by MacG » Tue 20 Mar 2007, 17:52:58
$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('smallpoxgirl', 'I')f you are going to tell people, that "You know what, don't worry about that condom, just don't take AZT and you'll be fine", you'd better damned well be right and be sure you're right because if you're wrong, people are going to die.
Oh-ho... Here comes the barrage! This accusation is really complex and it would take a looong post to deconstruct it. Almost nobody would care to read such a long post. Memeplexes at their best!
In short: You touch a LOT of "triggers" and accuse everyone who even dare to ask questions of the most horrific things, which nobody here have even hinted about.
Who have suggested that unprotected male homosexual intercourse should be inherently "safe" if you just avoid taking AZT afterwards? Not me. Not any poster I've read here.
Some facts maybe? I know it's disturbing, and I apology for it, but anyhow:
I have only had access to statistics from Sweden, and we are pretty backwards and left behind and such, but from a population of 9 mil we had 20 deaths from "HIV" in 2004. More people die from falls from stairs every year here. There are quite significant risks for infections inherent in unprotected male homosexual intercourse, like gonorrhea, syphilis, hepatitis-A and just about ANY infection you could imagine. NOBODY have EVER suggested that it's in any way "safe" for gay males to engage in sexual encounters without condom.
Still you claim that somebody said it.
I'm not mad, irritated or in any way emotionally engaged in this discussion, I just find it immensely interesting.