by MarkJ » Sun 07 Sep 2008, 12:52:16
$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('joelcolorado', 'T')he PROBLEM will be as we use less oil, gas etc. with smaller cars, there will not be enough taxes generated for road improvements.
Denver had a water conservation program and ppl responded and in ten years cut water useage in half. OF COURSE the water dept went broke so....they doubled the water bills to cover that. So you use less, and pay the same amount. NEAT HUH??
Water bills increased substantially in some regions since water usage declined due to shrinking population, shrinking commercial/industrial use, vacant/abandoned homes/buildings low flow toilets, flow restrictors, fewer people filling bath tubs, dish sinks, utility sinks, pools and fewer people washing cars, watering lawns etc.
Of course real inflation, declining home values, (less propety tax revenue), zero or negative tax base growth doesn't help matters when the cities are struggling to pay off bonds and/or improve existing systems.
The thousands of Toto G-Max system low-flow toilets we've installed in one region have probably put a substantial dent in some city water system usage patterns, as well as all the leaks and sticking toilet valves we've fixed. All those high water content toilets (that often had to be flushed 2 or 3 times) really used to use a lot of extra water.