Donate Bitcoin

Donate Paypal


PeakOil is You

PeakOil is You

THE Corn Thread (merged)

What's on your mind?
General interest discussions, not necessarily related to depletion.

Re: U.S. Farmers May Plant Less Corn, Soybeans

Postby Antimatter » Wed 14 Sep 2005, 07:17:14

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', 'M')y gut feeling is that is probably cost effective now or will be in short period of time to generate ammonia using electricity.


Coal is cheaper than electrickerty, they use it for amonia production in China already. Might see some popping up in the US when people realise NG prices are gonna stay high.
User avatar
Antimatter
Tar Sands
Tar Sands
 
Posts: 587
Joined: Tue 04 Jan 2005, 04:00:00
Location: Australia

Re: U.S. Farmers May Plant Less Corn, Soybeans

Postby BabyPeanut » Wed 14 Sep 2005, 07:27:36

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('frankthetank', 'T')he pieces are all on the table...Have you noticed grain prices really haven't done much for all this negativity...?

Farmers are "price takers". We can still import food more cheaply than grow it here.

It is up to us to go to farmer's markets and other sources of local produce as much as possible. We need to support local farmers now so they will be here when nothing else is.
BabyPeanut
Intermediate Crude
Intermediate Crude
 
Posts: 3275
Joined: Tue 17 Aug 2004, 03:00:00
Location: 39° 39' N 77° 77' W or thereabouts

Re: U.S. Farmers May Plant Less Corn, Soybeans

Postby EnergySpin » Wed 14 Sep 2005, 07:29:02

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Antimatter', '')$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', 'M')y gut feeling is that is probably cost effective now or will be in short period of time to generate ammonia using electricity.


Coal is cheaper than electrickerty, they use it for amonia production in China already. Might see some popping up in the US when people realise NG prices are gonna stay high.

That will be interesting from a history of science viewpoint. Haber used coke from coal in the paper that gave him the Nobel prize :)
"Nuclear power has long been to the Left what embryonic-stem-cell research is to the Right--irredeemably wrong and a signifier of moral weakness."Esquire Magazine,12/05
The genetic code is commaless and so are my posts.
User avatar
EnergySpin
Intermediate Crude
Intermediate Crude
 
Posts: 2248
Joined: Sat 25 Jun 2005, 03:00:00

Re: U.S. Farmers May Plant Less Corn, Soybeans

Postby Starvid » Wed 14 Sep 2005, 11:03:04

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Antimatter', '')$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', 'M')y gut feeling is that is probably cost effective now or will be in short period of time to generate ammonia using electricity.


Coal is cheaper than electrickerty, they use it for amonia production in China already. Might see some popping up in the US when people realise NG prices are gonna stay high.

Not in Norway it isn't. Due to their abundant hydro capacity they have among the lowest electricity prices in the world.
Peak oil is not an energy crisis. It is a liquid fuel crisis.
User avatar
Starvid
Intermediate Crude
Intermediate Crude
 
Posts: 3021
Joined: Sun 20 Feb 2005, 04:00:00
Location: Uppsala, Sweden
Top

Re: U.S. Farmers May Plant Less Corn, Soybeans

Postby Pops » Wed 14 Sep 2005, 11:52:18

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('aahala', 'I') can understand higher input costs can reduce profit, but I don't understand why the appropriate approach would be to reduce production.


Because cheap fuel, fertilizer, irrigation, pesticides and herbicides all allow marginal land and marginal management to be profitable – take the cheap away and the margin goes away.
The legitimate object of government, is to do for a community of people, whatever they need to have done, but can not do, at all, or can not, so well do, for themselves -- in their separate, and individual capacities.
-- Abraham Lincoln, Fragment on Government (July 1, 1854)
User avatar
Pops
Elite
Elite
 
Posts: 19746
Joined: Sat 03 Apr 2004, 04:00:00
Location: QuikSac for a 6-Pac
Top

Re: U.S. Farmers May Plant Less Corn, Soybeans

Postby Gary » Wed 14 Sep 2005, 23:58:59

Who was it who said the following?

"Modern agriculture is the art of using land to make food from petroleum."

I've quoted from memory, but I think that's fairly close.

More accurate statement: modern agriculture is the art of using land to make food from fossil fuels.
pedaling for peace and ecojustice -- Gary
User avatar
Gary
Peat
Peat
 
Posts: 132
Joined: Fri 07 Jan 2005, 04:00:00
Location: Mpls, MN, USA

corn burning stoves

Postby Armageddon » Fri 09 Dec 2005, 19:02:21

does anyone have any info about these ? i am just starting to research them. thanks.

sorry mods, didnt know where to put this thread, and current events is my favorite thread category
User avatar
Armageddon
Light Sweet Crude
Light Sweet Crude
 
Posts: 7450
Joined: Wed 13 Apr 2005, 03:00:00
Location: St.Louis, Mo

Re: corn burning stoves

Postby Armageddon » Fri 09 Dec 2005, 19:41:49

brand, price, how many sq ft can they heat, ventilation, how much corn do they use, how much does corn cost, etc. lol, sorry
User avatar
Armageddon
Light Sweet Crude
Light Sweet Crude
 
Posts: 7450
Joined: Wed 13 Apr 2005, 03:00:00
Location: St.Louis, Mo

Re: corn burning stoves

Postby pip » Fri 09 Dec 2005, 19:43:06

I bought an Amaizablaze last summer. It's working out very well for me. It's been heating the whole house until the 0 degree temps of a few days ago when I had to kick on the natural gas to help it out a little. I've used about 45 bushels of corn so far this year. What exactly would you like to know?
The road goes on forever and the party never ends - REK
User avatar
pip
Coal
Coal
 
Posts: 480
Joined: Wed 21 Apr 2004, 03:00:00
Location: Republic of Texas

Re: corn burning stoves

Postby pip » Fri 09 Dec 2005, 20:06:40

We posted at the same time. For those questions:

Mine’s heating 2100 ft^2 with a 50,000 BTU stove usually running below half on the corn feed rate. Average winter lows in my area are about 20F. Stove costed around $2300. It’s a fireplace insert model and vents through a flexible metal pipe that sticks up the chimney past the damper. I went to a grain elevator and bought my corn, just had them load the back of my pickup with the truck loading spout. A pickup bed will hold around 55 bushels if anyone was wondering about that. That’s about 3,100 pounds so my ½ ton pickup was loaded up good. They charged 40 cents over the spot corn price which is running around $2.00/bushel.
The road goes on forever and the party never ends - REK
User avatar
pip
Coal
Coal
 
Posts: 480
Joined: Wed 21 Apr 2004, 03:00:00
Location: Republic of Texas

Re: corn burning stoves

Postby Armageddon » Fri 09 Dec 2005, 20:26:07

sounds pretty good, thanks. i have two fireplaces in my house and am thinking about either converting one of them with an insert, or just buying one of those free standing types. It would be nice in the sunroom upstairs and seems it may heat a large area. 2,300.00 seems reasonable, but i wonder what the availability is this time of year. also, i wonder what the availability of corn is now, and later if people start converting to these. im not really a corn expert.
User avatar
Armageddon
Light Sweet Crude
Light Sweet Crude
 
Posts: 7450
Joined: Wed 13 Apr 2005, 03:00:00
Location: St.Louis, Mo

Re: corn burning stoves

Postby Armageddon » Fri 09 Dec 2005, 20:47:45

these cornstoves look cool. i would like to start a cornstove business where i live. people would go crazy over these things. any investors ? lol
User avatar
Armageddon
Light Sweet Crude
Light Sweet Crude
 
Posts: 7450
Joined: Wed 13 Apr 2005, 03:00:00
Location: St.Louis, Mo

Re: Anybody got experience with corn burning stoves?

Postby JBinKC » Fri 09 Dec 2005, 20:54:34

I think corn stoves are a great idea to save money if you are a farmer and/or have adequate storage facilities with a cheap access to corn. Besides the stove needing electricity to operate I would think the big potential drawback to corn is potential rodent infestation.
User avatar
JBinKC
Lignite
Lignite
 
Posts: 254
Joined: Sat 14 Aug 2004, 03:00:00

USDA says less corn acreage this year

Postby frankthetank » Fri 31 Mar 2006, 18:07:39

Want to know why?

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', 'U')SDA projected 2005 U.S. corn plantings at 78.019 million acres, below the
average trade estimate of 80.576 million. This figure is well below the 2005
season, when 81.759 million acres were seeded.

USDA said the corn plantings if realized would be the lowest U.S. corn
acreage since 2001, citing farmer intentions to plant less intensive crops due
to fertilizer and fuel costs.


This can't be good, can it? A person would think with all the ethanol talk, corn planting should be way up.

Although there looks to be a sizeable corn stock on hand.

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', 'U')SDA pegged March 1 corn stocks at a hefty 6.987 billion bushels, which
matched the average analyst estimate. This is also well above the same time
last year, when stocks totaled 6.756 billion.


I'm no farmer, so be kind! I just came across the article...

LINK
User avatar
frankthetank
Light Sweet Crude
Light Sweet Crude
 
Posts: 6202
Joined: Thu 16 Sep 2004, 03:00:00
Location: Southwest WI
Top

Re: USDA says less corn acreage this year

Postby Daculling » Fri 31 Mar 2006, 18:28:04

I think this is how the farmer passes the increased cost onto the consumer.

High fuel cost -> Less corn -> Higher corn cost

How come the "ethanol solution" is not taking up the slack? I don't know... but I suspect the subsidies at the ethanol production level are not trickling down to the corn market. And yes, I know corn is subsidized as well.

Just my thoughts... I really don't know much so correct me please.
Daculling
Heavy Crude
Heavy Crude
 
Posts: 1228
Joined: Tue 12 Apr 2005, 03:00:00

Re: USDA says less corn acreage this year

Postby Ludi » Fri 31 Mar 2006, 18:32:25

That's good news. Corn is very hard on the soil.
Ludi
 

Re: USDA says less corn acreage this year

Postby Leanan » Fri 31 Mar 2006, 19:02:43

This is to be expected. Many farmers are using planting methods that use less fertilizer and fuel, like no-till. The disadvantage is lower yields. Others are growing crops that don't need as much fertlizer as corn does.

As for ethanol...I suspect this is an indication that ethanol still is not economical, even with oil at $65/barrel.
"The problems of today will not be solved by the same thinking that produced the problems in the first place." - Albert Einstein
User avatar
Leanan
News Editor
News Editor
 
Posts: 4582
Joined: Thu 20 May 2004, 03:00:00

Re: USDA says less corn acreage this year

Postby Ancien_Opus » Fri 31 Mar 2006, 19:02:51

It takes a lot of nitrogen fertilizer (natural gas) to plant corn. Nitrogen fertilizer cost is up as is the fuel to apply the fertilizer, plus the herbicides and pesticides. The back of the envelope calculations that a lot of farmers are doing is saying soy beans. Soybeans are drought resitant and nitrify the soil. At roughly $6.00 per bushel and a good yeild of 50 bushels per acre its $300/ acre. Corn at $2.50 per acre and a good yeild of 150 bushels per acre its $325/acre. Then you remove all your additional cost the soybeans turn out to be a slightly better deal. Simply put revenue does not mean profit. In a capital intensive operation like farming you're not around long if you can't figure this out.
User avatar
Ancien_Opus
Peat
Peat
 
Posts: 142
Joined: Thu 21 Jul 2005, 03:00:00

Re: USDA says less corn acreage this year

Postby Novus » Fri 31 Mar 2006, 19:45:54

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Leanan', '
')
As for ethanol...I suspect this is an indication that ethanol still is not economical, even with oil at $65/barrel.


Ethanol will never be economical because it is a net energy looser. The less we make of it the better. In fact the suff should probably be banned. We cannot afford to be wasting energy during an energy crisis.
User avatar
Novus
Intermediate Crude
Intermediate Crude
 
Posts: 2450
Joined: Tue 21 Jun 2005, 03:00:00
Top

Re: USDA says less corn acreage this year

Postby Daculling » Fri 31 Mar 2006, 19:52:16

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Novus', '')$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Leanan', '
')
As for ethanol...I suspect this is an indication that ethanol still is not economical, even with oil at $65/barrel.


Ethanol will never be economical because it is a net energy looser. The less we make of it the better. In fact the suff should probably be banned. We cannot afford to be wasting energy during an energy crisis.


As an anecdotal note... my grandparents burn corn for heat rather than sell it.
Daculling
Heavy Crude
Heavy Crude
 
Posts: 1228
Joined: Tue 12 Apr 2005, 03:00:00
Top

PreviousNext

Return to Open Topic Discussion

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest

cron