by TonyPrep » Fri 18 Apr 2008, 05:03:35
$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('OilFinder2', 'I') am saying:
-- 1) There is plenty of oil to satisfy human wants for a very long time.
-- 2) At some point, human wants for oil will diminish, not because the earth is running out of oil, but because we've found a better substitute for it, or because we've learned to use it so efficiently that demand starts to decrease, and/or because human population starts to decrease (which is projected to happen around 2070 anyway). Or some combination of the above. It is impossible for me to say when all these factors might come together. As I said before, it could be 15 years, it could be 50 years, or maybe longer, I don't really know.
No one really knows, but we do have pointers.
Consumption is already ahead of production, so your first point is incorrect, at least at the moment. According to EIA figures, that has been the case for at least 2 years. IEA figures show a narrower gap, but still a gap.
Even if China and India rein in their growth in oil consumption, to, say, 3% per year, those two countries alone will require an extra 6 million barrels a day in 15 years. At current growth rates, that would be 10 million barrel per day extra. If other countries' economies don't collapse, the extra amount of oil required, worldwide, would be about 21 million barrels per day, in 15 years (at 1.5% growth rate).
As the premature announcement of the 33 billion barrel find in Brazil, which may turn out to be much lower, has shown, people are desperate for more oil. OPEC is being entreated by world leaders to increase production but they continue to bleat the self-fulfilling reason that demand is falling. There is no reason to believe that Aramco can increase production significantly and Russian output is predicted to fall this year. You are basing your hopes for 15 to 50 years of growth on a cluster of small discoveries each year.
If CERA is correct, current producing fields will be declining at 4.5% per year. In 15 years, that's 43 million barrels per day gone from production. So you are hoping to see an extra 64 million barrels per day, in 15 years, to cover declines and the required additions. You then suggest it could be 50 years before oil production can't meet demand or until some better fuel is found. The former is wrong (it is already wrong and an extra 64 mbpd is a dream) and the latter (that a better alternative is found) requires a lot of crossed fingers. It also requires that no other limits are hit on the way.
It's amazing that you can keep believing but I guess the desire to do so is very strong in most people.