Donate Bitcoin

Donate Paypal


PeakOil is You

PeakOil is You

THE International Energy Agency (IEA) Thread pt 1 (merged) A

Discuss research and forecasts regarding hydrocarbon depletion.

Re: Winter Outlook Report 2005

Postby Typhoon » Thu 27 Oct 2005, 15:35:48

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Trindelm', 's')o we could be one cold-snap away from an economic meltdown?


Yes, I strongly feel that there will be an economic recession in 2006. (Perhaps a better word is "depression" considering that getting out of it will be a long-term problem.)

However, it may be fortunate if we're peaking right now. Predictions such as those by Koppelaar and Laherrere indicate a peak in the middle of the next decade, but they show the decline becoming steep quite quickly. I believe that the decline rate has the potential to become very steep, but if we're peaking right now, we might have several years of 1%-2% decline, followed by a gradual acceleration of the decline rate. We might even have a short plateau instead of a peak. Up until now, we've generally had more production from new oil projects than decline from existing fields. In the first post-peak year, that decline will of course outdo the new production, but only by a slight amount. The change could be somewhat more abrupt, for example, if we have a production collapse from Saudi Arabia.

I also think there's a decent chance we're not peaking right now, but we will be in the next two or three years. In that case, a recession in 2006 is possible, but not very likely. Sustained $70 or even $80 oil will not do it. We need triple-digit prices to trigger a recession. We probably won't get triple-digit prices until it's clear that we're peaking, unless there is a massive supply disruption. Maybe I am wrong, since a continuation of slow production increases that is outstripped by demand might allow oil prices to go way higher. It all depends on the elasticity of oil demand.
User avatar
Typhoon
Peat
Peat
 
Posts: 176
Joined: Tue 27 Sep 2005, 03:00:00

Re: Winter Outlook Report 2005

Postby Trindelm » Thu 27 Oct 2005, 17:29:18

Not if the government keeps meddling with oil prices to keep them artificially low. Being left of center, even I am aware that there should be balance between government intervention and Laissez Faire (sp?).
Trindelm
Peat
Peat
 
Posts: 96
Joined: Tue 14 Jun 2005, 03:00:00

Re: Winter Outlook Report 2005

Postby Typhoon » Thu 27 Oct 2005, 17:43:22

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Trindelm', 'N')ot if the government keeps meddling with oil prices to keep them artificially low. Being left of center, even I am aware that there should be balance between government intervention and Laissez Faire (sp?).


I think that there has indeed been some market manipulation going on. However, we'll see prices go up soon enough. I'll make the exact same prediction as Michael Economides: by Christmas eve, natural gas will be at $20/mmbtu. I'll also predict that WTI crude oil will be at $100 per barrel sometime in 2006, but there could easily be a spike this winter if it is clear that things are getting really bad.
User avatar
Typhoon
Peat
Peat
 
Posts: 176
Joined: Tue 27 Sep 2005, 03:00:00

Re: Winter Outlook Report 2005

Postby DamienJasper » Thu 27 Oct 2005, 18:19:06

Then of course there's what Ruppert said about a meltdown just weeks away. Who really cares if we're not going to make it until Christmas?
User avatar
DamienJasper
Lignite
Lignite
 
Posts: 200
Joined: Tue 22 Mar 2005, 04:00:00
Location: Pocatello

Re: Winter Outlook Report 2005

Postby ubercynicmeister » Thu 27 Oct 2005, 19:35:33

Welcome thomasjpaul!

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('thomasjpaul', '.')..Is published on the 7th November. See: 2005.http://www.iea.org/Textbase/publication ... BS_ID=1540

The IEA (International Energy Agency) concluded in its Winter Outlook Report 2004 that “. . . global production of conventional oil will not peak before 2030 if the necessary investments are made.”


Heck, now there's an insight into the IEA and it's ultimate way of "hedging one's bets". The relevant bit is of course the part about "if the necessary investments are made.”

This tells us three things:

#1. The IEA now accepts Peak Oil as inevitable. The only argument is now over the date - soon (2005~06) or late (2030);

#2. Things will get rough on the Oil production front if the necessary investments are NOT made, and therefore Oil will Peak in production before 2030 if those self same investments are not made;

#3. Given that the investments haven't been made (if they have then the IEA would not be saying that part about "necessary investments") then we can see Oil peaking somewhat before 2030.

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', 'T')wo questions about this:

1. Are they likely to change that assessment in this year's outlook?
2. Why did they conclude with 2030 when Mr. Simmons concludes 2005. What did they do differently?

(This is my first post... I hope I have maintained all due forum ettiquette)


Yes, the ettiquette is exquisite, LOL, pardon my levity.

The questions need not be asked. The give-away line (and their "hedging") is in the line about "if the necessary investments are made.” They would not have put that line in at all, Unless They Were Covering Their Arses.

I can imagine the fiollowing uncomfortable conversation in the White House at some future point:

US President: OK, is this Peak Oil thing - has it happened?

IEA: Yes, Mr President, it has.

US President: Then why didn't you warn us?

IEA: Well, on page 9743 (Appendix C, sub-appendix ix, paragraph 74, subparagraph vii, section 2, subsection 2.1.13) of our Winter Outlook Report of 2005, we clearly state that in order to avoid these problems, more investment needed to be made...


Get the picture?

Note Well: that line about necessary investment - please don't think it means "investment in the Oil Industry". That's the beauty of such a line. It could mean: Investment in Non Oil Energy Sources....Investment In Bigger Armies To Take Control Of The World's Remaining Oil...Investment in Bunkers to survive the Post Peak Oil collapse.

All of these things are investments. They all fulfill the concept of "avoiding" Peak Oil, both in the sense of "prevention" and also in the sense of "evasion".
User avatar
ubercynicmeister
Tar Sands
Tar Sands
 
Posts: 640
Joined: Sun 25 Jul 2004, 03:00:00
Location: Hunter Valley, New South Wales, Australia

Re: Winter Outlook Report 2005

Postby rogerhb » Thu 27 Oct 2005, 19:43:39

I like the president giving the oil companies old Army bases and congress giving them tax concessions to build new refineries and they are still not biting.

Still not prepared to "make the necessary investments".
"Complex problems have simple, easy to understand, wrong answers." - Henry Louis Mencken
User avatar
rogerhb
Light Sweet Crude
Light Sweet Crude
 
Posts: 4727
Joined: Mon 06 Sep 2004, 03:00:00
Location: Smalltown New Zealand

Re: Winter Outlook Report 2005

Postby thomasjpaul » Fri 28 Oct 2005, 05:48:31

Cheers Guys! :D

I'll tell you what prompted my question. Thiswas a reply given to an opposition MP by the UK Energy Minister about the government's estimate of when global production of conventional crude oil will peak (see below):

"The Government's assessment of the remaining lifespan of global oil reserves is set out in the Energy White Paper 2003 “Our energy future—creating a low carbon economy” (http://www.dti.gov.uk/energy/whitepaper/index.shtml). Paragraph 6.15 of the White Paper notes that"“Globally, conventional oil reserves are sufficient to meet projected demand for around 30 years, although new discoveries will be needed to renew reserves. Together with non-conventional reserves such as oil shales and improvements in technology, there is the potential for oil reserves to last twice as long”."This is consistent with the latest assessment by the International Energy Agency (IEA) in its 2004 World Energy Outlook. The IEA concludes that"“. . . global production of conventional oil will not peak before 2030 if the necessary investments are made.”"The Government remain committed to working with producers, consumers and the international community to improve the conditions for investment in the international oil sector, as well as implementing policies to maximise the economic recovery of the UK's own oil (and gas) reserves and to ease the UK economy away from power supplied primarily through fossil fuel supply. We are also supporting efforts to promote greater transparency in reporting of global oil reserves."

If the UK is committed to the Winter Energy Outlook, and the Winter Energy Outlook 2006 continues to predict a 2030 peak, it is unlikely that the British government will revise their estimates.

I think they are wrong to blindly follow what the IEA say: but the problem is that I can't find any other similarly respected organisation making oil predictions. If I did we could ask specifically about why the Minister uses one set of predictions and not the other. Can anyone help me?
User avatar
thomasjpaul
Wood
Wood
 
Posts: 3
Joined: Thu 27 Oct 2005, 03:00:00

Re: Winter Outlook Report 2005

Postby RdSnt » Fri 28 Oct 2005, 12:48:12

I'm not sure why a UK report would include oil shale development. You don't have any oil shale there do you?
The significant oil shale that I know of is in the US west and whatever production comes from there will never make it out of the US, nor will it be a meaningful amount.
Gravity is not a force, it is a boundary layer.
Everything is coincident.
Love: the state of suspended anticipation.
To get any appreciable distance from the Earth in
a sensible amount of time, you must lie.
User avatar
RdSnt
Heavy Crude
Heavy Crude
 
Posts: 1461
Joined: Wed 02 Feb 2005, 04:00:00
Location: Canada

Re: Winter Outlook Report 2005

Postby Ngy » Sun 30 Oct 2005, 21:12:38

Hey gang, my concern is in the amount of heating oil stored and being prepared for this winter. Are we ready for when we get a cold spell? Some say yes, others say we are no way near to being ready, but that is being kept hush hush. What ye say?
User avatar
Ngy
Wood
Wood
 
Posts: 1
Joined: Sun 30 Oct 2005, 03:00:00

Re: Winter Outlook Report 2005

Postby thomasjpaul » Mon 31 Oct 2005, 10:43:06

Shale is the UK governments concern because when they do their budget forecasts they have to take into account global conditions. Currently, based on this document which I now have sitting in front of me (unread as yet!) , the Uk gov't does not believe there is an impending peak in global production. If they did they woudl act very differently!

Winter in the UK: If it gets a cold as it was in 1986/7 or lower there are likely to be gas shortages - as gas demand is basicalyl inelastic during a cold winter. thsi will affact business most. If it gets much colder, as the MET office have indicated it might, it may affect electrictity generation. The National Grid's Winter Outlook Report is available here.Winter Outlook Report
User avatar
thomasjpaul
Wood
Wood
 
Posts: 3
Joined: Thu 27 Oct 2005, 03:00:00

IEA warns of 50% oil price rise by 2030

Postby UncoveringTruths » Thu 03 Nov 2005, 12:09:03

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', 'T')he IEA said Saudi Arabia would need almost to double current output of 10m b/d to meet the expectations of demand in 2030. But Mr Birol said the kingdom might muster the long-term political will only to produce just over half the extra barrels deemed necessary.

Iran and Iraq are also vital to ensuring adequate oil and natural gas supplies in the next 25 years. But both face political hurdles to achieving the necessary investment. Many Middle East countries fear that investing heavily in new oil supplies will deplete fields too quickly and cut revenues by depressing oil prices.

Mr Birol said: “We may end up with much less oil from the Middle East than we demand. There is substantial risk of substantially high oil prices if current investment in the Middle East is not stepped up substantially. “Such high oil prices would be an additional trigger for major consuming nations to introduce policies to save oil and look for alternative sources. If they don't, the global economy but mainly the economies of the consuming nations will suffer.”


IEA warns of 50% oil price rise by 2030

Same old song and dance.
It's a cold cold world when a man has to pawn his shoes.
User avatar
UncoveringTruths
Tar Sands
Tar Sands
 
Posts: 887
Joined: Thu 04 Nov 2004, 04:00:00
Top

Re: IEA warns of 50% oil price rise by 2030

Postby FoxV » Thu 03 Nov 2005, 12:47:35

well at least they are making the new step of saying there are issues with oil supply by 2030.

however their 50% increase by 2030 doesn't even cover inflation. I think if Demand was 5mb/d more than supply (as they suggest in their report) you could probably add an extra "0" to that 50% (our pre Katrina supply/demand situation of +1mb/d gave us a 100% increase)

but as you say 'Truths, this is just more IEA jibbering
Angry yet?
FoxV
Heavy Crude
Heavy Crude
 
Posts: 1321
Joined: Wed 02 Mar 2005, 04:00:00
Location: Canada

Re: IEA warns of 50% oil price rise by 2030

Postby nero » Thu 03 Nov 2005, 13:11:34

I think this is progress. At least the IEA is no longer using Saudi Arabia as a plug factor to fill any possible gap that occurs in their supply and demand forecasts. Movement like this helps enormously in arguments with politicians or bureaucrats. Previously all these people had to do was say "Look, we trust the International Energy Agency and they say there isn't going to be a problem" and that would be the end of the discussion. Now the discussion continues.
Biofuels: The "What else we got to burn?" answer to peak oil.
User avatar
nero
Heavy Crude
Heavy Crude
 
Posts: 1433
Joined: Sat 22 May 2004, 03:00:00
Location: Ottawa, Ontario

Re: IEA warns of 50% oil price rise by 2030

Postby nth » Thu 03 Nov 2005, 13:12:21

Why can't they just say that we will run out of oil around 2030?

That is what they are inferring... that without Middle East oil production doubling by 2030, we have to find alternatives or have massive demand destruction.
User avatar
nth
Heavy Crude
Heavy Crude
 
Posts: 1978
Joined: Thu 24 Feb 2005, 04:00:00

Re: IEA warns of 50% oil price rise by 2030

Postby frankthetank » Thu 03 Nov 2005, 13:40:47

We have to 2030? Great...more time to get prepared.

I'll be an old man by then, so i'll let you youngsters grind me up into fuel to power your SUV.

NOT! :-D
User avatar
frankthetank
Light Sweet Crude
Light Sweet Crude
 
Posts: 6202
Joined: Thu 16 Sep 2004, 03:00:00
Location: Southwest WI

Re: IEA warns of 50% oil price rise by 2030

Postby IslandCrow » Thu 03 Nov 2005, 13:58:34

They have moved a lot in the year. See the quote I that I took from one of their web pages:

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', 'T')he key assumptions underpinning the projections of the 2004 edition include:

GDP is assumed to grow worldwide by an average 3.2% per year over the period 2002 to 2030.

The world's population is assumed to expand by 1% per year, from 6.2 billion in 2002 to over 8 billion in 2030.

The average IEA crude oil import price is assumed to fall back from current highs to $22 (in year-2000 dollars) in 2006. It will remain flat until 2010 and then begin to rise steadily to $29 in 2030.
User avatar
IslandCrow
Heavy Crude
Heavy Crude
 
Posts: 1272
Joined: Mon 12 Sep 2005, 03:00:00
Location: Finland
Top

Re: IEA warns of 50% oil price rise by 2030

Postby Trindelm » Thu 03 Nov 2005, 14:10:07

Warning?

I find this an optimistic prediction
Trindelm
Peat
Peat
 
Posts: 96
Joined: Tue 14 Jun 2005, 03:00:00

Re: IEA warns of 50% oil price rise by 2030

Postby Grimnir » Thu 03 Nov 2005, 15:54:57

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Trindelm', 'I') find this an optimistic prediction


Yeah; A 50% increase over 25 years would be expected from nothing worse than 1.5% annual inflation.
Grimnir
Tar Sands
Tar Sands
 
Posts: 851
Joined: Mon 04 Oct 2004, 03:00:00
Location: USA
Top

Re: IEA warns of 50% oil price rise by 2030

Postby aahala » Thu 03 Nov 2005, 16:26:37

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('frankthetank', 'W')e have to 2030? Great...more time to get prepared.

I'll be an old man by then, so i'll let you youngsters grind me up into fuel to power your SUV.

NOT! :-D


I couldn't tell from your post if it was a reference to the Mark Twain account or not, but for the uninformed, Twain wrote of travels to the old world and said they were using mummies to power the railroads. Over the years, Twain's name dropped out and the idea appeared occassionally in more legitimate publications as having some factual basis which of course
it did not.
User avatar
aahala
Tar Sands
Tar Sands
 
Posts: 944
Joined: Thu 03 Feb 2005, 04:00:00
Top

Re: IEA warns of 50% oil price rise by 2030

Postby The_Virginian » Thu 03 Nov 2005, 17:38:31

What is it April 1st already? :P

Will "they" manage us all the way down to the end?

At what time will "reality" set in, and all this "environmentalisim" and "Efficiency" be exposed as ineffective makeup that neither solves the problem, nor covers the wart.
[urlhttp://www.youtube.com/watchv=Ai4te4daLZs&feature=related[/url] "My soul longs for the candle and the spices. If only you would pour me a cup of wine for Havdalah...My heart yearning, I shall lift up my eyes to g-d, who provides for my needs day and night."
User avatar
The_Virginian
Heavy Crude
Heavy Crude
 
Posts: 1684
Joined: Sat 19 Jun 2004, 03:00:00

PreviousNext

Return to Peak oil studies, reports & models

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 0 guests

cron