by Munqi » Thu 23 Apr 2009, 15:31:09
$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('3aidlillahi', '')$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', ' ')You're lying to yourself because you know that a similar situation could and most likely has already happened. You know that torture has already saved lives
Yes a similar situation probably has happened. Someone was tortured and he gave wrong information. The bomb went off anyway and then they still had to deal with having had tortured someone while going off on a while goose chase.
Torture does not work. It does not save lives. Why are you arguing that? It's been quite proven by pretty much everyone who has been tortured. These two cases in this report
prove that. They were waterboarded 200+ times combined. They were tortured so frequently because torture doesn't work. You're just rambling if you think that it does work.
In the hypothetical,
unrealistic situation in which torture does work, I wouldn't know which side to agree with. It's quite an ethical dilemma because both torture and the allowing of innocents to die are wrong. Maybe I'd agree with you, maybe not. But it's a moot question because torture doesn't work, no matter how much you want to think so.
Saying that torture doesnt work is like saying that there is no gravity. Ofcourse it works. If you inflict enough pain on someone eventually he will tell you what you need to know. If he lies, then you come back and torture him more until he gives the right information. Why oh why does this not work?
Yes its barbaric, but if someone is about to murder innocent people then its more barbaric to let those people die than torture the person who is going to kill them.
You're a hypocrite. You blame people even though you know that you would have done the same.