by MrBill » Thu 09 Feb 2006, 10:20:23
$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('pup55', '[')code]EIA lowered its projection for Q1 global oil demand...last month to 85.0-mbpd[/code]
$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', 'G')lobal oil demand rose by 1.4-mbpd or 1.7% in Jan over a year ago to 83.977-mbpd while global oil supply rose 2.2-mbpd to 85.95-mbpd according to Oil Market Intelligence.
Per your news summary above.....
The "gap", as it were, could be under 1 mbpd this year at times.
Too close for comfort. All those energy traders who earned record bonuses in 2005 for their stellar performance in being on the right side of the market may be having to fill their newly built swimming pools with unleaded gasoline and flooding their basements with distillates right now that all other storage is full, but take your pick of any of the three events, one of which is more than likely to be a repeat of 2005, and the supply & demand situation may not be so benign in 9-12 months' time.
1. a large scale successful terrorist attack against any key refining assets or transit routes/pipelines such as the Straits of Hormuz, Saudi Arabia, Iran or Iraq.
2. another active hurricane season with one or two storms just as destructive as Katerina/Rita/Wilma
3. a hotter than average summer or colder than average winter that eats into storage, given that in many places with a mild winter this year, there has also been below average precipitation and therefore less water for hydroelectric generation next year.
Well, all ifs, but demand is also increasing, so all eyes will again be on refining capacity this summer. Keep on truckin' means all those Flying J's have to be well supplied with the stuff. In the meantime, full storage will keep the physical market well supplied and the contango firmly in place. No guff.
The organized state is a wonderful invention whereby everyone can live at someone else's expense.
by cube » Thu 09 Feb 2006, 12:50:09
$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Dukat_Reloaded', 'I')f oil trades in the $55-$60 range again, I'm going to guy.
Confucius says:$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', 'M')an who waits for roast duck to fly into mouth must wait for a very long time.
$55 oil??? No way!
$60 oil.....perhaps.
Anyhow after watching the price dropped for 3 days in a row this week, my "crude" instinct told me oil will go up today.

Unfortunately I placed my open price just a wee bit too low...if only I placed it 10 cents higher I'd be sitting on a gain of 100 cents as of this writing.
Now I know why traders don't live that long. All this frustration and stress must knock off at least 10 years from a person's life.

by MrBill » Fri 10 Feb 2006, 03:54:55
$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Daryl', '')$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('MrBill', ' ')The worst is a buy or sell order below or above the current market where the market gets to your level, but does not trade through, so you go unfilled and then it moves a dollar in the other direction.
Funny though how they always manage to fill the stops in those situations, huh?

I am not sure, maybe Houlbt can tell us, but on the ICE platform, for example, can you see market depth, inlcuding stop losses above or below the current market? I know in the FX markets, the traders used to look at the order board and try to go for the most vulnerable side, which was usually where the stops were. I cannot count the number of times that I have been stopped out at the very top of the market. Too many.
Also, to be honest, I can call the market usually about 4 out of 5 days pretty well, but if I never traded on Fridays, ever, I would be much farther ahead. I am sure I have lost well over a million dollars on Fridays alone. My concentration must just lapse. I am more on an early morning trader in any case and it kills me to have to trade in NY time late in the evening.
$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', 'I') think they're premature, but like the saying goes,
the markets can remain irrational longer than you can remain solvent.
I have never heard that, but I think it is absolutely brilliant! Thanks. Take care and have a great day. Cheers.
The organized state is a wonderful invention whereby everyone can live at someone else's expense.
by MrBill » Fri 10 Feb 2006, 04:45:47
What little news there is compliments of Marex (yes, it really is that quiet)
$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', 'N')ews:
· Shell Nigeria began repair work on a damaged crude oil pipeline two days ago. Militant attacks on Shell’s operations caused the shut-in of 106,000-bpd in production and force majeure.
· Statoil will shut down its 140,000-bpd Heidrun platform next week to replace a gas flare unit.
· MMS director Johnnie Burton predicts oil and gas production in the Gulf will probably return to normal pre-hurricane levels and exceed them within 18 months. 25% of production is still shut-in but repairs to damaged pipelines and platforms may be completed by the end of the summer. But maybe 3-4% will remain offline due to outright destruction.
· Oil Movements report OPEC exports are up 180,000-bpd to 25.32-mbpd in the four weeks through Feb 25 vs. 25.14-mbpd in the prior four weeks.
· Dow Jones survey shows OPEC Jan output fell 220,000-bpd to 29.67-mbpd due to losses in Nigeria and the UAE, the former due to unrest and the latter due to maintenance.
Refinery news:
· Exxon Mobil says a small fire in a coker drum at its 154,600-bpd Torrance, CA refinery Tuesday night had no impact on operations. Fire response personnel on site quickly extinguished it.
It takes a brave man to sell at the bottom, but sometimes discretion is the better part of valour.
The organized state is a wonderful invention whereby everyone can live at someone else's expense.
-

MrBill
- Expert

-
- Posts: 5630
- Joined: Thu 15 Sep 2005, 03:00:00
- Location: Eurasia
-
by MrBill » Fri 10 Feb 2006, 08:09:23
$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('MicroHydro', 'J')ust looking at the futures versus my other positions, the commodities would have been serious underachievers without the magic of leverage.
Leverage puts some adrenaline in the game. Or as Billy Joel might sing...
she carelessly cuts you and laughs while you're bleeding.
I do not want to call a bottom, but we are oversold in the crude here. Also, volume in the March month is now trailing volume in the April, so traders are already giving up on any rally in the nearby futures with the exception of March heating oil maybe. Not a very typical day. Decided to try my hand at bottom picking for a quick rally, but this is really just a Hail Mary and hope I get lucky. Look to sell at technical resistance. If we end weak today, think next week will see a lot of follow through selling.
The organized state is a wonderful invention whereby everyone can live at someone else's expense.
-

MrBill
- Expert

-
- Posts: 5630
- Joined: Thu 15 Sep 2005, 03:00:00
- Location: Eurasia
-
by MrBill » Fri 10 Feb 2006, 11:59:34
$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('DantesPeak', 'T')his may be of interest to Mr. Bill and other US $ traders:
China is discussing
selling $400 billion dollars. $this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', 'F')orex reserves should be cut by half: Chinese banker
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
8/2/2006 10:05
The government should ideally cut its foreign exchange reserves by half at the end of last year, to help ward off risk and ease upward pressure on the yuan, a Bank of China official was quoted as saying yesterday.
China's foreign exchange reserves swelled 34 percent in 2005 to a record US$818.9 billion, signaling upward pressure on the yuan despite July's revaluation, setting off calls by some Chinese economists to find ways to slow down the growth.
"China's foreign exchange reserves should roughly be kept at a level between US$300 billion and US$400 billion, which will be appropriate," the Financial News quoted Wang Yuanlong, a director at Bank of China's Australian operations and former economist at the bank, as saying.
"China should use its interest rate policy and exchange rate policy to adjust the foreign exchange reserves," Wang said.
Wang said China needed adequate foreign exchange reserves to fend off risk as it was in transition between a planned and market-driven economy, but the current level of reserves had far exceeded conventional prudence.
In fact, it is very interesting to me. Thanks. You may also want to check out this blog by
Brad Setser. This is a good space along with
Econbrowser to keep up with these issues.
$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', 'V')aluation changes are potentially quite significant. So significant that a wrong call on the euro/ dollar ruined the career of a senior Chinese official back when China only had $200 billion in total reserves. Now China has $820 billion in reserves, and at least $160 billion (20%) and perhaps as much as $240 billion (30%) in reserve assets denominated in euros, yen and other currencies not named the US dollar. So a 10% annual move against a composite of the euro/ yen/ pound would reduce (or increase) China's reported reserves by somewhere between $16 and $24 billion.
China reserve watch
But, as for me, I must be missing something? In general, China runs a trade surplus in dollars. The US DEC trade deficit with China was $16.30 billion down slightly from NOV's $18.49 billion, but still hefty. I posted an article under the
A Survey of the World Economy, in which some economists argue that in a multilateral, globalized world that bilateral trade statistics do not accurately reflect real deficits as many countries use China as a final assembler for goods destined to the USA, but for example, internal firm pricing for tax and other reasons, may significantly differ from customs data as to the size of the real deficit.
But I digress, it is still a large trade deficit, no matter how you slice it. China has two choices with export earnings, a) repatriate them, which would result in a stronger yuan and drive up domestic inflation, or b) sterilize them by holding them as foreign exchange reserves (it does not matter whether they are in dollars, euros or yen they remain offshore and therefore out of the local economy).
The statement to reduce these reserves from some $820 billion to something like $300-400 billion would result in an appreciation the yuan, precisely what the Chinese state they would like to avoid, if the CBoC sells foreign currency and buys yuan. So basically, the statement is policy nonsense. It is like Bush saying that the US should lessen its dependence on Middle Eastern oil? How by importing Canadian oil? Oil dependence is oil dependence. But again, I am off topic!
One way that the Chinese could lower their foreign reserves while not putting upward appreciation on the yuan would be to address the problem of non-performing loans to state owned enterprizes (SOEs), and by cleaning-up the balance sheets of state controlled banks. It is estimated that this would cost upwards to $600 billion, which would of course make a huge dent in their foreign exchange reserves. China has already done this with some $60 billion, that I know of, and is a step in the right direction. However, this will only be effective if once recapitalized the state banks do not go out and relend the money again based on the same set of poor credit decisions. Unfortunately, the few and the brilliant in Beijing and Shangahi aside, many everyday would-be bankers lack the training and sophistication to make informed lending choices. And of course you have moral suasion from local party bosses to keep lending to regional entities and keep manufacturing employment high/rural unemployment low.
So either this is technocrat babble speak or taken along with this week's announcement to change China's law to allow interest rate swaps in the yuan, we may be seeing the first signs of a new direction in Chinese monetary policy? The possibilities are intriguing, but I would need more data to make an informed opinion.
Meanwhile, funds are rumored to be dumping both commodities and oil as we speak. Out of my long just in time, but out of my short way, way too early! I am only catching the crumbs falling from the table and should have had more conviction. Unleaded is getting punished here. $1.4650. Ouch. Heating oil is holding its own for the moment. $1.6530 only. Brent touched $5985 and WTI has been as low at $61.75. There is technical support just under here for the crude, but if there is fund long liquidation, it might still push lower. Dunno, it is Friday and it is still early in the NYMEX pit session. A weak close sets us up to test $60.00 next week in the WTI.
Take care and have a nice weekend. Cheers.
The organized state is a wonderful invention whereby everyone can live at someone else's expense.