by americandream » Sat 15 Jan 2011, 18:43:18
$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('vtsnowedin', '')$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('americandream', 'I') don't know who is the more naive. Peak Oil doomers who actually believe that they see warning signals of a capitalism, which is in ebullient expansionary mode, on the brink of imminent collapse, or denialists who believe that this dog and pony show has a future of any sort, Singularity devices included.

Is it naive to think that adding three billion people to a planet that has six billion already will not go well?
Is it naive to think that the end of cheap oil ,peak or not, will put a damper on the economy ?
Is it naive to think that human ingenuity might yet again stave off global starvation if we have the brightest minds out of seven billion people working the problem?
Just what I was waiting for. Corporatism masquerading as human ingenuity.
Developing product lines that, as one of their objectives, help feeds the 9 billion whilst systematically unravelling the organic basis of background life by virtue of their packaging, transport, limited shelf life and other mechanisms designed to propel their fast circulation through the profit system (profit being the major objective), with the resultant leakages in continental run-off that sees the oceans/atmosphere being leeched by massive quantities of a variety of pollutants (which there is ample reading for on the Net), is NAIVE, capitalised.
We can use the 7 billion to plumb for the stars, in fact. I have no doubts about our capacity to be creative. Not within capitalism however. There lies the rub.