Donate Bitcoin

Donate Paypal


PeakOil is You

PeakOil is You

THE Waterboarding Thread (merged)

What's on your mind?
General interest discussions, not necessarily related to depletion.

Re: CIA waterboarded one individual 183 times in a month

Unread postby Munqi » Wed 22 Apr 2009, 09:21:22

Im guessing this means you admit im right. :roll:


Anyways, the reason why i do care about what people think about this is that YOU are responsible for this. If torture was legal and controlled innocent people wouldnt have to suffer. Your hypocricy has caused this.


You think about that.
User avatar
Munqi
Lignite
Lignite
 
Posts: 288
Joined: Sun 04 May 2008, 03:00:00
Location: Finland

Calling Out Munqi . . .

Unread postby Schmuto » Wed 22 Apr 2009, 11:02:24

Come on Munqi - state your principle - - -

It is OK to do evil if good results from that evil.

That is your principle, right?

For example, according to your theory of living, if you had the choice of . . .

A) killing one baby, thereby allowing 10 million to live . . .

or

B) not killing the one baby, which means 10 million would die . . .

. . . you would choose A, right?
Schmuto
Tar Sands
Tar Sands
 
Posts: 659
Joined: Wed 17 Dec 2008, 04:00:00

Re: CIA waterboarded one individual 183 times in a month

Unread postby smallpoxgirl » Wed 22 Apr 2009, 11:17:32

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Fishman', 'L')oved the comments afterward, no historical perspective. Waterboarding vs decapitation, you call it.

Yeah. Decapitating someone 183 times would definitely be worse. :razz:
"We were standing on the edges
Of a thousand burning bridges
Sifting through the ashes every day
What we thought would never end
Now is nothing more than a memory
The way things were before
I lost my way" - OCMS
User avatar
smallpoxgirl
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 7258
Joined: Mon 08 Nov 2004, 04:00:00

Re: CIA waterboarded one individual 183 times in a month

Unread postby Plantagenet » Wed 22 Apr 2009, 11:49:35

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('dinopello', '')$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Plantagenet', '')$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('dinopello', '')$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Munqi', 'Y')ou catch a terrorist who has hidden a bomb somewhere that will kill 100 people when it goes off. The only way to get to that bomb is to torture him.

What do you do?

Do you kindly tell him that you're above such barbaric things and just watch those 100 people die?


What you do, is up to you. If you believe you can save the lives of a 100 people by torturing some guy.... then you could do that.


Perhaps you could interrogate the terrorist and get him to tell you by applying an enhanced interrogation technique that would scare him or temporarily stress him but wouldn't be torture. Something like putting him in a box with a caterpillar or making him sit in an uncomfortable position or playing rap music when he is trying to sleep.

Wouldn't that be better then torturing him?


Better how ? More effective at getting the information ? If torturing someone by making them listen to rap music, rush limbaugh or whatever got you the location of the nuclear device there would be no reason to move beyond that. Do you agree ?


The whole point of interrogating someone is to get information.

And I disagree with you that making someone listen to rap music or putting them in a box with a caterpillar is torture. EVERY kind of interrogation involves some element of stress.....prisoners don't normally get to sit in padded comfy chairs and adjustable lights in the interrogation room, for example. Interrogating criminals is not torture and tricking criminals during interrogation is not torture and even putting verbal pressure on criminals and making them physically uncomfortable during interrogations to get them to answer questions is not torture.
User avatar
Plantagenet
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 26765
Joined: Mon 09 Apr 2007, 03:00:00
Location: Alaska (its much bigger than Texas).
Top

Re: CIA waterboarded one individual 183 times in a month

Unread postby 3aidlillahi » Wed 22 Apr 2009, 12:41:25

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', '
')You catch a terrorist who has hidden a bomb somewhere that will kill 100 people when it goes off. The only way to get to that bomb is to torture him.

What do you do?


That is a horribly inventive situation that is not based upon reality in the slightest. I want you to find someone who was ever tortured or who has ever tortured in order to get information. They will all tell you, like Mr. McCain has done so frequently, that you do not get accurate information. They will tell you anything in order to get the torturing to stop.

So in your hypothetical situation, you have a certain timeframe in which you are working and that terrorist will likely know that timeframe as well as yourself. Thus, you decide to torture him into giving you the information. However, knowing that you only have one hour or however long, he gives you false information. You then waste your resources as you chase after a phantom target, thus diverting any and all resources you have away from the real target.

In conclusion, the 100 people will still die and you just tortured someone for no real reason since you were never going to get the accurate information in the first place.
Riches are not from abundance of worldly goods, but from a contented mind.
User avatar
3aidlillahi
Heavy Crude
Heavy Crude
 
Posts: 1416
Joined: Tue 25 Mar 2008, 03:00:00
Top

Re: CIA waterboarded one individual 183 times in a month

Unread postby Plantagenet » Wed 22 Apr 2009, 14:20:25

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('3aidlillahi', ' ') I want you to find someone who was ever tortured or who has ever tortured in order to get information. They will all tell you, like Mr. McCain has done so frequently, that you do not get accurate information.


That would make this issue simple, but it just isn't true.

The CIA people say they did get useful intel from their questioning. In fact, they say it stopped terror attacks and saved American lives. Cheney (of all people) asked Obama to be more transparent and to release more documents about the interrogation program, including those showing the results of the harsh interrogation program.
User avatar
Plantagenet
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 26765
Joined: Mon 09 Apr 2007, 03:00:00
Location: Alaska (its much bigger than Texas).
Top

Re: CIA waterboarded one individual 183 times in a month

Unread postby Plantagenet » Wed 22 Apr 2009, 14:23:53

Its hard to say where this will go, because of the conflicting messages that Obama and his White House staff are putting out.

Obama flip flops upsetting justice department

Obama is trying to set limits on the who the justice department can charge with torture.......normally the law requires that everyone who breaks the law must be charged.
User avatar
Plantagenet
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 26765
Joined: Mon 09 Apr 2007, 03:00:00
Location: Alaska (its much bigger than Texas).

Re: CIA waterboarded one individual 183 times in a month

Unread postby Munqi » Wed 22 Apr 2009, 15:03:53

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('3aidlillahi', '')$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', '
')You catch a terrorist who has hidden a bomb somewhere that will kill 100 people when it goes off. The only way to get to that bomb is to torture him.

What do you do?


That is a horribly inventive situation that is not based upon reality in the slightest. I want you to find someone who was ever tortured or who has ever tortured in order to get information. They will all tell you, like Mr. McCain has done so frequently, that you do not get accurate information. They will tell you anything in order to get the torturing to stop.

So in your hypothetical situation, you have a certain timeframe in which you are working and that terrorist will likely know that timeframe as well as yourself. Thus, you decide to torture him into giving you the information. However, knowing that you only have one hour or however long, he gives you false information. You then waste your resources as you chase after a phantom target, thus diverting any and all resources you have away from the real target.

In conclusion, the 100 people will still die and you just tortured someone for no real reason since you were never going to get the accurate information in the first place.


Dont you ever get tired of lying to yourself?

For arguments sake, lets assume that the situation i described would happen.

What would you do?
User avatar
Munqi
Lignite
Lignite
 
Posts: 288
Joined: Sun 04 May 2008, 03:00:00
Location: Finland
Top

Re: CIA waterboarded one individual 183 times in a month

Unread postby Fishman » Wed 22 Apr 2009, 16:48:42

Clearly we will never reach agreement on this issue. The challenge for the present administration is they recognize now their job is to save the country, even if it requires approaching the brutality of one's enemy at times. Unfortunately those that voted for obama disagree. If one's principle leads to the death of others, clearly in this thread there will be a variety of views. If it leads to your own death? Isn't self defense allowed?
Obama, the FUBAR presidency gets scraped off the boot
User avatar
Fishman
Intermediate Crude
Intermediate Crude
 
Posts: 2137
Joined: Thu 11 Aug 2005, 03:00:00
Location: Carolina de Norte

Re: CIA waterboarded one individual 183 times in a month

Unread postby Plantagenet » Wed 22 Apr 2009, 17:40:15

We can't reach a conclusion when the Obama administration is covering up the facts on this issue. Obama cherry-picked four documents to release from the thousands of documents on this subject. Then Obama gave his speech and lied to the American people when he claimed the CIA torture didn't work ----- Obama's own CIA and intelligence people told him it did work, it did obtain valuable intel, and did stop terror attacks and save American lives.

From Politico.com:

"....In the most recent instance, Obama's Director of National Intelligence Dennis Blair acknowledged in a memo to the intelligence community that Bush-era interrogation practices yielded had "high-value information,” then omitted that admission from a public version of his assessment.

That leaves a top Obama administration official appearing to validate claims by former Vice President Dick Cheney that waterboarding and other techniques the White House regards as torture were effective in preventing terrorist attacks. And the press release created the impression the administration was trying to suppress this conclusion.
User avatar
Plantagenet
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 26765
Joined: Mon 09 Apr 2007, 03:00:00
Location: Alaska (its much bigger than Texas).

Re: CIA waterboarded one individual 183 times in a month

Unread postby Schmuto » Wed 22 Apr 2009, 19:26:12

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Fishman', 'C')learly we will never reach agreement on this issue. The challenge for the present administration is they recognize now their job is to save the country, even if it requires approaching the brutality of one's enemy at times. Unfortunately those that voted for obama disagree. If one's principle leads to the death of others, clearly in this thread there will be a variety of views. If it leads to your own death? Isn't self defense allowed?


Typical Israeli-supporter donkey sh-t.

Stop viewing the world as full of terrorists out to get us.

Start viewing the world as full of people we've been f----g with for a long time.

But it would be bad for Israel if America just packed her bags and came home, right Fishman?
Schmuto
Tar Sands
Tar Sands
 
Posts: 659
Joined: Wed 17 Dec 2008, 04:00:00
Top

Re: CIA waterboarded one individual 183 times in a month

Unread postby Schmuto » Wed 22 Apr 2009, 19:27:11

MUNQI?

You haven't answered my question. Come on, play along - you'll learn something about yourself - I promise.

Based on your principles, I should kill a single baby if doing so saves 100 million, right?
Schmuto
Tar Sands
Tar Sands
 
Posts: 659
Joined: Wed 17 Dec 2008, 04:00:00

Re: CIA waterboarded one individual 183 times in a month

Unread postby 3aidlillahi » Wed 22 Apr 2009, 20:25:02

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', 'D')ont you ever get tired of lying to yourself?


Where exactly do you think I'm lying to myself?

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', 'F')or arguments sake, lets assume that the situation i described would happen.


It would never happen, so I'm not even going to entertain the idea. But do I agree with the notion* that you help out as many people as possible with the greatest chance of success? Yes. Notice that I use the word "chance" because the world is not a black and white reality like you seem to think. You won't be in a situation where you know one way or the other. Not when it comes to life and death situations.

*This is no way justifies the use of torture or the condoning of it. Doing either is absolutely disgusting and inhumane.
Riches are not from abundance of worldly goods, but from a contented mind.
User avatar
3aidlillahi
Heavy Crude
Heavy Crude
 
Posts: 1416
Joined: Tue 25 Mar 2008, 03:00:00
Top

Re: CIA waterboarded one individual 183 times in a month

Unread postby Fishman » Wed 22 Apr 2009, 21:23:08

Shmu
Wow, what an attack for simply asking if its ok to defend yourself. I have to assume you are unwilling to answer the question due to the conclusion one must reach.

Typical Israeli-supporter donkey sh-t. (you diminish your argument with rants)

Stop viewing the world as full of terrorists out to get us.(what if they actually say they are out to get us, should I pay no attention?)

Start viewing the world as full of people we've been f----g with for a long time.(so I should allow them to kill me, even though they are not out to get me?)

But it would be bad for Israel if America just packed her bags and came home, right Fishman? (how does one get from a question about self defense to this?)
Shmu, did your mom waterboard you?
Obama, the FUBAR presidency gets scraped off the boot
User avatar
Fishman
Intermediate Crude
Intermediate Crude
 
Posts: 2137
Joined: Thu 11 Aug 2005, 03:00:00
Location: Carolina de Norte

Re: CIA waterboarded one individual 183 times in a month

Unread postby Schmuto » Wed 22 Apr 2009, 23:37:18

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Fishman', 'S')hmu
(you diminish your argument with rants)

""Stop viewing the world as full of terrorists out to get us."" (what if they actually say they are out to get us, should I pay no attention?)

""Start viewing the world as full of people we've been f----g with for a long time.""(so I should allow them to kill me, even though they are not out to get me?)

""But it would be bad for Israel if America just packed her bags and came home, right Fishman?"" (how does one get from a question about self defense to this?)


1. Your view of my argument would be no different if it was written with no ranting. As for other people, I rant for them.
2. If they actually are out to get us, then we defend ourselves. But before I conclude that "they" are out to get "us," I want to extricate myself from their affairs. That is, get out of the Middle East and leave the rest of the muslim world alone.
3. Not sure how you arrived there - Stop screwing with them, and then reassess.
4. One gets to this from this, Fishman:

You are a Jew. Or are you not?

You are a supporter of Israel. No doubt.

You, like all but a few of the Jews I have met in my life, view life through the lens of, "is this good for us Jews?" By extension, you view life through the lens of, "is this good for Israel." Surely this is natural.

The problem with your view, like that of most Jews I have met, is it prevents you from considering right and wrong.

You ask, "is this good for Israel," and if the answer is "yes," then, with almost no exception, you support it, whatever "it" is.

This is why all but a few of the Jews I know are pro "war on terror". To them, it's not so much about "war on terror" as it about, "the best thing to happen to Jews in 2000 years was 911, because now America is going to be fighting our enemies along with us."

This is why most of the Jews I have met cannot accurately describe the formation of Israel, which is . . .

They used ethnic cleansing and genocide to steal land that was not theirs, and now they pretend that they are not the ones to blame for why so many billions want them dead. They fail to acknowledge that THEY THEMSELVES caused the hatred.

That is how it ties in, Fishman.

But don't let my "rant" be the final word.

While Jews of today have conveniently forgotten the truth, Jews of yesteryear, flush from victory, were much more comfortable with the truth.

I give you the father of Israel:

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('David Ben Gurion', '')If I were an Arab leader, I would never sign an agreement with Israel. It is normal; we have taken their country. It is true God promised it to us, but how could that interest them? Our God is not theirs. There has been Anti - Semitism, the Nazis, Hitler, Auschwitz, but was that their fault ? They see but one thing: we have come and we have stolen their country. Why would they accept that?”


Jews have used their influence to have the verb "to Jew" somebody removed from dictionaries, despite the widespread use of that verb in English. Notably, nigger and other such words have not been so struck.

Perhaps, in another 100 years, you can have history rewritten so that the brash words of the founder of Israel are stricken.

Truth is ugly.
Schmuto
Tar Sands
Tar Sands
 
Posts: 659
Joined: Wed 17 Dec 2008, 04:00:00
Top

Re: CIA waterboarded one individual 183 times in a month

Unread postby Munqi » Thu 23 Apr 2009, 04:09:43

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Schmuto', '[')size=200]MUNQI?[/size]

You haven't answered my question. Come on, play along - you'll learn something about yourself - I promise.

Based on your principles, I should kill a single baby if doing so saves 100 million, right?



I already answered this - ofcourse you should.
User avatar
Munqi
Lignite
Lignite
 
Posts: 288
Joined: Sun 04 May 2008, 03:00:00
Location: Finland
Top

Re: CIA waterboarded one individual 183 times in a month

Unread postby Munqi » Thu 23 Apr 2009, 04:14:22

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('3aidlillahi', '')$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', 'D')ont you ever get tired of lying to yourself?


Where exactly do you think I'm lying to myself?

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', 'F')or arguments sake, lets assume that the situation i described would happen.


It would never happen, so I'm not even going to entertain the idea. But do I agree with the notion* that you help out as many people as possible with the greatest chance of success? Yes. Notice that I use the word "chance" because the world is not a black and white reality like you seem to think. You won't be in a situation where you know one way or the other. Not when it comes to life and death situations.

*This is no way justifies the use of torture or the condoning of it. Doing either is absolutely disgusting and inhumane.


You're lying to yourself because you know that a similar situation could and most likely has already happened. You know that torture has already saved lives. Im not defending the bush administration anyway. They are gangsters, but torture has to be allowed.

You know that you're wrong, but still you're not willing to give up that moral highground of yours that you love so much.

But i'll ask one more time: Even though we know (!) that it could NEVER happen. What would you do if it did? You're not going to answer this because you cant answer it without admitting that you're wrong.
User avatar
Munqi
Lignite
Lignite
 
Posts: 288
Joined: Sun 04 May 2008, 03:00:00
Location: Finland
Top

Re: CIA waterboarded one individual 183 times in a month

Unread postby 3aidlillahi » Thu 23 Apr 2009, 05:50:36

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', ' ')You're lying to yourself because you know that a similar situation could and most likely has already happened. You know that torture has already saved lives


Yes a similar situation probably has happened. Someone was tortured and he gave wrong information. The bomb went off anyway and then they still had to deal with having had tortured someone while going off on a while goose chase.

Torture does not work. It does not save lives. Why are you arguing that? It's been quite proven by pretty much everyone who has been tortured. These two cases in this report prove that. They were waterboarded 200+ times combined. They were tortured so frequently because torture doesn't work. You're just rambling if you think that it does work.

In the hypothetical, unrealistic situation in which torture does work, I wouldn't know which side to agree with. It's quite an ethical dilemma because both torture and the allowing of innocents to die are wrong. Maybe I'd agree with you, maybe not. But it's a moot question because torture doesn't work, no matter how much you want to think so.
Last edited by 3aidlillahi on Thu 23 Apr 2009, 06:36:05, edited 1 time in total.
Riches are not from abundance of worldly goods, but from a contented mind.
User avatar
3aidlillahi
Heavy Crude
Heavy Crude
 
Posts: 1416
Joined: Tue 25 Mar 2008, 03:00:00
Top

Re: CIA waterboarded one individual 183 times in a month

Unread postby 3aidlillahi » Thu 23 Apr 2009, 06:05:01

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', 'Y')ou know that you're wrong, but still you're not willing to give up that moral highground of yours that you love so much.


As someone who approves of torture and stealing, you clearly have no morality.
Riches are not from abundance of worldly goods, but from a contented mind.
User avatar
3aidlillahi
Heavy Crude
Heavy Crude
 
Posts: 1416
Joined: Tue 25 Mar 2008, 03:00:00
Top

Re: CIA waterboarded one individual 183 times in a month

Unread postby OutOfGas » Thu 23 Apr 2009, 10:08:12

Waterboarding does not sound like torture to me.

The guy is still alive with all his digits and private parts.

All of you bleading heart whiners will be singing a different tune when
an A-Bomb goes off in the US because we cannot collect intel !
OutOfGas
Peat
Peat
 
Posts: 152
Joined: Sat 21 Mar 2009, 19:31:45

PreviousNext

Return to Open Topic Discussion

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 2 guests