by yeahbut » Sat 29 Dec 2007, 05:55:42
$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Cornelian', '
')
However, the feral cat problem was created by people. Do we address the cat problem first, or the people problem which causes it? I find it interesting that people seem to focus their hate on the victims of humanity's sins, rather than on the perpetrators.
Hatred directed towards the victims of our own behaviour, I think, is always driven by a sense of deep self-failure and self-loathing.
This just might be the smartest post in this thread, IMHO. Just about any problem of introduced plant or animal species is the direct result of human actions. To think that humans can make it better again is just another example of our shameful hubris. What is the possibility of all your poisoning, trapping and shooting in terms of actually eradicating the introduced species(in this case, cats)? Nil, I am quite sure. If that is the case, what is all the killing for?
In the long term, non-human time scale, equilibrium will be re-established and all the plants and animals we have introduced all over the world will be part of balanced ecosystems once more. We won't get to see it, and no doubt it will involve lots of extinctions(and the evolution of new species), but there's nothing we can do about that. Killing a few cats won't do anything but postpone the natural readjustment that must occur.
Don't get me wrong, I am not opposed to the killing of animals for food, I've done a fair bit of that. Nor am I opposed to killing pest species if there is the possibility of total eradication(as has happened on some offshore islands here in NZ). If it's just cos you don't like em, or cos you like another species better, well maybe it's that kind of thinking that got us in this bloody mess in the first place.