Donate Bitcoin

Donate Paypal


PeakOil is You

PeakOil is You

THE Enron Thread (merged)

General discussions of the systemic, societal and civilisational effects of depletion.

Re: Enron and Big Oil- Compare and contrast

Unread postby MonteQuest » Mon 28 May 2007, 02:29:33

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('threadbear', ' ')Is the FTC an impartial body?


Refute their findings, don't attack their impartiality.

Not permitted.
A Saudi saying, "My father rode a camel. I drive a car. My son flies a jet-plane. His son will ride a camel."
User avatar
MonteQuest
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 16593
Joined: Mon 06 Sep 2004, 03:00:00
Location: Westboro, MO

Re: Enron and Big Oil- Compare and contrast

Unread postby Aaron » Mon 28 May 2007, 08:04:54

Refineries are NOT "gouging" (whatever that means); recent profits in refining reflect the price-points for the products they bring to the market vs. investments refiners made expecting $32/barrel oil.

The WSJ is often full of crap, & little more than a mouthpiece for big business.

As for this thread... I recommend Senokot.
The problem is, of course, that not only is economics bankrupt, but it has always been nothing more than politics in disguise... economics is a form of brain damage.

Hazel Henderson
User avatar
Aaron
Resting in Peace
 
Posts: 5998
Joined: Thu 15 Apr 2004, 03:00:00
Location: Houston

Re: Enron and Big Oil- Compare and contrast

Unread postby bobcousins » Mon 28 May 2007, 08:09:11

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('threadbear', '')$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('MonteQuest', '')$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('threadbear', ' ')How does the fact that they are having real difficulties obviate the fact that they gouge at the same time?


There are no facts in evidence to support contentions that refineries are gouging.


I used the word "fact" incorrectly. I should have used the term "the well reasoned suspicion" that they are gouging. I remind you that technically speaking peak oil is considered a suspicion as well, though reason compels us to take it seriously.


Now come on threadbear, trying to downgrade PO to the level of paranoid suspicions is not doing your cause any good. Oil reserves are finite, that's a fact. We are using more oil than we are finding, that's a fact. Oil fields and producing regions have shown Hubbert curves, that's a fact. Global Peak hasn't happened yet, but it's a certainty.

Your "well founded suspicion" is based on nothing but the assumption that oil companies are gouging, nothing else. You are entitled to your personal opinion I guess, but it's pure conjecture.

And I wouldn't complain about moderation, if I was you. :wink:
It's all downhill from here
User avatar
bobcousins
Heavy Crude
Heavy Crude
 
Posts: 1164
Joined: Thu 14 Oct 2004, 03:00:00
Location: Left the cult

Re: Enron and Big Oil- Compare and contrast

Unread postby threadbear » Mon 28 May 2007, 11:57:31

So, if I have this right...WSJournal isn't to be trusted but Oil corporation's are considered a reliable source of information, regarding gouging?
User avatar
threadbear
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 7577
Joined: Sat 22 Jan 2005, 04:00:00

Re: Enron and Big Oil- Compare and contrast

Unread postby threadbear » Mon 28 May 2007, 12:06:02

Ralph Nadar--Counterpunch 2006

Back in the Sixties, here is what Congress would probably have done in a similar situation: Impose an excess profits tax and investigate and subpoena oil company records to determine the kinds of parallel prices, restricted refinery outputs (the industry has closed scores of refineries in the past 40 years) and mergers that warrant tough antitrust prosecution. Never would the Congress of those years have tolerated the merger of the number one and number two giants in the oil industry Exxon and Mobil companies

http://www.counterpunch.org/nader07292006.html
User avatar
threadbear
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 7577
Joined: Sat 22 Jan 2005, 04:00:00

CFC Being Investigated (READ ENRON II)

Unread postby Roccland » Mon 13 Aug 2007, 16:55:53

link

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', 'L')ast Update: 1:45 PM ET Aug 10, 2007


SAN FRANCISCO, Aug 10, 2007 (PrimeNewswire via COMTEX) -- Liner Yankelevitz Sunshine & Regenstreif LLP ("LYS&R") has commenced an investigation relating to Countrywide Financial Corporation ("Countrywide" or the "Company") and potential violations of the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 ("ERISA"). The investigation focuses on investments in Countrywide by the Countrywide Financial Corporation 401(k) Savings and Investment Plan (the "Plan").
500 MPH into a brick wall - me
User avatar
Roccland
Heavy Crude
Heavy Crude
 
Posts: 1604
Joined: Sat 16 Jun 2007, 03:00:00
Top

Re: CFC Being Investigated (READ ENRON II)

Unread postby highlander » Tue 14 Aug 2007, 10:38:36

We will have to wait and see how this plays out, but watch for the golden parachutes and the rank and file holding the bag, as usual.
This is where everybody puts profound words written by another...or not so profound words written by themselves
Highlander 2007
User avatar
highlander
Tar Sands
Tar Sands
 
Posts: 752
Joined: Sun 03 Oct 2004, 03:00:00
Location: Washington State

What's this "Enron Loophole"?

Unread postby joewp » Mon 10 Dec 2007, 12:06:41

Recently I've been hearing stuff about a so-called "Enron Loophole" that supposedly exempted energy markets from federal oversight. There's a web site, and a bill before Congress that's supposed to "close" this "loop hole".

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Close the Enron Loophole', 'I')n 2000, Enron lobbyists seeking to exempt energy commodity trading from federal oversight were successful in passing the “Enron Loophole.” Virtually overnight, the loophole freed certain energy trading platforms (upon which a majority of such trades now occur) from federal oversight requirements, opening the door to excessive speculation and energy price manipulation. While Enron is long gone, its legacy remains. These new unregulated “dark markets” are now the dominate energy trading environment; resembling the Wild West more than Wall Street. Congress should pass the “Close the Enron Loophole Act” and bring the rule of law back to the energy markets.


Here's the text of the bill. I don't know what to make of this, since the NYMEX is completely regulated by the CFTC and that's where the prices are set, as far as I know. Does anybody know if this "loophole" is legitimate, or is this more hand-waving by people who don't understand the concept of natural resource depletion driving up prices?
Joe P. joeparente.com
"Only when the last tree is cut; only when the last river is polluted; only when the last fish is caught; only then will they realize that you cannot eat money." - Cree Indian Proverb
User avatar
joewp
Intermediate Crude
Intermediate Crude
 
Posts: 2054
Joined: Tue 05 Apr 2005, 03:00:00
Location: Keeping dry in South Florida
Top

Re: What's this "Enron Loophole"?

Unread postby joewp » Tue 11 Dec 2007, 22:09:14

Sorry to bump this, but does anybody know if there is some loophole in the law that allows for "dark markets"? Some people are saying this is the reason for high oil prices, and I'd like to bust this bubble, but I'm not that familiar with the securities laws to understand what this proposed bill would do or not do.
Joe P. joeparente.com
"Only when the last tree is cut; only when the last river is polluted; only when the last fish is caught; only then will they realize that you cannot eat money." - Cree Indian Proverb
User avatar
joewp
Intermediate Crude
Intermediate Crude
 
Posts: 2054
Joined: Tue 05 Apr 2005, 03:00:00
Location: Keeping dry in South Florida

Previous

Return to Peak Oil Discussion

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest

cron