Donate Bitcoin

Donate Paypal


PeakOil is You

PeakOil is You

The "I Hate SUVs" thread

What's on your mind?
General interest discussions, not necessarily related to depletion.

The "I Hate SUVs" thread

Unread postby lardlad » Tue 03 Jan 2006, 23:36:28

Yes, I hate them. Always have. Their defenders bleat about how much safer they are, how their precious children are protected by the tank-like aspects of the damn things.

Now comes research that blasts that nonsense out of the water:

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', 'C')HICAGO (Reuters) - Sports utility vehicles do not offer child passengers added protection in a crash compared to cars because SUVs are more likely to roll over in an accident, researchers said on Tuesday. "Contrary to public perception, SUVs do not provide superior protection to child occupants, compared with passenger cars," wrote lead author Dr. Lauren Daly of A.I. Dupont Hospital for Children in Wilmington, Delaware.


Full Article here.


Image
lardlad
Lignite
Lignite
 
Posts: 303
Joined: Fri 30 Dec 2005, 04:00:00
Location: USA, Australia and Africa

Re: The "I Hate SUVs" thread

Unread postby Specop_007 » Wed 04 Jan 2006, 12:57:44

We've been through this before.
only idiots and assholes blindly accept those slanted articles.

What are you?
"Battle not with monsters, lest ye become a monster, and if you gaze into the
Abyss, the Abyss gazes also into you."

Ammo at a gunfight is like bubblegum in grade school: If you havent brought enough for everyone, you're in trouble
User avatar
Specop_007
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 5586
Joined: Thu 12 Aug 2004, 03:00:00

Re: The "I Hate SUVs" thread

Unread postby holmes » Wed 04 Jan 2006, 13:37:41

Spec u know I like u alot however I do have to agree with the Dummer slogan. These dummer vehicles are really pathetic. and It does seem to be true that these owners do not take personal responsibility with their energy use. I just want the most consumtive individuals and families to be trained for war and sent to our resource wars. So yes I would accept a monitoring of our energy uses to find out just who is guzzling the resources we are ramping up to war for.
as someone who will ahve maybe one child and really monitors my energy use I do not want to pay for the unsustainable vices of my fellow citizens. This is happening now with welfare and subsidies. So yes if they all want their personal tanks, fine. but they must do the dirty work. leave me out of it. That would mean have me pay less or no taxes. as of now the guzzlers pay less with subsidies. The governemnt supports consumption. Have mroe kids and more stuff you get breaks cuz u are feeding the economy. Conserve u get to pay more not less.
Ecological economics would take care of this. U consume and waste more you pay more, etc..
holmes
Intermediate Crude
Intermediate Crude
 
Posts: 2382
Joined: Tue 12 Oct 2004, 03:00:00

Re: The "I Hate SUVs" thread

Unread postby mekrob » Wed 04 Jan 2006, 16:42:43

GODDAMNIT, I HATE 'EM SUV's. I HATE 'EM I HATE 'EM I HATE 'EM.
mekrob
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 2408
Joined: Fri 09 Dec 2005, 04:00:00

Re: The "I Hate SUVs" thread

Unread postby PenultimateManStanding » Wed 04 Jan 2006, 16:55:25

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('mekrob', 'G')ODDAMNIT, I HATE 'EM SUV's. I HATE 'EM I HATE 'EM I HATE 'EM.
What's even worse are those pickup trucks hoisted up on gargantuan wheels so you need a ladder to climb up to the door. Why would anyone want to drive around in something like this? Leo on the deck of the Titanic, "woohoo! I'm King of the World!" Vanity, vanity. How much of the vanity in this world is centered around the cars?
Image
User avatar
PenultimateManStanding
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 11363
Joined: Sun 28 Nov 2004, 04:00:00
Location: Neither Here Nor There

Re: The "I Hate SUVs" thread

Unread postby Specop_007 » Wed 04 Jan 2006, 17:26:49

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('PenultimateManStanding', '')$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('mekrob', 'G')ODDAMNIT, I HATE 'EM SUV's. I HATE 'EM I HATE 'EM I HATE 'EM.
What's even worse are those pickup trucks hoisted up on gargantuan wheels so you need a ladder to climb up to the door. Why would anyone want to drive around in something like this? Leo on the deck of the Titanic, "woohoo! I'm King of the World!" Vanity, vanity. How much of the vanity in this world is centered around the cars?
Image


Thats fuckin awesome. 8)
"Battle not with monsters, lest ye become a monster, and if you gaze into the
Abyss, the Abyss gazes also into you."

Ammo at a gunfight is like bubblegum in grade school: If you havent brought enough for everyone, you're in trouble
User avatar
Specop_007
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 5586
Joined: Thu 12 Aug 2004, 03:00:00

Re: The "I Hate SUVs" thread

Unread postby PenultimateManStanding » Wed 04 Jan 2006, 17:29:54

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Specop_007', '')$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('PenultimateManStanding', '')$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('mekrob', 'G')ODDAMNIT, I HATE 'EM SUV's. I HATE 'EM I HATE 'EM I HATE 'EM.
What's even worse are those pickup trucks hoisted up on gargantuan wheels so you need a ladder to climb up to the door. Why would anyone want to drive around in something like this? Leo on the deck of the Titanic, "woohoo! I'm King of the World!" Vanity, vanity. How much of the vanity in this world is centered around the cars?
Image


Thats fuckin awesome. 8)
Yeah, hop in to head down to the 7-11 for a pack of smokes: where's that damn ladder! Gimme a break! :roll:
User avatar
PenultimateManStanding
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 11363
Joined: Sun 28 Nov 2004, 04:00:00
Location: Neither Here Nor There
Top

Re: The "I Hate SUVs" thread

Unread postby killJOY » Wed 04 Jan 2006, 17:33:01

One can hate SUVs for their vanity, gargantuanism, waste, fraudulent masculinity, etc., but the fact is the drivers of those SUVs are going to be suffering profoundly in the next three years. Listen to this Robert Hirsch interview and count yourself lucky that you don't own one of those hideosities yourself.
Peak oil = comet Kohoutek.
User avatar
killJOY
Intermediate Crude
Intermediate Crude
 
Posts: 2220
Joined: Mon 21 Feb 2005, 04:00:00
Location: ^NNE^

Re: The "I Hate SUVs" thread

Unread postby Yossarian » Wed 04 Jan 2006, 17:36:21

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Specop_007', 'W')e've been through this before.
only idiots and assholes blindly accept those slanted articles.

What are you?


Slanted!!? Hardly. The Data is from real flesh and blood

"The study examined a sample from more than 72,000 children aged 15 or younger who were involved in crashes. The injuries sustained were to the brain, spinal cord, face, internal organs and limbs and included concussions, fractures and lacerations."

Those here who have successfully completed HS physics would know the basics of mass and center of gravity, both pointed out in the article.

"Though the added weight of SUVs conferred some protection in non-rollover accidents, the vehicles were twice as likely as cars to roll over during a wreck, the report published in the journal Pediatrics said."

Now if one was an owner of a SUV, I could see them lashing out at those who have shown them to have been duped, but isn't that always the case.
"Things fall apart, the center does not hold"
User avatar
Yossarian
Peat
Peat
 
Posts: 67
Joined: Thu 03 Feb 2005, 04:00:00
Location: Bergen Cty, NJ
Top

Re: The "I Hate SUVs" thread

Unread postby killJOY » Wed 04 Jan 2006, 17:44:56

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', '"')Though the added weight of SUVs conferred some protection in non-rollover accidents, the vehicles were twice as likely as cars to roll over during a wreck, the report published in the journal Pediatrics said."


This is purely anecdotal, but as a firefighter/EMT, I can attest to that. I see more SUVs than anything else. This might also be due to a disproportion of SUVs to cars in our area, I don't know.

It's simple physics: objects of greater mass take greater distances to stop, and tall objects tend to fall over.
Peak oil = comet Kohoutek.
User avatar
killJOY
Intermediate Crude
Intermediate Crude
 
Posts: 2220
Joined: Mon 21 Feb 2005, 04:00:00
Location: ^NNE^
Top

Re: The "I Hate SUVs" thread

Unread postby SinisterBlueCat » Wed 04 Jan 2006, 17:47:19

We have a suburban. We need it for work, we travel 6 times a year across the country jammed full all of our supplies. It is good for that.

In town, we drive our little car...who wants to waste money going to the grocery store in a huge behemoth?

So, I do not hate them (how does one hate an inanimate object, anyway?) as they have their uses.

What I hate is people the get them for status. They are usually not hard to spot, they are the ones driving everywhere in their perfectly pristine and constantly fresh washed vehicle. We will see how much status those things afford them when gas goes over 3 gallon later this spring.
User avatar
SinisterBlueCat
Tar Sands
Tar Sands
 
Posts: 885
Joined: Tue 06 Sep 2005, 03:00:00

Re: The "I Hate SUVs" thread

Unread postby Specop_007 » Wed 04 Jan 2006, 17:59:14

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('holmes', 'S')pec u know I like u alot however I do have to agree with the Dummer slogan. These dummer vehicles are really pathetic. and It does seem to be true that these owners do not take personal responsibility with their energy use.


How so? If you uy a car thats less efficient, you pay more for gas. Seems pretty cut and dried to me.


$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', 'I') just want the most consumtive individuals and families to be trained for war and sent to our resource wars. So yes I would accept a monitoring of our energy uses to find out just who is guzzling the resources we are ramping up to war for.


You dont believe Armed Services should be volunteer? In todays society, if you dont want to go fight YOU DONT HAVE TO. That simple. You personally think wars are for resources, and you dont want to support that. Then dont join the armed forces. Pretty simple.

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', 'a')s someone who will ahve maybe one child and really monitors my energy use I do not want to pay for the unsustainable vices of my fellow citizens. This is happening now with welfare and subsidies.


What? How many people on welfare are driving Escalades and using abnormally large amounts of energy. I can tell you right now, us middle class and those above us sure as hell arent getting welfare. Its the bottom feeders that get welfare.
And personally I dont likepaying for them either, so we're in the same boat there.

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', 'S')o yes if they all want their personal tanks, fine. but they must do the dirty work. leave me out of it. That would mean have me pay less or no taxes. as of now the guzzlers pay less with subsidies. The governemnt supports consumption. Have mroe kids and more stuff you get breaks cuz u are feeding the economy. Conserve u get to pay more not less.
Ecological economics would take care of this. U consume and waste more you pay more, etc..


Do the dirty work? They do. Have you ever licensed a SUV? Guess what. Unless you get the bare bones options, the price of the vehicle puts you in the "luxury" tax bracket. Also, you pay more in property taxes due to the price of the car. You pay more at the pump and you pay more in insurance. How do you figure these SUV drivers arent paying their fair share? I assure you, SUV drivers dont get subsidies. I know, I own one (Which is driven very little because of the cost to drive it)
As for your more kids argument, now your generalizing "consume". Consume more food? More gas? More paper for homework? I thought we were discussing the consumption of energy. I can assure you, I pay the same to heat/cool my house with 1 person as I do with 100. (Thats not *entirely* true, I keep it a touch warmer because of the kids.....By choice. And I pay for that)
Then you add in waste. So, if I consume more then you but recylce so I have less waste, where do I fit in? What about if I consume less then you, but waste more? Then where do I fit in?



The simple fact is this. I hate people who bitch about SUV's because they somehow have convinced themselves the entirety of the problem is SUV's. Are you tellingme if there were no SUV's on the road we wouldnt be facing peak oil and energy shortages? Thats nonsense. Are you telling me SUV's are less safe? In ask you, in what regard? Are SUV's less safe thena Honda in side impacts? What about frontal? Rear ends? Roll overs? With or without seatbelts? What if I said tomorrow you WILL get T-boned by a drunk driver in a...ohhh.....Mercedes, whos doing 40 miles an hour. You can choose ANY car in the world to be in when it happens, but the accident is unavoidable. What would you choose? I'll take an SUV with side impacts airbags. Why? I wont get a hood ornemant shoved into my face, it'll get shoved into the running bars.

SUV drivers, we pay our fair sahre I assure you. More in fuel, more in licensing, more in insurance, more in maintenance. You say there unsafe in rollovers. How does that affect you? If your basis for hating SUV's in there danger of rollovers I challenge we should ban kitchen ovens as I dont thinkI've met someone who hasnt at one time or another burned themselves on those highly dangerous devices.

I just think its ridiculous to hate SUV's. Its a tool, nothing more nothing less. You might as well hate pencils because of all the paper they ruin.
"Battle not with monsters, lest ye become a monster, and if you gaze into the
Abyss, the Abyss gazes also into you."

Ammo at a gunfight is like bubblegum in grade school: If you havent brought enough for everyone, you're in trouble
User avatar
Specop_007
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 5586
Joined: Thu 12 Aug 2004, 03:00:00
Top

Re: The "I Hate SUVs" thread

Unread postby holmes » Wed 04 Jan 2006, 18:04:03

I say port the cargoe ships, fill em up with the suvs, owners and families and send em to the desert and front lines. Build a bloated suv battalion. They can be used for combat. and the big tires would work well in the sand. Nope have others fight for them.
holmes
Intermediate Crude
Intermediate Crude
 
Posts: 2382
Joined: Tue 12 Oct 2004, 03:00:00

Re: The "I Hate SUVs" thread

Unread postby Specop_007 » Wed 04 Jan 2006, 18:19:40

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Yossarian', '')$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Specop_007', 'W')e've been through this before.
only idiots and assholes blindly accept those slanted articles.

What are you?


Slanted!!? Hardly. The Data is from real flesh and blood

"The study examined a sample from more than 72,000 children aged 15 or younger who were involved in crashes. The injuries sustained were to the brain, spinal cord, face, internal organs and limbs and included concussions, fractures and lacerations."

Those here who have successfully completed HS physics would know the basics of mass and center of gravity, both pointed out in the article.

"Though the added weight of SUVs conferred some protection in non-rollover accidents, the vehicles were twice as likely as cars to roll over during a wreck, the report published in the journal Pediatrics said."

Now if one was an owner of a SUV, I could see them lashing out at those who have shown them to have been duped, but isn't that always the case.


And any 3rd grader would ask
"Were they wearing their seatbelts?"

The data is completely worthless without knowing what percentage of those who suffered those injuries were wearing their seatbelt.

As for higher odds of rollover, well thank you Capt'n Obvious. Is THAT your basis for hating SUV's, because they might rollover?
Well hell, in that case we might as well just hate all cars equally as they cause injuries to people.
"Battle not with monsters, lest ye become a monster, and if you gaze into the
Abyss, the Abyss gazes also into you."

Ammo at a gunfight is like bubblegum in grade school: If you havent brought enough for everyone, you're in trouble
User avatar
Specop_007
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 5586
Joined: Thu 12 Aug 2004, 03:00:00
Top

Re: The "I Hate SUVs" thread

Unread postby Yossarian » Wed 04 Jan 2006, 18:25:32

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Specop_007', '
')And any 3rd grader would ask
"Were they wearing their seatbelts?"



You might want to actually click on the link and try the 'reading' thing, as it does answer that question. Then you could get into 3rd Grade.
;)
"Things fall apart, the center does not hold"
User avatar
Yossarian
Peat
Peat
 
Posts: 67
Joined: Thu 03 Feb 2005, 04:00:00
Location: Bergen Cty, NJ
Top

Re: The "I Hate SUVs" thread

Unread postby Specop_007 » Wed 04 Jan 2006, 18:30:00

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Yossarian', '')$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Specop_007', '
')And any 3rd grader would ask
"Were they wearing their seatbelts?"



You might want to actually click on the link and try the 'reading' thing, as it does answer that question. Then you could get into 3rd Grade.
;)


There was a similiar article posted in Current Events, I assumed it was the same one so didnt bother reading this one.
Off to read it.
"Battle not with monsters, lest ye become a monster, and if you gaze into the
Abyss, the Abyss gazes also into you."

Ammo at a gunfight is like bubblegum in grade school: If you havent brought enough for everyone, you're in trouble
User avatar
Specop_007
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 5586
Joined: Thu 12 Aug 2004, 03:00:00
Top

Re: The "I Hate SUVs" thread

Unread postby Specop_007 » Wed 04 Jan 2006, 18:33:11

Ok, I read it. It doesnt answer my question. It states this...

"The highest odds of injury occurred among children riding unbelted in an SUV that rolled over.

Another strong risk factor for children age 13 or younger was from an air bag deploying while they rode in the front seat, and Daly recommended children always ride in rear seats. "

Well no shit. Theres not a vehicle on the road thats "safe" in a rollover with no seatbelt.

I want to know of those injuries what percentage are sustained by children who are wearing their seatbelt and what is the percentage of similiar injureis in children wearing seatbelts in other passenger cars.

Otherwise, we're just being fed media bullshit and lapping it up with a spoon.

And I dont eat shit. And I call it when I smell it, and something dont smell right about that article.
"Battle not with monsters, lest ye become a monster, and if you gaze into the
Abyss, the Abyss gazes also into you."

Ammo at a gunfight is like bubblegum in grade school: If you havent brought enough for everyone, you're in trouble
User avatar
Specop_007
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 5586
Joined: Thu 12 Aug 2004, 03:00:00

Re: The "I Hate SUVs" thread

Unread postby lardlad » Wed 04 Jan 2006, 19:37:27

Well, maybe many Americans need SUVs to accommodate their vast bodies?

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', '[')b]Car seats supersized to fit American bums
James Bone, New York
December 30, 2005

AMERICANS who gorged themselves at Christmas parties can take solace from the thought that the journey home will soon be more comfortable. Foreign car-makers are widening the seats to accommodate the spreading American bottom.

The front seats of Honda's 2006 Civic are 2cm wider than this year's model. Subaru's new B9 Tribeca, designed for the US market, offers front-seat passengers an extra 1.3cm over other models in the line. Mercedes Benz's R-Class Grand Sports Tourer gives front-seat riders 2.5cm of extra girth over its M-Class.


Original article here
lardlad
Lignite
Lignite
 
Posts: 303
Joined: Fri 30 Dec 2005, 04:00:00
Location: USA, Australia and Africa
Top

Re: The "I Hate SUVs" thread

Unread postby Yossarian » Thu 05 Jan 2006, 16:14:24

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Specop_007', 'O')k, I read it. It doesnt answer my question. It states this...

"The highest odds of injury occurred among children riding unbelted in an SUV that rolled over.

Another strong risk factor for children age 13 or younger was from an air bag deploying while they rode in the front seat, and Daly recommended children always ride in rear seats. "

Well no shit. Theres not a vehicle on the road thats "safe" in a rollover with no seatbelt.

I want to know of those injuries what percentage are sustained by children who are wearing their seatbelt and what is the percentage of similiar injureis in children wearing seatbelts in other passenger cars.


Then you need to go find it, I'm sure a full report was published. This was even, brief Yahoo 'nutshell' article. This is a He Said/She Said media. It stated what we already knew, in a nutshell SUVs aren't as safe as they are sold to you as.

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Specop_007', 'O')therwise, we're just being fed media bullshit and lapping it up with a spoon.

And I dont eat shit. And I call it when I smell it, and something dont smell right about that article.


I agree with you. Find a better place to eat, don't yell at McDonalds cause you don't like their menu.

Stepping down from my soapbox now...
"Things fall apart, the center does not hold"
User avatar
Yossarian
Peat
Peat
 
Posts: 67
Joined: Thu 03 Feb 2005, 04:00:00
Location: Bergen Cty, NJ
Top

Re: The "I Hate SUVs" thread

Unread postby lardlad » Thu 05 Jan 2006, 19:32:05

One of the biggest problems with SUVs is the fact that they are built on truck frames that do not deform to absorb impact in an accident. The H-frame is rigid for carrying load. Without any crumple zones, all forces of the accident are transmitted to the occupants. Now since most cars on the road today in the USA are SUVs, your chances of hitting or being hit by another SUV is very high, exacerbating this situation even further.

SUVs are simply a bad, bad idea. They need to be removed from the road asap.
lardlad
Lignite
Lignite
 
Posts: 303
Joined: Fri 30 Dec 2005, 04:00:00
Location: USA, Australia and Africa

Next

Return to Open Topic Discussion

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 3 guests

cron