keep the media from focusing on the real issue of peaking supply. The US has long lost control of the oil market, as has OPEC. Their best bet is to prolong the spread of the peak oil contagion until war breaks out. Then, we can just blame prices on war.
Last edited by bkwillia on Sun 29 Jun 2008, 09:55:22, edited 1 time in total.
User avatar
bkwillia
Peat
Peat
 
Posts: 68
Joined: Mon 20 Aug 2007, 03:00:00

Re: House Resolution Calls for Naval Blockade against Iran

Postby pedalling_faster » Sat 28 Jun 2008, 08:28:19

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Cashmere', 'I')f you're a Zionist, the analysis is very easy.

You ask . . .

"Will this action benefit Israel?"

If the answer is "yes", then the action is supported.


a war with Iran might weaken one of Israel's enemies.

it also deposits more Depleted Uranium dust in their neighborhood, and increases the likelihood that someone will drop a b*mb on Israel.

this might "benefit" Zionists who are too obsessed with war-making to think about the health of people living in Israel - or Christians who think the re-building of Israel is part of Jesus Coming Back.

or politicians who rely on the vote of those 2 blocks.

it's gone from MAD to Mutually Assured Self Destruction.

one good reference, Mearsheimer's book, "The Israel Lobby".
http://www.LASIK-Flap.com/ ~ Health Warning about LASIK Eye Surgery
User avatar
pedalling_faster
Permanently Banned
 
Posts: 1399
Joined: Sat 10 Dec 2005, 04:00:00

Re: House Resolution Calls for Naval Blockade against Iran

Postby MrBean » Sun 29 Jun 2008, 04:10:37

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('idiom', 'A') war with Iran will leave America in control of a huge swathe of the Middle East running from Afghanistan to Iraq.

With that size Islamic population under American occupation, with that amount of Oil under Ameircan control, the balance of global power destabilse quickly.


Nah, the question you need to ask, would war with Iran leave enough fuel for the US mechanized military to operate at any level? Would a war with Iran leave any soldiers to fight foreign wars, when all available troops are needed to control riots and rebels at home with collapsing economy and infrastructure and society?
User avatar
MrBean
Heavy Crude
Heavy Crude
 
Posts: 1202
Joined: Sun 26 Sep 2004, 03:00:00

Re: House Resolution Calls for Naval Blockade against Iran

Postby jbrovont » Sun 29 Jun 2008, 04:26:53

War with Iran will leave the US with nothing. No oil, thanks to their alliances, a destroyed currency, and an inability to wage war on credit. This is by far the most stupid idea I've ever seen come out of Washington, second even to the congress supporting King George in his faux(fox?) war on terrorism after he attacked NY.

Any armed conflict with Iran will decimate your standard of living. If you can't understand that, you need to read more. :)

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('MrBean', '')$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('idiom', 'A') war with Iran will leave America in control of a huge swathe of the Middle East running from Afghanistan to Iraq.

With that size Islamic population under American occupation, with that amount of Oil under Ameircan control, the balance of global power destabilse quickly.


Nah, the question you need to ask, would war with Iran leave enough fuel for the US mechanized military to operate at any level? Would a war with Iran leave any soldiers to fight foreign wars, when all available troops are needed to control riots and rebels at home with collapsing economy and infrastructure and society?
User avatar
jbrovont
Heavy Crude
Heavy Crude
 
Posts: 1003
Joined: Fri 16 Jun 2006, 03:00:00

Re: House Resolution Calls for Naval Blockade against Iran

Postby SILENTTODD » Sun 29 Jun 2008, 04:45:02

DocHoliday, Welcome! (Been a number of places the original walked as he was one of my favorite people in the old west. Only
Wyatt Earp was more so!),

Totally agree with your assessment for a first post. Let's hope our president is not as stupid as I believe he might be!
Last edited by SILENTTODD on Mon 21 Jul 2008, 13:44:25, edited 1 time in total.
Skeptical scrutiny in both Science and Religion is the means by which deep thoughts are winnowed from deep nonsense-Carl Sagan
User avatar
SILENTTODD
Tar Sands
Tar Sands
 
Posts: 928
Joined: Sat 06 May 2006, 03:00:00
Location: Corona, CA

Re: House Resolution Calls for Naval Blockade against Iran

Postby idiom » Mon 30 Jun 2008, 06:27:04

The thing is Bush doesn't have to sell it to anyone! Congress is going to ask him to go to war.
User avatar
idiom
Tar Sands
Tar Sands
 
Posts: 672
Joined: Mon 23 Aug 2004, 03:00:00
Location: New Zealand

Re: House Resolution Calls for Naval Blockade against Iran

Postby IndigoMoon » Fri 11 Jul 2008, 18:43:09

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Medeno', 'H').CON.RES.362 now has 169 Cosponsors (another 23 in the last two days). There are I believe 535 house members. I would think this would be the top of the headlines. For more information and current status, check,

http://thomas.loc.gov/cgi-bin/bdquery/z ... .res.00362:


As of today the cosponsor count is 238.
Live simply, love generously, care deeply, and speak kindly.
Life isn't about waiting for the storm to pass;
It's about learning how to dance in the rain.
User avatar
IndigoMoon
Lignite
Lignite
 
Posts: 254
Joined: Sun 25 May 2008, 03:00:00
Location: NE Ohio
Top

Re: House Resolution Calls for Naval Blockade against Iran

Postby idiom » Sun 13 Jul 2008, 07:39:04

Oh suck. 238 in the house. 35 in the Senate. That's more than half of each house co-sponsoring a declaration of war.

Democracy FTW.
User avatar
idiom
Tar Sands
Tar Sands
 
Posts: 672
Joined: Mon 23 Aug 2004, 03:00:00
Location: New Zealand

Re: House Resolution Calls for Naval Blockade against Iran

Postby Plantagenet » Sun 13 Jul 2008, 11:59:50

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('idiom', 'O')h suck. 238 in the house. 35 in the Senate. That's more than half of each house co-sponsoring a declaration of war.


Nope.

There are 100 Senators.
User avatar
Plantagenet
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 26765
Joined: Mon 09 Apr 2007, 03:00:00
Location: Alaska (its much bigger than Texas).
Top

Re: House Resolution Calls for Naval Blockade against Iran

Postby Plantagenet » Sun 13 Jul 2008, 12:02:07

The simplest way to stop this is to find 40 Senators to fillibuster in the Senator, or pressure Nancy Pelosi to come out against it in the House.

NOTHING happens in the house of representatives that isn't controlled and approved by the Speaker of the House (Nancy Pelosi, dem-SF).

NOTHING can happen in the Senate without a filibuster proof majority of 60 Senators. :)
User avatar
Plantagenet
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 26765
Joined: Mon 09 Apr 2007, 03:00:00
Location: Alaska (its much bigger than Texas).

Re: House Resolution Calls for Naval Blockade against Iran

Postby EnergyUnlimited » Sun 13 Jul 2008, 13:15:40

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Plantagenet', 'N')OTHING happens in the house of representatives that isn't controlled and approved by the Speaker of the House (Nancy Pelosi, dem-SF).

So why don't you dissolve house of reps and just keep Nancy Pelosi or any another speaker, possibly elected one instead? :-D
User avatar
EnergyUnlimited
Light Sweet Crude
Light Sweet Crude
 
Posts: 7537
Joined: Mon 15 May 2006, 03:00:00
Top

Re: House Resolution Calls for Naval Blockade against Iran

Postby Plantagenet » Sun 13 Jul 2008, 16:51:58

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('EnergyUnlimited', '')$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Plantagenet', 'N')OTHING happens in the house of representatives that isn't controlled and approved by the Speaker of the House (Nancy Pelosi, dem-SF).

So why don't you dissolve house of reps and just keep Nancy Pelosi or any another speaker, possibly elected one instead? :-D


The Speaker of the House is elected by the majority party in the House of Representatives. The Speaker has the power to set agendas in the House (i.e. to decide what bills come up for a vote and to block other bills from ever coming to a vote). Thus, NOTHING happens in the house of representatives that isn't controlled and approved by the Speaker of the House (Nancy Pelosi, dem-SF).

Nancy Pelosi stopped consideration of impeachment bills for Bush and Cheney, so nothing happened, and Nancy Pelosi supports more funding for the Iraq War, so the war goes on, and Nancy Pelosi supports the Iran embargo resolution, so it got passed by the House..
User avatar
Plantagenet
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 26765
Joined: Mon 09 Apr 2007, 03:00:00
Location: Alaska (its much bigger than Texas).
Top

Re: House Resolution Calls for Naval Blockade against Iran

Postby idiom » Sun 13 Jul 2008, 20:06:53

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Plantagenet', '')$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('idiom', 'O')h suck. 238 in the house. 35 in the Senate. That's more than half of each house co-sponsoring a declaration of war.


Nope.

There are 100 Senators.


I realised this when I woke up this morning. First thought was "Oh No! Plantagenet will laugh at my useless math" :)
User avatar
idiom
Tar Sands
Tar Sands
 
Posts: 672
Joined: Mon 23 Aug 2004, 03:00:00
Location: New Zealand
Top

Re: House Resolution Calls for Naval Blockade against Iran

Postby IndigoMoon » Sat 19 Jul 2008, 18:28:05

H.CON.RES.362
Title: Expressing the sense of Congress regarding the threat posed to international peace, stability in the Middle East, and the vital national security interests of the United States by Iran's pursuit of nuclear weapons and regional hegemony, and for other purposes.
Related Bills: S.RES.580

The cosponsor count continues to rise. For more information and current status, go HERE

As of 7/11/08 the cosponsor count was 238.
As of today, 7/19/08 the cosponsor count is 247.

Could someone please explain what the 'magic' cosponsor number is?
Live simply, love generously, care deeply, and speak kindly.
Life isn't about waiting for the storm to pass;
It's about learning how to dance in the rain.
User avatar
IndigoMoon
Lignite
Lignite
 
Posts: 254
Joined: Sun 25 May 2008, 03:00:00
Location: NE Ohio

Re: House Resolution Calls for Naval Blockade against Iran

Postby idiom » Sat 19 Jul 2008, 19:40:33

Well 3 gets a Bill considered I think. 261 or so would be enough co sponsors to over-ride a veto. The still need 60 senators to avoid a filibuster. They don't need to all be co-sponsors, they just need to vote yes.

Bu what are the odds of Bush Vetoing it? "Its not my fault, Congress wants me to go to war. I am being Bi-Partisan"

On the upside:

Rep Clay, Wm. Lacy [MO-1] - 6/17/2008(withdrawn - 7/9/2008)

Sanity got through to someone.
User avatar
idiom
Tar Sands
Tar Sands
 
Posts: 672
Joined: Mon 23 Aug 2004, 03:00:00
Location: New Zealand

Re: House Resolution Calls for Naval Blockade against Iran

Postby miles392 » Sun 20 Jul 2008, 08:58:18

Isn't any major newsmedia adressing this? Seems pretty strange.
User avatar
miles392
Peat
Peat
 
Posts: 58
Joined: Sun 15 Jun 2008, 03:00:00
Location: Somewhere in the cold north

Re: House Resolution Calls for Naval Blockade against Iran

Postby SILENTTODD » Mon 21 Jul 2008, 15:54:24

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Plantagenet', 'N')ancy Pelosi stopped consideration of impeachment bills for Bush and Cheney, so nothing happened, and Nancy Pelosi supports more funding for the Iraq War, so the war goes on, and Nancy Pelosi supports the Iran embargo resolution, so it got passed by the House..

I guess time to eliminate Nancy Pelosi as speaker of the house, Dumb Bitch!
Skeptical scrutiny in both Science and Religion is the means by which deep thoughts are winnowed from deep nonsense-Carl Sagan
User avatar
SILENTTODD
Tar Sands
Tar Sands
 
Posts: 928
Joined: Sat 06 May 2006, 03:00:00
Location: Corona, CA
Top

Re: House Resolution Calls for Naval Blockade against Iran

Postby SILENTTODD » Thu 24 Jul 2008, 02:43:25

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('vetusfirma', 'A')lright children, remember this is all about PEAK OIL. Of course we are in Iraq, it's the only way to surround Iran and control the oil. Of course we are going to stop Iran from controlling the region thur nuclear fear.

Just hating Jews and America is not going to keep the lights on here. If you hate Jews so much, go to Gaza. If you love Chavez so much, go to Venezuela.

Me, I'm gonna take care of mine, and I don't care what the rest of the world does. Remember, all the oil will be used. It's just a matter of 'who' will do the using.


Just got around to reading your entre. Who up to this post has said anything about "hating Jews"? Pointing out that Zionism is a Cult that has been responsible for killing my fellow Americans is not anti Jewish, or anti Semitic (Arabs are a Semitic People too)!
Last edited by SILENTTODD on Thu 24 Jul 2008, 02:48:42, edited 1 time in total.
Skeptical scrutiny in both Science and Religion is the means by which deep thoughts are winnowed from deep nonsense-Carl Sagan
User avatar
SILENTTODD
Tar Sands
Tar Sands
 
Posts: 928
Joined: Sat 06 May 2006, 03:00:00
Location: Corona, CA
Top

Re: House Resolution Calls for Naval Blockade against Iran

Postby SILENTTODD » Thu 24 Jul 2008, 02:47:09

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('idiom', 'A') war with Iran will leave America in control of a huge swathe of the Middle East running from Afghanistan to Iraq.

With that size Islamic population under American occupation, with that amount of Oil under Ameircan control, the balance of global power destabilse quickly.


idiom, believe me I'm on your side! America does not possess an army big enough to occupy the middle east.

It hasn't since about 1945!
Skeptical scrutiny in both Science and Religion is the means by which deep thoughts are winnowed from deep nonsense-Carl Sagan
User avatar
SILENTTODD
Tar Sands
Tar Sands
 
Posts: 928
Joined: Sat 06 May 2006, 03:00:00
Location: Corona, CA
Top

PreviousNext

Return to North America Discussion

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 4 guests