by skyemoor » Mon 21 Jul 2008, 10:33:42
If the attack and mortality rate approaches or exceeds the 1918 flu pandemic, people will be staying home out of overwhelming concern for their family. The Bush Administration was trying to change this mindset by talking about 'distancing' at work, washing hands, and coughing in a socially acceptable manner, none of which would be widespread enough to do much to slow the spread (e.g., it only takes one person in a lobby/elevator/floor forgetting to cover their mouth). Now that it looks like a pandemic won't happen during Bush's tenure, they're admitting that people will most likely feel the need to stay home. Touching elevator buttons, opening doors, knobs on faucets, the coffee mess, and so forth would be viewed as the possible touch of death. Building ventilation systems recycle air from room to room, so viral-loaded aerosols from people coughing would be spread throughout the building.
And absenteeism will likely be close to 50% anyway at homes with school children as one parent at a minimum would have to stay. And if another parent works, would they even be allowed in the same area of the house, given that they might become infected, spreading the virus asymptomatically the first few days before they become aware they are infected?
In recognition of this, Chertoff recently said;
$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', 'B')ut you would have to start dealing with the issue of absenteeism. People either not showing up to work because they're sick, or because they're afraid of getting sick, or because they're afraid that the place they're working doesn't have a plan to make sure they don't get sick, or because the schools are closed and there's nobody to take care of the kids at home, so they're not going to go to work.
And when people don't show up to work, all of a sudden, the power plants aren't running unless you have a plan in place to deal with that on an emergency basis. The food isn't getting delivered to the grocery store. That doesn't matter, though, because no one is around to open the grocery store.
So now the problems begin to cascade and ripple throughout society and potentially can magnify the damage of the underlying attack because of the collateral effects on our ability to eat, turn on the lights, get to work and deal with all the other issues which allow society to function in a well-ordered way.
In addition to the cascading collateral effects of this kind of a medical disaster is the fact that it's not going to come with a bang, it's going to come with a whisper. And, in fact, it may be very challenging to detect when it first begins. It can be hours or days before we realize the full extent of an incident. And, on top of that, depending on whether it is a natural event or a manmade event, our modeling ability with respect to analyzing the course of the epidemic or pandemic will be profoundly effected, because we have built a series of public health models based on the idea that we know how ordinary diseases spread and how they circulate among populations.
But if someone is moving around the country with an aerosol tank, spraying it all over different places, that's going to be a very different model. And therefore, one of the things you learn very quickly is, making some preliminary judgments with some basis in fact about whether you're dealing with a manmade or a natural attack has a critical impact on the subsequent course of how you deal with it.
http://www.dhs.gov/xnews/speeches/sp_1208283625146.shtm
The good news is that most peak oil preparation can also be applied to avian flu preparation;
- Food sources and storage
- Water supply
- Electricity
- Home heating and hot water
- Cooking energy
- Communications
The inverse of pandemic preparation being applied to peak oil preparation is less applicable, as pandemic preparation looks to making through a roughly 18 month period of multiple pandemic waves, after which life gradually returns to 'normal'.