Donate Bitcoin

Donate Paypal


PeakOil is You

PeakOil is You

THE Detroit Thread (merged)

A forum for discussion of regional topics including oil depletion but also government, society, and the future.

Re: Detroit : No way to shrink a city

Unread postby Fishman » Thu 03 Jan 2013, 15:17:22

"And what would a Republican mayor have done differently? Free enterprise, an unfettered marketplace sent the jobs to Japan." No, auto jobs still do quite well in none union states. The vast overentitlement , corrupt Dem machine crushed Detroit.

The rest translated
Do not answer that the Unions were the fault( I don't want you to actually bring up the obvious cause). The high cost of living (brought on by unions) in America is the fault. We can never compete with slave wages in slave countries that don't depend expensive infrastructure (but overpaying folks here is a great idea). YOU want freeways, skyscrapers, malls, endless air-conditioning and heating, large McMansion AND free trade AND plenty of work AND a free markets (and the Dems wanted unlimited entitlement with no one actually having to work). But YOU (Detroit apparently) can not have it all. Something had to give. It gave.(Sucks that's it consistently Democratic managed cities)
Obama, the FUBAR presidency gets scraped off the boot
User avatar
Fishman
Intermediate Crude
Intermediate Crude
 
Posts: 2137
Joined: Thu 11 Aug 2005, 03:00:00
Location: Carolina de Norte

Re: Detroit : No way to shrink a city

Unread postby Fishman » Thu 03 Jan 2013, 15:25:25

Pops, sorry to have to disagree with you again, but Detroit is pure Democratic, if it fails its clear who is the cause. The question with peak oil will be who best leads us down the slope. Detroit is a perfect example of post peak oil,/carbon reduction/ downsizing done the Democratic Party way.
Obama, the FUBAR presidency gets scraped off the boot
User avatar
Fishman
Intermediate Crude
Intermediate Crude
 
Posts: 2137
Joined: Thu 11 Aug 2005, 03:00:00
Location: Carolina de Norte

Re: Detroit : No way to shrink a city

Unread postby Tanada » Thu 03 Jan 2013, 16:01:42

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Pops', 'A')nyway, I'll vote for containerized shipping and computer networks.

Capital has from day one arbitraged labor - paying less for labor than the labor produced is the definition of profit. America was founded by capitalists exporting labor to exploit the resources here. The New England mills were imported from Olde England before they were exported to the south until they were outsourced to Asia.

Couple things, if Capital doesn't arbitrage labor and pay less than it generates then it goes bankrupt pretty soon. Only Governments and charity can pay labor more than the value labor adds to the bottom line.
Also Old England fought tooth and nail to keep New England a consumer of good and producer of resources, it just happens that a mill worker memorized how to build a mill and them emigrated to the colonies. Anyone caught bringing blueprints was subject to jail time but he had the plans memorized so he got through.$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', '
')
It took containerized shipping to reduce the price of transport to a level that allowed capital to access overseas labor and it took computer networks to enable real-time logistics control on the other side of the world.
That is partially true, but good record keeping allowed resource extraction quite handily from the undeveloped area's of the world. It was only when the poor area's became independent and wanted their own manufacturing that containerized cargo and real time shipping became important.$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', '
')
Geographic specialization is the logical outgrowth of cheap energy.


I agree with this one, cheap energy and cheap transport took us from fruits being canned and hauled all over to fresh fruit being hauled all over instead. There was a time not that long ago that fruits like Peaches and Apples were only available in season fresh, the rest of the time you had canned or did without. Now a huge proportion of fruits are shipped to the opposite hemisphere out of season just to satisfy demand. The same kind of effect makes it possible for one or two factories to make all the computer chips used in thousands of locations across the entire planet instead of every country having its own producer.

To get back to Detroit, a great many mistakes were made by the local council and mayor, for 20 years there was a positively hostile attitude towards business and people who were the wrong color for the mayors taste. In the late 1990's different attitudes were voted into office but so much damage had been done it took a decade to mend fences. Now the city has had a couple good mayors, but in between they had Kwame Kilpatrick as mayor and his corruption trial is still dragging on. Detroit has been pounded by bad politics for a long time, but she is far from dead. She just needs to shed her tattered housing and restore sensible attitudes towards business and she can be reborn.
$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Alfred Tennyson', 'W')e are not now that strength which in old days
Moved earth and heaven, that which we are, we are;
One equal temper of heroic hearts,
Made weak by time and fate, but strong in will
To strive, to seek, to find, and not to yield.
Tanada
Site Admin
Site Admin
 
Posts: 17094
Joined: Thu 28 Apr 2005, 03:00:00
Location: South West shore Lake Erie, OH, USA

Re: Detroit : No way to shrink a city

Unread postby Pops » Thu 03 Jan 2013, 17:10:04

Detroit is the perfect example of free markets.

Capital eliminated labor to the extent possible and when that was not profitable enough it moved to where labor was cheaper, unorganized and desperate for a job.

How can a market get any freer than that?

The problem of course is that in the process it also eliminated it's customers.


The ownership class sees class war on wage earners as a good thing because it increases profit. The problem being, since owners won not only the war to bust unions etc and cap wages at the level of the 1970s, they also won the war to reduce their tax liability, which of course kinda leads us to where we are today.

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', 'T')he capitalists’ all out assault to reduce direct and indirect wages was highly successful (and involved trade union busting, outsourcing, offshoring and eventually globalization). As a result, real wages started to stagnate since the seventies. This situation worsened as public expenditures that were important for the reproduction of the labor force were cut and condemned. Increased indebtedness (and a higher debt burden) ensued as wages stopped being the key reference for the reproduction of the proletariat.

Eventually, profit rates recovered. But by the late eighties, the institutions that had supported the previous wage norm (the period of Keynesianism) had been destroyed. Capitalists had been extremely successful and had no interest in restoring those institutions. The degree of their success can be gauged by the magnitude of today’s crisis. In this framework, class struggle sets the stage for indebtedness and plants the seed for the current financial crisis.

http://triplecrisis.com/understanding-t ... al-crisis/

@tanada
I didn't say capitalism can exist without profit, what I implied was capitalism can't exist without consumers. There has always been a struggle between the owners and the workers and since the '70's or so the momentum has shifted to the owners dramatically. I think it would be hard to overestimate the effect containerized shipping had in reducing the ability of the wage earner to bargain. The labor pool has in effect been extended to include the entire world.
The legitimate object of government, is to do for a community of people, whatever they need to have done, but can not do, at all, or can not, so well do, for themselves -- in their separate, and individual capacities.
-- Abraham Lincoln, Fragment on Government (July 1, 1854)
User avatar
Pops
Elite
Elite
 
Posts: 19746
Joined: Sat 03 Apr 2004, 04:00:00
Location: QuikSac for a 6-Pac
Top

Re: Detroit : No way to shrink a city

Unread postby noobtube » Fri 04 Jan 2013, 12:59:04

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Fishman', 'P')ops, sorry to have to disagree with you again, but Detroit is pure Democratic, if it fails its clear who is the cause. The question with peak oil will be who best leads us down the slope. Detroit is a perfect example of post peak oil,/carbon reduction/ downsizing done the Democratic Party way.


So, I suppose Republicans, with that magical, mythical, mystical fairy dust would have stopped the de-industrialization of the United States.

If anything, you could say things would be a LOT WORSE under Republican mayors.

After all, it was the Republican Presidents (Nixon, Reagan) who were in charge when the United States began its massive offshoring and globalization push.

It amazes me how someone can be so partisan that they ignore obvious facts because it doesn't fit their blind view of Republican good/Democrat bad.

They are labels, that is all. It's like saying Coke wouldn't make you sick because Pepsi is so much better. They are still sugar water and they are all politicians.

Politicians to the rescue, I suppose.
noobtube
Lignite
Lignite
 
Posts: 287
Joined: Fri 04 Jan 2013, 12:48:54
Top

Re: Detroit : No way to shrink a city

Unread postby Revi » Fri 04 Jan 2013, 13:48:40

Plantagenet asked:

"Can someone please answer the question?

When do you think heavy industry, and specifically the bloody automobile industry, will die? Will it be dead by 2015? 2020? 2030? When exactly?"

They are dead already. Remember? They have been on life support since the big auto bailout. Tell me they are making money now. Really? The car companies are all being supported by governments all over the world. They are like the railroads were at the beginning of the 20th century. Cars will still be around, but they are already obsolete. Better to invest in drones or iphones or something.
Deep in the mud and slime of things, even there, something sings.
User avatar
Revi
Light Sweet Crude
Light Sweet Crude
 
Posts: 7417
Joined: Mon 25 Apr 2005, 03:00:00
Location: Maine

Re: Detroit : No way to shrink a city

Unread postby Cloud9 » Fri 04 Jan 2013, 17:14:11

Detroit is what happens when a system that is built on exponential growth comes into contact with limits. We can blame crony capitalism, corruption, unions, and even nepotism, but the bottom line is we are on the back slope of peak oil. The water is draining out of the pool and to steal a line from Nassim Taleb, it’s becoming apparent who went into the water without any cloths.
User avatar
Cloud9
Intermediate Crude
Intermediate Crude
 
Posts: 2961
Joined: Wed 26 Jul 2006, 03:00:00

Re: Detroit : No way to shrink a city

Unread postby Pops » Fri 04 Jan 2013, 17:36:20

I see Detroit is more an artifact of "progress" rather than of decline. Like pstarr said initially, car manufacture has moved on. The great lakes were the transport hub of the past and the fact that the car business grew up in Detroit made it the logical center of the car business - until transportation became less of a constraint than labor.

Not everyone thinks globalization is keen or even progress but there is no doubt that it has made products cheaper and it has definitely made Detroit shrink.

I wonder what would be an alternative to Detroit as the city best epitomizing the post-peak world?
The legitimate object of government, is to do for a community of people, whatever they need to have done, but can not do, at all, or can not, so well do, for themselves -- in their separate, and individual capacities.
-- Abraham Lincoln, Fragment on Government (July 1, 1854)
User avatar
Pops
Elite
Elite
 
Posts: 19746
Joined: Sat 03 Apr 2004, 04:00:00
Location: QuikSac for a 6-Pac

Re: Detroit : No way to shrink a city

Unread postby Newfie » Fri 04 Jan 2013, 17:46:42

I sure don't want to get into this Blue/Red argument but I have to wonder, is there some larger lesson to be learned here?

I'm not so much interested in WHY it failed but HOW it went down? Don't care much for blame, how do we deal with the reality?

I expect many of our cities to fail in the future. It would be interesting and informative to know more about what the trip down the sewer was like for those living there.

Any insights?
User avatar
Newfie
Forum Moderator
Forum Moderator
 
Posts: 18651
Joined: Thu 15 Nov 2007, 04:00:00
Location: Between Canada and Carribean

Re: Detroit : No way to shrink a city

Unread postby Pops » Fri 04 Jan 2013, 19:37:45

I think a person could look at any hamlet or ag focused small town, at least in America and see exactly the same story. Good roads, cheap transportation and no jobs sent people elsewhere.

In Detroit, cheap transportation enabled cheap labor and once the good jobs at union scale left, the small business and the menial jobs at minimum wage dried up as well.

In the small ag towns were all the trades necessary to keep the farm and the town itself running, from shoes to silos and at some scale the shoe salesmen and silo operators too. But once the migration to town jobs (in Detroit) started and then the small diversified farms became unprofitable and the remaining inhabitants started to commute and spend money in the city the little towns dried up.

The rust belt town is a duplicate of the corn belt town 30 years before. Both succumbed to cheap transportation, geographic specialization and labor arbitrage.
The legitimate object of government, is to do for a community of people, whatever they need to have done, but can not do, at all, or can not, so well do, for themselves -- in their separate, and individual capacities.
-- Abraham Lincoln, Fragment on Government (July 1, 1854)
User avatar
Pops
Elite
Elite
 
Posts: 19746
Joined: Sat 03 Apr 2004, 04:00:00
Location: QuikSac for a 6-Pac

Re: Detroit : No way to shrink a city

Unread postby Tanada » Fri 04 Jan 2013, 19:52:38

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Newfie', 'I') sure don't want to get into this Blue/Red argument but I have to wonder, is there some larger lesson to be learned here?

I'm not so much interested in WHY it failed but HOW it went down? Don't care much for blame, how do we deal with the reality?

I expect many of our cities to fail in the future. It would be interesting and informative to know more about what the trip down the sewer was like for those living there.

Any insights?


I grew up in the shadow of Detroit, in the 1970's and early 1980's a lot of manufacturing jobs moved south and west to Texas and California. There were whole neighborhoods you could drive through, block after block and perfectly sound abandoned houses. Now you can drive through those same neighborhoods but only one house in 20 is owner occupied, the rest are tumbled down, derelict, burnt out or occupied by people you really don't want to spend time with. When I was a kid int he 1970's you could still go to downtown Detroit and shop at Hudson's world headquarters, it caught fire about 20 years ago and was demolished to build the new stadiums for the Tigers and Lions along with a bunch of other buildings. Late in the 1990's or early 0's Hudson's was bought out by Macy's. Detroit had the oldest Thanksgiving Day parade in the country, sponsored by Hudson's. When I was growing up we would watch the two competing parades, Hudson's in Detroit and Macy's in NYC.

Starting in the late 1970's there was the People Mover project, it was supposed to be an elevated transit system based on the D.C. Metrorail system except for being elevated everywhere instead of subway style. The corruption on the project was so bad that it took almost 20 years to get the base loop around downtown completed and none, zip-zero-nada of the connector legs ever got built to link all of the suburbs back together. From the 1920's to the late 1950's there was a transit rail linking Toledo, Ohio with Novi, a northern suburb of Detroit, it was bought out by automotive interests who wanted less competition and much of the right of way was resold to Detroit Edison which built high tension lines in the right of way and new powerplants in the 1960's and 1970's between Toledo and Detroit to feed power into the grid down that power line right of way. It became harder to get to Detroit because when they built the freeway system they meant it for trucks and if you drive it, it shows. Michigan allows heavier trucks than almost any state in the Union and as a result the roads grow potholes quicker than you would believe as soon as the first flaw appears. Corruption was again a major problem, some of the feeder routes like I-275 and I-75 have been rebuilt three times since 1985, and I mean rebuilt as in they dig everything out and layer in new gravel, new rebar and pour new cement then cap it with asphalt. The parts they did three times were substandard and didn't last for beans, maybe they finally got it right.
As people moved out of the city proper into the suburbs out out to thew southwest in pursuit of jobs the tax base collapsed. Instead of retrenching and retooling to fit within the budget the city instead raised taxes on those who remained, which meant everyone who could afford to move was motivated to do so. For a very long time the city has not plowed snow off of the neighborhood streets unless it was a deep fall all at once, and if it was it would take them two or three weeks to get it cleaned up. Meanwhile you would get stories about elderly people without power or heat because repair crews couldn't get into some locations until snow removal was done.
Gosh writing about this brings back a lot of depressing memories, in the big blizzard of 1978 there were people stranded who froze to death, though probably only a score or so, not the thousands people think of these days when you call a weather event a disaster.

Well that is the way I remember the decline and decay of Detroit, others may remember it differently. I never lived there, but we were always 'in the shadow' because if you wanted to go to a cultural event or a major league sporting event or the annual auto show you had to go to Detroit to do it. They had a great zoo and a great museum of fine art back in the day, but the zoo as I understand it has fallen on hard times and nobody seems to care about art anymore. The whole of Belle Isle was park like with a smaller zoo and lots of activities for kids but now even that is bankrupt.
$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Alfred Tennyson', 'W')e are not now that strength which in old days
Moved earth and heaven, that which we are, we are;
One equal temper of heroic hearts,
Made weak by time and fate, but strong in will
To strive, to seek, to find, and not to yield.
Tanada
Site Admin
Site Admin
 
Posts: 17094
Joined: Thu 28 Apr 2005, 03:00:00
Location: South West shore Lake Erie, OH, USA
Top

Re: Detroit : No way to shrink a city

Unread postby Lore » Fri 04 Jan 2013, 20:27:44

Fear not, Governer Rick Snyder is busy trying to push in one of his chosen Gestapo like emergency managers there to sell off what's left of the assets from a former great US city that use to represented the nations middle class.

Detroit has the smell of death. A precursor and warning to the rest of the country. You don't have to ask why it happened there because now it's happening everywhere.
The things that will destroy America are prosperity-at-any-price, peace-at-any-price, safety-first instead of duty-first, the love of soft living, and the get-rich-quick theory of life.
... Theodore Roosevelt
User avatar
Lore
Fission
Fission
 
Posts: 9021
Joined: Fri 26 Aug 2005, 03:00:00
Location: Fear Of A Blank Planet

Re: Detroit : No way to shrink a city

Unread postby SamInNebraska » Fri 04 Jan 2013, 20:41:47

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Lore', '
')
Detroit has the smell of death. A precursor and warning to the rest of the country. You don't have to ask why it happened there because now it's happening everywhere.


Interesting, Detroit made the news this evening (ABC). Apparently the auto manufacturers have been doing better, rather than worse, in the improving economy and this is hoped to have trickle down effects in Detroit.
SamInNebraska
Lignite
Lignite
 
Posts: 313
Joined: Sun 14 Oct 2012, 23:05:58
Top

Re: Detroit : No way to shrink a city

Unread postby Lore » Fri 04 Jan 2013, 21:12:09

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('SamInNebraska', '')$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Lore', '
')
Detroit has the smell of death. A precursor and warning to the rest of the country. You don't have to ask why it happened there because now it's happening everywhere.


Interesting, Detroit made the news this evening (ABC). Apparently the auto manufacturers have been doing better, rather than worse, in the improving economy and this is hoped to have trickle down effects in Detroit.


Those hopeful for cities like Detroit are turning into members of a cargo cult. They build spec buildings in the outer ring industrial parks, praying for a business to land.

The trickle of business, in truth, is falling on parched earth. Sucked up and distributed to the diverse and thirstiest of the cheapest labor and manufacturing markets. Detroit was the lesson of a one trick pony that is on its way to the glue factory.
The things that will destroy America are prosperity-at-any-price, peace-at-any-price, safety-first instead of duty-first, the love of soft living, and the get-rich-quick theory of life.
... Theodore Roosevelt
User avatar
Lore
Fission
Fission
 
Posts: 9021
Joined: Fri 26 Aug 2005, 03:00:00
Location: Fear Of A Blank Planet
Top

Re: Detroit : No way to shrink a city

Unread postby The Practician » Fri 04 Jan 2013, 21:17:14

Steve over at Economic Undertow recently did a series of Posts centered around Detroit. well worth a read although you might want to space them out. the links are in order of first to last.

http://www.economic-undertow.com/2012/1 ... -business/

http://www.economic-undertow.com/2012/1 ... g-economy/

http://www.economic-undertow.com/2012/12/15/model-city/
The Practician
Lignite
Lignite
 
Posts: 270
Joined: Wed 20 Jul 2011, 22:08:02

Re: Detroit : No way to shrink a city

Unread postby Newfie » Fri 04 Jan 2013, 23:01:50

Thanks Tanda,

I have lived or worked in Phila. Since 78. Back then I got around the city more because I worked maintenance jobs or construction. Now I work in an office building and walk to work.

It appears to me that the slums are not as bad as they were back then. But they have pulled down a lot of old houses. I think we have around 40,000 vacant houses here. The high rises went down, and it is funny to see the little suburban style houses taking their place. We live in an 1887 house in a good neighborhood were crime is low.

Murder rate is pretty high, but not so bad as 20 years ago. Crime seems to be on the wane. But someone tried to break into our house about a month ago, eleven o'clock at night and we were n bed. Kinda freaky.

There is almost no manufacturing base in Philly. In the 70's there would be soot on my desk if I left a window open overnight, no more. A good thing?

There are almost no real jobs, just workfare service jobs. Insurance clerks, lawyers, consultants, and other service related non jobs. One wonders how such a behemoth can exist, it produces nothing. Thus it has no reason for existence. But that is true for most of the country.

Because I do live in a center city area I worry about the decay and how it will effect us. Righ now we are doing well. We live in a good neighborhood, not hit bad by housing crisis, rents are up (we rent out three apts in our house) things are stable or improving.

But I wonder how long that all can last and how quick it can fall.
User avatar
Newfie
Forum Moderator
Forum Moderator
 
Posts: 18651
Joined: Thu 15 Nov 2007, 04:00:00
Location: Between Canada and Carribean

Re: Detroit : No way to shrink a city

Unread postby Shaved Monkey » Sat 05 Jan 2013, 19:43:42

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Pops', 'I') see Detroit is more an artifact of "progress" rather than of decline.
I wonder what would be an alternative to Detroit as the city best epitomizing the post-peak world?

Havana
Detroit needs some Organopónicos
Ready to turn Zombies into WWOOFers
User avatar
Shaved Monkey
Intermediate Crude
Intermediate Crude
 
Posts: 2578
Joined: Wed 30 Mar 2011, 01:43:28
Top

Re: Detroit : No way to shrink a city

Unread postby Newfie » Sat 05 Jan 2013, 19:55:53

No,Havana is in better shape because you don't need heat, and have a 365 growing season.

You can't do in Detroit what they did in Havana.

Apples and oranges.
User avatar
Newfie
Forum Moderator
Forum Moderator
 
Posts: 18651
Joined: Thu 15 Nov 2007, 04:00:00
Location: Between Canada and Carribean

Re: Detroit : No way to shrink a city

Unread postby jdmartin » Wed 23 Jan 2013, 13:27:26

Tanada, thanks for the excellent writeup on your memories of Detroit. It was really interesting to read about Detroit at the end of its heyday.

Detroit's problems are just a mirror of those of the United States as a whole. Yes, some problems are self-inflicted by corrupt political administration, sweetheart union deals, etc. But the bottom line is that when manufacturing left the United States, the money left with it. That is going to create winners and losers. The corporatocracy, China, Vietnam, were the winners. Most of the United States was the losers, and some worse than others. Detroit had more manufacturing to lose, so it should be no surprise it's one of the biggest losers.

I think some of the ideas of contracting the city are pretty interesting. One in particular is advocating creating thousands of acres of greenhouses to produce food year-round. A roundabout return to agriculture, but why not? Land that's sitting vacant is only costing the city money.
After fueling up their cars, Twyman says they bowed their heads and asked God for cheaper gas.There was no immediate answer, but he says other motorists joined in and the service station owner didn't run them off.
User avatar
jdmartin
Heavy Crude
Heavy Crude
 
Posts: 1272
Joined: Thu 19 May 2005, 03:00:00
Location: Merry Ol' USA

PreviousNext

Return to North America Discussion

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 4 guests