by MonteQuest » Sun 01 Jul 2007, 13:12:15
$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('MattSavinar', ' ') The day those supply lines and energy flows reach certain tipping points, TPTB won't even be able to answer the phones let alone engage in massive Orwellian command and control schemes. In other words, the future is more likely to be a low-energy, chaotic dystopia like "The Road Warrior" than a high-energy, fascist dystopia like "1984".
Then perhaps the erosion of civil liberties that has started, via the neocons actions and the quickly drafted Patriot Act, is the forerunner to help facilitate control before the tipping point arrives.
From my book:$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Montequest', 'T')he Patriot Act is a case study in that most dependable of all instances, war, to alter the attitude of people who “would be willing to give up things they cherish in return for the desperate need and desire for security against a deadly enemy.” The bill came to Congress on Sept 19, only eight days after the attacks. The Senate passed its version by a vote of 96 to 1 on October 11, one month to the day following the attacks. The House followed the next day.
In his book, Losing America: Confronting a Reckless and Arrogant Presidency, senior Senator from West Virginia (D), Robert C. Byrd writes: “Little by little, inch by inch, this administration bores into the walls built by the framers, walls with foundations going back to antiquity.” It is an important must read for all Americans by one of the country’s longest serving and most respected legislators; one who does not shrink from warning the people of the sinister agenda of a power-seeking White House.
What the Senator is alluding to here is this: Every bit of legislation is carefully written, with all attempts to avoid obfuscation, and import accurate legal distinctions. This is what they mean by “the letter of the law.” Inasmuch as one word, a “shall” or a “whereas,” can change the meaning—and most importantly—the lengths to which that law can be applied. The Patriot Act does this in spades, removing certain legal distinctions in order to give more power to the government, while taking some of our civil liberties in the process. Citizens should look out for Patriot II, a broader and more invasive sequel or a stealth version broken up and camouflaged in other legislation to avoid being a target for criticism.
The U.S. has traditionally prided itself on its Constitution and Bill of Rights, and one would think that the final passing of a sacrosanct right would at least be noted in the press. But “public discussion” is limited to whatever the “media” chooses to feature. Look at how much media attention this “Swift Boat” controversy has sparked. Are we being properly served? I think not.
“They that can give up essential liberty to obtain a little temporary safety deserve neither liberty nor safety.” — Benjamin Franklin