Donate Bitcoin

Donate Paypal


PeakOil is You

PeakOil is You

THE Petrobras Thread (merged)

General discussions of the systemic, societal and civilisational effects of depletion.

Re: Credit crunch hits Petrobras

Postby jamest » Mon 01 Dec 2008, 12:17:57

If the oil importing nations of the world were smart (they're not), they would offer to guarantee the financing against a share of future production.

It is very much in the long term interest of importing nations to see projects like this proceed smoothly.
User avatar
jamest
Peat
Peat
 
Posts: 92
Joined: Sat 08 Nov 2008, 04:00:00

Re: Credit crunch hits Petrobras

Postby Spanktron9 » Mon 01 Dec 2008, 12:22:30

Jamest

I agree on both counts. When the effects of slowing production growth run into the steepening depletion curve, all the money in the world won't put gas in your tank.
Who are you going to turn to when all the crazy Peak-oil doomers end up being right?
User avatar
Spanktron9
Lignite
Lignite
 
Posts: 243
Joined: Tue 03 Jun 2008, 03:00:00
Location: Terrified beyond the capacity for rational thought

Re: Credit crunch hits Petrobras

Postby ReverseEngineer » Mon 01 Dec 2008, 12:49:02

I think the idea here is to wait until Brasil goes Bankrupt, then pick up their oil fields for pennies on the dollar. Why invest to get only a piece of the action when you can wait and get the whole deal later at a cheaper price?

Reverse Engineer
User avatar
ReverseEngineer
Intermediate Crude
Intermediate Crude
 
Posts: 3352
Joined: Wed 16 Jul 2008, 03:00:00

Re: Credit crunch hits Petrobras

Postby Spanktron9 » Mon 01 Dec 2008, 15:38:48

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('ReverseEngineer', 'I') think the idea here is to wait until Brasil goes Bankrupt, then pick up their oil fields for pennies on the dollar. Why invest to get only a piece of the action when you can wait and get the whole deal later at a cheaper price?

Reverse Engineer


RE

That is sound in theory, but it is based on the belief that BRazil would de-nationalize its Oil industry. A move I don't see as likely, regardless of price pressure.
Who are you going to turn to when all the crazy Peak-oil doomers end up being right?
User avatar
Spanktron9
Lignite
Lignite
 
Posts: 243
Joined: Tue 03 Jun 2008, 03:00:00
Location: Terrified beyond the capacity for rational thought

Petrobras: Tupi Oil ‘Viable’ at Current Price

Postby JohnDenver » Tue 23 Dec 2008, 20:42:39

Petrobras CEO Says Tupi Oil ‘Viable’ at Current Price (Update2)

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', 'D')ec. 22 (Bloomberg) -- Petroleo Brasileiro SA, Brazil’s state-controlled oil company, said the offshore pre-salt oil fields, including Tupi, the largest discovery in the Americas since 1976, remain viable even after crude prices plunged.

“The pre-salt is viable at $40 to $50 a barrel,” Chief Executive Officer Jose Sergio Gabrielli said today. “We are also in an environment where the costs of production are likely to fall, we don’t know when, but they are likely to fall.”
JohnDenver
Intermediate Crude
Intermediate Crude
 
Posts: 2145
Joined: Sun 29 Aug 2004, 03:00:00

Re: Petrobras: Tupi Oil ‘Viable’ at Current Price

Postby dukey » Tue 23 Dec 2008, 20:45:43

well the WTI spot price is 33 dollars per barrel currently
lol
User avatar
dukey
Intermediate Crude
Intermediate Crude
 
Posts: 2248
Joined: Sun 20 Feb 2005, 04:00:00

Re: Petrobras: Tupi Oil ‘Viable’ at Current Price

Postby TheDude » Tue 23 Dec 2008, 23:52:34

Petrobras has shown essentially flat production for 3 years, even after almost 1 mb/d production additions - 640 kb/d in 2007 alone. No future years show additions at that level; it's not out of the question that they're about to peak.
Cogito, ergo non satis bibivi
And let me tell you something: I dig your work.
User avatar
TheDude
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 4896
Joined: Thu 06 Apr 2006, 03:00:00
Location: 3 miles NW of Champoeg, Republic of Cascadia

Re: Petrobras: Tupi Oil ‘Viable’ at Current Price

Postby JohnDenver » Wed 24 Dec 2008, 02:49:25

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('TheDude', 'P')etrobras has shown essentially flat production for 3 years, even after almost 1 mb/d production additions - 640 kb/d in 2007 alone.


Those stats don't pass the smell test. Here's 180kbd of your 640kbd for 2007:

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', 'P')etrobras says that platform P-52 departed from the BrasFels shipyard in Angra dos Reis, Rio de Janeiro, on Saturday, September 9th, towards the Angra Bay, where it will undergo testing and adjustments. After this stage is concluded, the unit will set sail towards the Roncador field, in the Campos Basin, where it will be anchored and connected to the wells.

The P-52 will be capable of producing up to 180,000 barrels of oil and of compressing 9.3 million cubic meters of natural gas per day. The platform is expected to go online in October and to reach top production in the second half of 2008.Link


As you can see, that 180kbd was barely ramping up at the end of 2007, and would be better attributed to 2H 2008. The megaprojects database is riddled with problems like that because it doesn't take into account the production profile. Here's a classic example: according to the database, Mexico added 500kbd from Ku-Maloob-Zap in 2005, even thought the peak year for that expansion is 2010.

BTW, I detected the above problem with your figures in about 5 minutes of cursory checking. I'm sure there's more where that came from.
JohnDenver
Intermediate Crude
Intermediate Crude
 
Posts: 2145
Joined: Sun 29 Aug 2004, 03:00:00

Re: Petrobras: Tupi Oil ‘Viable’ at Current Price

Postby efarmer » Wed 24 Dec 2008, 10:15:05

I can't wait for these sources to come on line if only
just for the advertising value. My yota wagon will really
be a grizzled elder by then. I can see the sign on the
station now:

"We have Tupi and Ku-Maloob-Zap on tap for your hoopty car."
User avatar
efarmer
Intermediate Crude
Intermediate Crude
 
Posts: 2003
Joined: Fri 17 Mar 2006, 04:00:00

Re: Petrobras: Tupi Oil ‘Viable’ at Current Price

Postby TheDude » Wed 24 Dec 2008, 11:06:38

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('JohnDenver', 'A')s you can see, that 180kbd was barely ramping up at the end of 2007, and would be better attributed to 2H 2008.


That's not really much of a difference quantitatively, though, given what we're seeing for results.

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', 'T')he megaprojects database is riddled with problems like that because it doesn't take into account the production profile. Here's a classic example: according to the database, Mexico added 500kbd from Ku-Maloob-Zap in 2005, even thought the peak year for that expansion is 2010.


I wouldn't call it a "problem," more of a necessary shortcoming. You could graphically display how production is spread out over x number of years and compute means, if so inclined. Another shortcoming is taking the producer's word that the posted peak rate will be what they say in the first place, too. I'm impressed by how closely the Wiki figures are tracking actual production.

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', 'B')TW, I detected the above problem with your figures in about 5 minutes of cursory checking. I'm sure there's more where that came from.


Erm, more of what? I just take the data from the Wiki and articles like GM Morton's and do a bit of light postulating. The dates for true peak production are listed in the Wiki, if anyone wants to scrutinize more closely. This is what Brazil will be bringing online in the coming years for bulk production:

Image
Image

2010 will be the closest to the 2007 volumes, '08 and '09 fall much shorter. This is why I'm speculating that they could peak, barring a raft of new platforms coming online, or gaps in the Wiki data, or above ground factors, or new production ramping up slower than would be expected. As it stands average Crude/NGL production from Petrobras for '06-'08 has been 1.919 mb/d, 1.918 mb/d, 1.975 mb/d (YTD). That's from their website, and should take you another 5 minutes to check if you still think I'm just a scaremongering pessimist. :roll:
Cogito, ergo non satis bibivi
And let me tell you something: I dig your work.
User avatar
TheDude
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 4896
Joined: Thu 06 Apr 2006, 03:00:00
Location: 3 miles NW of Champoeg, Republic of Cascadia
Top

Re: Petrobras: Tupi Oil ‘Viable’ at Current Price

Postby copious.abundance » Wed 24 Dec 2008, 15:40:18

The bulk of the supply additions from the big pre-salt fields in the Santos basin won't come online until the 2nd half of the 2010's. Heck, they haven't even made any production plans for Sugar Loaf/Carioca yet, and rumor has it that one is several times the size of Tupi. The Wiki megaprojects list, as TheDude shows above, only goes through 2015. Even Tupi won't be at peak production by then. The recent supply additions by Petrobras in Brazil have largely been from some smaller and medium-sized fields in the Espirito Santo and Campos basins.
Stuff for doomers to contemplate:
http://peakoil.com/forums/post1190117.html#p1190117
http://peakoil.com/forums/post1193930.html#p1193930
http://peakoil.com/forums/post1206767.html#p1206767
User avatar
copious.abundance
Fission
Fission
 
Posts: 9589
Joined: Wed 26 Mar 2008, 03:00:00
Location: Cornucopia

Re: Petrobras: Tupi Oil ‘Viable’ at Current Price

Postby copious.abundance » Wed 24 Dec 2008, 15:44:10

BTW here is Brazil's crude oil and liquids production through October.

Image
Stuff for doomers to contemplate:
http://peakoil.com/forums/post1190117.html#p1190117
http://peakoil.com/forums/post1193930.html#p1193930
http://peakoil.com/forums/post1206767.html#p1206767
User avatar
copious.abundance
Fission
Fission
 
Posts: 9589
Joined: Wed 26 Mar 2008, 03:00:00
Location: Cornucopia

Re: Petrobras: Tupi Oil ‘Viable’ at Current Price

Postby TheDude » Wed 24 Dec 2008, 19:15:53

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('OilFinder2', 'T')he Wiki megaprojects list, as TheDude shows above, only goes through 2015.


There are subpages out to 2020, mostly empty by then at this stage of course. They don't document what hasn't been announced.

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', 'E')ven Tupi won't be at peak production by then.


They list the Tupi platform for block Santos BM-S-11 coming online in 2013 and hitting peak production two years later. The Tupi pilot project is 100 kb/d next year. Of course Petrobras may announce plans to install more platforms for the field at later dates, to meet their proposed 1 mb/d goal.
Cogito, ergo non satis bibivi
And let me tell you something: I dig your work.
User avatar
TheDude
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 4896
Joined: Thu 06 Apr 2006, 03:00:00
Location: 3 miles NW of Champoeg, Republic of Cascadia
Top

Re: Credit crunch hits Petrobras

Postby jamest » Thu 01 Jan 2009, 18:59:38

[quote]

BRASILIA, Brazil (AP) — China wants to loan Brazil's state oil company $10 billion to help develop massive new oil fields in deep water off the coast of Rio de Janeiro, Brazil's top energy official said in comments published Monday.

Mines and Energy Minister Edison Lobao also told the Folha de S. Paulo newspaper that the United Arab Emirates has offered to finance field development, but he did not specify a price tag.

Lobao said Chinese officials contacted his ministry to propose a loan and Petrobras then negotiated directly with the Chinese. He gave no details on the status of talks, and any deal would have to be approved by his ministry.

Petrobras, in an e-mailed statement to The Associated Press, didn't confirm a China deal, but said the company has historically searched for "varied sources of financing" and that recent deals will be included in its new investment plan, expected in the coming weeks.

Lobao told the privately run Agencia Estado news agency other countries also wanted to participate: "It's not just China. It's a range of opportunities that Petrobras has."

Lobao said the ministry has talked with a Japanese consortium, Canadian banks and various foreign oil service companies who want to invest in or work on offshore finds. He offered no other details.

Brazil also is ready to tap its foreign reserves to offer a credit line for exploration by Petroleo Brasileiro SA if needed, he added. Lobao's ministry confirmed the comments, but a spokesman did so only on condition of anonymity in keeping with department policy.

Lobao spoke as many Brazilian companies are being cut off from international credit, which has tightened in the global financial crisis. The minister and other top government officials have repeatedly said the crisis will not effect the exploration of the offshore oil reserves, which could hold up to 80 billion barrels of oil.

Petrobras says it has discovered 50 billion to 80 billion barrels of reserves over the past year and is gearing up to spend hundreds of billions of dollars during the next 30 years to extract the light crude.

Lobao said investment would not be hurt as long as oil prices stay above $30 per barrel. But other officials have put the price from $35 to $60 a barrel for deep-water exploration to remain viable.

Light, sweet crude for January delivery was up $2.89 to $43.70 a barrel in electronic trading Monday on the New York Mercantile Exchange.

Petrobras' American depository shares were up 7.8 percent Monday in New York, or $1.40 to $19.34. [quote]


http://www.google.com/hostednews/ap/art ... wD94UPIHO0
User avatar
jamest
Peat
Peat
 
Posts: 92
Joined: Sat 08 Nov 2008, 04:00:00

Re: Credit crunch hits Petrobras

Postby Spanktron9 » Thu 01 Jan 2009, 19:31:49

Matt Simmons has commented in several video interviews that the level of technical complexity to even reach these fields, let alone make them economically viable has never been attempted an the reservoirs are so deep that the are very near the mantle of the earth.

To further address RE's point. Letting Brazil go belly up puts the timeline of bringing those fields into production so far back, that the ensuing shortages could cripple the production effort.
Who are you going to turn to when all the crazy Peak-oil doomers end up being right?
User avatar
Spanktron9
Lignite
Lignite
 
Posts: 243
Joined: Tue 03 Jun 2008, 03:00:00
Location: Terrified beyond the capacity for rational thought

Re: Credit crunch hits Petrobras

Postby lawnchair » Thu 01 Jan 2009, 22:19:53

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Spanktron9', '
')That is sound in theory, but it is based on the belief that BRazil would de-nationalize its Oil industry. A move I don't see as likely, regardless of price pressure.


I could see them de-nationalizing for cash. Sure. But, who can promise they won't re-nationalize and seize fields again in the future? A little more stable than Mexico or Venezuela, perhaps, but it's happened so many times before.
At 1% annual growth, human bodies will incorporate every gram in the observable universe in approximately 10,170 years.
User avatar
lawnchair
Tar Sands
Tar Sands
 
Posts: 866
Joined: Wed 20 Oct 2004, 03:00:00
Top

Re: Credit crunch hits Petrobras

Postby Tyler_JC » Thu 01 Jan 2009, 22:39:14

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('lawnchair', '')$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Spanktron9', '
')That is sound in theory, but it is based on the belief that BRazil would de-nationalize its Oil industry. A move I don't see as likely, regardless of price pressure.


I could see them de-nationalizing for cash. Sure. But, who can promise they won't re-nationalize and seize fields again in the future? A little more stable than Mexico or Venezuela, perhaps, but it's happened so many times before.


I wouldn't invest in a newly privatized Brazilian oil company, would you?

South America has shown its unwillingness to play by the rules, unfair as they may be in the eyes of some.

Look at the number of Latin American countries that have defaulted on their sovereign debt in the past 20 years. Ecuador this year. Argentina in 2001. Brazil in 1999. Mexico in 1994.
"www.peakoil.com is the Myspace of the Apocalypse."
Tyler_JC
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 5438
Joined: Sat 25 Sep 2004, 03:00:00
Location: Boston, MA
Top

Re: Credit crunch hits Petrobras

Postby copious.abundance » Thu 01 Jan 2009, 23:37:19

Not this again . . . *sigh* This is old news by now.

People need to read the articles at the top of this page here, and in particular pay attention to ROCKMAN's first post on that page.

Petrobras will be releasing its 5-year spending plan (probably) this month. Only then shall we shall see how and if the credit crunch actually affects them.
Stuff for doomers to contemplate:
http://peakoil.com/forums/post1190117.html#p1190117
http://peakoil.com/forums/post1193930.html#p1193930
http://peakoil.com/forums/post1206767.html#p1206767
User avatar
copious.abundance
Fission
Fission
 
Posts: 9589
Joined: Wed 26 Mar 2008, 03:00:00
Location: Cornucopia

Re: Credit crunch hits Petrobras

Postby AirlinePilot » Sat 03 Jan 2009, 14:29:58

OF,

You need to spend a little part of your day over at TOD. Make sure you read all of the Daily "Drumbeat" articles.

Its becoming painfully evident that the global economic crisis is already having a fairly large impact on your cornucopian outlook. I know its hard for you to see past those big blinders your wearing but open up your horizon a bit.
User avatar
AirlinePilot
Moderator
Moderator
 
Posts: 4378
Joined: Tue 05 Apr 2005, 03:00:00
Location: South of Atlanta

Re: Credit crunch hits Petrobras

Postby ROCKMAN » Mon 05 Jan 2009, 13:12:46

A couple of points worth considering. Above all else, the BZ gov't isn't developing these fields in the first place. They are being developed by public companies with Petrobras (owned 50% or so by the BZ gov't) being just one. My client is one of the other operators developing Deep Water fields down there as well as are a number of other US and foreign companies. If Petrobras is having a cash flow problem it’s as likely to do as much with their high activity level as anything else. I haven’t seen the stat for a while but a couple of years ago Petrobras had more offshore drilling rigs (175) under contract the next 6 largest operators combined. They also have long term leases on 80% of all the rigs in the world that can drill in water depths greater then 7000’. As far as the BZ gov't goes it's all positive cash flow: they get the front end bonus payments as well as the royalty payments. They pay for nothing. If the BZ gov’t didn’t have a peso development would probably move along even faster (they would be motivated to give up a bigger piece of the pie). In fact, when prices peaked last summer the gov’t announced they weren’t going to offer any more leases to anyone (including Petrobras) in the red-hot Santos basin. The gov’t was going to contract the drilling/development and own it 100%. If they are getting short on capital they might now reconsider that plan.

But, to be sure, the drop in oil prices will definitely slow up progress. But not right now. If a company has truly proven reserves (what the independent bank auditors say...not the company talking heads) then the banks will throw a certain amount of $'s at them based upon today's price. Some rig builders might not be able to finance new construction but exploration and development hasn't taken a hit...YET. The time lines for these projects are years long so they can't be modified much in the short term (6+ months). Now if oil stays low for a year+ then we should start seeing some strategic changes.

Nationalization isn’t the big fear it use to be…at least for the very big companies like Exxon and Shell. Folks like Hugo can take away all the production they want from legitimate owners. But the World Court does function fairly well in such matters these days. It might take 15 to 20 years for an issue to be resolved but it does happen now. The biggest stick damaged parties have to use is the threat of legal action against parties who buy their “stolen” production. It is a meaningful threat these days.

Though it goes against my income potential I see a silver lining to any slow down in the development of new fields. This new production never was going to prevent PO but if current pricing stretches it out those projects another 5+ years they may be coming on at a truly critical time….not like the little hiccup we had last summer. They can never stop the inevitable but perhaps they’ll allow a softer landing (which will still likely be harsh IMO).
User avatar
ROCKMAN
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 11397
Joined: Tue 27 May 2008, 03:00:00
Location: TEXAS

PreviousNext

Return to Peak Oil Discussion

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 9 guests