Donate Bitcoin

Donate Paypal


PeakOil is You

PeakOil is You

Re: Land redistribution and revolution

What's on your mind?
General interest discussions, not necessarily related to depletion.

Re: On the brink, will economic inequality lead to revolution?

Postby Hawkcreek » Wed 11 Nov 2009, 14:52:44

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', 'W')ell, it seems kinda harsh, I have to admit.. but here is the thinking.... If you are asking the government, literally at gunpoint, to take money away from hard working people like me, to support a litter of kids that some guy fathers and is unable to support.... then it starts to make sense for the goverment to also have the ability to put a stop to that crap so that the practice does not continue.....Same goes for the moms. Spaying, they call it I guess...


Good in theory, but I know a couple of guys that willingly paid child support after their divorces, and then because of unemployment, went to jail for non-support afterwards. In some cases, non support is more a fabrication of conditions then true intent.
I do not doubt that some of the posters on this board could find themselves in such conditions. Then nut-cutting may not seem like such a great punishment.
And for the record, after my divorce, I willingly paid a lot more than the court required to make sure my kids had a good life.
"It don't make no sense that common sense don't make no sense no more"
John Prine
Hawkcreek
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 1468
Joined: Sun 15 Aug 2004, 03:00:00
Location: Washington State

Re: On the brink, will economic inequality lead to revolution?

Postby pup55 » Wed 11 Nov 2009, 21:02:44

Hmmmm.....

Well, perhaps I should rethink the issue.

Question: At any time during your child support situation did you actually feel like going out and fathering a few more kids? I suppose it is a bit difficult to father kids from jail, although it is not unheard of, so at least your friends were chilled out for awhile.

I wholeheartedly appreciate you taking care of your kids in excess of what the law requires, but I am afraid there is a segment of society that just pops them out and walks away from them. I suppose a wise judge would be able to tell the difference between somebody who was a serial baby daddy, rather than someone who got divorced and then had some bad employment luck.
User avatar
pup55
Light Sweet Crude
Light Sweet Crude
 
Posts: 5249
Joined: Wed 26 May 2004, 03:00:00

Re: On the brink, will economic inequality lead to revolution?

Postby Hawkcreek » Thu 12 Nov 2009, 22:11:14

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', 'Q')uestion: At any time during your child support situation did you actually feel like going out and fathering a few more kids? I suppose it is a bit difficult to father kids from jail, although it is not unheard of, so at least your friends were chilled out for awhile.

I wholeheartedly appreciate you taking care of your kids in excess of what the law requires, but I am afraid there is a segment of society that just pops them out and walks away from them. I suppose a wise judge would be able to tell the difference between somebody who was a serial baby daddy, rather than someone who got divorced and then had some bad employment luck.

Nope, after I had two kids, I thought that was enough.
And even my friends that went to jail quit at two kids - so far, at least.
I was just trying to say that many (probably most) people who have kids want to do the most for them that they can. But sometimes, conditions don't allow them to be as good a parent as they wish. Some are dirtbags, but many are just dirt poor.
And I don't trust that judges have a real lock on wisdom. If the book says go to jail, they don't usually look past that. In my book, justice in our country is usually more just, if you have money - in which case you can probably pay the support anyway.
But justice is probably another discussion.
"It don't make no sense that common sense don't make no sense no more"
John Prine
Hawkcreek
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 1468
Joined: Sun 15 Aug 2004, 03:00:00
Location: Washington State

Re: On the brink, will economic inequality lead to revolution?

Postby Cloud9 » Thu 12 Nov 2009, 22:30:44

There is something happening here, and what it is ain’t exactly clear. The series of continuous crisis caused by government actions has allowed the political class in conjunction with an oligopoly of bankers and mega-corporations to hijack the American Republic. The American public has allowed this to happen by being distracted by the imaginary differences between the Democratic and Republican parties. There is virtually no difference between these parties. Both parties have taken away American freedoms and liberties. The government has waged undeclared wars since the 1950’s, they have restricted freedom of speech, freedom to own a gun, freedom to healthcare, freedom to protest, and freedom to live our lives the way we choose.

http://www.marketoracle.co.uk/Article14967.html
User avatar
Cloud9
Intermediate Crude
Intermediate Crude
 
Posts: 2961
Joined: Wed 26 Jul 2006, 03:00:00

Re: on the brink, will economic inequality lead to revolution?

Postby bshirt » Sat 14 Nov 2009, 05:37:06

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('pup55', 'C')HICAGO — Nearly half of all U.S. children and 90 percent of black youngsters will be on food stamps at some point during childhood, and fallout from the current recession could push those numbers even higher, researchers say.


Read more at: http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2009/11/02/food-stamps-will-feed-hal_n_342834.html

This horse is dead, beaten, dragged off and turned to glue, but I had to throw this one thing in....

The logic behind feeding the kids in the first place is so that you do not have a lot of starving kids around, right?

But, the problem is, without negative consequences for being stupid and having kids that you cannot support, there is nothing to stop the moms (it is, the moms, isn't it?} from cranking out a dozen....In fact, there is a lot of incentive FOR cranking out a dozen. It's a nice career if you can do it.

So the taxpayers are ultimately supporting half of the population at some point? How is this sustainable by any stretch of the imagination.....



It's not sustainable at all. In fact, just the opposite. But it would be massively un-pc to state so publicly.
User avatar
bshirt
Tar Sands
Tar Sands
 
Posts: 502
Joined: Sat 23 Dec 2006, 04:00:00

Re: on the brink, will economic inequality lead to revolution?

Postby bshirt » Sat 14 Nov 2009, 05:46:15

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('pstarr', '')$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Novus', '')$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('pup55', 'S')o the taxpayers are ultimately supporting half of the population at some point? How is this sustainable by any stretch of the imagination.....
It only takes 1% of the population working in food production and distribution to feed the other 99%. The madness is that we force the other 99% of the population into producing and consuming piles of worthless trash or they don't get fed. This "forced" consumerism is what depletes resources and destroys the environment. That is what is unsustainable.
Yes. That is truly the madness of these times.

We could all live lives of leisure and grace, yet we have permitted ourselves to be placed in bondage. Why? Just to enrich the few already rich beyond their own imagination and beyond any reason or need? Is that the only reason?

People will never wake up from their own bondage. Because to do so would be unbearable. It would logically demand they fight for themselves and their planet and their children. It is easier to suck on the poisoned teat then fight.
There truly is no hope for mankind. We are doomed :badgrin:


Damn, it hurts to read your post. My God, what has happened to us? What happened to T. Jefferson? We used to be Texas Rangers......now we're mindless, fat, gutless gerbils. Whatever we are, home of the "free and the brave" we most certainly are not.

In a bizarre way maybe PO is are only hope.
User avatar
bshirt
Tar Sands
Tar Sands
 
Posts: 502
Joined: Sat 23 Dec 2006, 04:00:00
Top

Re: On the brink, will economic inequality lead to revolution?

Postby bshirt » Sat 14 Nov 2009, 05:52:29

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('pup55', '')$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', 'S')terilization for dead beat dads? I like it! After that becomes acceptable, I would add a few more crimes individual should be sterilized for Rape, is an obvious choice, then all convicted felons, crack addicts....


Well, it seems kinda harsh, I have to admit.. but here is the thinking.... If you are asking the government, literally at gunpoint, to take money away from hard working people like me, to support a litter of kids that some guy fathers and is unable to support.... then it starts to make sense for the goverment to also have the ability to put a stop to that crap so that the practice does not continue.....Same goes for the moms. Spaying, they call it I guess...

Rape? That is a slightly different issue. Publicly televised castration without anesthesia in certain cases is probably a more appropriate penalty. Depends on the case. We will put it on right before or after Ultimate Fighting. The commercial revenue will be used for victim counseling.

Crack? I suppose that if you get loaded, and then OD, and show up in an emergency room and have to ask the government, that is, hard-working me, who is being forced at gunpoint to pay taxes, to take care of you, then you should have to perform some appropriate service to pay us back.....If you choose to spend your afternoons in the back yard getting high on crack, and not work, and expect the government to take tax money from me, and give it to you so that you do not starve, .... we can't really have that either, can we? I will have to search my soul for a solomon-like pound of flesh that we can extract from you in exchange for me feeding you, if you choose to do this while you are still young and frisky instead of find a job of some type.....

Side point: I would be delighted to sit in my backyard and drink beer and have the government send me money, and expect nothing in return, but I will have to wait 11 years (if social security still exists by that time) for me to get to do it. Hopefully I will still be good looking.

Right now, stupidly, in the case of reproduction, we have the government enabling the personal irresponsibility, and not expecting anything in return. How does that make sense?
You should either pull the plug on the welfare, and get the government out of peoples lives, and let them sink or swim or starve or get loaded and OD if they want, which in a way would be desirable, or insist on your pound of flesh from the dads, and moms, if need be....and use the proceeds to make sure those little kids are responsibly taken care of and do not turn into criminals.....

The guy Howard Ruff pointed out years ago that people have figured out how to vote themselves benefits out of the treasury, without any additional responsibility on their part.

Here is the worst part.... not to be changing the subject: but if you are a banker, and have managed to make a bunch of stupid decisions and run your bank into the ground, why should the government bail you out? Why would we not be outraged if they raided my 401K so some fatass can comfortably go to his mansion in the Hamptons this afternoon and look at the TIVO of the Real Housewives" last night? I have no mansion. I have no Tivo. Here is why: The cowardly government got the money from someone who would not complain about it: The nation's 3-year olds.

If it was so important that this deal be done, why did not the government come to me and say "pup55, it is important that we do this, therefore we are going to have to charge you and everyone else in the country $100K to keep the whole system running"...... The reason is, they would have been immediately rounded up and driven into the Potomac for being the rats that they are.

What I am afraid that they are instead doing is just inflating the currency, costing me $100,000 in deferred consumption since my 2025 dollars will be worth much less, and not telling me that either....

Similarly, the Iraq War.... If this had been so important, so vital to spend a trillion dollars to attack a nation of 22 million goat herders.... why did they not come to us and say "pay up, $100K each of you"....and oh, by the way, contribute your first born son or daughter to the war effort.... same reason.... there is no way, in those terms, that they could have gotten the job done.....so they were cowards and took the easy way out. They took it "off budget", and asked our so-called professional army of mercenaries plus a lot of civilian contractors to do it for us. You know what Machiavelli said about mercenaries.....

So that is why the system is going to come to a screeching halt someday.....There is a disconnect between the government service and the cost. The government mammary gland is finite, someone is finally going to have to have the courage to come forward and ask us to sacrifice, and then, being the animals we are, all hell will break loose.... like it should have years ago...

Sorry for threadjacking this into a rant.....but it is the "hell breaking loose" we are talking about, isn't it?


Wow....what a great post!! Maybe there is hope after all.....
User avatar
bshirt
Tar Sands
Tar Sands
 
Posts: 502
Joined: Sat 23 Dec 2006, 04:00:00
Top

Re: On the brink, will economic inequality lead to revolution?

Postby eXpat » Fri 11 Dec 2009, 23:16:18

For bankers is time to start investing in security.
Bankers might be feeling public’s wrath — literally
$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', 'A') Los Angeles lawyer who had represented a failed subprime mortgage lender is found dead outside his home, having been shot in the head.

Three men allegedly invade the home of a former subprime lender, and are arrested after reportedly injuring three people inside.

Vandals target the home of the former CEO of the Royal Bank of Scotland, smashing windows in the banker's home and car.

Those are just three notable incidents of violence aimed at people who were in some way linked to the financial crisis that has unfolded over the past year. And while in many of those cases it's unclear whether the incidents were politically motivated, or motivated by financial issues, or just a coincidence, the cases fit into a pattern of escalating crime and violence in the wake of the recession.

http://rawstory.com/2009/12/bankers-public-wrath-literally/
[smilie=new_popcornsmiley.gif]
"I learned long ago, never to wrestle with a pig. You get dirty, and besides, the pig likes it."
George Bernard Shaw

You can ignore reality, but you can't ignore the consequences of ignoring reality.” Ayn Rand
User avatar
eXpat
Intermediate Crude
Intermediate Crude
 
Posts: 3801
Joined: Thu 08 Jun 2006, 03:00:00
Top

Re: On the brink, will economic inequality lead to revolution?

Postby sittinguy » Sat 12 Dec 2009, 09:34:26

They can afford it.

In the words of Biggie Smalls,, Mo Money Mo Problems.

Ha Ha,

My revolution will consist of staying home.

Soon they will come out with an X-box game. Death of the Dollar. The object of the game will be hunting bankers. :)
User avatar
sittinguy
Coal
Coal
 
Posts: 478
Joined: Fri 07 Sep 2007, 03:00:00

Re: Revolution: Causes and Effects (merged)

Postby evgeny » Fri 15 Jan 2010, 12:58:38

A Plea to Yushchenko



The Orange Revolution officially comes to a close on Sunday. Save a miracle, President Viktor Yushchenko, who five years ago lead massive demonstrations that toppled an authoritarian regime, will be soundly defeated, Jeremy Druker comments for ISN Security Watch.


By Jeremy Druker in Prague for ISN Security Watch

The euphoria has long ago worn away from those days in November 2004 when throngs of Ukrainians began to don all things orange and fill up the country’s squares to protest a fraudulent election.

All the bickering between members of the Orange coalition, dozens of scandals, pervasive corruption and an imploding economy did away with the optimism that Ukraine could quickly become a modern, European democracy.

But the disappointment today for many Ukrainians runs even deeper because of the fall of one of the heroes of the Orange Revolution, Viktor Yushchenko, who rallied the crowds that jubilant winter and survived an apparent poisoning.

Yushchenko has by now lost many of the credentials that once made him a poster child for the potential of ‘people power’ to overthrow corrupt regimes in the former Soviet Union and install western-oriented democracies.

Under Yushchenko’s leadership, remarkably little has been done in terms of instituting long-needed reforms (to ensure the independence of the judiciary, for example, or to fight corruption in a systematic way). Though admittedly hamstrung by devolution of some of his powers to parliament, Yushchenko repeatedly sullied himself through unabashed power grabs, often in competition with his former ‘Orange’ ally Yulia Tymoshenko.

The past few months of campaigning have only besmirched Yushchenko’s reputation further, as he has lashed out at his rivals in vulgar and nationalistic language and faced accusations of misusing government funds (so-called administrative resources) for his campaign. He also seems to be operating in his own little world, absurdly self-confident, almost messianic, despite poll ratings under 5 percent. (“Today an alternative to President Yushchenko doesn’t exist,” he told The Wall Street Journal).

The net impact of all the infighting and lack of reform on the general population is disheartening, to say the least.

According to a poll conducted late last year by the Pew Research Center, a mere 30 percent of those surveyed voiced approval for the shift to democracy, placing Ukraine last among the other ex-communist countries analyzed. And, as reported by RFE/RL, another poll conducted by the Kiev-based Razumkov polling agency found only 7 percent of Ukrainians confident that their country was moving in the right direction.

There is still time, however, for the president to preserve part of his legacy. And, in the midst of the disgust and disappointment with how things turned out, that legacy should not be forgotten. Chaos and corruption may still abound, but without Yushchenko bravely contesting those fixed elections, it’s hard to imagine today’s political plurality, freedom of the media and vibrant civil society.

Once the results inevitably come in that he has been soundly defeated, Yushchenko would be well-advised to stand aside and face reality. Unless he really does have proof of fraud once again, it won’t be time for protests, but simply a peaceful transfer of power.

Soros and the U.S. State Department understood the second time to dress all in orange, spending many millions to isolate this country from its northern neighbor will not work.
Ukrainian GDP (grew up well before the Orange Revolution) has suffered huge losses from NATO sentiments Yushchenko and his girlfriend. People feel NATO's in their own income
User avatar
evgeny
Tar Sands
Tar Sands
 
Posts: 638
Joined: Mon 11 Aug 2008, 03:00:00

Re: Revolution: Causes and Effects (merged)

Postby dissident » Fri 15 Jan 2010, 19:11:31

Funny how Yuskenko's dictatorial behaviour is given a pass. The clown basically dissolved the constitutional court because it went against his desires. This a** also threatened to start war with Russia over the Sevastopol naval base in the wake of his pal Sakashvili being driven out of South Ossetia and Abkhazia. Imagine if Castro tried to take back Guantanamo by force.

And now he is claiming he will win the election even though all opinion polls show his approval rating is less than 5% and he has no chance against Timoshenko. If he loses will he call out the tanks to save "democracy"?
dissident
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 6458
Joined: Sat 08 Apr 2006, 03:00:00

America on the brink of a Second Revolution

Postby Cabrone » Mon 04 Oct 2010, 17:17:02

This (rather excitable) fellow thinks the US will go anarchic by 2020.

Don't know about that but I do wonder if a new political party or two might form in the next decade, seems to be a lot of disillusionment around at the moment.

Anyway, back to the article and the countdown to anarchy:
$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', 'S')tage 1: The Dems just put the nail in their coffin by confirming they are wimps, refusing to force the GOP to filibuster the Bush tax cuts for America’s richest.

Stage 2: The GOP takes over the House, expanding its war to destroy Obama with its new policy of “complete gridlock,” even “shutting down government.”

Stage 3: Obama goes lame-duck.

Stage 4: The GOP wins back the White House and Senate in 2012. Health care returns to insurers. Free market financial deregulation returns.

Stage 5: Under the new president, Wall Street’s insatiable greed triggers the catastrophic third meltdown of the 21st century Shiller predicted, with defaults on dollar-denominated debt.

Stage 6: The Second American Revolution explodes into a brutal full-scale class war rebelling against the out-of-touch, out-of-control greedy conspiracy-of-the-rich now running America.

Stage 7: Domestic class warfare is compounded by Pentagon’s prediction that by 2020 “an ancient pattern of desperate, all-out wars over food, water, and energy supplies would emerge” worldwide and “warfare is defining human life.”


http://www.marketwatch.com/story/america-on-the-brink-of-a-second-revolution-2010-09-28?pagenumber=1
User avatar
Cabrone
Coal
Coal
 
Posts: 433
Joined: Fri 21 Apr 2006, 03:00:00
Location: London
Top

Re: America on the brink of a Second Revolution

Postby Lore » Mon 04 Oct 2010, 17:46:06

Didn't happen during the Great Depression, why would it happen now? You always get a bunch of angry old folks grousing about their health and welfare when ever there is a down turn. The SHTF when all the resource and environmental fundamentals really begin to go South.
The things that will destroy America are prosperity-at-any-price, peace-at-any-price, safety-first instead of duty-first, the love of soft living, and the get-rich-quick theory of life.
... Theodore Roosevelt
User avatar
Lore
Fission
Fission
 
Posts: 9021
Joined: Fri 26 Aug 2005, 03:00:00
Location: Fear Of A Blank Planet

Re: America on the brink of a Second Revolution

Postby Ludi » Mon 04 Oct 2010, 18:00:42

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', '
')Stage 6: The Second American Revolution explodes into a brutal full-scale class war rebelling against the out-of-touch, out-of-control greedy conspiracy-of-the-rich now running America.




Brutal full-scale class war of 2% with virtually everything versus 98% with not much of anything (but a few guns).

Who will survive? 8O

Of course some of the 98% seem intent on defending the 2% who keep taking everything from them.... :|
Ludi
 
Top

Re: America on the brink of a Second Revolution

Postby Plantagenet » Mon 04 Oct 2010, 18:47:06

This kind of thing is much more likely to happen in European countries, where there is tradition of crackpot dictators taking over in times of trouble.

The last depression in the 1930s produced civil war in Spain, and totalitarian takeovers in Spain, Italy and Germany.

Already in this downturn we've got massive labor unrest mixed with general strikes in Spain, Greece and France, with Ireland, Portugal, and Italy heading down the same road.
Never underestimate the ability of Joe Biden to f#@% things up---Barack Obama
-----------------------------------------------------------
Keep running between the raindrops.
User avatar
Plantagenet
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 26765
Joined: Mon 09 Apr 2007, 03:00:00
Location: Alaska (its much bigger than Texas).

Re: America on the brink of a Second Revolution

Postby Ludi » Mon 04 Oct 2010, 19:06:02

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Pops', '
')
Where are you going to find the people to hang/guillotine/crucify?



On their private island?

Or merely in their gated community?
Ludi
 
Top

Re: America on the brink of a Second Revolution

Postby rangerone314 » Mon 04 Oct 2010, 19:06:18

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Pops', 'R')iots maybe, burn down your neighborhood grocery store - wait there aren't any - burn down a walmart maybe.

But a class war? Against who?

Where are you going to find the people to hang/guillotine/crucify?

The Hamptons?
An ideology is by definition not a search for TRUTH-but a search for PROOF that its point of view is right

Equals barter and negotiate-people with power just take

You cant defend freedom by eliminating it-unknown

Our elected reps should wear sponsor patches on their suits so we know who they represent-like Nascar-Roy
User avatar
rangerone314
Light Sweet Crude
Light Sweet Crude
 
Posts: 4105
Joined: Wed 03 Dec 2008, 04:00:00
Location: Maryland
Top

Re: America on the brink of a Second Revolution

Postby vtsnowedin » Mon 04 Oct 2010, 19:41:57

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Ludi', '')$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Pops', '
')
Where are you going to find the people to hang/guillotine/crucify?



On their private island?
Or merely in their gated community?

8) Quite right. I was thinking Connecticut or Palm Springs but that is so much more to the point.
User avatar
vtsnowedin
Fusion
Fusion
 
Posts: 14897
Joined: Fri 11 Jul 2008, 03:00:00
Top

Re: America on the brink of a Second Revolution

Postby Cloud9 » Mon 04 Oct 2010, 20:31:13

What the feds want is contingent on the continuation of their ability to pay its agents to enforce its will. Therein lays the stick. The carrot depends on the fed’s ability to bribe its subjects. As long as the carrot and stick are functional, there will be no revolution.

What makes this go around different from the great depression is oil. In the thirties we were an oil exporter. Today sixty percent of our oil is imported. Our entire society depends on it. We have debased our industry. We are debasing our currency. We are swapping our gold and silver for our own worth less paper. We have capitalized our enemies and now live on credit. We have become like an old alcoholic gunslinger. We are a thing to be pitied, but still extremely dangerous. Still, I would not cash us out.

Like a phoenix, we can be reborn.
User avatar
Cloud9
Intermediate Crude
Intermediate Crude
 
Posts: 2961
Joined: Wed 26 Jul 2006, 03:00:00

PreviousNext

Return to Open Topic Discussion

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 4 guests

cron