Donate Bitcoin

Donate Paypal


PeakOil is You

PeakOil is You

The Peak Oil Perfect Storm II

General discussions of the systemic, societal and civilisational effects of depletion.

Re: The Peak Oil Perfect Storm II

Postby shady28 » Mon 26 Feb 2007, 04:43:44

I wanted to hit a few of your points here - partly to remove some of the 'its happening next year' sound to the post.

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('MonteQuest', '
')Seventy-eight million baby-boomers are going to start retiring at 62 next year, the first year they will be eligible to collect Social Security. As they do, the number of retirees in America will double. At the same time the workforce supporting them will grow by a mere 15%. Solving this problem will hurt like hell.


Lets be a bit more realistic. Baby boomers are usually defined as those born between 1945 and 1957. The bulk of these folks will be turning 62 over the next 10 years, but we won't be done retiring baby boomers until 2022 when the last of them turns 65.

The only ones turning 62 in 2007 are those born in 1945, and most of those will wait until 63 (there are significant tax reasons for this). 2007 will see the first small wave of boomers, but the real boomer retirement wont start until 2008. That first group of 1945 boomers won't finish retiring until 2010, when they turn 65.

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', '
')
Increases in stock market and residential property wealth have substituted for putting aside money each month from their paychecks. As the US baby boomers retire, they will further depress the savings rate as they draw down their savings in an effort to make up the difference between the salaries they earned on the job and their smaller Social Security payments.



You're contradicting yourself here. The big problem is that boomers have not saved cash, they have saved stocks and bonds. When they retire - those stocks and bonds will be 'cashed in'. Who is going to buy them? The most basic explanation of why the stock market falls is 'there were more sellers than buyers'.

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', '
')
Sixth: Infrastructure. $this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Montequest', 'I') tend to look at our limitations to bear the brunt of this storm. We know that whatever we do, it will require trillions of dollars of investment in infrastructure. Money that we don't have unless we "print it" causing hyperinflation.



A lot of talk goes into 'printing money' causing hyperinflation. That's only partly true. If you study the Weimar Republic and German hyperinflation, you'll find that this printed money stayed 'hidden' for a long time. More specifically, people saved it (this goes back to your earlier arguments concerning the need for a higher savings rate).

It wasn't until until people began to spend their hordes of saved up money that inflation really took off.

From that perspective, the question really should be 'who has hordes of US dollars saved up?'. In all reality, there isn't all that much cash out there.

Most of the money people talk about having been printed is actually US Treasuries sitting in central banks - esp in Japan and China. The question of if and how these will ultimately unwind is important to the question of inflation - but the printing of money you speak of hasn't happened yet. It will happen if those treasuries are honored, but the Fed is in control of that.

Countering that force is debt - billions in interest being paid on loans represented by mortgage backed securities. Guess who owns most of those MBS?

ie, the Fed holds both ends of the proverbial string.

I'm not saying that I think this will end well - just that the end won't be as soon or as straightforward as most here seem to believe.
Welcome to the Kondratieff Winter
User avatar
shady28
Coal
Coal
 
Posts: 412
Joined: Wed 06 Jul 2005, 03:00:00

Re: The Peak Oil Perfect Storm II

Postby gg3 » Mon 26 Feb 2007, 09:23:08

Population is the problem in the "developing" (ha) world, but disease and war will take care of that. See also Zimbabwe, which is also a pandemic-in-waiting. Needless to say, borders will have to close.

The other half of the equation is consumption levels in the "developed" (ha) world. For this we have a readily available solution that will also solve the problem of government deficits and win the General War On Terrorism:

Legalize recreational marijuana and opium.

Yes, that's right, marijuana and opium.

Marijuana tricks the brain's reward system into thinking that you've actually done something to justify a reward. Even if all you've done is to sit around contemplating your oh-so-fascinating navel. Friday night at the pot party is the perfect antidote for Saturday at the shopping center.

As for opium, need I state the obvious? Few people in this world are quite as unproductive and unconsuming as the opium addict, who just lounges around on cushions smoking himself into oblivion. Produce? Consume? Why bother? "What, me worry?"

And since opium apparently also wipes out the desire for food, all those obese Americans can do themselves and the world a favor by dreaming away their excess poundage! Why go to a gym and sweat when you can go to a dope den and drool? The food not eaten by the opium "aficionados" can of course be redistributed to the rest of the world, or at least to "developing" (ha) countries that are getting their birth rates under control.

Both of these products are indefinitely renewable resources. Both can be taxed appropriately and thereby solve the government deficits overnight.

And as for the war on terrorism, appoint a new government in Afghanistan and tell them: a) We'll buy all of your opium so long as you eradicate all traces of Al Qaeda in Afghanistan and then develop a secret force that can go into other countries and do likewise, but b) If there's another Al Qaeda attack against any Western country, not only is the deal off but the bombs will come raining down as well. Carrot and stick. And Afghanistan's secret force will take up all the risks of doing covert actions throughout the region.

Win-win solution all'round.
User avatar
gg3
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 3271
Joined: Mon 24 May 2004, 03:00:00
Location: California, USA

Re: The Peak Oil Perfect Storm II

Postby JPL » Mon 26 Feb 2007, 19:49:18

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('gg3', 'L')egalize recreational marijuana and opium.

Yes, that's right, marijuana and opium.

Marijuana tricks the brain's reward system into thinking that you've actually done something to justify a reward. Even if all you've done is to sit around contemplating your oh-so-fascinating navel. Friday night at the pot party is the perfect antidote for Saturday at the shopping center.

As for opium, need I state the obvious? Few people in this world are quite as unproductive and unconsuming as the opium addict, who just lounges around on cushions smoking himself into oblivion. Produce? Consume? Why bother? "What, me worry?"
.



Hi gg3

Ohhh, I see we're back onto this-one again. Well this is my bit (grin).

Firstly, both dope and opium can be grown as natural products and the 'home grown' stuff is much purer. Marijuana in it's natural form (grass) can be strong as hell and basically has a similar effect to malt wiskey (except not so addictive).

Dope gives you no hang-over but it does slow you down long-term, which is why I no longer use the stuff. However I have no problem with other users, IMHO if more people smoked it there would be less problems in the world (grin).

Opium is a stronger drug but more difficult to prepare - from experience I would say it is about as addictive as alcohol so BEWARE if you have a regular supply. Again, I no-longer taste the stuff but I have no problem with people that do.

With regard to Opium 'tricking' people into being conusmers - do us a favour mate! In large doses the drug will induce hullucinations which are 'almost' as vivid as television & soaps. Except it doesn't last as long, of course, and it's not so easily switch-on-and-off-able.

JPL
Nothing ever happens, nothing happens at all
The needle returns to the start of the song
And we all sing along like before


Del Amitri
JPL
Heavy Crude
Heavy Crude
 
Posts: 1264
Joined: Sat 18 Mar 2006, 04:00:00
Location: Off with the Fey Folk
Top

Re: The Peak Oil Perfect Storm II

Postby MonteQuest » Tue 27 Feb 2007, 01:50:59

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('shady28', ' ')$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', ' ')Increases in stock market and residential property wealth have substituted for putting aside money each month from their paychecks. As the US baby boomers retire, they will further depress the savings rate as they draw down their savings in an effort to make up the difference between the salaries they earned on the job and their smaller Social Security payments.



You're contradicting yourself here.


Not at all. If your savings rate is negative, it doesn't necessarily mean that you don't have any savings. It means you're spending more than you earn, so you're dipping into your savings or you're borrowing to pay for purchases. The Commerce Department calculates the savings rate by taking the difference between after-tax income and all expenditures, including housing, food and clothing.

Most are not buying more stocks or bonds, they have subsituted the stock growth and real estate growth for saving at all.

Image

And what's more...the government's calculation may even overstate how much is going into savings. Money put into a 401k is considered to be part of take-home pay in the government calcuation. But that money isn't available to spend.

If you contribute 10 percent of your income to a 401k and the govt says you have a zero savings rate, you are actually spending about 10 percent more than your actual take-home pay, liquidating assets or taking on more debt to support spending.
A Saudi saying, "My father rode a camel. I drive a car. My son flies a jet-plane. His son will ride a camel."
User avatar
MonteQuest
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 16593
Joined: Mon 06 Sep 2004, 03:00:00
Location: Westboro, MO
Top

Re: The Peak Oil Perfect Storm II

Postby MonteQuest » Tue 27 Feb 2007, 01:56:34

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('shady28', 'I') wanted to hit a few of your points here - partly to remove some of the 'its happening next year' sound to the post.


Next year sound? This was an update to a thread I wrote in 2004! The sound is one of ominous portent.

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('MonteQuest', '
')Seventy-eight million baby-boomers are going to start retiring at 62 next year, the first year they will be eligible to collect Social Security. As they do, the number of retirees in America will double. At the same time the workforce supporting them will grow by a mere 15%. Solving this problem will hurt like hell.


$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', 'L')ets be a bit more realistic. Baby boomers are usually defined as those born between 1945 and 1957. The bulk of these folks will be turning 62 over the next 10 years, but we won't be done retiring baby boomers until 2022 when the last of them turns 65.

The only ones turning 62 in 2007 are those born in 1945, and most of those will wait until 63 (there are significant tax reasons for this). 2007 will see the first small wave of boomers, but the real boomer retirement wont start until 2008. That first group of 1945 boomers won't finish retiring until 2010, when they turn 65.


Realistic?

"As they do", certainly doesn't mean next year. And your point? The 87 trillion in unfunded enttilements is not a pressing issue, then?
A Saudi saying, "My father rode a camel. I drive a car. My son flies a jet-plane. His son will ride a camel."
User avatar
MonteQuest
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 16593
Joined: Mon 06 Sep 2004, 03:00:00
Location: Westboro, MO
Top

Re: The Peak Oil Perfect Storm II

Postby MonteQuest » Tue 27 Feb 2007, 02:15:50

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('shady28', ' ') $this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Montequest', 'I') tend to look at our limitations to bear the brunt of this storm. We know that whatever we do, it will require trillions of dollars of investment in infrastructure. Money that we don't have unless we "print it" causing hyperinflation.



A lot of talk goes into 'printing money' causing hyperinflation. That's only partly true. If you study the Weimar Republic and German hyperinflation, you'll find that this printed money stayed 'hidden' for a long time. More specifically, people saved it (this goes back to your earlier arguments concerning the need for a higher savings rate).

It wasn't until until people began to spend their hordes of saved up money that inflation really took off.

From that perspective, the question really should be 'who has hordes of US dollars saved up?'. In all reality, there isn't all that much cash out there.


I'm talking about monetization of the debt. Helicopter money. It is always inflationary. This is money that will be infused into the economy to either stimulate growth or fund these captial shortfalls I speak of. It isn't going to stay "hidden."

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', 'I')'m not saying that I think this will end well - just that the end won't be as soon or as straightforward as most here seem to believe.


Cross your fingers. It is unsustainable, no?
A Saudi saying, "My father rode a camel. I drive a car. My son flies a jet-plane. His son will ride a camel."
User avatar
MonteQuest
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 16593
Joined: Mon 06 Sep 2004, 03:00:00
Location: Westboro, MO
Top

Re: The Peak Oil Perfect Storm II

Postby shady28 » Wed 28 Feb 2007, 01:46:14

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', '
')
I'm talking about monetization of the debt. Helicopter money. It is always inflationary. This is money that will be infused into the economy to either stimulate growth or fund these captial shortfalls I speak of. It isn't going to stay "hidden."


Actually, this goes back to my 'your contradicting yourself' statement.

There are two major forces at work here, one is deflationary and the other is inflationary.

The destruction of credit / debt is a deflationary process. Regardless of whether monetization of debt occurs in the future - before it occurs there will almost certainly be a deflationary period. The reason is fairly straightforward - huge capacity to produce good (cars, boats, ipods, HDTVs, etc). The sale of those goods is largely dependent on the availability of credit. As credit growth slows and ultimately begins to contract, it will result in 'overcapacity'.

Basically you have to think of credit as money when thinking in terms of the 'big picture' - because it is used just like money. Credit contraction has the same effect as shrinking the money supply. In a severe credit contraction, you'll start seeing companies go under because they cannot secure adequate credit lines to continue their operation.

Keep in mind both inflation and deflation can be seen in different places at different times. Stock markets and housing markets are currently the most visible.

What I meant by 'contradicting yourself' was the recognition that there would be credit contraction / default, then talking about hyperinflation. The 'natural' result of credit contraction will be deflation not inflation.

Then we jump to an assumption - that the Fed will monetize debt. This is in no way a given.

I would say that monetizing debt is possible (Fed monetization of debt) *only* after the credit contraction has caused a severe and sustained economic downturn. We aren't talking about something that is likely to happen this year - maybe something that happens in a couple of years. One thing you can bet on - the Fed is not going to monetize debt unless someone (ie, the public) twists its arm really good. The reason i straightforward - the fed is aware that monetizing debt risks dollar collapse. If the dollar collapses, the fed becomes less than useless and quite likely to be replaced entirely.

You'd be suprised how many people believe the fed will simply print money to drive us out of a depression. The fed would not want to do that.


IOW, the thing to do *right now* is not buy gold or illiquid assets like property - things that would suffer as credit contracts - but rather to hold cash and interest bearing liquid assets such as high grade bonds and treasuries.
Welcome to the Kondratieff Winter
User avatar
shady28
Coal
Coal
 
Posts: 412
Joined: Wed 06 Jul 2005, 03:00:00
Top

Re: The Peak Oil Perfect Storm II

Postby shady28 » Wed 28 Feb 2007, 02:09:21

One last point on deflation.

Prime example is Japan. 1989 - Nikkei collapses from 39,000 and today sits at 17000. Property values collapsed, causing many banks to technically go bankrupt as the value of their assets vs liabilities went 'upside down'. Japan was / is a major creditor to Asia - as those debts went bad, the books of Japan's banks went 'bad' too.

1989-present Japan maintained a huge trade surplus. This is in effect money being poured into Japan, an inflationary process. At the same time, the BoJ (Japan's Fed) made many attempts to 'reflate' the economy - including monetizing some banks and even giving special 'tax refunds' - basically giving away money.

End result ? Since 1991, total inflation in Japan is less than 3%. That's including things like medical care which rose rapidly. Looking at the price of goods - they've been static for some 17 years.

http://www.stat.go.jp/english/data/cpi/ ... 1581h5.xls

Like I said, hyperinflation is not a given. The deflationary forces from massive debt retirement are themselves massive.
Welcome to the Kondratieff Winter
User avatar
shady28
Coal
Coal
 
Posts: 412
Joined: Wed 06 Jul 2005, 03:00:00

Re: The Peak Oil Perfect Storm II

Postby MonteQuest » Wed 28 Feb 2007, 11:11:56

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('shady28', ' ')Like I said, hyperinflation is not a given. The deflationary forces from massive debt retirement are themselves massive.


I agree. I don't think the FED has the control they once had. For instance, the FED cannot fight inflation now or it will kill the housing market which is convulsing as we speak. One storm cancels or exacerbates another.
A Saudi saying, "My father rode a camel. I drive a car. My son flies a jet-plane. His son will ride a camel."
User avatar
MonteQuest
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 16593
Joined: Mon 06 Sep 2004, 03:00:00
Location: Westboro, MO
Top

Re: The Peak Oil Perfect Storm II

Postby shady28 » Sun 04 Mar 2007, 16:16:35

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('MonteQuest', '')$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('shady28', ' ')Like I said, hyperinflation is not a given. The deflationary forces from massive debt retirement are themselves massive.


I agree. I don't think the FED has the control they once had. For instance, the FED cannot fight inflation now or it will kill the housing market which is convulsing as we speak. One storm cancels or exacerbates another.


The Fed already crushed the housing market trying to realign its money presses. It's stopped injecting huge amounts of cash into the system.

There are markets to trade the various mortgage backed securities (MBS). Those markets have been in freefall for a couple of months now, with a small rally just recently. You really should look at these charts :

http://www.markit.com/information/affiliations/abx


These markets usually do not move very much, but note the sudden collapse of several of these markets. It's not much granted, but what they are saying is that investors expect MBS' to be worth maybe 5% less than face value. That is to say, that a lot more people are going to default.

It started last fall with subprime MBS' (the BBB charts), and has crept into prime MBS (AAA).

What you are looking at is the wholesale destruction of credit value and assets held by financial institutions and banks.

The next result will be economic slowdown and deflation. That has already started I believe. Below is a link to the prime MBS index - these lost about 0.5% in very short order.

Don't compare these drops to stocks - these are *Asset backed* unlike stocks. This tells you a lot about what just happened to the value of these assets.

This is something that is likely to cause deflation and high interest rates, regardless of what the fed does.

http://www.markit.com/cache/curves/ba49 ... 37fc3d.png
http://www.markit.com/cache/curves/ba49 ... 37fc3d.png
Welcome to the Kondratieff Winter
User avatar
shady28
Coal
Coal
 
Posts: 412
Joined: Wed 06 Jul 2005, 03:00:00
Top

Re: The Peak Oil Perfect Storm II

Postby MonteQuest » Sun 04 Mar 2007, 18:47:00

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('shady28', ' ')This is something that is likely to cause deflation and high interest rates, regardless of what the fed does.



Well, here we agree very closely. Your post was spot on. Yes, the 17 basis point rises have reigned in the housing market, but if the FED raises rates much more to fight inflation, it will kill the housing market.

I see the whole derivatives and carry trade market unwinding along with all the illusionary wealth preceived in asset markets.
A Saudi saying, "My father rode a camel. I drive a car. My son flies a jet-plane. His son will ride a camel."
User avatar
MonteQuest
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 16593
Joined: Mon 06 Sep 2004, 03:00:00
Location: Westboro, MO
Top

Re: The Peak Oil Perfect Storm II

Postby MonteQuest » Mon 14 Apr 2008, 21:41:16

The storm brews.

In 2007, many people refinanced their homes. Many to get a fixed rate over an ARM or interest only...but 80% of those loans were equity cash outs.

That refi-ATM liquidity flow is going to dry up. For all those who say the bottom is near or here, I chuckle.
A Saudi saying, "My father rode a camel. I drive a car. My son flies a jet-plane. His son will ride a camel."
User avatar
MonteQuest
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 16593
Joined: Mon 06 Sep 2004, 03:00:00
Location: Westboro, MO

Re: The Peak Oil Perfect Storm II

Postby Jenab6 » Mon 21 Apr 2008, 14:36:03

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('MonteQuest', '')$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('TreebeardsUncle', 'A') good question is when will the peak oil, global warming, and indebtedness effects reach a point where they qualitatively change the way of life in such privileged influential regions as the US, Australia, and Britain.? Will China be impacted more severely first?

Yes, this is when the conflict starts. Resource Wars.

You made me think of something. A war is what happens when you send a bunch of soldiers into a place to kill people, yes? And usually the reason for a war is that the people being killed have something that the people doing the killing want, yes?

Okay then.

How about let's want a military eradication of all public, corporate and private debt in the United States. How might we achieve it?

If we suppose that a group of people in some Third World country were sitting on a big pile of gold, or oil, or whatever, and we wanted to get those assets without paying the market price for it, we send our soldiers in, guns blazing, and take it away from them. We might use the resource, then, to pay down our debts, even to eliminate them, if the resource amount is vast enough.

Now, change the scenario. Suppose that we go about things somewhat more directly. We identify the bankers who hold our debts as the enemy. We send our soldiers to find and kill them all. Bankers gone. If their heirs claim we now owe them, our soldiers will get a bit more exercise. Heirs of bankers gone. No one left to pay. Debt gone.

I fail to see why we ought to scapegoat any Third Worlders with deadly military attacks when, for a fraction of the number of deaths, we can simply wipe out the bankers and start with a clean slate.

But we don't do that. Our governments happily kill anyone else, but never the bankers. This doesn't seem to make sense, neither moral nor practical.

Jerry Abbott
User avatar
Jenab6
Tar Sands
Tar Sands
 
Posts: 564
Joined: Sun 25 Dec 2005, 04:00:00
Location: Hillsboro, West Virginia
Top

Re: The Peak Oil Perfect Storm II

Postby MonteQuest » Mon 15 Dec 2008, 20:45:02

Well, well. It seems the storm has arrived. What remains now is whether it will be a Cat 5. I think it will.
A Saudi saying, "My father rode a camel. I drive a car. My son flies a jet-plane. His son will ride a camel."
User avatar
MonteQuest
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 16593
Joined: Mon 06 Sep 2004, 03:00:00
Location: Westboro, MO

Re: The Peak Oil Perfect Storm II

Postby copious.abundance » Mon 15 Dec 2008, 22:48:02

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('MonteQuest', '')$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('shady28', ' ')$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', ' ')Increases in stock market and residential property wealth have substituted for putting aside money each month from their paychecks. As the US baby boomers retire, they will further depress the savings rate as they draw down their savings in an effort to make up the difference between the salaries they earned on the job and their smaller Social Security payments.



You're contradicting yourself here.


Not at all. If your savings rate is negative, it doesn't necessarily mean that you don't have any savings. It means you're spending more than you earn, so you're dipping into your savings or you're borrowing to pay for purchases. The Commerce Department calculates the savings rate by taking the difference between after-tax income and all expenditures, including housing, food and clothing.

Most are not buying more stocks or bonds, they have subsituted the stock growth and real estate growth for saving at all.

Image

And what's more...the government's calculation may even overstate how much is going into savings. Money put into a 401k is considered to be part of take-home pay in the government calcuation. But that money isn't available to spend.

If you contribute 10 percent of your income to a 401k and the govt says you have a zero savings rate, you are actually spending about 10 percent more than your actual take-home pay, liquidating assets or taking on more debt to support spending.

You need to check a few of your prior assumptions and accompanying data. This was posted on Feb 26, 2007. Notice the (new) savings rate figures.
Stuff for doomers to contemplate:
http://peakoil.com/forums/post1190117.html#p1190117
http://peakoil.com/forums/post1193930.html#p1193930
http://peakoil.com/forums/post1206767.html#p1206767
User avatar
copious.abundance
Fission
Fission
 
Posts: 9589
Joined: Wed 26 Mar 2008, 03:00:00
Location: Cornucopia
Top

Re: The Peak Oil Perfect Storm II

Postby Revi » Mon 15 Dec 2008, 23:00:28

People are squirreling away nuts for winter. We aren't really saving for the long term, just saving because the rest of the ponzi schemes have all gone belly up.

Time to stuff as much as you can in a mattress, (or in the bank at practically zero interest) because it beats investing it in any other kind of asset.

The Baltic Dry Index, which is a measure of world shipping fell practically to nothing just in the past few months. We aren't going to have anything happening in the next couple of months.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SXATSV8S3-M


Manufacturing worldwide is at a standstill. Cars are piling up in ports, so paying people to make more of them is crazy.

Nobody's buying anything. They are hoarding whatever cash they can get together.

We are going to see some tough times very soon.
Deep in the mud and slime of things, even there, something sings.
User avatar
Revi
Light Sweet Crude
Light Sweet Crude
 
Posts: 7417
Joined: Mon 25 Apr 2005, 03:00:00
Location: Maine

Re: The Peak Oil Perfect Storm II

Postby MonteQuest » Mon 15 Dec 2008, 23:07:26

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('OilFinder2', ' ') You need to check a few of your prior assumptions and accompanying data. This was posted on Feb 26, 2007. Notice the (new) savings rate figures.


And your point is? This is just further evidence that US consumers are hunkering down and saving for the storm that is coming. Near term, saving more means spending less, which translates into more hard times in retail and other consumer-driven businesses. Since 70% of economic activity is consumer spending, today's savings binge will exacerbate the current crisis.

Gasoline on an already raging fire.
A Saudi saying, "My father rode a camel. I drive a car. My son flies a jet-plane. His son will ride a camel."
User avatar
MonteQuest
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 16593
Joined: Mon 06 Sep 2004, 03:00:00
Location: Westboro, MO
Top

Re: The Peak Oil Perfect Storm II

Postby MonteQuest » Mon 15 Dec 2008, 23:13:37

And I stick with my assumption:

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', 'A')s the US baby boomers retire, they will further depress the savings rate as they draw down their savings in an effort to make up the difference between the salaries they earned on the job and their smaller Social Security payments.


With a little addition:

As the US baby boomers retire, they will further depress the savings rate as they draw down their savings in an effort to make up the difference between the salaries they earned on the job and their smaller Social Security payments, their job loss at Walmart, their losses in the stock market, and the implosion of their real estate reverse mortage equity.
A Saudi saying, "My father rode a camel. I drive a car. My son flies a jet-plane. His son will ride a camel."
User avatar
MonteQuest
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 16593
Joined: Mon 06 Sep 2004, 03:00:00
Location: Westboro, MO
Top

Re: The Peak Oil Perfect Storm II

Postby copious.abundance » Mon 15 Dec 2008, 23:18:12

Monte, this is what you wrote in your very first post in this thread.
$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('MonteQuest', 'T')hird: People no longer have any rebound ability. The Commerce Department reported recently that the savings rate for all of 2006 was a negative 1 percent, meaning that not only did people spend all the money they earned but they also dipped into savings or increased borrowing to finance purchases. The 2006 figure was lower than a negative 0.4 percent in 2005 and was the poorest showing since a negative 1.5 percent savings rate in 1933 during the Great Depression. (2004 savings rate = positive 1.7%)

Guess what? The economic doomsday you (mostly correctly) predicted solved one of the problems you cited: The savings rate is now going up.

You also wrote this in your first post:
$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('MonteQuest', 'I')n coming decades, a growing fraction of U.S. workers will pass their peak earning years and approach retirement. In preparation, workers should be building their nest eggs and paying down debt. Instead, many of today's workers are saving almost nothing and taking on large amounts of adjustable-rate debt with payments programmed to rise with the level of interest rates.

Once again, the problem you cited is now correcting itself: Not only has the savings rate gone back up (ironically, in response to the economy calamity you predicted), but US household debt shrank in the 3rd quarter for the first time since 1952. So not just one, but two of the problems you cited are now correcting themselves.
Stuff for doomers to contemplate:
http://peakoil.com/forums/post1190117.html#p1190117
http://peakoil.com/forums/post1193930.html#p1193930
http://peakoil.com/forums/post1206767.html#p1206767
User avatar
copious.abundance
Fission
Fission
 
Posts: 9589
Joined: Wed 26 Mar 2008, 03:00:00
Location: Cornucopia
Top

Re: The Peak Oil Perfect Storm II

Postby copious.abundance » Mon 15 Dec 2008, 23:24:17

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('MonteQuest', 'A')nd I stick with my assumption:

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', 'A')s the US baby boomers retire, they will further depress the savings rate as they draw down their savings in an effort to make up the difference between the salaries they earned on the job and their smaller Social Security payments.


With a little addition:

As the US baby boomers retire, they will further depress the savings rate as they draw down their savings in an effort to make up the difference between the salaries they earned on the job and their smaller Social Security payments, their job loss at Walmart, their losses in the stock market, and the implosion of their real estate reverse mortage equity.

No, all they need to do is to defer retirement:
$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', 'A') recent Bank of America Retirement Savings Survey showed that about 43% of people in the US are planning to work for more years than they expected a year ago.

Boo hoo hoo. My father is 76 and still working. It'll be just like "the good old days" when people worked 'till they could work no more.
Stuff for doomers to contemplate:
http://peakoil.com/forums/post1190117.html#p1190117
http://peakoil.com/forums/post1193930.html#p1193930
http://peakoil.com/forums/post1206767.html#p1206767
User avatar
copious.abundance
Fission
Fission
 
Posts: 9589
Joined: Wed 26 Mar 2008, 03:00:00
Location: Cornucopia
Top

PreviousNext

Return to Peak Oil Discussion

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 63 guests