In Richard Heinberg's book 'Power-Down' he contrasts the survivalist mentality with that of the preservationist.
The wiki on this topic:
"A survivalist is a person who anticipates and prepares for a future disruption in local, regional or worldwide social or political order."
"Preservationism...as a term distinguishing between survivalist groups who wish merely to survive a collapse of civilization, and communities who wish to preserve as much of human culture as is possible in the event of collapse."
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Survivalist
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Preservationist
Mr. Heinberg talked about a gene bank founded by Nikolai Vavilov in Russia and the dedicated preservationists that guarded the seed and gene pool. He went on to say how 9 of the scientists and workers starved to death because they refused to eat the seeds and tubers in the gene bank.
Now, I don't know if a few seeds or tubers would have made much difference in their surviving. But I can say a survivalist would have eaten the first one to die. While their efforts were most admirable, we can say their life was not an enviable one for us to emulate. And in the end they failed miserably at self preservation and survival.
Mr. Heinberg brings up a good point though, balancing the two areas of survival with preservation. For we may well survive, but if we do not preserve a semblance of a somewhat livable world to survive in, we may not wish to survive in what remains.
There is a famous saying: "First you get rich...then you get holy."
This applies especially to our topic at hand. Our first instinct is to survive. The foundation of our survivalist attitude is grounded in mental preparedness, knowing we have the tools and skill to survive. Then, once we have a semblance of peace, knowing we can survive with our skill level and necessities of survival, we can work on community and preservation.
This is how it has always been with a drowning man...we save ourselves first and others second. And if we balk at natures way...both men drown. It is part of natural law as well and is imbedded in our instinct.
But, since we have a 'free will' of sorts, we need moral guidance or a moral conscience as well as guidance by some hand tools, skills and instinct to live a peaceful, flourishing and balanced life.
Actually it is like this.
We are free to do what we want -- but are not free to want what we want. As all our actions have consequences, and many of our actions produce consequences that end up destroying peace. (both ours and other's peace).
And in the process, we learn we are not quite independent in the word and are interdependent and will come to realize the wisdom of Blake's words in 'The Marriage of Heaven and Hell'..."and thus men forgot that all deities reside in the human breast."
So in a nutshell, this mix of instinctual and moral guidance is what separates us from the animals that run solely on instinct. And without moral guidance and compassion for others, community will be lost. And the better the community is at balancing self preservation within that community, the better its chances are for long term survival.
"When a man's mind is concentrated he is blind."
A few years ago I read an article in the Wall Street Journal about a con man named Charles Ponzi. He was credited with inventing the first pyramid scheme. The article stated when Ponzi was interviewed he was asked how he was able to swindle so many people so easily, his responded, "When a man's mind is concentrated he is blind."
This case of having your mind concentrated to the point of blindness is not anything new. The ancient philosophers new this well. They called it "putting passion before reason."
Both these areas of passion and reason where the foundation of much philosophical discussion of ethics and virtue with the ancient Greeks.They knew when passion rules the mind, that the only job left for reason is that of the subservient task to find cleaver ways to satisfy the passions.
When our minds are occupied with too much wreckage of the past, too many problems and complexities and out of control passions then there is little room left in it for reasoning. We can see this with the gene bank scientists that starved to death guarding the seeds and tubers - too concentrated in one area and blind to everything else.
In our own blindness and concentration of mind there are no doubt many areas that can use some thought. For instance, in my own life, I pondered in bed this morning about my lack of preparedness for the vast expanses of glass in my downstairs gym. What would happen in times of unrest if someone broke the glass out?
Should I have had the forethought to store some plywood to shutter up my house?No doubt each season would have its say bout such a circumstance? The winter cold and snow would destroy our efforts at heating the house. In the summers the torrid of bugs, mosquitoes, raccoons or unwanted two leg visitors could enter at will.
The houses nowadays have evolved into very poor vehicles for the post-carbon life that awaits us. Most are heated by gas or electric and both of these power sources will have supply problems down the road.
In addition, my split level house has very few doors inside. It's design favors wide open spaces and passageways instead of doors. Large areas of windows, while providing sunlight to illuminate and spaciousness are not ideal for survival needs. Once the outer skin is penetrated, most of the house is penetrated as well.
My thoughts then turned to the installation of the plywood even if I did have a few sheets around.
Did I have a a hand drill and extra bits? After all, there may not be any electric or gas to power my generators? And if I broke a bit, the stores may have been drained long ago of such items. Would it been wise to pre-drill the plywood and door frame prior to need? I don't even think I have a hand saw...did I precut the plywood to fit the frames or at least buy a hand saw? Did I notch the plywood to clear the hinges and deadbolt....and on and on?
(BTW, I can tell you cutting large 3/4 inch ply sheets with a hand saw is not easy.)
Yes, many questions that we normally don't address due to concentration of mind in one area and lack of forethought in others. And this is just one small area of my concerns at being a balanced survivalist.
Remember, balancing acts are not perfect and need to be dynamic and flexible or we will get out of balance again.
When judgments have to be made, mistakes can and will happen the best we can do is give it an honest effort with rational thought. It is a never ending job of mindfulness of what disturbs our peace and the best fit equation to returning our life to a semblance of peace.
And we must accept our work can only be "progress oriented" and never actually perfected. Perfection is the nature of the gods...imperfection is the nature of humans. Many of us do not know we have gone too far until we actually go too far and start rebalancing and pulling back - so without realizing imperfection we cannot learn.
"The road of excess leads to the palace of wisdom." ~ Blake
The Greeks used to teach harmony and balance in the Trivium in their schools. In the 'tenants of reason' they went into much details with the subject of harmony breaking it down into proportionally, prudence, balance, fitness and aptness. Not subjects you hear a lot of nowadays.
3 Components of Rationality
1 - Rationality requires reflection.
Many of us are too busy to reflect. Other times our minds our consumed with troubles and out of control passions. Over thinking also plays a part in keeping our minds working in the wrong direction. An old Buddhist saying tells us that a constantly busy mind cannot heal itself.
Reflection time must be 'open thinking' time where we look at all ends of the spectrum of answers and choices and not just the comfortable one we are accustomed to. We cannot solve our problems with the same thinking that we used when we created them. Psychologist William James once said, "A great many people believe they are thinking when they are merely rearranging their prejudices."
2- Rationality is the ability to anticipate consequences.
Reflection pays big part in this as well as past experiences and the process of extrapolation from past experiences and others mistakes. Weighing and balancing are two key words that come into play. Sometimes 'gambling' is more a component to those that 'shoot from the hip' and worry about consequences later. Many of us get stuck in a place of justifying our actions with blindness to the consequences.
Many times our actions are ego based and not truth or rational based. "First one decides the goal, then one gathers the principles or delusions to justify reaching this goal." Principles or delusions? This depends on whether the mind is being used for rational thought or if out of control passions are in command.
3 - Rationality requires adherence to certain standards.
There are many standards to consider and each individual has to judge these for themselves. Another name for a standard is a rule. Many people are defiant against 'rules' and they are entitled to not follow the rules as they please. But such freedom has a price to pay, so they should not balk at paying the price for their freedom with the necessary consequences that come from not following the rules.
Standards are different for each area of excellence that we seek to attain, but they may also share certain commonalties with other areas as well. The standards for excellence in rock climbing are different from those of a scuba diver. Professional standards of an engineer will be different from societal standards of being a good parent.
But one thing is certain. If we are defiant and balk against these standards we will probably be headed for failure or even death in certain activities. (Failure? This cannot be said in 100% of the cases, for without such experimentation and digression inventors would not produce much. But in generally acceptable terms, standards usually have to be followed. If you balk at following standards then go back to component 1 and do some reflection as to why?)
I'll leave you with the mantra of the mixed gas technical diver...just as it applies to rock climbers and just as it will apply to survivalists / preservationists.
"It's not a question of if you will taste death ~ the only question is if you will swallow."
Take care,
V (Male)
Agnostic Freethinker
Practical Philosopher
Futurist
Urban Homesteader