Donate Bitcoin

Donate Paypal


PeakOil is You

PeakOil is You

Trader's Corner 2007

Discussions about the economic and financial ramifications of PEAK OIL

Where will WTI crude be on DEC 31st 2007?

Poll ended at Thu 19 Apr 2007, 04:20:21

under $50 per barrel
5
No votes
around $55
0
0%
around $60
5
No votes
around $65
12
No votes
around $70
11
No votes
around $75
28
No votes
 
Total votes : 61

Re: Trader's Corner 2007

Postby MrBill » Thu 22 Nov 2007, 05:37:06

If the global economy is so strong that it can easily decouple from US growth then what is up with metals?
$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', '
')Base Metals
Quantifying the risk to base metals prices

The risks to the downside in base metals are mounting as US demand continues to fall while worries emerge over Chinese demand in coming months

Prices have been moving mostly sideways for the past two years

Metals prices have been largely rangebound, as a strong China has been offset by a weak US, allowing consumers to opportunistically enter and exit the market.

Demand and inventories - the key drivers in our models - may be at an inflection point

Backward looking data on metals demand is still firm, but forward looking indicators suggest the potential for an inflection point in demand and inventories.

Updating our metals price elasticities

To help in responding to the unfolding macro outlook for base metals demand over the next weeks and months, we quantify the sensitivity in prices to the shifts in the key fundamentals.

Source: Goldman Sachs Commodities Research
November 21, 2007

I am not quite sure how we quantify the sensitivity in prices to the shifts in the key fundamentals? But are not metals also quoted in those depreciating US dollars? Hmm?

Looking at crude prices that retreated from $99.29 yesterday, but look set to test the $100 mark, one has to ask themselves how much of that is demand and how much is the US dollar effect?

In a basket of currencies WTI looks like this from yearly lows to year to date highs...

USD +99%

CAD +67.5%
CHF +79%
EUR +75%
JPY +84%
SEK +78%
GBP +90%

We see 79% real rise in the price of oil, and about 20% due to the depreciation of the US dollar against this basket of currencies.

Just for the fun of it I wanted to see how some major stock markets have also performed YTD. All gains or losses are reported in EUR as opposed to local currency for comparison purposes.

USD (S&P500) -11%

CAD (TSX) +8%
CHF (SMI) -9%
EUR (DAX) +14%*
JPY (Nikkei) -16%
SEK (OMX) -11%

GBP (FTSE) -8.5%

So there seems to be no ready correlation between either developments in the price of oil, or currency appreciation or depreciation, and the performance of local stock markets YTD. No matter what links commentators may draw to those tenuous links at best.

What about China?

Oil in CNY +90%

and the Shenzhen Composite in EUR (SZCOMP) +129%

Wow! How high might it have been if oil prices had not gone up on average 75% in EUR?

But we also see almost no real appreciation of the CNY (or JPY) against the EUR or that basket of six major currencies excluding the USD either.

So once again I have to ask what's up with metals? Are they not supposed to be proxies for worldwide growth? Take copper, although up 9% YTD as measured in euros, it is well off its highs (-28% in EUR). It seems to be signalling slower global growth despite a weak US dollar.

I am not sure that a single data point weakens the case for decoupling from a possible recession in the USA, but it certainly does not strenthen the argument either.

Happy Thanksgiving Day to our American friends! ; - )


*DAX +14% but for other major EU bourses

CAC -3%
IBEX +8.5%
MIB -10%
AEI -2%

so clearly the DAX outperformed its peers


UPDATE: lotsa useful statistics, some of which I have not seen before, but beware of the slant and the conclusions....
$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', 'L')ast of all, China is providing a bonanza of cheap manufactured goods to developing nations - fueling an unprecedented consumer frenzy. The Chinese behemoth is rapidly displacing the US as the world's main source of capital, manufacturing and commodity demand, leading to a decoupling of the waning North American giant from the rest of the marketplace.

Source: Make way for the Chinese giant
The organized state is a wonderful invention whereby everyone can live at someone else's expense.
User avatar
MrBill
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 5630
Joined: Thu 15 Sep 2005, 03:00:00
Location: Eurasia

Re: Trader's Corner 2007

Postby Starvid » Thu 22 Nov 2007, 17:34:04

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('MrBill', 'I') told a Chinese girlfriend of mine who has made money in both real-esate and the stock market to please be very careful. But the Chinese love to gamble in any case, so up it goes, until it doesn't! ; - )

It seems I got really lucky with the timing of the sale of my PetroChina shares.

Bought them at $125, sold them at $250 and now they are back down at $180.

Image
Peak oil is not an energy crisis. It is a liquid fuel crisis.
User avatar
Starvid
Intermediate Crude
Intermediate Crude
 
Posts: 3021
Joined: Sun 20 Feb 2005, 04:00:00
Location: Uppsala, Sweden

Re: Trader's Corner 2007

Postby Starvid » Thu 22 Nov 2007, 17:42:07

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('MrBill', 'T')he S&P 500 is up a measely 1% year to date (YTD). That means it is down almost 10% YTD in euro terms. Not very impressive I am afraid.

At least it is up. The Stockholm stock exchange (OMX) is down about 10 %. Hehe, not in dollars though.

My Swedish holdings, two big investment/holding companies and a tiny local iron mining startup have been slaughtered, down 20-30 % since I bought them this spring.

One reason for that is the cursed Ericsson, another is that the other holdings have generally fallen more than they really should have. That's good as it means a further weakening of the global economy will hopefully not result in further radical falls.

And hey, with lower share prices the dividends will look bigger.
Peak oil is not an energy crisis. It is a liquid fuel crisis.
User avatar
Starvid
Intermediate Crude
Intermediate Crude
 
Posts: 3021
Joined: Sun 20 Feb 2005, 04:00:00
Location: Uppsala, Sweden

Re: Trader's Corner 2007

Postby drew » Thu 22 Nov 2007, 22:56:37

Completely off topic Mr Bill, (and Starvid) but I love your new avatar. The glowing halo strikes me as a bit Greek/Russian Orthodox/early Byzantine, which BTW is almost completely fitting for your present place of habitation. The monkey is good fun too.

As for the markets -yikes- although CIBC was looking rather sweet at $82 yesterday. That was around the point I bought it in '06. I dont think the banks are done bleeding yet, so I'll wait. Stupid CEF is making me some money, finally, just not enough yet.

A risky though for you; use the rest of my cash to buy BCE?? I'd get one more quarter of dividends (ex dec 14th) and the deal is supposed to finish in Jan 08. I'd profit about $3 bucks a share. The clincher is simple, the deal could fall through. How likely?? If the econ. really tanks does teachers have an escape clause? I bet they do. What do you think?

Drew
User avatar
drew
Tar Sands
Tar Sands
 
Posts: 953
Joined: Thu 22 Jul 2004, 03:00:00
Location: canada

Re: Trader's Corner 2007

Postby drew » Thu 22 Nov 2007, 23:07:17

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Starvid', 'M')y Swedish holdings, two big investment/holding companies and a tiny local iron mining startup have been slaughtered, down 20-30 % since I bought them this spring.



I feel your pain and more! Stupid uranium! I bought at pretty much the peak. Down 38% and counting since april. Come on Putin, cut everyone off!!


Drew
User avatar
drew
Tar Sands
Tar Sands
 
Posts: 953
Joined: Thu 22 Jul 2004, 03:00:00
Location: canada
Top

Re: Trader's Corner 2007

Postby topcat » Fri 23 Nov 2007, 00:11:39

Drew -- Trailing stops!
"No workey, no beef jerkey." TC

"Home is where the hot dogs are." TC
User avatar
topcat
Tar Sands
Tar Sands
 
Posts: 626
Joined: Wed 01 Feb 2006, 04:00:00
Location: Northern US

Re: Trader's Corner 2007

Postby MrBill » Fri 23 Nov 2007, 06:28:52

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('drew', 'C')ompletely off topic Mr Bill, (and Starvid) but I love your new avatar. The glowing halo strikes me as a bit Greek/Russian Orthodox/early Byzantine, which BTW is almost completely fitting for your present place of habitation. The monkey is good fun too.

As for the markets -yikes- although CIBC was looking rather sweet at $82 yesterday. That was around the point I bought it in '06. I dont think the banks are done bleeding yet, so I'll wait. Stupid CEF is making me some money, finally, just not enough yet.

A risky though for you; use the rest of my cash to buy BCE?? I'd get one more quarter of dividends (ex dec 14th) and the deal is supposed to finish in Jan 08. I'd profit about $3 bucks a share. The clincher is simple, the deal could fall through. How likely?? If the econ. really tanks does teachers have an escape clause? I bet they do. What do you think?

Drew


RE avatar. Thanks Drew. Bas was kind enough to make that up for me. To be honest I thought that my grinning 'where's Waldo' avatar might be starting to irritate people? But then again maybe it is just me? ; - )

I am a firm believer that global stock markets are headed lower, and that a potential recession in the USA will erode demand for energy, metals and commodities as well.

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', ' ')The Fed's downgrade of the U.S. growth outlook highlighted vulnerability of the world's biggest economy as defaults in subprime mortgages hit banks. Investors also fret about further possible write-downs as well as rising inflation from surging oil, commodity and food prices.

Gold has been a haven in times of crisis for centuries and is gaining in popularity as an alternative investment to currencies and bonds. It is seen as a hedge against inflation and rose in value during the Great Depression of the 1930s.


Source: Gold gains $6 on bargain hunting and Fed outlook



I do not buy the de-coupling theory at all. At best there will be a time lag of six to 12-months before Asian growth starts to falter too. That may be a few months after the Beijing Olympics next summer, but I think we will look back at 2007 as the start of the worst recession or world slowdown since The Great Depression.

I may have to wait until 2008 for confirmation of that, but the alternative is central banks slashing rates, flooding the world with excess money supply and re-igniting run away inflation. I do not think they are that stupid, but I cannot dismiss that they might make a mistake thinking that it is the lesser of two evils.

Therefore, although I remain on the post peak oil resource depletion bandwagon in the medium to long-term, in the short-term I am pretty confident that we will see better entry levels into most of these strategic trades.

The exception being the US dollar where I see continued weakness. But even there it is conceivable that we might see a pullback to $1.4040 before breaking through $1.5000. That might come about by concerted central bank intervention in the currency markets, but that is mere speculation on my part at the present. There is no fundamental reason why the US dollar should be stronger.

As an aside. There was a huge correction to EUR/CAD, eh? $1.3280 to $1.4710! Ten percent in two weeks. Maybe I should be buying some CAD now?

I am standing by my prediction of 1250 for the S&P 500 by year-end. Such weakness is not a supporting factor for the TSX, especially if metal and commodity prices also decline at the prospect of a steep economic slowdown in the USA. Therefore, although I do not know the specifics behind the BCE trade per se I am not a broad market buyer in any case. I am saving my powder for after we hit bottom and then may start higher.

Actually, I have to qualify that as well. I think we may see a New Year rally if we end the year on a weak note which I expect. Therefore, the closing days of 2007 may be a good bargain hunting time ahead of that expected bounce. But given the uncertainty, I would not allocate too much capital to that strategy. A little mad money, but no more. Especially, as I will be away for the first two weeks of January and therefore not in a position to closely monitor any larger positions.

We should know more on December 11th after the Fed makes their opinion clearer by either not cutting rates because they see the risk of inflation, or signalling that they are worried about a recession by dropping Fed funds. Neither higher inflation, and eventually higher interest rates, nor a US recession should be good for stocks. Although the prospect of a rate cut might spark a relief rally if stocks are already beaten down ahead of it.

At some point battered financial stocks are going to look attractive. I do not think at today's levels though. There is likely more bad news to come from the credit mess, but also as their revenues from normal lending fall as they tighten their credit standards. That will affect the real economy's ability to whether a slowdown without a full-blown recession.

By the way, I am not hung-up on the term recession, which technically means two consecutive quarters of zero or negative growth. I am more worried about a Japan moment where imbalances and excesses lead to years of low, slow, no growth in the overall economy. Heck, if we bounced back strongly in 2008 after just two quarters of flat growth I think a lot of policy makers would breathe a collective sigh of relief. No, I am talking about something deeper, nastier and longer lasting. Not just a lack of animal spirits, but kicking the beast hard while he is down.

If I were not worried about inflation then I would continue to be comfortable in cash. However, my nagging suspicion is that we will see stagflation, and I am not sure how to protect myself from that eventuality? For one I will be paying down my mortgage. It is not much, but it is one sure fire way to perserve wealth and free up future income for investment at the sametime. But other than living debt free the places to put idle cash elude me for the time being.

Have a great weekend and speak to you next week. Cheers.

UPDATE: the USD slide...
$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', ' ') -- Some Chinese shipyards are seeking
payment in euros as the dollar weakens, TradeWinds reported,
citing European brokers and an unidentified Greek shipowner.
Gezhouba Shipyard of Yichang and other ``emerging'' Chinese
shipbuilders have drawn up contracts with fees in both euros and
dollars, the newspaper said today.
The Bank of Korea on Nov. 11 urged yards in the world's
biggest shipbuilding nation to settle contracts in the won.
Japan, the second-biggest, plans to use the yen for new
contracts, the Shipbuilders' Association of Japan said Nov. 22.

Source: Nov. 23 (Bloomberg)

A friend of mine in Rotary imports clothing from China. That is a very exchange rate sensitive business for both suppliers and buyers. Her suppliers have also now started requesting payment in euro. Just a harbinger of things to come.
The organized state is a wonderful invention whereby everyone can live at someone else's expense.
User avatar
MrBill
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 5630
Joined: Thu 15 Sep 2005, 03:00:00
Location: Eurasia
Top

Re: Trader's Corner 2007

Postby MrBill » Mon 26 Nov 2007, 04:12:35

Posted for the benefit of some others that may have similiar concerns. Thanks.

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', 'H')ello,

well, I don't want to scare anyone because I do not have all the answers either. I just think that historically and relatively speaking everything is expensive right now. I cannot find anything to invest in that is not already too expensive. However, I am afraid of inflation too, so cash is not really the perfect option either.

So what to do? Pay down debt. Conserve cash. Take a conservative approach to all my investments. Diversify. If a market drops two-thirds, and your investments only drop one-third, then relatively speaking your purchasing power has increased by a factor of two.

There may be some that rush headlong into gold and silver, but I am not sure of that strategy myself. I think at very best a severe world slowdown or US recession may bring the price of all metals, including gold and silver, down, so one might see better entry levels. Even then I could not justify having more than say 5% in gold and silvers. Too many variables to consider. And they are not income earning investments.

I would like to increase my investments in real-estate and farmland, but those are tricky to find the right properties at the right prices. I do not want to overpay at what might be the top of that cycle as well. The Economist calls real-estate the biggest bubble ever. They are not usually alarmist, so one should keep that in the back of their mind when deciding to make the plunge.

Never the less, all things being equal, and they never are, governments tend to favor homeowners and shareholders over all others. This is inherently unfair to other taxpayers who might be renting, but this seems to be a self-evident truth. I cannot fight it. So my feeling is that central banks and governments will always in the end try to save homeowners and investors from their own mistakes in the name of stability. So I have to invest accordingly.

I have survived several emerging market meltdowns and currency crises over the years and the bottomline is that you have to invest your way out of a crisis as inflation and/or devaluation will erode the value of your savings. It is okay to have cash on the sidelines while you decide where to deploy it, but employ it you must eventually. I am a deer in the headlights at the moment, but I also know that I have to make some decisions soon, and that there is a great deal of uncertaintly no matter what direction I choose.

Therefore, an even-handed approach is probably better than an all or nothing bet at this point. Capital preservation is more important than having bragging rights over calling the market correctly. Take care and all the best.

Have a good week ahead. Cheers.

MrBill



UPDATE: comments by Larry Summers on the probability of a US recession and its impacts
$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', '[')b]The odds now point to a U.S. economic recession that slows global growth significantly even if necessary policy changes are implemented, former U.S. Treasury secretary Larry Summers said.

Summers, who served in the Democratic administration of former president Bill Clinton, said the U.S. authorities needed to act urgently in avert long-lasting economic damage from the global credit crunch.

"Without stronger policy responses than have been observed to date ... there is the risk that the adverse impacts will be felt for the rest of the decade and beyond," Summers wrote in a column in the Financial Times on Monday.


Source: Ex-U.S. Treasury head Summers says recession likely: report

Is it just me or does Larry Summers look like Hugo Chavez? ; - )

UPDATE II: Sputnik II or Kleptocrats Behaving Badly?
$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', 'R')ussia is once again thinking big – and Rusal’s plans signal that the country’s economic revival is entering a new phase. The steep economic decline of the 1990s, caused by the turbulent shift from communism to capitalism, is over. Gross domestic product will be around $1,200bn this year – six times higher, in nominal dollar terms, than in 1999. In real terms, GDP is finally back to its 1990 level, just before the Soviet collapse.

Source: Russia plans grand projects to become a top-five economy
The organized state is a wonderful invention whereby everyone can live at someone else's expense.
User avatar
MrBill
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 5630
Joined: Thu 15 Sep 2005, 03:00:00
Location: Eurasia
Top

Re: Trader's Corner 2007

Postby rostov » Tue 27 Nov 2007, 05:29:53

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('MrBill', '
')I am a firm believer that global stock markets are headed lower, and that a potential recession in the USA will erode demand for energy, metals and commodities as well.


$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('MrBill', 'T')here is no fundamental reason why the US dollar should be stronger.


$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('MrBill', 'W')e should know more on December 11th after the Fed makes their opinion clearer by either not cutting rates because they see the risk of inflation, or signalling that they are worried about a recession by dropping Fed funds. Neither higher inflation, and eventually higher interest rates, nor a US recession should be good for stocks. Although the prospect of a rate cut might spark a relief rally if stocks are already beaten down ahead of it.


$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('MrBill', 'I')f I were not worried about inflation then I would continue to be comfortable in cash. However, my nagging suspicion is that we will see stagflation, and I am not sure how to protect myself from that eventuality? For one I will be paying down my mortgage. It is not much, but it is one sure fire way to perserve wealth and free up future income for investment at the sametime. But other than living debt free the places to put idle cash elude me for the time being.


MrBill,

I want to express alongside your concern on stagflation (right now I'm still gathering proof of a deflationary cycle short term), but could I ask for advice on how the USA's recent 10-year yield (and thus the bond market rush to safety) fits into what you just said?

Last night's action was NASTY : I could not find a similar move (since my trading platform's 20-year history) whereby so much treasuries was bought after a few days (and weeks since mid July 2007) hard -- all within 1 day.

The bond market doesn't seem to buy the inflationary model, and therefore declaring their stand(?) on the Fed moves. FFR, IRX, etc are still on track, and provides very little insight on why the Fed would want to cut rates. What boggles my mind is why anyone would want to park their capital into a place with very little yield compared to the true inflation rate (we know the latter is really double digits).

I suspect this may also answer the global decoupling position these folks are buying. This is going to be hard to trade.
regards,
Rostov
"Some {} are more equal than others"
User avatar
rostov
Lignite
Lignite
 
Posts: 346
Joined: Sat 29 Jan 2005, 04:00:00
Location: New Zealand
Top

Re: Trader's Corner 2007

Postby MrBill » Tue 27 Nov 2007, 07:16:02

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('rostov', '
')
MrBill,

I want to express alongside your concern on stagflation (right now I'm still gathering proof of a deflationary cycle short term), but could I ask for advice on how the USA's recent 10-year yield (and thus the bond market rush to safety) fits into what you just said?

Last night's action was NASTY : I could not find a similar move (since my trading platform's 20-year history) whereby so much treasuries was bought after a few days (and weeks since mid July 2007) hard -- all within 1 day.

The bond market doesn't seem to buy the inflationary model, and therefore declaring their stand(?) on the Fed moves. FFR, IRX, etc are still on track, and provides very little insight on why the Fed would want to cut rates. What boggles my mind is why anyone would want to park their capital into a place with very little yield compared to the true inflation rate (we know the latter is really double digits).

I suspect this may also answer the global decoupling position these folks are buying. This is going to be hard to trade.


2y UST 3.00%
10y UST 3.89%
30y UST 4.30%

10y CAD 3.91%
10y Gilts 4.54%
10y Bunds 4.00%
10y JGB 1.48%

This is a classic flight to quality, but one has to assume that these investors are not parking their short-term capital in low yielding bonds with the intention of leaving it there, but as a safe store of value as they are genuinely afraid the stock market is tanking as the US slips into a recession in 2008.

So their time horizon is completely different. Witness the preference for shorter term maturities as seen in the 2y UST with a yield of just 3.00%. This barely covers official inflation much less currency risk. But if you are expecting a 10-20% pullback in equity markets then it is a good place to be in the short-term for capital preservation.

I would have been tempted into the Canadian Bonds (CAD) due to an almost identical yield in the 10y and greater chance of currency appreciation vis a vis the US dollar. EUR/CAD has appreciated 10% in the past 2-weeks, so it is an attractive entrty point even though against the US dollar that trade looks like its already been done.

However, as the US dollar carry trade comes back in vogue this will push the US dollar lower like we saw in the yen and the Swiss franc. At least while the early movers are putting on those trades.

I will try to post more later. But here are some good links I found today. Cheers.

Oil math

and

Oil: Key players and movements
The organized state is a wonderful invention whereby everyone can live at someone else's expense.
User avatar
MrBill
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 5630
Joined: Thu 15 Sep 2005, 03:00:00
Location: Eurasia
Top

Re: Trader's Corner 2007

Postby NTBKtrader » Tue 27 Nov 2007, 23:17:22

Any thoughts on the actions of Mr Rubin securing $7.5 from Abu Dhabi for Citi? The news greeted me with shock while the markets saw it as a positive, almost equally shocking to me. In my opinion, when the largest US bank has to send it's top political rep on an 11th hour mission to secure financing from a middle eastern country by promising to pay junk bond rates to shore up capital... something just ain't right. We all know that the subprime fiasco that started this entire issue won't even begin to subside until well into mid next year (judging by the credit suisse/deutsche bank arm resets graphs). By then panic will have stricken the markets and banks will be deathly afraid to lend to each other, car loans and credit cards will be having major issues and they are all ready. Foreclosures really haven't hit the streets yet but I predict will come in droves by mid next year.

I am one of those people that moved much of my investments into treasuries. I did so Monday. I am still holding several gold stocks, a mutual fund that invests in China although I am pondering taking my profits because I do believe the US slowdown/credit issues/and oil and food prices will start to effect the rest of the world.

I strongly feel that the write downs and credit issues are not even half way through, therefore I think some of the big mortgage lenders/banks with ties to sivs i.e. cfc, bsc, merrill, etc have only one way to go in the medium term and that is down. I was thinking about buying puts on bsc or merrill, it's an easy way to play what I think will happen without having too many chips in the pot.
User avatar
NTBKtrader
Tar Sands
Tar Sands
 
Posts: 600
Joined: Tue 19 Oct 2004, 03:00:00

Re: Trader's Corner 2007

Postby MrBill » Wed 28 Nov 2007, 04:10:20

NTBKtrader wrote:
$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', 'A')ny thoughts on the actions of Mr Rubin securing $7.5 from Abu Dhabi for Citi? The news greeted me with shock while the markets saw it as a positive, almost equally shocking to me. In my opinion, when the largest US bank has to send it's top political rep on an 11th hour mission to secure financing from a middle eastern country by promising to pay junk bond rates to shore up capital... something just ain't right.


First mover advantage I suppose? The best looking girls go home early with the most handsome men. If the writing is on the wall then best to get in early and secure the best deal possible. You do not want to be cap in hand after donor fatigue sets in.

What surprises me is that this values Citigroup at somewhere around $151 billion. Not very much for what was before one of the largest banks in the world. Their shareprice has slumped 45 percent so far this year. That makes any dead cat bounce look more impressive than it is. Just profit taking on short positions and some bottom fishers taking a punt. As you said, we have not likely seen the worst in the banking system yet.

But think about this. Citigroup has a beta of 1.25 against the SPX. They are down 45% from their peaks, which translates into minus 36 percent for the SPX if this historic beta holds true. We are currently just 11 percent off recent highs. So the market may have another 25 percent to fall or alternatively Citigroup may be oversold and there will be some convergence.

Call it another 12.5% left to slide for the broader market or 1230. My price target for the SPX is 1250 by year-end, but actually I see today that the technical level is 1269, which is the 0.382R of the move from 777 to 1579. Looking at the Bollinger bands then 2-standard deviations from the 21-week moving average gives me a bottom of 1226. So I get a range of 1225-1270 by various means.

UPDATE: the stuff I always seem to read after I have already posted ; - )
$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', ' ')The S&P 500 has declined at least 10 percent from a recent high 45 times since 1945, Bespoke analyst Justin Walters wrote in a research note yesterday. After crossing that threshold, the S&P 500 has on average slipped a further 7.8 percent. The index has dropped more than 20 percent, usually defined as a bear market, 11 times since 1945.


I think we would already be there had the Fed not started cutting in mid-August when we were testing first support at 1371. Further Fed rate cuts are likely now in my opinion to stabilize markets. But don't count on it. As I have said before I think the market is already preparing for year-end. Traders and fund managers that missed selling at or near the recent highs are now selling into rallies. There is very little new money outside of the ME entering the market. Also we will have hedge fund redemptions going into the end of December.

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', ' ')``The worry is that in a bear market mentality it's death by a thousand cuts, where good news becomes bad news and bad news becomes horrendous news,'' said Quincy Krosby, who helps manage $330 billion as chief investment strategist at the Hartford in Hartford, Connecticut. ``The market's message right now is sell when you can.''


Yesterday I spoke to a lot of European and US investment banks about funding issues. I also needed to secure quite a lot over year-end. I was successful, but that last little bit was expensive. The spread over LIBOR was about 36% more expensive than prior to the credit crisis in August. Some were offering me funding in euros because they could not guarantee dollar funding over the end of the year. Other repo traders were in emergency meetings with their Treasury departments to plan for liquidity issues at the end of December.

It is not a pretty situation. Three month LIBOR is 5.07% versus a Fed funds target rate of 4.50%. If you were paying 1.50% over LIBOR before you might be paying 2% now. If you can get funding? That is an all in rate of over 7% p.a. compared to bonds yielding 3-4% and a stock market (SPX) down 11% off its highs. I am positive that some banks and funds will not be able to fund themselves over year-end and so they will be forced to liquidate positions instead. And that is into a dearth of new buying.

That may set us up for a New Year's rally, but in the meantime it will be tough sledding this Christmas. Talk about climbing a wall of worry? More like a wailing wall! ; - )


UPDATE: a timely reminder on the limitations of relying on historical trends
$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', 'C')itigroup's reversal of a recommendation to buy shares of U.S. homebuilders, made just eight weeks ago, demonstrates the pitfalls of building forecasts on past performance.

Analyst Stephen Kim wrote in an Oct. 1 report that the builders' track record for the past three decades showed they were due for a rebound after losing 40 percent since late June.

There hasn't been a recovery this time. A gauge of companies in Standard & Poor's U.S. benchmark indexes, including the S&P 500, has lost 23 percent since the report was published.

``The prognosis is grim'' for sustaining the historical pattern, Kim wrote in a follow-up yesterday. He also said the stocks dropped to the lowest prices relative to book value, or the value of assets minus liabilities, in at least 20 years.

Source: Nov. 27 (Bloomberg)
The organized state is a wonderful invention whereby everyone can live at someone else's expense.
User avatar
MrBill
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 5630
Joined: Thu 15 Sep 2005, 03:00:00
Location: Eurasia
Top

Re: Trader's Corner 2007

Postby MrBill » Wed 28 Nov 2007, 11:54:47

If this works then I can substantially spruce up Trader's Corner with charts and graphs, but I may need some help and practice with re-sizing the images. Please be patient. Thanks.

Image

UPDATE: that seems to work with photobucket, so now I will see if I cannot link to my Bloomberg and Reuters.

Image

I do not want to use too much bandwidth, so I will sometimes still leave links as well. Thanks.

UPDATE: okay that image is too big for the page and it distorts the page width which makes reading the text tedious. does anyone know how I would re-size that Bloomberg page so it is smaller? thanks.
The organized state is a wonderful invention whereby everyone can live at someone else's expense.
User avatar
MrBill
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 5630
Joined: Thu 15 Sep 2005, 03:00:00
Location: Eurasia

Re: Trader's Corner 2007

Postby MrBill » Thu 29 Nov 2007, 07:41:50

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', 'C')anada: Trading with risk aversion.

The CAD has seen an abrupt change in fortunes following its decline close to 0.90 versus the USD. The CAD has fallen by close to 10% over the last three weeks due to a variety of factors not least of which has been the renewed increase in risk aversion. Concerns about Canadian economic growth have also contributed to pushing the CAD lower, with the Bank of Canada taking a more dovish monetary policy stance. The deterioration in sentiment has been revealed in the latest CTFC IMM positioning data, which shows a sharp drop in net long CAD positions to the lowest level since early May 2007. Is the long standing CAD rally over? It is difficult to conclude that it is just yet, but it is probably not too far from the end of the road for CAD appreciation. The CAD’s appreciation trend over recent months has been driven by a combination of factors including stronger commodity prices, the slide in the USD, and a shift in interest rate differentials with the US. The biggest driver at the moment however, is risk aversion and like other commodity bloc currencies the CAD has suffered as carry trades have been unwound. After having only a negligible correlation with the Calyon Risk Aversion Barometer over recent months, the last few weeks have seen a significant increase in correlation. The CAD managed to recover somewhat yesterday in line with the rise in global equity markets and drop in risk aversion. Given the prospects that market turbulence will persist over coming weeks it is likely that the CAD will remain vulnerable to a further decline, however. Much will also depend on general USD direction and given our view that the USD will recover over the course of 2008 this implies that the CAD will remain under pressure next year.

Source: research@uk.calyon.com

Image

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', 'E')urozone: Europe and the CNY – it’s good to talk?

ECB President Trichet’s announcement that the European and Chinese central banks are to immediately set up a working group to discuss currency issues is unlikely to prompt a sustained drop in EUR/CNY. Indeed, the recent discussion between officials doesn’t seem to have changed much. President Trichet seemed to suggest that China may allow the CNY to rise more against the EUR but Chinese Premier Wen Jiabo still highlighted a more gradual approach. So it seems that we are back where we started? Well perhaps not, the Chinese trip has at least allowed Trichet and the ECB to look concerned about the rise of the EUR – even though it helps them meet their primary goal of controlling inflation – and might deflect future political criticism that they are not doing enough to support activity. But is the CNY really such a problem? Admittedly, EUR/CNY has appreciated 52% since the start of 2002, but EUR/JPY has risen 43% and EUR/USD 69%. Hence, Premier Wen has a point when he stated that the EUR’s rise against the CNY was a reflection of a sharp drop in the USD. Indeed, since 2002 the correlation between EUR/CNY and the USD index has been just over 0.97. Unsurprising though, Europe remains worried about the widening trade deficit with China and concerned that it isn’t benefiting much from stellar Chinese growth. In 1989 China accounted for around 1.7% of both Eurozone exports and imports. By Q3 2007 China’s share of EMU exports had only risen to 4%, whilst it was responsible for almost 12% of imports into the region. Eventually a need to guard against an overheating economy will entail a rise in the CNY, but the focus on the currency hides the fact that a lot of the EMU export underperformance is due to the maintenance trade barriers. As long as these remain in place Europe’s deficit with China is unlikely to reverse swiftly, regardless of what the new working group discusses.

Source: research@uk.calyon.com

Image

UPDATE: on yesterday's post with regards to money market rates over year-end
$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', ' ')Soaring forward interest rates suggest borrowing costs will surge in global money markets toward year-end as commercial banks hoard capital.

The chart of the day shows the one-month rates one month forward for British pounds, euros and dollars. Forward borrowing costs have soared this month, with the charge for pounds climbing 102 basis points to 7.23 percent, compared with the Bank of England's key lending level of 5.75 percent.

The dollar rate has jumped 24 basis points to 5.49 percent, compared with the Federal Reserve's 4.5 percent target for overnight loans. The euro rate is up 25 basis points at 5.44 percent, higher than the European Central Bank's 4 percent benchmark lending rate.

``The rise that we've seen in the past two or three weeks now reflects credit risk,'' Bank of England Governor Mervyn King told a government committee today. ``There is great concern that in the future there may be further falls in asset prices that would impair the capital cushion of leading banks around the world. It is that concern, that fear that has been driving spreads up.''

The Bank of England said today it will auction emergency five-week funds on Dec. 6. The ECB said last week there's a ``re- emerging risk of volatility'' and that it will supply cash ``for as long as it is needed,'' while the Fed said this week it will ``provide sufficient reserves to resist upward pressure'' on borrowing costs around the turn of the year.

Forward rates are calculated from current rates. Traders can work out what the one-month yield would have to be in four weeks
time to generate identical returns for either a single two-month investment made today, or two separate investments, with one made today and the second a month later.

Source: Nov. 29 (Bloomberg)

p.s. once again sorry about the sizing issues. I know how annoying it is to have to scroll from left to right to read the entire post. Sorry.
The organized state is a wonderful invention whereby everyone can live at someone else's expense.
User avatar
MrBill
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 5630
Joined: Thu 15 Sep 2005, 03:00:00
Location: Eurasia
Top

Re: Trader's Corner 2007

Postby seahorse » Thu 29 Nov 2007, 12:04:42

Does anyone know of any publicly traded companies that are the actual producers of wheat, corn, or rice?
User avatar
seahorse
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 2275
Joined: Fri 15 Oct 2004, 03:00:00
Location: Arkansas

Re: Trader's Corner 2007

Postby MrBill » Thu 29 Nov 2007, 12:22:51

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('seahorse', 'D')oes anyone know of any publicly traded companies that are the actual producers of wheat, corn, or rice?


I don't? Which is why some investors may be seeking exposure to the ag sector via companies like John Deere? Or even ADM or Monsanto?
The organized state is a wonderful invention whereby everyone can live at someone else's expense.
User avatar
MrBill
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 5630
Joined: Thu 15 Sep 2005, 03:00:00
Location: Eurasia
Top

Re: Trader's Corner 2007

Postby Daryl » Thu 29 Nov 2007, 12:59:31

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('seahorse', 'D')oes anyone know of any publicly traded companies that are the actual producers of wheat, corn, or rice?


You might want to check out an ETF that trades under the symbol "DBC". I believe it tracks the CRB, a general commodity index. You will have to look up what percentage of that index consists of agriculturals, but I believe it is substantial. I avoid that ETF, though, because is has very low volume ie you won't get good pricing at all if you want to get out in a moving market. But for a long term hold, it should be alright.

By the way, nice looking charts, Mr. Bill. And a question. How does today's Euro rate translate back into the old $/DM rate? I can't remember how to do that. Are we past the old 1979 lows for the dollar yet? I believe that was around 1.76 DM or something.
User avatar
Daryl
Tar Sands
Tar Sands
 
Posts: 927
Joined: Mon 10 Oct 2005, 03:00:00
Top

Re: Trader's Corner 2007

Postby seahorse2 » Thu 29 Nov 2007, 16:14:37

Thanks Daryl I'll check it out.
User avatar
seahorse2
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 2042
Joined: Mon 18 Oct 2004, 03:00:00

Re: Trader's Corner 2007

Postby topcat » Fri 30 Nov 2007, 00:22:16

Another potential is 'MOO.' Put it on my watch list for some commidity-based reason, but cannot remeber why.

From the ticker, sounds like it may be dairy-based. Very recent fund.

Don't own, have not looked into, so all disclaimers apply.

TC
"No workey, no beef jerkey." TC

"Home is where the hot dogs are." TC
User avatar
topcat
Tar Sands
Tar Sands
 
Posts: 626
Joined: Wed 01 Feb 2006, 04:00:00
Location: Northern US

Re: Trader's Corner 2007

Postby eastbay » Fri 30 Nov 2007, 00:37:49

According to this website the ETF DBC consists of oil, heating oil, gold, aluminum, wheat and corn. I couldn't determine what percentage of this fund is in corn and wheat.

I was also hoping to invest in an ETF or a mutual fund focusing only on basic food commodities. Late last SEP when I went to cash for a month I conducted a bit of research to locate such a fund and it was unsuccessful. Too bad. I'm sure it exists, but I couldn't locate one.

No doubt many investors here and elsewhere would be interested in defending against inflation and potential looming basic food commodity scarcities with such an instrument.

This article dated 07NOV07 says light oil makes up 35% of DBC. That's all I could find before running out of time. i
Got Dharma?

Everything is Impermanent. Shakyamuni Buddha
User avatar
eastbay
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 7186
Joined: Sat 18 Dec 2004, 04:00:00
Location: One Mile From the Columbia River

PreviousNext

Return to Economics & Finance

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest

cron