by BlisteredWhippet » Fri 28 Dec 2007, 00:22:38
$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('gg3', 'M')any years ago I lived in a large collective household: ten people sharing one kitchen. There was a cat. One night I heard some scratching noise behind the oven: uh-oh, a mouse in the kitchen. I called the cat in, who quickly heard the noise and sat there flicking his tail from side to side and licking his chops. As I prepared to move the oven, he got in close. I pulled back the oven and not one, but four or five (!) mice jumped down from a niche they had created for themselves. The cat pounced and got three of them in one pounce. The other two escaped down the hole where the gas line came through, which must have had only 1/2" of clearance on one side.
So, in terms of addressing causes instead of symptoms= net effect: zero. A live trap would have caught them all in a single night. Just admit that cats are vastly less efficient. Just admit it dude! Where was the cat before the infestation? And how could the cat "get to places no mousetrap can reach"?? Why, you had to help it. And it was only 60% effective in this regard... So in effect, one cat AND one human were less efficient than a dumb trap.
You're really stretching by reaching into the grab-bag of standard fallacies to with your dark-age examples of conventional wisdom. No intelligent person relies on cats to do what a trap can do better, unless their judgment is already impaired by believing in the pretzel-shaped tautologies of the pet-owner sort.
The medieval era's cat/mouse stories are largely unprovable hearsay, examples which fall apart easily. Lest anyone forget the Plague is a disease mainly caused by
cultural practices. Rats were a disease vector because people were too stupid to invent proper traps... an excuse we moderns don't have. The Pro-cat lobby loves the picturesque examples of our special friend, the cat, and his noble service to mankind. This is another such fairy tale.
Perhaps a population explosion in rats was due to poorly stored food? A lack of large rodent predators due to over-hunting by peasants without any knowledge of the ecological significance of their actions, in a time of overcrowding and overpopulation.... ?? Its so much more easily digestible and picturesque for someone to repeat the cat-ban theory nonsense. Perhaps the cats were actually more effective at killing the smaller predators of Rodentia?
Or perhaps the plague of cats that preceded the plague of rats succeeded a little too well in removing the bats, hawks, small birds, and snakes they depend on, and introducing new parasite vectors into continental Europe? In other words, rodent plagues happen because humans distort and destroy ecosystems with their
fallacious, simple minded actions.
$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', 'T')he cat took his Happy Meal into another part of the kitchen and finished off the three mice quickly enough,
Augh... incubating Toxoplasma in the cat's stomach no doubt... and exposing the rest of the people in the house to its cysts, no doubt.
$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', 'I')t's not that I have any hatred of mice; domestic ones in clean cages are kinda' cute and perfectly acceptable. But not wild ones in food storage & preparation areas. For this there will be cats, who can go where no mousetrap would reach.