General discussions of the systemic, societal and civilisational effects of depletion.
by MonteQuest » Mon 28 May 2007, 02:29:33
$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('threadbear', ' ')Is the FTC an impartial body?
Refute their findings, don't attack their impartiality.
Not permitted.
A Saudi saying, "My father rode a camel. I drive a car. My son flies a jet-plane. His son will ride a camel."
-

MonteQuest
- Expert

-
- Posts: 16593
- Joined: Mon 06 Sep 2004, 03:00:00
- Location: Westboro, MO
-
by bobcousins » Mon 28 May 2007, 08:09:11
$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('threadbear', '')$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('MonteQuest', '')$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('threadbear', ' ')How does the fact that they are having real difficulties obviate the fact that they gouge at the same time?
There are no facts in evidence to support contentions that refineries are gouging.
I used the word "fact" incorrectly. I should have used the term "the well reasoned suspicion" that they are gouging. I remind you that technically speaking peak oil is considered a suspicion as well, though reason compels us to take it seriously.
Now come on threadbear, trying to downgrade PO to the level of paranoid suspicions is not doing your cause any good. Oil reserves are finite, that's a fact. We are using more oil than we are finding, that's a fact. Oil fields and producing regions have shown Hubbert curves, that's a fact. Global Peak hasn't happened yet, but it's a certainty.
Your "well founded suspicion" is based on nothing but the assumption that oil companies are gouging, nothing else. You are entitled to your personal opinion I guess, but it's pure conjecture.
And I wouldn't complain about moderation, if I was you.
