I'm not a big fan, but maybe people don't give President Bush credit for doing more about helping us survive peak oil than anyone else. Bush and Cheney are oil people. If the peak is here, then they would know it! I reference this earlier article you may be familiar with:
After Oil
By David Fleming
(C) Prospect Magazine, November 2000
"Only one country has the potential for a serious increase in output, on a scale which could make a difference. The bad news is: that country is Iraq. Iraq's oil geology is not fully explored, but there are some well-informed guesses. One estimate is that there are 110 billion barrels there--equal to more than three British North Seas, or more than one third of the total resource once possessed by Saudi Arabia. This oil could not be made immediately available, but it is on a scale to keep world oil production rising for a few more years. It lies, however, in a country which is armed to the teeth, consumed by loathing of the west, and just waiting for a US armed intervention to make its day. Iraq was prevented from selling off its oil during the 1990s, when prices were lower than they will ever be again; it will soon be well placed to apply its own sanctions to the rest of the world by fine-tuning its output and naming its price."
http://www.geocities.com/davidmdelaney/ ... eming.html
China was making overtures to Sadam to secure rights to the oil. So did Bush/Blair do what they had to do in the short run to prevent collaspe of western economies? Can you tell the sheepeople the truth?? Or do you have to mask your actions in the cloth of a so called "just war" ???
Maybe Bush is peak oil believer just like us and did what had to be done...."in the short run." He lives of the grid and now our armies sit on top of the last large supply of oil in the world.
The spice must flow!
Viddy well, little brother. Viddy well.