by vision-master » Wed 01 Apr 2009, 10:10:38
$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('MarkJ', '')$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Ludi', '')$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('MarkJ', '
')No good deed goes unpunished.
Why don't they have higher (or rather, lower) standards for subsidized housing? Why would they give subsidized housing to people capable of paying for unsubsidized?
Because many purposely limit their official claimed income(s), or sell, transfer, exhaust or hide over-the-limit liquid/hard assets like properties, vehicles, bank accounts, registered/motorized toys etc.
For example, people may purposely work lower paying jobs, turn down promotions, work under the table jobs or collect passive unreported income streams in order to qualify for housing and other public assistance benefits.
Often people end up renting slumlord apartments in bad neighborhoods while they're on a multi-year waiting list for subsidized housing, or housing voucher subsidized rentals. Many of the private non owner occupied multi-family rentals which make up the majority of rental housing in some regions don't meet the safety inspection standards necessary to qualify for the housing voucher program.
Besides the bad condition of these rentals, many are uninsulated, poorly insulated, have old single pane windows, older grossly inefficient, grossly oversized heating systems, lead, asbestos, no appliances, old inefficient appliances, no parking, no off-street parking, no washer/dryer etc. The newer subsidized housing projects are like luxury condos in comparison to these places.
One local subsidized/ mixed income housing project has an estimated cost of over $200,000 per unit. No expense will be spared.
They buy those $15 ele space heaters. I see it all the time.