by Sixstrings » Fri 20 Dec 2013, 16:41:20
$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('wildbourgman', 'S')ixstrings, that's a very good point, but I don't think we're going to have anyone recommending that we structure social security payouts according to whether you had a desk job versus being a coal miner.
I'm not either,
What I'm saying is that raising that age is a massive hardship on people from certain lines of work, folks on the lower end of the scale who haven't spent a life yacking by a water cooler in some Washington think tank.
So what government does is the OPPOSITE wb, they're saying "well okay everyone is the same everyone's life expectancy has gone up *on average* so now we're raising retirement age another 4 years* -- and it's just not right, because it's just not true, averages don't mean sh*t because this is not an averaged out country, it has classes, with real and stark differences between those classes.
What winds up happening is working class folks who are worn out and can't make it to retirement age go the disability route with SS. Government will go after that next. I'm not sure what you can do here, you can't beat an old dog and make him do new tricks, if his body's shot and worn out, what can you do. It's not like there are lots of jobs out there for old folks with health problems, sheesh.
I'm just saying, *there's a difference*. You can see it. Yes there are 80 year olds enjoying the golf course. Yes, teachers and gov workers can work into their 70s. But also notice some 60ish working class folks you see out there, the waitress, the cash station clerk, and so on. These folks look *old*, they've had hard lives, and it's not fair to go raising that age on them.
In the 1950s and 60s and 70s they'd have had a good solid working class company pension, now all they have is SS and government keeps taking that away too.
(incidentally, we should tax the rich and lower the darn retirement age and get the youth employed -- I've posted about this before, that you could lower SS age and increase benefit payout and it would be just a small tax on the rich to do it, and better economically. All of this keeps coming down to the shift in classes and wealth transfer that went on after the 1970s to now, from a broad middle class and solid working class with pensions and the bulk of America's wealth to today -- a rich elite and oligarchs.)