by roccman » Sat 29 Sep 2007, 12:33:20
$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('seahorse', 'R')occ,
If you're wanting to argue, I guess you can go look in the mirror. I'm only clarifying that Great River has not closed its doors, which is what your link was titled. If you read my post more carefully, you will see that they are considered a "troubled bank" by the FDIC, that the FDIC is stepping in, and that there is no guarantee they will survive even with that oversight. If you want to check in on them in two months, that's fine. Since I don't bank there, I won't be doing so. However, it is, in my opinion, a sign of things to come. Great River wasn't the first and it won't be the last.
Well IMO a "troubled" bank is a closed bank.
The banking system is based solely on the faith and confidence one puts on a bank that holds your money.
Great River has lost that faith and confidence...in my mind it is closed.
"There must be a bogeyman; there always is, and it cannot be something as esoteric as "resource depletion." You can't go to war with that." Emersonbiggins