Donate Bitcoin

Donate Paypal


PeakOil is You

PeakOil is You

THE Topic of Abortion Thread (merged)

Discussions related to the physiological and psychological effects of peak oil on our members and future generations.

Re: Abortion Question?

Postby erl » Tue 20 Mar 2007, 22:45:01

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('smallpoxgirl', ' ')PBA is a right wing fantasy.


So, you wouldn't mind a law that prohibits it?

After all, it is only a fantasy.
erl
Tar Sands
Tar Sands
 
Posts: 580
Joined: Mon 21 Mar 2005, 04:00:00

Re: Abortion Question?

Postby threadbear » Tue 20 Mar 2007, 23:30:11

Or at least give the third trimester tenant the same kinds of rights that renters get under landlord tenant agreements?
User avatar
threadbear
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 7577
Joined: Sat 22 Jan 2005, 04:00:00

Re: Abortion Question?

Postby smallpoxgirl » Tue 20 Mar 2007, 23:30:19

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('erl', '')$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('smallpoxgirl', ' ')PBA is a right wing fantasy.


So, you wouldn't mind a law that prohibits it?

After all, it is only a fantasy.


The problem is that what they say they're banning, and what the legislation actually bans bear no resemblance. The media version is more or less that a woman goes into labor, decides she wants to have an abortion instead, drives to the abortion clinic where they half deliver the baby, and kill it half way through. The law that they passed had the potential of leading to felony charges for abortions as early as 12 weeks.
"We were standing on the edges
Of a thousand burning bridges
Sifting through the ashes every day
What we thought would never end
Now is nothing more than a memory
The way things were before
I lost my way" - OCMS
User avatar
smallpoxgirl
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 7258
Joined: Mon 08 Nov 2004, 04:00:00

Re: Abortion Question?

Postby RonMN » Wed 21 Mar 2007, 18:59:17

Crudeawakening Worte:
Even that definition is problematic, as embryos do not develop in isolation and require external support in order to thrive. And many embryos don't go the full distance to become fully fledged infant human beings.

I have a tough time with this response because both points apply to infants as well...

- infants require external support & many don't live to age one...yet to kill (or starve/neglect) an infant is murder.

I have to say after 4 pages of this thread...I'm surprised how flimsey (if not rediculous) the majority of the pro-choice arguments really are. They've mostly been an attack, or an attempt to silence me, or comming up with the most sensational set of circumstances the world has ever seen, in order to force a point, rather than to prove it. (let's say a girl doesn't know she's pregnant & then does something to harm the fetus :lol: )

It reminds me of arguing with somebody who's convinced that a finite resource can never run out.

Although the "life begins at 40" comment really did crack me up! :)
Quis custodiet ipsos custodes.
User avatar
RonMN
Intermediate Crude
Intermediate Crude
 
Posts: 2628
Joined: Fri 18 Mar 2005, 04:00:00
Location: Minnesota

Re: Abortion Question?

Postby TWilliam » Wed 21 Mar 2007, 20:34:15

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('RonMN', '[')b]Smallpoxgirl Wrote:
you are volunteering some one else to be a human incubator for it.

Excellent point there SPG!


Here's another point to ponder. If you insist that the law prevent a woman from having a choice, then I insist that a concomitant law require that 'pro-lifers' must become adoptive parents to children who would otherwise have been aborted, whether they are willing to, financially able to, emotionally stable enough to or not.

Anything less is hypocritical.

And no, you can't stop at just one...
"It means buckle your seatbelt, Dorothy, because Kansas? Is goin' bye-bye... "
User avatar
TWilliam
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 2591
Joined: Sun 28 Nov 2004, 04:00:00

Re: Abortion Question?

Postby gg3 » Thu 22 Mar 2007, 10:06:41

Interesting about anencephaly.

For those who don't recognize that term, it's when a fetus develops in all ways except one: it has no brain, there is no brain inside its skull, the brain is entirely absent.

Question I have for the folks here who oppose abortion: do you consider it murder to abort a fetus that is anencephalic? Why or why not?
User avatar
gg3
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 3271
Joined: Mon 24 May 2004, 03:00:00
Location: California, USA

Re: Abortion Question?

Postby smallpoxgirl » Thu 22 Mar 2007, 11:15:27

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('gg3', 'Q')uestion I have for the folks here who oppose abortion: do you consider it murder to abort a fetus that is anencephalic? Why or why not?


It's a very good question. Bear in mind that anencephaly is 100% fatal, usually within 24 hours of birth.

Anencephalic infant - Warning graphic depiction of illness
"We were standing on the edges
Of a thousand burning bridges
Sifting through the ashes every day
What we thought would never end
Now is nothing more than a memory
The way things were before
I lost my way" - OCMS
User avatar
smallpoxgirl
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 7258
Joined: Mon 08 Nov 2004, 04:00:00
Top

Re: Abortion Question?

Postby TWilliam » Thu 22 Mar 2007, 13:00:05

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('I', 'H')ere's another point to ponder. If you insist that the law prevent a woman from having a choice, then I insist that a concomitant law require that 'pro-lifers' must become adoptive parents to children who would otherwise have been aborted, whether they are willing to, financially able to, emotionally stable enough to or not.

Anything less is hypocritical.

And no, you can't stop at just one...


Wow. Nearly 60 views since I posted this and not a single volunteer.



I expected as much.



"Put up or shut up..."
"It means buckle your seatbelt, Dorothy, because Kansas? Is goin' bye-bye... "
User avatar
TWilliam
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 2591
Joined: Sun 28 Nov 2004, 04:00:00
Top

Re: Abortion Question?

Postby dbruning » Thu 22 Mar 2007, 13:38:34

You know, with all the hundreds of billions of abortions (grin) that have happened, it makes the upcoming die-off of roughly 5-6 billion seem so much less significant.

I feel much better now.

Since this thread is 100% opinion, here's mine. Pro-choice.

Although I wouldn't mind an obligatory sterilization after the 2nd one being passed as a law. Sometimes the truly stupid need a little help.

I've known unloved neglected children. Their lives were living hell until the system got a hold of them. Whether their lives improved after that, I'm not sure.

Either way, if a child is truly not wanted, why bring it into this world?

Do you enjoy the pain and suffering? Why do you hate children?

*grin*

Threads like these don't convince anyone. To make one is to invite loud debate that solves nothing.
User avatar
dbruning
Coal
Coal
 
Posts: 486
Joined: Wed 13 Sep 2006, 03:00:00
Location: Vancouver Island

Re: Abortion Question?

Postby threadbear » Thu 22 Mar 2007, 13:54:52

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('dbruning', 'Y')ou know, with all the hundreds of billions of abortions (grin) that have happened, it makes the upcoming die-off of roughly 5-6 billion seem so much less significant.

I feel much better now.

Since this thread is 100% opinion, here's mine. Pro-choice.

Although I wouldn't mind an obligatory sterilization after the 2nd one being passed as a law. Sometimes the truly stupid need a little help.

I've known unloved neglected children. Their lives were living hell until the system got a hold of them. Whether their lives improved after that, I'm not sure.

Either way, if a child is truly not wanted, why bring it into this world?

Do you enjoy the pain and suffering? Why do you hate children?

*grin*

Threads like these don't convince anyone. To make one is to invite loud debate that solves nothing.


I'm all for a world where tubal ligations are encouraged and rewarded after the first or second child.
User avatar
threadbear
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 7577
Joined: Sat 22 Jan 2005, 04:00:00
Top

Re: Abortion Question?

Postby RonMN » Thu 22 Mar 2007, 14:02:06

Twilliam Wrote:
'pro-lifers' must become adoptive parents to children who would otherwise have been aborted.

Twilliam...i totally agree 100% without question! I've often thought (and said) that christians need to put their money where their mouth is...

However you mis-understand one point...I am not trying to make/change any laws...nor am I condeming anybody...I'm simply trying to call a spade a spade (& no, that is not a racist comment).
Quis custodiet ipsos custodes.
User avatar
RonMN
Intermediate Crude
Intermediate Crude
 
Posts: 2628
Joined: Fri 18 Mar 2005, 04:00:00
Location: Minnesota

Re: Abortion Question?

Postby RonMN » Thu 22 Mar 2007, 14:09:54

gg3 Wrote:
Question I have for the folks here who oppose abortion: do you consider it murder to abort a fetus that is anencephalic? Why or why not?

Is this a set-up for saying that no brain inside the babies skull is equal to a deformed left hand or having blue eyes? Trying to blur the lines?
Quis custodiet ipsos custodes.
User avatar
RonMN
Intermediate Crude
Intermediate Crude
 
Posts: 2628
Joined: Fri 18 Mar 2005, 04:00:00
Location: Minnesota

Re: Abortion Question?

Postby LaLaLand » Thu 22 Mar 2007, 14:22:08

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('RonMN', 'I') have a question to all Pro-Abortionists out there


You're an idiot. There are no "pro-abortionists" anywhere. No one wants to partake in or mandate this activity. This is a perpetual myth spread by Jerry Falwell and Pat Robertson, as well as the fools who follow these "freedom hating"* bigots.

As far as I'm concerned; if abortion rid the gene pool of fundamentalist Christian's genes, I'd require Nazi style abortion clinics throughout the USA. Anyone caught saying the term "pro-abortion" would be required to go to the clinic and get their balls chopped off, or uterus ripped out.

*I did not invent this term either; guess who did?
User avatar
LaLaLand
Peat
Peat
 
Posts: 78
Joined: Thu 16 Dec 2004, 04:00:00
Top

Re: Abortion Question?

Postby RonMN » Thu 22 Mar 2007, 19:27:03

LaLaland Wrote:
There are no "pro-abortionists" anywhere

Then it would stand to reason that there is no such thing as "anti-abortionists"...would you agree?
Quis custodiet ipsos custodes.
User avatar
RonMN
Intermediate Crude
Intermediate Crude
 
Posts: 2628
Joined: Fri 18 Mar 2005, 04:00:00
Location: Minnesota

Re: Abortion Question?

Postby smallpoxgirl » Thu 22 Mar 2007, 19:34:10

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('threadbear', 'I')'m all for a world where tubal ligations are encouraged and rewarded after the first or second child.


Why tubal ligation? Vasectomy is easier, safer, and arguably more effective.
"We were standing on the edges
Of a thousand burning bridges
Sifting through the ashes every day
What we thought would never end
Now is nothing more than a memory
The way things were before
I lost my way" - OCMS
User avatar
smallpoxgirl
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 7258
Joined: Mon 08 Nov 2004, 04:00:00
Top

Re: Abortion Question?

Postby RonMN » Thu 22 Mar 2007, 20:54:00

I personally, have to look at it backwards...

Would it be ok for somebody to take my life right now?
NO!

Would it be ok for somebody to take my life as a teeenager?
NO!

Would it be ok for somebody to take my life as an infant?
NO!

Would it be ok for somebody to take my life as a dependant fetus?
NO!

Would it be ok for somebody to block ME from developing in the first place?
YES.

My opinion...I don't demand that you agree with my opinion...but I wish you'd atleast respect my opinion!
Quis custodiet ipsos custodes.
User avatar
RonMN
Intermediate Crude
Intermediate Crude
 
Posts: 2628
Joined: Fri 18 Mar 2005, 04:00:00
Location: Minnesota

Re: Abortion Question?

Postby lateralus » Thu 22 Mar 2007, 20:58:09

I can think of many people that should of been aborted.
lateralus
Tar Sands
Tar Sands
 
Posts: 621
Joined: Tue 04 Jul 2006, 03:00:00
Location: Hockeyland

Re: Abortion Question?

Postby threadbear » Fri 23 Mar 2007, 00:04:13

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('RonMN', 'I') personally, have to look at it backwards...

Would it be ok for somebody to take my life right now?
NO!

Would it be ok for somebody to take my life as a teeenager?
NO!

Would it be ok for somebody to take my life as an infant?
NO!

Would it be ok for somebody to take my life as a dependant fetus?
NO!

Would it be ok for somebody to block ME from developing in the first place?
YES.

My opinion...I don't demand that you agree with my opinion...but I wish you'd atleast respect my opinion!


I respect it, and considering that your mother almost had an abortion, instead of having you, it would be difficult to be dispassionate about the topic. But I think you have to understand that other people feel no sense of the humanness of a little teeny embryo, and therefore, the whole issue has a different effect on them.

There is a real difference in perception here that has nothing to do with selfishness, cruelty, murder, or anything of the sort and that goes for the people on both sides. All my friends are pro choice, but if you even hint at a second or third trimester abortion, they turn green and look like they're going to throw up.
User avatar
threadbear
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 7577
Joined: Sat 22 Jan 2005, 04:00:00
Top

Re: Abortion Question?

Postby TWilliam » Fri 23 Mar 2007, 01:27:01

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('RonMN', '[')b]Twilliam Wrote:
'pro-lifers' must become adoptive parents to children who would otherwise have been aborted.

Twilliam...i totally agree 100% without question! I've often thought (and said) that christians need to put their money where their mouth is...

However you mis-understand one point...I am not trying to make/change any laws...nor am I condeming anybody...I'm simply trying to call a spade a spade (& no, that is not a racist comment).


Sorry Ron, my comment wasn't aimed at you particularly.

Regarding the question, "is abortion murder?", maybe it is, maybe it isn't. But for the sake of argument let's say it is.

Ok, so what? I happen to believe that murder is at times justified.

As for any Christians who insist that no one has the right to make such a judgment save God above, well, that exact same stricture applies to them as regards passing judgment upon me. (Again I'm not referring to you specifically. Unless of course the shoe fits... :wink: )

If there is to be retribution, that is between my Maker and myself. It is not for them to administer on His behalf.

I seem to recall something about not bothering about the splinter in your neighbors eye when you have a beam in your own? I read that as "mind your own business", and as far as I'm concerned no woman's body and what she chooses to do with it is anyone's business but her own.

Finally, as regards "rights of the unborn"; sorry, but imo the rights of a life already established trump any that a potential life might have. It's a conveniently ignored fact that all pregnancies are potentially life-threatening to the mother, and she absolutely has the right to decide for herself if she wishes to accept that risk.

For the record, I do not condone abortion as birth control. Like dbruning, I would also support obligatory sterilization after the second one (actually, making a second abortion available only upon consent to sterilization at the same time would be my preference).
Last edited by TWilliam on Fri 23 Mar 2007, 19:02:29, edited 1 time in total.
"It means buckle your seatbelt, Dorothy, because Kansas? Is goin' bye-bye... "
User avatar
TWilliam
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 2591
Joined: Sun 28 Nov 2004, 04:00:00
Top

Re: Abortion Question?

Postby LaLaLand » Fri 23 Mar 2007, 09:27:54

The made-up word "abortionist" is exactly that... a made-up word.

I just looked it up on www.m-w.com and there wasn't a historical reference in regards to the fake word's origin and date of origin. I also looked it up in my paper 'Merriam-Webster's College Dictionary'; it wasn't there. My paper dictionary is 18 years old. That means "abortionist" is a recent entry into the American English lexicon. I travel to Scotland about once a year. The word "abortionist" does not exist in the Scottish dialect.

I'd say odds are high that the fake word appeared in the early 90's when the Republicans needed newer and flashier talking points in order to usher in their fascist agenda. Guess what! The American media doesn't use exact language; IE they repeated "abortionist" until it became an "official" word within the American English lexicon.
User avatar
LaLaLand
Peat
Peat
 
Posts: 78
Joined: Thu 16 Dec 2004, 04:00:00

PreviousNext

Return to Medical Issues Forum

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 19 guests