by shady28 » Wed 28 Feb 2007, 01:46:14
$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', '
')
I'm talking about monetization of the debt. Helicopter money. It is always inflationary. This is money that will be infused into the economy to either stimulate growth or fund these captial shortfalls I speak of. It isn't going to stay "hidden."
Actually, this goes back to my 'your contradicting yourself' statement.
There are two major forces at work here, one is deflationary and the other is inflationary.
The destruction of credit / debt is a deflationary process. Regardless of whether monetization of debt occurs in the future - before it occurs there will almost certainly be a deflationary period. The reason is fairly straightforward - huge capacity to produce good (cars, boats, ipods, HDTVs, etc). The sale of those goods is largely dependent on the availability of credit. As credit growth slows and ultimately begins to contract, it will result in 'overcapacity'.
Basically you have to think of credit as money when thinking in terms of the 'big picture' - because it is used just like money. Credit contraction has the same effect as shrinking the money supply. In a severe credit contraction, you'll start seeing companies go under because they cannot secure adequate credit lines to continue their operation.
Keep in mind both inflation and deflation can be seen in different places at different times. Stock markets and housing markets are currently the most visible.
What I meant by 'contradicting yourself' was the recognition that there would be credit contraction / default, then talking about hyperinflation. The 'natural' result of credit contraction will be deflation not inflation.
Then we jump to an assumption - that the Fed will monetize debt. This is in no way a given.
I would say that monetizing debt is possible (Fed monetization of debt) *only* after the credit contraction has caused a severe and sustained economic downturn. We aren't talking about something that is likely to happen this year - maybe something that happens in a couple of years. One thing you can bet on - the Fed is not going to monetize debt unless someone (ie, the public) twists its arm really good. The reason i straightforward - the fed is aware that monetizing debt risks dollar collapse. If the dollar collapses, the fed becomes less than useless and quite likely to be replaced entirely.
You'd be suprised how many people believe the fed will simply print money to drive us out of a depression. The fed would not want to do that.
IOW, the thing to do *right now* is not buy gold or illiquid assets like property - things that would suffer as credit contracts - but rather to hold cash and interest bearing liquid assets such as high grade bonds and treasuries.