Donate Bitcoin

Donate Paypal


PeakOil is You

PeakOil is You

THE Enron Thread (merged)

General discussions of the systemic, societal and civilisational effects of depletion.

Re: Enron and Big Oil- Compare and contrast

Unread postby Zentric » Sat 26 May 2007, 22:18:05

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('MonteQuest', '')$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Zentric', ' ')If the principles of Cargill and Archer Daniels Midland got together and decided to either plant a whole lot or almost no corn next year, and to plant either a whole lot or almost no other grains instead, do you think that could influence the price of corn or the value of corn futures?


Could they do this unnoticed?

No.

Do they?

No.

Why not?


Q:Could the major oil companies collude unnoticed (or, if not unnoticed, at least unindicted like the power companies, through 2000)?

A: Possibly.

Q:Would they have the financial incentive to collude?

A: Yes.

Q: Could they have the Federal Government's tacit approval for doing it?

A: Possibly.

Q: Does our Federal Government show a propensity for malfeasance?

A: Yes.

Q: Is Big Oil one of the Bush Administration's biggest donors?

A: Yes.

Q:Does Monte want Zentric to present Monte with a circumstantial case that this collusion could be easily be happening?

Q: Or is Monte being far too set in his world view to be in a position to learn anything from Zentric, Threadbear, or anyone else really?
User avatar
Zentric
Tar Sands
Tar Sands
 
Posts: 709
Joined: Mon 14 Mar 2005, 04:00:00

Re: Enron and Big Oil- Compare and contrast

Unread postby Zentric » Sat 26 May 2007, 22:20:16

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('threadbear', '')$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('MonteQuest', '')$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Zentric', ' ')If the principles of Cargill and Archer Daniels Midland got together and decided to either plant a whole lot or almost no corn next year, and to plant either a whole lot or almost no other grains instead, do you think that could influence the price of corn or the value of corn futures?


Could they do this unnoticed?

No.

Do they?

No.

Why not?


What about corn sweeteners. Did YOU notice?

Closing a final chapter on a nine-year scandal, the Archer Daniels Midland Company said last night that it had agreed to pay $400 million to settle a civil class-action lawsuit accusing the company of fixing prices in the huge market for CORN sweeteners.

http://www.kaplanfox.com/press/index.php?id=116

:lol: :lol:

God, this is easier than shooting fish in a barrel. There's just NO competition. It's a rigged game :lol: :lol:


:lol: That's great threadbear. :lol:

I think I'll take the rest of the night off.
User avatar
Zentric
Tar Sands
Tar Sands
 
Posts: 709
Joined: Mon 14 Mar 2005, 04:00:00
Top

Re: Enron and Big Oil- Compare and contrast

Unread postby threadbear » Sat 26 May 2007, 22:23:03

Goodnight Buddy. That was fun.
User avatar
threadbear
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 7577
Joined: Sat 22 Jan 2005, 04:00:00

Re: Enron and Big Oil- Compare and contrast

Unread postby MonteQuest » Sat 26 May 2007, 22:27:32

More of the homework I've done to have my position:

Paul Sankey is lead oil analyst and Managing Director at Deutsche Bank before US Senate May 15, 2007

http://energy.senate.gov/public/_files/ ... timony.pdf
A Saudi saying, "My father rode a camel. I drive a car. My son flies a jet-plane. His son will ride a camel."
User avatar
MonteQuest
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 16593
Joined: Mon 06 Sep 2004, 03:00:00
Location: Westboro, MO

Re: Enron and Big Oil- Compare and contrast

Unread postby AirlinePilot » Sat 26 May 2007, 22:31:21

Monte, dont you know that relying on industry analysts is a no-no? I mean they surely are part of the collusion andmalfeasance too. That Senate hearing is obviously rigged. I'm shocked at you Monte...tsk, tsk.
User avatar
AirlinePilot
Moderator
Moderator
 
Posts: 4378
Joined: Tue 05 Apr 2005, 03:00:00
Location: South of Atlanta

Re: Enron and Big Oil- Compare and contrast

Unread postby MonteQuest » Sat 26 May 2007, 22:35:14

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('threadbear', ' ')
What about corn sweeteners. Did YOU notice?


Last time I looked corn sweetners weren't a publicly traded commodity. Easy to fix the price of something you sell.

Your desperation is showing.
Last edited by MonteQuest on Sun 27 May 2007, 00:12:09, edited 2 times in total.
A Saudi saying, "My father rode a camel. I drive a car. My son flies a jet-plane. His son will ride a camel."
User avatar
MonteQuest
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 16593
Joined: Mon 06 Sep 2004, 03:00:00
Location: Westboro, MO
Top

Re: Enron and Big Oil- Compare and contrast

Unread postby MonteQuest » Sat 26 May 2007, 22:37:13

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('threadbear', 'I')t's not too late to change the name from Oil Drum to Oil Dumb. Seriously, they should think about it. :razz:


Why don't you challenge them them?
A Saudi saying, "My father rode a camel. I drive a car. My son flies a jet-plane. His son will ride a camel."
User avatar
MonteQuest
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 16593
Joined: Mon 06 Sep 2004, 03:00:00
Location: Westboro, MO
Top

Re: Enron and Big Oil- Compare and contrast

Unread postby MonteQuest » Sat 26 May 2007, 22:38:42

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('AirlinePilot', 'M')onte, dont you know that relying on industry analysts is a no-no? I mean they surely are part of the collusion andmalfeasance too. That Senate hearing is obviously rigged. I'm shocked at you Monte...tsk, tsk.


Ad hominems don't go far with me. Debate and refute the merits of his testimony, don't shoot the messenger.
A Saudi saying, "My father rode a camel. I drive a car. My son flies a jet-plane. His son will ride a camel."
User avatar
MonteQuest
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 16593
Joined: Mon 06 Sep 2004, 03:00:00
Location: Westboro, MO
Top

Re: Enron and Big Oil- Compare and contrast

Unread postby MonteQuest » Sat 26 May 2007, 22:52:56

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('threadbear', ' ')Oil and Gas Journal’s Worldwide Refinery Survey for 2002:

Major oil companies dominate the refining industry. The top 10 U.S. refiners, all of them major integrated oil companies or refiner/marketers, control more than 80 percent of all domestic oil refinery capacity. Of those top 10 U.S. refiners, four of them (ExxonMobil, Royal Dutch/Shell, British Petroleum PLC and Chevron Texaco) are the top four refiners in the world.

http://www.localnews1.net/1state&localb ... 7/gas.html

Perhaps HE would like to challenge the Oil and Gas Journal's own survey?


No, but your quote isn't from that survey. It is from the article you linked.

What the article referenced with regard to the O&G Journal was this:
$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', 'I')nformation in the Oil and Gas Journal’s Worldwide Refinery Survey for 2002 indicated that there were 143 refineries in the United States that had the capacity to process 16,040,000 barrels of crude oil per day (16,040 mb/cd).


I'll check on the accuracy of the author's claims. I've posted as such on the oildrum.
A Saudi saying, "My father rode a camel. I drive a car. My son flies a jet-plane. His son will ride a camel."
User avatar
MonteQuest
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 16593
Joined: Mon 06 Sep 2004, 03:00:00
Location: Westboro, MO
Top

Re: Enron and Big Oil- Compare and contrast

Unread postby MonteQuest » Sat 26 May 2007, 23:43:02

Bottom line here: There is no compelling evidence of price gouging by any aspect of the oil industry, and the recent run-up in gas prices due to refinery problems has been readily explained by market forces over at the oildrum.

From a conference call with the American Petroleum Institute.:

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', 'R')ED CAVANEY: A couple points I would make in terms of a lot of the claims that are out there and a lot of the activity: first of all, contrary to the claims that a number of critics are making, there is not any overwhelming evidence to indicate that refiners are withholding supplies or manipulating the market. In fact, if you look at the data, refiners are producing record amounts of fuel and they’re doing that in response to record demand. Refiners have, in fact, been expanding capacity for some time. If you look at the last decade, we’ve added the equivalent of 10 new refineries and if you look at the announced capacity expansions which are to come on line between now and 2011, you’re talking about an additional eight more refineries.


http://www.theoildrum.com/node/2566#more
A Saudi saying, "My father rode a camel. I drive a car. My son flies a jet-plane. His son will ride a camel."
User avatar
MonteQuest
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 16593
Joined: Mon 06 Sep 2004, 03:00:00
Location: Westboro, MO
Top

Re: Enron and Big Oil- Compare and contrast

Unread postby MonteQuest » Sat 26 May 2007, 23:59:49

Oil executive responds to outcry

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', 'Q'): In the first quarter, the major producers of gasoline saw profits from refining operations in the U.S. and abroad grow 50 percent over last year, and the second quarter is also expected to be strong. It would be easy to look at high gas prices and those profit numbers and assume something isn't right. Why shouldn't people do that?

A: The country is short of refining capacity. That is a direct outflow of a business that, say, in 2003 and 2004 had an average return of 6 percent or lower.

So there has not been a lot of margin in refining over the years, and there hasn't been a huge incentive for refiners to invest. Now, all of the sudden, you find yourself in a situation where demand has caught up with production capacity, and the pressure is on.

For a while we were able to compensate with imports from Europe, and that is still happening. But obviously we're in a different world right now ... With refineries running close to 100 percent capacity, any little thing that happens has an impact. It is a matter of enough capacity. In order to build that capacity, you need four to five years. So we'll have to wait till that catches up.


http://www.chron.com/disp/story.mpl/bus ... 34682.html
A Saudi saying, "My father rode a camel. I drive a car. My son flies a jet-plane. His son will ride a camel."
User avatar
MonteQuest
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 16593
Joined: Mon 06 Sep 2004, 03:00:00
Location: Westboro, MO
Top

Re: Enron and Big Oil- Compare and contrast

Unread postby threadbear » Sun 27 May 2007, 13:42:43

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('MonteQuest', '[')b]Oil executive responds to outcry

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', 'Q'): In the first quarter, the major producers of gasoline saw profits from refining operations in the U.S. and abroad grow 50 percent over last year, and the second quarter is also expected to be strong. It would be easy to look at high gas prices and those profit numbers and assume something isn't right. Why shouldn't people do that?

A: The country is short of refining capacity. That is a direct outflow of a business that, say, in 2003 and 2004 had an average return of 6 percent or lower.

So there has not been a lot of margin in refining over the years, and there hasn't been a huge incentive for refiners to invest. Now, all of the sudden, you find yourself in a situation where demand has caught up with production capacity, and the pressure is on.

For a while we were able to compensate with imports from Europe, and that is still happening. But obviously we're in a different world right now ... With refineries running close to 100 percent capacity, any little thing that happens has an impact. It is a matter of enough capacity. In order to build that capacity, you need four to five years. So we'll have to wait till that catches up.


http://www.chron.com/disp/story.mpl/bus ... 34682.html


Quoting apologists for Big Oil now, to justify record profits? How does this in any way rebut the position I take, Montequest. Hmmm? You're just reinforcing my point. Gasoline prices are a feature, both of peak oil and gouging at the refinery level.
User avatar
threadbear
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 7577
Joined: Sat 22 Jan 2005, 04:00:00
Top

Re: Enron and Big Oil- Compare and contrast

Unread postby MonteQuest » Sun 27 May 2007, 19:05:42

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('threadbear', ' ')Quoting apologists for Big Oil now, to justify record profits? How does this in any way rebut the position I take, Montequest. Hmmm? You're just reinforcing my point. Gasoline prices are a feature, both of peak oil and gouging at the refinery level.


Ad hominems don't go far with me. Debate or refute the points made.

If you cannot refute what he says, then your position holds no water.

Where is the irrefutable evidence of price gouging anywhere?

Why are there record profits?

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', 'B')ecause the wells they are producing from today were drilled in past years, where they used $15-25 per barrel as their estimated selling price for the oil. Thus when the market got tight, they have cheap oil going at a higher price. Why? Simple—demand is high.
Now this higher priced oil is filtering back to them in the form of higher priced goods, so the profits decline slowly over time as higher priced energy enters the economic mill. But right now, they are making a lot of money.


The market sets the price of oil and gas, not the oil companies. Nor more than farmers set the price of corn.
A Saudi saying, "My father rode a camel. I drive a car. My son flies a jet-plane. His son will ride a camel."
User avatar
MonteQuest
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 16593
Joined: Mon 06 Sep 2004, 03:00:00
Location: Westboro, MO
Top

Re: Enron and Big Oil- Compare and contrast

Unread postby threadbear » Sun 27 May 2007, 20:48:18

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('MonteQuest', '')$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('threadbear', ' ')Quoting apologists for Big Oil now, to justify record profits? How does this in any way rebut the position I take, Montequest. Hmmm? You're just reinforcing my point. Gasoline prices are a feature, both of peak oil and gouging at the refinery level.


Ad hominems don't go far with me. Debate or refute the points made.

If you cannot refute what he says, then your position holds no water.

Where is the irrefutable evidence of price gouging anywhere?

Why are there record profits?

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', 'B')ecause the wells they are producing from today were drilled in past years, where they used $15-25 per barrel as their estimated selling price for the oil. Thus when the market got tight, they have cheap oil going at a higher price. Why? Simple—demand is high.
Now this higher priced oil is filtering back to them in the form of higher priced goods, so the profits decline slowly over time as higher priced energy enters the economic mill. But right now, they are making a lot of money.


The market sets the price of oil and gas, not the oil companies. Nor more than farmers set the price of corn.


Ad hominims?? I say, no wait a minute, I "dare say" old Chappie, your arguments are getting weaker, running on empty, as it were. There seems to be a supply crisis, a lack of refinement, a sour and crude attitude. :lol: :lol:
User avatar
threadbear
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 7577
Joined: Sat 22 Jan 2005, 04:00:00
Top

Re: Enron and Big Oil- Compare and contrast

Unread postby Zentric » Sun 27 May 2007, 22:41:25

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('MonteQuest', '[')b]Oil executive responds to outcry

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', 'Q'): In the first quarter, the major producers of gasoline saw profits from refining operations in the U.S. and abroad grow 50 percent over last year, and the second quarter is also expected to be strong. It would be easy to look at high gas prices and those profit numbers and assume something isn't right. Why shouldn't people do that?

A: The country is short of refining capacity. That is a direct outflow of a business that, say, in 2003 and 2004 had an average return of 6 percent or lower.

So there has not been a lot of margin in refining over the years, and there hasn't been a huge incentive for refiners to invest. Now, all of the sudden, you find yourself in a situation where demand has caught up with production capacity, and the pressure is on.

For a while we were able to compensate with imports from Europe, and that is still happening. But obviously we're in a different world right now ... With refineries running close to 100 percent capacity, any little thing that happens has an impact. It is a matter of enough capacity. In order to build that capacity, you need four to five years. So we'll have to wait till that catches up.


http://www.chron.com/disp/story.mpl/bus ... 34682.html


I'm afraid threadbear's right. You were caught trying to pass along someone else's crud as premium high-grade stuff. Let me repeat my favorite part of the oil industry apologist's analysis:

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', 'N')ow, all of the sudden, you find yourself in a situation where demand has caught up with production capacity, and the pressure is on.


You must realize that the guy never did say why the industry was caught so flat-footed with inadequate supply. I'm assuming that you are a believer in truth and accountability, Monte. So, considering how you're certain that you've seen no indication of supply-related collusion in the industry, you should have no trouble providing a link that gives us the definitive account of the events that allowed domestic demand to race so quickly ahead of projected supply - or, alternatively, tells us what caused domestic supplies to plummet in relation to projected demand.

And, if it's not too much trouble, I'd be happy if you just provided the link instead of something other than what I've just ask you for. Thanks!
User avatar
Zentric
Tar Sands
Tar Sands
 
Posts: 709
Joined: Mon 14 Mar 2005, 04:00:00
Top

Re: Enron and Big Oil- Compare and contrast

Unread postby MonteQuest » Sun 27 May 2007, 22:58:04

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Zentric', ' ') So, considering how you're certain that you've seen no indication of supply-related collusion in the industry, you should have no trouble providing a link that gives us the definitive account of the events that allowed domestic demand to race so quickly ahead of projected supply - or, alternatively, tells us what caused domestic supplies to plummet in relation to projected demand.


Asked and answered ad naseum.

Both of you have joined the ranks of trivial posters.
A Saudi saying, "My father rode a camel. I drive a car. My son flies a jet-plane. His son will ride a camel."
User avatar
MonteQuest
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 16593
Joined: Mon 06 Sep 2004, 03:00:00
Location: Westboro, MO
Top

Re: Enron and Big Oil- Compare and contrast

Unread postby MonteQuest » Sun 27 May 2007, 23:00:02

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Zentric', ' ')I'm afraid threadbear's right. You were caught trying to pass along someone else's crud as premium high-grade stuff.


Like I said, ad hominems don't go far with me. Refute what he says, don't attack the messenger.
A Saudi saying, "My father rode a camel. I drive a car. My son flies a jet-plane. His son will ride a camel."
User avatar
MonteQuest
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 16593
Joined: Mon 06 Sep 2004, 03:00:00
Location: Westboro, MO
Top

Re: Enron and Big Oil- Compare and contrast

Unread postby MonteQuest » Sun 27 May 2007, 23:02:16

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('threadbear', ' ')Ad hominims??


It's ad hominem. You attack the messenger instead of debating the merits.

Refute what he says, rather than some glib remark about him being an apologist for big oil. How does that, in and of itself, make the facts go away?
A Saudi saying, "My father rode a camel. I drive a car. My son flies a jet-plane. His son will ride a camel."
User avatar
MonteQuest
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 16593
Joined: Mon 06 Sep 2004, 03:00:00
Location: Westboro, MO
Top

Re: Enron and Big Oil- Compare and contrast

Unread postby threadbear » Sun 27 May 2007, 23:07:36

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('MonteQuest', '')$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('threadbear', ' ')Ad hominims??


It's ad hominem. You attack the messenger instead of debating the merits.

Refute what he says, rather than some glib remark about him being an apologist for big oil. How does that, in and of itself, make the facts go away?


"facts"? Why sir, that's an ad hominem attack on my intelligence.
User avatar
threadbear
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 7577
Joined: Sat 22 Jan 2005, 04:00:00
Top

Re: Enron and Big Oil- Compare and contrast

Unread postby Zentric » Sun 27 May 2007, 23:09:09

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('MonteQuest', '')$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Zentric', ' ') So, considering how you're certain that you've seen no indication of supply-related collusion in the industry, you should have no trouble providing a link that gives us the definitive account of the events that allowed domestic demand to race so quickly ahead of projected supply - or, alternatively, tells us what caused domestic supplies to plummet in relation to projected demand.


Asked and answered ad naseum.

Both of you have joined the ranks of trivial posters.


When winning means everything then losing must hurt really, really bad. I understand how you feel, Monte.

Just to be certain. Are you declining to provide the link because you can't or you won't?

If you can't, then why are you so certain there's been no collusion?

If you won't, then why are you acting like such a baby?
User avatar
Zentric
Tar Sands
Tar Sands
 
Posts: 709
Joined: Mon 14 Mar 2005, 04:00:00
Top

PreviousNext

Return to Peak Oil Discussion

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 4 guests

cron