Where's the bubble?
$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('MarketWatch', '[')b]Commentary: Oil and stocks can't both go up in tandem forever
It used to be taken as axiomatic that oil and equities moved inversely. As recently as five years ago, for example, an academic study found that an investor could have easily beaten a buy-and-hold in the stock market over the previous three decades by following a simple rule that calls for being out of stocks whenever oil, in the previous calendar month, rose by at least 5%.
And yet somebody forgot to refresh the stock market about this axiom. Though crude oil keeps barreling higher, fast closing in on the $100 mark, the stock market hardly seems unfazed. Tuesday was no exception: Crude oil futures rose 3% on the day, and yet, far from falling, the Dow Jones Industrial Average turned in a triple-digit gain.
It seems fair to say that these trends can't keep going forever.
But, if that's the case, which market is going to blink first - stocks or oil?
The nearly-universal consensus among the nearly 200 newsletters monitored by the Hulbert Financial Digest, as well as from investment-oriented blogs I read: Stock investors are in denial right now. Investors in the oil market, in contrast, are on solid ground.
But...
I'm wondering about this question because if oil stays above $90 for months and months, that would have much more serious economic consequences than if this were merely a short-term spike due to factors other than supply and demand. High gasoline prices will surely follow.
Back a few years, I made a prediction to a friend that gas would cost abot $4.50/gal by mid '07. I was proven wrong. But I based it on $100 oil and just kept the ratio of cost per barrel/cost per gallon the same.