Donate Bitcoin

Donate Paypal


PeakOil is You

PeakOil is You

THE Topic of Abortion Thread (merged)

Discussions related to the physiological and psychological effects of peak oil on our members and future generations.

Re: Abortion Question?

Postby smallpoxgirl » Sun 25 Mar 2007, 15:25:44

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('threadbear', 'I') think Aaron, if you don't mind me interjecting here, a key abortion issue is determining if a being is suffering through the process. According to SPG, pain receptors don't start to form in the brain until, if I remember correctly, 20 weeks.


Suffering is a very complicated subject. What is the societal role of suffering? What is the relationship between suffering and pain? Is suffering universally a bad thing? These questions lead to complicated metaphysical discussions.

The pathways in the brain that carry pain sensation do not begin to form until 20-22 weeks. That's begin. They continue to develop well into the first year of life. In general, we think of two components being necessary for pain to occur: 1. Functioning neural pathways to detect and process pain signals and convey them to the cortex. 2. An intact cerebral cortex that can interpret the signals and experience pain. There is a big discussion right now about fetal pain and how that relates to abortion both amongst legislatures and amongst abortion providers. The vast majority of abortions are done before 20 weeks. I think we can say quite conclusively in that group, that fetal pain is a non-issue. In the 20 weeks and above group, it's probably a non-issue as well because like I said the low oxygen environment pre-cludes wakefulness and induces a similar state to general anesthesia. We may, however, see a shift to using analgesics prior to post-20 week abortions "just to be sure."
"We were standing on the edges
Of a thousand burning bridges
Sifting through the ashes every day
What we thought would never end
Now is nothing more than a memory
The way things were before
I lost my way" - OCMS
User avatar
smallpoxgirl
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 7258
Joined: Mon 08 Nov 2004, 04:00:00

Re: Abortion Question?

Postby NEOPO » Sun 25 Mar 2007, 15:32:05

Good points TB.
Sounds like an anti abortion conspiracy!
<smiles and wrings his hands with delight> 8)

Some bitch about this but not a peep about the resource war and all of its many guises.
<sits his drink down on a flaming coffeetable>

Then there is the spectre of future hard choices that anyone who understands PO and sustainable limits should know will have to be made.
I repeat - will have to be made.

In essence, in some distant future people are going to have to die because more abortions did not occur...doh!!!
<hands the elephant in the room a peanut>

Some people are simply not thinking this matter through relevant to our current precarious predicament and that would apply to both/all camps.
Its alittle scary when you do yet damn if I can deny what I see when I do.
How bout you?
Have you really thought this through? :roll:
Sam you are....

And no this isnt "dark side" mentality its reality mentality.
I dont want to have to make these choices and if I can avoid it I will yet for some reason I get the funny feeling that every action I make is in some way an agreeance or disagreeance with the status quo which will collectively be forced to make these hard choices one day.

Few wish to believe that by eating bananas from some third world country they inadvertantly support the local politician who was empowered by the local drug lord who enslaves the local population and forces them to vote for said politician and plant coca, poppy etc etc which in turn is sold to americans/world and results in drug addicted prostitutes (probably the oldest profession) running amuck and ultimately some story on Faux news about a woman who was turned down after her 12th abortion.
Nope, cause we like bananas :lol:

Image
It is easier to enslave a people that wish to remain free then it is to free a people who wish to remain enslaved.
User avatar
NEOPO
Permanently Banned
 
Posts: 3588
Joined: Sun 15 May 2005, 03:00:00
Location: THE MATRIX

Re: Abortion Question?

Postby threadbear » Sun 25 Mar 2007, 19:56:25

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('smallpoxgirl', '')$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('threadbear', 'I') think Aaron, if you don't mind me interjecting here, a key abortion issue is determining if a being is suffering through the process. According to SPG, pain receptors don't start to form in the brain until, if I remember correctly, 20 weeks.


Suffering is a very complicated subject. What is the societal role of suffering? What is the relationship between suffering and pain? Is suffering universally a bad thing? These questions lead to complicated metaphysical discussions.

The pathways in the brain that carry pain sensation do not begin to form until 20-22 weeks. That's begin. They continue to develop well into the first year of life. In general, we think of two components being necessary for pain to occur: 1. Functioning neural pathways to detect and process pain signals and convey them to the cortex. 2. An intact cerebral cortex that can interpret the signals and experience pain. There is a big discussion right now about fetal pain and how that relates to abortion both amongst legislatures and amongst abortion providers. The vast majority of abortions are done before 20 weeks. I think we can say quite conclusively in that group, that fetal pain is a non-issue. In the 20 weeks and above group, it's probably a non-issue as well because like I said the low oxygen environment pre-cludes wakefulness and induces a similar state to general anesthesia. We may, however, see a shift to using analgesics prior to post-20 week abortions "just to be sure."


Interesting. Thanks for the input. It hasn't been until just recently that premature babies were thought to feel pain, but they obviously do, and I've read that they are actually susceptible to a pain sensitivity syndrome, due to being poked prodded and intubated, repetetively after delivery.

When I was a month old, I had an operation to remove a couple of benign subcutaneous growths on my head. I still have the scars. The one on my hair line is a whopper, so it involved more than just a little knick with a scalpel. It was done without any freezing or anasthesia whatsoever, which completely freaked my mother out. She could hear me screaming bloody murder, from the hallway.


The common thinking at that time, was that full term infants of one month of age didn't feel pain either.

Some people to this day, don't think animals feel pain. They have "aversion reactions".
User avatar
threadbear
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 7577
Joined: Sat 22 Jan 2005, 04:00:00

Re: Abortion Question?

Postby threadbear » Sun 25 Mar 2007, 20:02:48

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('NEOPO', 'G')ood points TB.
Sounds like an anti abortion conspiracy!
<smiles and wrings his hands with delight> 8)

Some bitch about this but not a peep about the resource war and all of its many guises.
<sits his drink down on a flaming coffeetable>

Then there is the spectre of future hard choices that anyone who understands PO and sustainable limits should know will have to be made.
I repeat - will have to be made.

In essence, in some distant future people are going to have to die because more abortions did not occur...doh!!!
<hands the elephant in the room a peanut>


[img]http://www.bbc.co.uk/slink/images/255x143/girl_banana.jpg[/i
mg]


I agree, Neopo that abortion of an embryo beats retroactive abortion of the already born. And I have grave reservations about banana consumption too. It turns a delightful Sunday afternoon, downing a banana split, into a nightmare of chocolate covered remorse.
User avatar
threadbear
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 7577
Joined: Sat 22 Jan 2005, 04:00:00

Re: Abortion Question?

Postby hubbertspeak7777777 » Sun 25 Mar 2007, 20:38:29

The only reason that conservatives are against abortion is that want more people to serve in the military. To them, every abortion is one less future 18 year old soldier that could be sent off to be killed in a pointless war. They're against killing fetuses, but are for sending off 18 year olds to be killed in a pointless war. Hypocrisy, anyone?

Besides, last time I checked, we have an overpopulation problem. Wouldn't abortion help with that? Do we really need more people consuming oil?
hubbertspeak7777777
Coal
Coal
 
Posts: 406
Joined: Wed 07 Mar 2007, 04:00:00

Re: Abortion Question?

Postby RonMN » Sun 25 Mar 2007, 21:47:36

OK...I've been rather busy for the last 24 hours..but could somebody please explain to me how the ability to feel pain equaits to wether or not you are alive?

If I'm 41 years old & i can't feel the blade you just used to scrape my leggs and arms off...is that an excuse?

(gee, he can't feel it...let's amputate his arms & leggs...cool..let's take his head off as well).
Quis custodiet ipsos custodes.
User avatar
RonMN
Intermediate Crude
Intermediate Crude
 
Posts: 2628
Joined: Fri 18 Mar 2005, 04:00:00
Location: Minnesota

Re: Abortion Question?

Postby RonMN » Sun 25 Mar 2007, 22:02:04

Entropyfails Wrote:
It doesn't seem like RonMN wants to have a discussion on the legal position of "human being,"

Y'r damn right I don't want to have a "Legal" disussion...i want to have a "PERSONAL" discussion! (althought the "legal" ramifications do bother me as well...that'll have to wait).

So I'll repeat myself...how can you call abortion anything but murder? (ofcourse unless the womans life is in danger...but as i've said before...that is not the point...anybody has the right to self preservation!)
Quis custodiet ipsos custodes.
User avatar
RonMN
Intermediate Crude
Intermediate Crude
 
Posts: 2628
Joined: Fri 18 Mar 2005, 04:00:00
Location: Minnesota

Re: Abortion Question?

Postby RonMN » Sun 25 Mar 2007, 23:01:08

Aaron Wrote:
It's a Spade.


Thank you! That is what I was looking for...now if the rest could stop deluding themselves...well, we'll see where this thread evolves.
Quis custodiet ipsos custodes.
User avatar
RonMN
Intermediate Crude
Intermediate Crude
 
Posts: 2628
Joined: Fri 18 Mar 2005, 04:00:00
Location: Minnesota

Re: Abortion Question?

Postby Jack » Mon 26 Mar 2007, 00:39:54

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('RonMN', 'I') have a question to all Pro-Abortionists out there (and 1 question only).

Thus...how is abortion NOT murder?


OK...

1) I'm pro-abortion.

2) From a religious perspective, abortion may or may not be murder. It depends on when the fetus is imbued with a human soul. Some contend this occurs at conception, others argue it occurs at birth. Since religion isn't my strong suit, I neither know nor care.

3) From a legal perspective, abortion isn't murder. So there's no risk of prosecution or civil liability.

4) As long as it's legal, go for it.

5) If murder (in a religious or moral sense) were legal (from the perspective of the various penal codes and civil liability), that would be OK with me.

If it weren't legal, the COC would prohibit my advocacy of it. So I won't go there.

Just to frame my views on the subject, once, many years ago, a friend with some skills in biochemistry came across the interesting fact that alpha-fetal protein sold for a high price. One could, in principle, get the (ahem) feedstock from an abortion clinic. I contacted several, trying to make arrangements. Sadly, federal law requires signed approval by the patient, the mother in this case. The clinics didn't believe the patients would agree to it; I suggested we tell them it was to advance research, but the clinics didn't feel comfortable with it...

Alas, we could have made a fortune. (Sigh)

So...yes, abortion may well be (from a religious and moral sense) murder. So?

8)

This sociopathic message brought to you by...who else?
Jack
Light Sweet Crude
Light Sweet Crude
 
Posts: 4929
Joined: Wed 11 Aug 2004, 03:00:00
Top

Re: Abortion Question?

Postby gg3 » Mon 26 Mar 2007, 01:59:45

Aaron, you've misconstrued the brain functioning arguement.

It is not about picking an arbitrary point on a linear continuum that can become a slippery slope. It's about determining a threshold: below the threshold there is not a functioning brain, above it there is. One you have a functioning brain, you have moral standing whether you're a Michelangelo or a moron.

---

As Smallpoxgirl pointed out, the fetus, like the jars of paint, only fulfills its potential via the intervention of the efforts of another human.

Now if we want to talk about compelling some humans to labor in order to allow other humans to fulfill their potential, then we can start by levying an additional increment of income tax, to be used to support an expanded version of the MacArthur Genius Grants, so that anyone with sufficient brains immediately gets a lifetime income sufficient to enable them to fulfill their potential.

How many of us here would vote for that tax, eh?

---

Re. fetal consciousness: OK, so the fetus at some point is in something like a sleep state. Seems to me that's sufficient. The clear "abortion on demand" zone is the point before there is sufficient brain tissue to support awareness of pain. The clear "no-go" zone is the point at which the fetus, if removed from the womb and given air to breathe, would become "awake" in any measurable sense of the word. In between is a gray area from OK to not-OK, where the standard for allowing an abortion would become progressively more stringent.

Either way this is a scientific issue that can be resolved via scientific methods.

---

Entropyfails, see my point above in this posting: it's not "how smart" it's "threshold of awareness."

Though I agree, too many humans, and if we don't reduce the birth rate, Ma Nature will increase the death rate.

---

Aaron re. "pre-baby." Hey, I'm a pre-Michaelangelo, let's have some subsidized paint and canvas here!

---

Entropyfails, re brain activity:

Because consciousness, the soul if you will, is dependent upon the human brain during the lifetime of the person. Please take the time to study the cognitive science re. the issue of brain activity and consciousness.

---

SPG, I would certainly support using analgesics for abortions performed after 20 weeks. And if we're going to go there, then no more routine circumcisions either; let people make that decision for themselves at age of adulthood, and for those who want it, provide analgesics the same as for any other surgery.

---

Hubbertspeak(multiple7s), that's overly simplistic and assumes a degree of foresight that is blatantly absent, otherwise we wouldn't have to be here discussing PO and climate change and all the rest of it.

Simpler and more accurate answer: it's about sex.

---

RonMN, did you read what I had to say about pre and post the threshold of consciousness?

If you agree with me that no brain = definition of death, then you can't murder something that's not alive in the first place.

Otherwise, if it's "potential" you're concerned about, then you should write a check for a minimum of $10k to The_Toecutter, because his blue-collar economic circumstances are interfering with his potential to develop inventions that will have a significant benefit for humanity in general.

---

For emphasis: You can't murder something that's not alive.
User avatar
gg3
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 3271
Joined: Mon 24 May 2004, 03:00:00
Location: California, USA

Re: Abortion Question?

Postby entropyfails » Mon 26 Mar 2007, 07:37:37

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('RonMN', '
')So I'll repeat myself...how can you call abortion anything but murder? (ofcourse unless the womans life is in danger...but as i've said before...that is not the point...anybody has the right to self preservation!)


As I said in my post...
1) Murder is legally defined.
2) Fetuses are not people in any way, shape, or form. You are not 106 years old even though you COULD be. Thresholds have not been passes for that categorization.

It's just killing lumps of cells. You didn't answer my question...

Do you think removing cancer is murder?
EntropyFails
"Little prigs and three-quarter madmen may have the conceit that the laws of nature are constantly broken for their sakes." -- Friedrich Nietzsche
User avatar
entropyfails
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 565
Joined: Wed 30 Jun 2004, 03:00:00
Top

Re: Abortion Question?

Postby entropyfails » Mon 26 Mar 2007, 08:20:18

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('gg3', ' ')One you have a functioning brain, you have moral standing whether you're a Michelangelo or a moron.


And I think that the computer scientist in you should realize that whenever you have a "functioning" metric, you are going to miss categorization on certain states. There is no real definitive line that we can determine from the outside. You only get to know that depending on what's happening on the inside of the organism. We can make some proclamations after the fact, for example in a corpse 3 days dead. But at the line, we won't ever know the truth of "how much they feel" either way.


$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('gg3', ' ')
Entropyfails, see my point above in this posting: it's not "how smart" it's "threshold of awareness."


But I see that as just as fuzzy as "how smart." A single cell is "aware" of damage done to itself and tries to repair it. It knows about damage and healing. The only threshold to cross is self-awareness, the ability to be aware that you are aware. But that comes much after birth in humans. So I see that as an argument for much later abortions.

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('gg3', ' ')
Though I agree, too many humans, and if we don't reduce the birth rate, Ma Nature will increase the death rate.


Agreed. There is only ever enough people as there is food to feed them. Few make it much longer than a month without food. So abortion is a good thing in that it removes unwanted people to feed by destroying tissue that is not yet a person.

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('gg3', ' ')
Entropyfails, re brain activity:

Because consciousness, the soul if you will, is dependent upon the human brain during the lifetime of the person. Please take the time to study the cognitive science re. the issue of brain activity and consciousness.


What aspects of consciousness do you think I fail to understand?

When we talk about "human consciousness" we are obviously talking about something different than "animal consciousness". The only real ability we possess beyond them is the ability of self-awareness. It is the ability to recognize yourself as a process in this world that is separate from other things in the world. It typically comes with the knowledge that your consciousness will eventually end. That process is very complex and requires specific activation of input patterns at specific human development times to fully form.

Are the "wolf children" who can never fully understand symbolic manipulation and sentence grammar really conscious? They will know nothing of death and can never integrate into human society. Legally, we treat them as humans but from the perspective of self-aware consciousness, they are different entities entirely.
EntropyFails
"Little prigs and three-quarter madmen may have the conceit that the laws of nature are constantly broken for their sakes." -- Friedrich Nietzsche
User avatar
entropyfails
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 565
Joined: Wed 30 Jun 2004, 03:00:00
Top

Re: Abortion Question?

Postby threadbear » Mon 26 Mar 2007, 09:53:49

Entropy, I think, that in many respects animals are more conscious than man.
User avatar
threadbear
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 7577
Joined: Sat 22 Jan 2005, 04:00:00

Re: Abortion Question?

Postby smallpoxgirl » Mon 26 Mar 2007, 12:17:06

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('threadbear', 'E')ntropy, I think, that in many respects animals are more conscious than man.


Well...concious or not, if one of them decided to roost in your uterus, I bet you'd darn well come begging me to get it out. :P
"We were standing on the edges
Of a thousand burning bridges
Sifting through the ashes every day
What we thought would never end
Now is nothing more than a memory
The way things were before
I lost my way" - OCMS
User avatar
smallpoxgirl
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 7258
Joined: Mon 08 Nov 2004, 04:00:00
Top

Re: Abortion Question?

Postby smallpoxgirl » Mon 26 Mar 2007, 12:44:08

This is an article from JAMA reviewing fetal pain. It also talks a bit about fetal conciousness: link
"We were standing on the edges
Of a thousand burning bridges
Sifting through the ashes every day
What we thought would never end
Now is nothing more than a memory
The way things were before
I lost my way" - OCMS
User avatar
smallpoxgirl
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 7258
Joined: Mon 08 Nov 2004, 04:00:00

Re: Abortion Question?

Postby Aaron » Mon 26 Mar 2007, 13:29:30

This is an excellent thread... thanks everyone for writing it.
The problem is, of course, that not only is economics bankrupt, but it has always been nothing more than politics in disguise... economics is a form of brain damage.

Hazel Henderson
User avatar
Aaron
Resting in Peace
 
Posts: 5998
Joined: Thu 15 Apr 2004, 03:00:00
Location: Houston

Re: Abortion Question?

Postby entropyfails » Mon 26 Mar 2007, 19:59:06

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('threadbear', 'E')ntropy, I think, that in many respects animals are more conscious than man.


Consciousness is a funny thing. We don't know that much about it. No good model of consciousness exists because if a good one did, we would be able to use it to create a true computer consciousness. The first team to create true machine intelligence will be the first people to fully and truly understand consciousness.

I think that SmallPoxGirl's link points out well, (Thank you very much for that excellent link spg!) We really don't have that good of a model of consciousness. In that paper, they used neural pathway termination at the perception layer of the cortex to define "consciousness of pain," but is that really the general metric we want to use? Many unconscious people have full pathways from nerve to brain that work, but the perception inputs get ignored by the larger, self-aware consciousness that we are actually talking about. So while the termination of nerves is a necessary condition, it is not sufficient for consciousness. So the conclusion of the paper holds, below 30 weeks it is impossible to be "conscious" of pain because the appropriate hardware is missing. But even AFTER the hardware is there, the software of "self-consciousness" doesn't load until far after.

Animals don't have self-reflected consciousness, and good for them. Self-reflected consciousness is a very destructive thing. Look what it has done to humans on this planet! It makes you fear the future because self-reflected consciousness demands its own continuity above all other things. The other forms of life live within nature, using their natural intelligence to protect themselves in the present moment. This is intelligence and "consciousness" used well.

We self-reflected conscious beings, on the other hand, live entirely outside of nature. We live in the functional mathematic domain where everything is divided up into "sets" and you can apply "truth" and "falsehood." We match neural input patterns with old learned patterns to try to "decide" what to do. And we always choose in the direction of "self", however we choose to define that direction. THAT process kills everything.

That process, I call "civilization". And thus YOU are civilization. And you have no other tools other than "civilization" to help you.

So tying that into abortion, we recognize that when "civilization" comes into being inside a human, we then require them to submit to the general laws of civilization. THAT is the point in which the laws of "civilization" should apply as opposed to the kill or be killed laws of the animals. Thus a few months after birth is probably appropriately consistent with that definition.
EntropyFails
"Little prigs and three-quarter madmen may have the conceit that the laws of nature are constantly broken for their sakes." -- Friedrich Nietzsche
User avatar
entropyfails
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 565
Joined: Wed 30 Jun 2004, 03:00:00
Top

Re: Abortion Question?

Postby smallpoxgirl » Tue 27 Mar 2007, 00:17:02

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('entropyfails', 'I')n that paper, they used neural pathway termination at the perception layer of the cortex to define "consciousness of pain," but is that really the general metric we want to use? Many unconscious people have full pathways from nerve to brain that work, but the perception inputs get ignored by the larger, self-aware consciousness that we are actually talking about. So while the termination of nerves is a necessary condition, it is not sufficient for consciousness.


The thalamo-cortical connections don't pertain to when when consciousness develops per-se. It's just that we know consciousness is a process that happens in the cerebral cortex. If there aren't any fibers from the pain processing centers that are going to the cortex, then we can say for 100% sure that there is no consciousness of pain.

In terms of stroke patients, there are three specific structural patterns of stroke that destroy the right circuitry to where the patient looses consciousness.
1: Complete destruction of both cerebral cortices.
2: Destruction of both thalami.
3: Destruction of the reticular activating system.

The reticular activating system is located in the brainstem. It's major function is to produce wakefulness.

I think development of consciousness does not happen at a specific moment in time but probably happens gradually over the first couple of years of life.
"We were standing on the edges
Of a thousand burning bridges
Sifting through the ashes every day
What we thought would never end
Now is nothing more than a memory
The way things were before
I lost my way" - OCMS
User avatar
smallpoxgirl
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 7258
Joined: Mon 08 Nov 2004, 04:00:00
Top

Re: Abortion Question?

Postby RonMN » Thu 29 Mar 2007, 22:43:19

Jack Wrote:
From a religious perspective, abortion may or may not be murder. It depends on when the fetus is imbued with a human soul. Some contend this occurs at conception, others argue it occurs at birth. Since religion isn't my strong suit, I neither know nor care.

I personally am not looking at it from a "religious" standpoint, I'm looking at it as if a 40 year old shot another 40 year old...I don't know if it should be called "ethics", "wrong", "moral"...but we all call it murder.

Jack Wrote:

So...yes, abortion may well be (from a religious and moral sense) murder. So?

One thing I can always respect Jack...is your honesty! :)
Quis custodiet ipsos custodes.
User avatar
RonMN
Intermediate Crude
Intermediate Crude
 
Posts: 2628
Joined: Fri 18 Mar 2005, 04:00:00
Location: Minnesota

Re: Abortion Question?

Postby RonMN » Thu 29 Mar 2007, 22:50:33

Entropyfails doesn't see any difference between a fetus & cancer cells...another argument so absurd it's really not worth a response.

But I will just ask...did you begin a cancer cells? Do you know of anybody who did?

Oh geeze, now I guess we have to go thru another re-definition of the word "begin"...UGH!

P.S. I would also like to thank everybody who has posted to this thread!!!

Even if you rail against me or hate me because of it...I'm learning...about myself and about others. And I appreciate all (even absurd) inputs!
Quis custodiet ipsos custodes.
User avatar
RonMN
Intermediate Crude
Intermediate Crude
 
Posts: 2628
Joined: Fri 18 Mar 2005, 04:00:00
Location: Minnesota

PreviousNext

Return to Medical Issues Forum

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest

cron