by BigTex » Fri 23 May 2008, 19:19:08
$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('jlw61', '')$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('BigTex', 'I')'v worked with the FDIC before in my practice as well, and I am certain they are going to close some banks somewhere based upon what seahorse is saying.
I would caution seahorse, though, that if the bank they are going to close is publicly traded this may be "inside information" that probably shouldn't be discussed in this kind of setting.
Just a thought.
I can take down this topic if you would like.
I thought "inside information" was only a problem if you traded on it... for instance if we dumped stock of publicly traded banks based on this information. Otherwise, this is just information from an inside source which may allow some people to pull money out of their banks, but no trade is being made, so no problem. So if there is only a problem if someone buys or sells stocks, options, etc based on this information. If I go out and buy a bunch of food, or pull cash out, or buy some metal (not options, actual metal) then there is no unlawful activity.
So, if I'm right on this, then if someone here has made trades based on what has been said, then they need to quickly find corroborating information from a public site to cover their assets.
$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', 'I')nsider trading is the trading of a corporation's stock or other securities (e.g. bonds or stock options) by individuals with potential access to non-public information about the company. In most countries, trading by corporate insiders such as officers, key employees, directors, and large shareholders may be legal, if this trading is done in a way that does not take advantage of non-public information. However, the term is frequently used to refer to a practice in which an insider or a related party trades based on material non-public information obtained during the performance of the insider's duties at the corporation, or otherwise in breach of a fiduciary duty or other relationship of trust and confidence or where the non-public information was misappropriated from the company.
Wikipedia