by BigTex » Tue 08 Apr 2008, 14:23:09
$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('ANewHuman', 'B')ird Flu will kill in the millions, maybe in the early 100s of millions, but really, it's nothing.
Well, if the 1918 outbreak provides any guidelines, that outbreak is estimated to have killed 2.5%-5% of the world's population, or between 50 and 100 million people. (
Spanish Flu)
That number today would be between 175 and 350 million.
But who are we kidding--it would be a lot worse today because the population is so much more mobile and there are so many more densely populated cities than there were in 1918.
Also, plan on governments covering it up, which will make it worse.
500 million dead is probably a reasonable estimate.
But remember, too, that with this type of flu the mortality is highest in young adults, so you would see a much higher mortality rate among people of child rearing age. Thus, not only would this be a dramatic population reduction event, it would also severely compromise future population growth as well.
It could also be the catalyst for all manner of other disruptive events that could lead to further population reduction.
Given that there is a smaller degree of human choice involved in the bird flu scenario than with the other scenarios you describe (neutron bomb, etc.), I think that there is a higher degree of inevitability to it, since choosing not to have it happen is not an option.
Overall, I disagree with your idea that "really, it's nothing."
It could be a big deal, and could be the gateway to bigger deals.
It's number 2 on my doom list.