Donate Bitcoin

Donate Paypal


PeakOil is You

PeakOil is You

An uneasy thought?

What's on your mind?
General interest discussions, not necessarily related to depletion.

An uneasy thought?

Unread postby freefall » Mon 07 Apr 2008, 22:57:26

It dawned on me a few months ago that one remedy to PO is to cull the global population. For example h5n1 with human to human transmission could reduce the stresses placed on our energy supplies due to the associated fatalities.

some people think HIV was man made and released to slow our ever rising global population (see nssm200). Who knows. If governments throughout the world are facing failure and collapse, then would'nt a global cull be tempting?
User avatar
freefall
Wood
Wood
 
Posts: 11
Joined: Fri 26 Oct 2007, 03:00:00

Re: An uneasy thought?

Unread postby TreeFarmer » Mon 07 Apr 2008, 23:00:37

You would need to kill off a billion people to make a dent that lasts for an appreciable amount of time.

FWIW, HIV first appeard in the 1960's, we could not engineer a virus then and we can't engineer one now.

TF
User avatar
TreeFarmer
Tar Sands
Tar Sands
 
Posts: 609
Joined: Tue 26 Jun 2007, 03:00:00

Re: An uneasy thought?

Unread postby Homesteader » Mon 07 Apr 2008, 23:06:40

google population control and see what you find.
User avatar
Homesteader
Heavy Crude
Heavy Crude
 
Posts: 1856
Joined: Thu 12 Apr 2007, 03:00:00
Location: Economic Nomad

Re: An uneasy thought?

Unread postby Cashmere » Mon 07 Apr 2008, 23:06:44

TF, I agree with your conclusion that HIV was not intentionally released by mankind.

But I don't agree that "engineering" a virus would be required.

The better question is, "when was the technology available to isolate a monkey virus on human cells?"

Because as soon as they can do that, then they have the means to infect humans with primate analogs. While not all direct infections would amount to anything, certainly, with enough time and effort, a virulent strain of fatal virus could be communicated to humans.
User avatar
Cashmere
Heavy Crude
Heavy Crude
 
Posts: 1882
Joined: Thu 27 Mar 2008, 03:00:00

Re: An uneasy thought?

Unread postby Kaj » Mon 07 Apr 2008, 23:21:16

The most efficient way of slowing growth is through the education of women in the third world. It's maybe not a total solution but I am amazed this isn't discussed more on this site.
User avatar
Kaj
Lignite
Lignite
 
Posts: 373
Joined: Wed 06 Dec 2006, 04:00:00

Re: An uneasy thought?

Unread postby mos6507 » Mon 07 Apr 2008, 23:27:58

More people who want to be this guy:

Image
mos6507
 

Re: An uneasy thought?

Unread postby Ferretlover » Mon 07 Apr 2008, 23:33:54

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Kaj', '[')b] through the education of women in the third world.


Women are only HALF the problem. *hint hint*
"Open the gates of hell!" ~Morgan Freeman's character in the movie, Olympus Has Fallen.
Ferretlover
Elite
Elite
 
Posts: 5852
Joined: Wed 13 Jun 2007, 03:00:00
Location: Hundreds of miles further inland

Re: An uneasy thought?

Unread postby Eli » Mon 07 Apr 2008, 23:37:18

Listen, it is a big problem we are facing, really there are just too damn many of us.

But if billions of us must die, I am certain our noble leaders will find a way to make it happen.
User avatar
Eli
Intermediate Crude
Intermediate Crude
 
Posts: 3709
Joined: Sat 18 Jun 2005, 03:00:00
Location: In a van down by the river

Re: An uneasy thought?

Unread postby jboogy » Mon 07 Apr 2008, 23:41:10

There's one very big problem with bio-weapons, and thankfully TPTB have been thoroughly de-briefed and convinced of it's danger. Cells mutate, and no one knows the potentially devastating consequences that could be unleashed were engineered viruses to be released.
How can you be assured of containing a virus that starts mutating and decides to go airborne? "I am legend" scenario would be a very real possibility.
All the major powers have natural and engineered "superbugs" in their labs, that's a given. But, they are there to be transported and released in rival countries, only in the event that your own population is being decimated due to either natural plague or as a response to a 1st strike biological attack. No-one will 1st strike with communicable plague. The blowback is truly unknowable in scale of both numbers and virulence.
I can conceive of sufficient evil in our elected leaders that would make such an option thinkable, were it not for the potential unintended consequences. But only a severly psychotic schizoid, would risk his own neck in order to reduce the worlds population.
Perhaps the population would be less swayed to socialism if we had fewer examples of socialism from our "Free Market Capitalists". -----fiddler dave
User avatar
jboogy
Heavy Crude
Heavy Crude
 
Posts: 1191
Joined: Mon 06 Jun 2005, 03:00:00
Location: the place where smartasses dwell

Re: An uneasy thought?

Unread postby Homesteader » Mon 07 Apr 2008, 23:42:14

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Ferretlover', '')$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Kaj', '[')b] through the education of women in the third world.


Women are only HALF the problem. *hint hint*


I hate the following statement. . . .However, studies do show that increasing the education levels of woman slows birthrate. But that is hardly the end of the story. But I guess it reads well in a lot of places.

That is fine as far as it goes. However, where are the studies showing how the consumption levels increase for those families with a mother who is higher educated. (don't throw stones, I'm not suggesting women shouldn't be educated because it would increase consumption)

Also, where are the jobs going to come from to employ these newly eductated people, both men and women? The numbers don't add up. (wouldn't be nice if the numbers just added up on a lot of things)

Never mind the logistics and money required to educate enough to make more of a difference than is already being done. There are so many school aged people on the planet that aren't getting educated that it is downright depressing.
User avatar
Homesteader
Heavy Crude
Heavy Crude
 
Posts: 1856
Joined: Thu 12 Apr 2007, 03:00:00
Location: Economic Nomad

Re: An uneasy thought?

Unread postby peaker_2005 » Tue 08 Apr 2008, 12:17:15

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('TreeFarmer', 'Y')ou would need to kill off a billion people to make a dent that lasts for an appreciable amount of time.

FWIW, HIV first appeard in the 1960's, we could not engineer a virus then and we can't engineer one now.

TF


Eh, that's easy enough. It's called nuclear warfare. OK, sure, it'll screw up the land too, but it WOULD cull the population...

(And no, I am NOT condoning this course of action.
"Human beings, who are almost unique in having the ability to learn from the experience of others, are also remarkable for their apparent disinclination to do so." - Douglas Adams
User avatar
peaker_2005
Tar Sands
Tar Sands
 
Posts: 686
Joined: Fri 02 Sep 2005, 03:00:00

Re: An uneasy thought?

Unread postby Plantagenet » Tue 08 Apr 2008, 12:23:48

Sounds like the Four Horsemen of the Apocalypse are scheduled for a return run......

War.........Pestilence........Famine.......Death
User avatar
Plantagenet
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 26765
Joined: Mon 09 Apr 2007, 03:00:00
Location: Alaska (its much bigger than Texas).

Re: An uneasy thought?

Unread postby BigTex » Tue 08 Apr 2008, 12:33:46

Bird flu mutation allowing easy human to human transmission WILL happen.

It's so certain that it's not even what I would call a "black swan" event.

It will, however, hit the world like a black swan event.

To me, it's the closest competition to peak oil when it comes to predictable doom scenarios (and in a peculiar way could actually mitigate peak oil fallout in many ways).

The Barenaked Ladies sang about it. Remember that song with the line about "Chinese chicken"?

That was a reference to bird flu.
:)
User avatar
BigTex
Intermediate Crude
Intermediate Crude
 
Posts: 3858
Joined: Thu 03 Aug 2006, 03:00:00
Location: Graceland

Re: An uneasy thought?

Unread postby Ludi » Tue 08 Apr 2008, 13:36:14

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Homesteader', '
')That is fine as far as it goes.


It's worked pretty well in Kerala province in India,where the birthrate is quite low due to population being an important issue in the province.

"Kerala's rate of population growth is India's lowest,[82]"

"Social reforms enacted in the late 19th century by Cochin and Travancore were expanded upon by post-independence governments, making Kerala among the Third World's longest-lived, healthiest, most gender-equitable, and most literate regions.[2][3] Though the state's basic human development indices are roughly equivalent to those in the developed world, the state is substantially more environmentally sustainable than Europe and North America.[4][5] Nevertheless, Kerala's suicide, alcoholism, and unemployment rates rank among India's highest.[6] A survey conducted in 2005 by Transparency International ranked Kerala as the least corrupt state in the country.[7]"

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kerala


Obviously not perfect, but it's something.
Ludi
 
Top

Re: An uneasy thought?

Unread postby PrairieMule » Tue 08 Apr 2008, 13:47:46

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('mos6507', 'M')ore people who want to be this guy:

Image

Hugo Drax plus
Image
The midget from Total recall equals
Image
Peter Dinklage?
If you give a man a fish you will have kept him from hunger for a day. If you teach a man to fish he will sit in a boat and drink beer all day.
User avatar
PrairieMule
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 2927
Joined: Fri 02 Sep 2005, 03:00:00
Location: In a Nigerian compound surrounded by mighty dignataries
Top

Re: An uneasy thought?

Unread postby ANewHuman » Tue 08 Apr 2008, 13:55:40

Bird Flu will kill in the millions, maybe in the early 100s of millions, but really, it's nothing. Neutron bombs, water poisoning, crop culling, all these methods can be used to kill people within days to weeks.

Water is probably the best, no one will notice really if it's poisoned and if they do, they will have to get water from other sources - meaning in 3 days most of them will be dead.
Introducing the human evolution.
User avatar
ANewHuman
Peat
Peat
 
Posts: 129
Joined: Sun 14 Oct 2007, 03:00:00

Re: An uneasy thought?

Unread postby BigTex » Tue 08 Apr 2008, 14:23:09

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('ANewHuman', 'B')ird Flu will kill in the millions, maybe in the early 100s of millions, but really, it's nothing.


Well, if the 1918 outbreak provides any guidelines, that outbreak is estimated to have killed 2.5%-5% of the world's population, or between 50 and 100 million people. (Spanish Flu)

That number today would be between 175 and 350 million.

But who are we kidding--it would be a lot worse today because the population is so much more mobile and there are so many more densely populated cities than there were in 1918.

Also, plan on governments covering it up, which will make it worse.

500 million dead is probably a reasonable estimate.

But remember, too, that with this type of flu the mortality is highest in young adults, so you would see a much higher mortality rate among people of child rearing age. Thus, not only would this be a dramatic population reduction event, it would also severely compromise future population growth as well.

It could also be the catalyst for all manner of other disruptive events that could lead to further population reduction.

Given that there is a smaller degree of human choice involved in the bird flu scenario than with the other scenarios you describe (neutron bomb, etc.), I think that there is a higher degree of inevitability to it, since choosing not to have it happen is not an option.

Overall, I disagree with your idea that "really, it's nothing."

It could be a big deal, and could be the gateway to bigger deals.

It's number 2 on my doom list.
:)
User avatar
BigTex
Intermediate Crude
Intermediate Crude
 
Posts: 3858
Joined: Thu 03 Aug 2006, 03:00:00
Location: Graceland
Top

Re: An uneasy thought?

Unread postby bodigami » Tue 08 Apr 2008, 14:31:43

...such a homogeneous genetic population; such vurnerable to virus and bacteria. I'm actually a bit surprised that there have not being massive deaths due to diseases in human population... I guess our medicine allowed this to build up and attack all at once (same diseases, now with better protection against our medicine plus some new diseases).
bodigami
Permanently Banned
 
Posts: 1921
Joined: Wed 26 Jul 2006, 03:00:00

Re: An uneasy thought?

Unread postby freefall » Tue 08 Apr 2008, 22:07:04

Nuetron bombs would be efficient mein fuhrer :)

That said, If they rocked the boat like that we would throw them out. It would be against their interests. A nasty microbial agent quitely introduced would not rock their boat but could meet their needs.

I also feel that a bird flu 'attack' would be launched in a country like china. To me it makes sense. Its eating up resources, has a less than great healthcare system and I guess it would be highly efficient if launched there. The west could hide behind a modern healthcare system. The 'rest' would presumably be doomed.
User avatar
freefall
Wood
Wood
 
Posts: 11
Joined: Fri 26 Oct 2007, 03:00:00

Re: An uneasy thought?

Unread postby bodigami » Wed 09 Apr 2008, 01:21:17

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('freefall', 'N')uetron bombs would be efficient mein fuhrer :)

That said, If they rocked the boat like that we would throw them out. It would be against their interests. A nasty microbial agent quitely introduced would not rock their boat but could meet their needs.

I also feel that a bird flu 'attack' would be launched in a country like china. To me it makes sense. Its eating up resources, has a less than great healthcare system and I guess it would be highly efficient if launched there. The west could hide behind a modern healthcare system. The 'rest' would presumably be doomed.


And China will let it happen without one single complaint. War psychopats doesn't have a clue. :lol:
bodigami
Permanently Banned
 
Posts: 1921
Joined: Wed 26 Jul 2006, 03:00:00
Top

Next

Return to Open Topic Discussion

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 2 guests

cron