by TheDude » Sat 13 Jun 2009, 17:04:27
$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Maddog78', 'T')rue. The Democrats seem to hate the idea of drilling more wells in the US.
Yet they say they want to reduce imports. Strange.
This morning's graph:

17,347 E&D wells for crude oil in 2009:
Crude Oil and Natural Gas Exploratory and Development Wells, EIA. Up from 8,054 in 2003, I wouldn't call this slacking off.
I'm all for up-to-date seismic exploration of the offshore in total, to find out what we really have; by the same token various Dems might oppose such a measure in the interest of keeping things a mystery so they can push for vaporware like Al Gore's plan for one final decade of hydrocarbon usage, which is an even bigger fantasy than short term energy independence, we all know the timelines for discovering and implementing deepwater projects, which aren't going to replace our imports overnight. Pols continuing to spout rhetoric about either of these scenarios coming to pass is what makes me doubtful in the extreme about any viable top-down solution, except for things like tax breaks on insulation, which we can act on personally.
Was surprised to read in Morgan Downey's book Oil 101 that the IOC's production still ranks high despite their paucity of reserves; perhaps this the result of doing business more efficiently. The top 5 non-OPEC companies are Pemex, Exxon Mobil, BP, Petrochina, Lukoil. Will scan this table and post it later.
$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', 'D')emand isn’t stagnant because of continuing urbanization and growing population, Hayward said.
What, are you the White House Press Secretary now? What happened to all that Peak Demand blather?