Donate Bitcoin

Donate Paypal


PeakOil is You

PeakOil is You

THE AIDS/HIV Thread (merged)

Discussions related to the physiological and psychological effects of peak oil on our members and future generations.

Re: HIV probably isn't the cause of AIDS

Unread postby MacG » Tue 20 Mar 2007, 07:49:40

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('smallpoxgirl', 'I') just stumbled on this which may be interesting to some of you. It goes through the arguements for the HIV-AIDS connection in some detail:link


Thanks. That was a torough one. I'm reading it carefully.

One big whopping elephant in the room is AZT. A lot of the references are from the 80's and 90's, and as I recall from memory, a lot of HIV-positives were routinely treated with AZT in those days.

In order to be able to trust results from AZT-treated patients, the hypothesis that AZT itself cause immune deficiency must be handled. Until that happen, there is a rather disturbing elephant in the room. It's a central question, and the closest thing I found adressing it is the much referenced "Concorde" study.

A very interesting question is about dosage regimens in the late 80's and early 90's. Were HIV+ patients initially treated with low doses of AZT? Just to have the dose increased when symptoms arrived?

As I have stated numerous times, I have not formed a strong opinion on the issue here, but I keep an eye open for future development.
User avatar
MacG
Heavy Crude
Heavy Crude
 
Posts: 1137
Joined: Sat 04 Jun 2005, 03:00:00

Re: HIV probably isn't the cause of AIDS

Unread postby dukey » Tue 20 Mar 2007, 09:20:42

Graphic (large)

Image
$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', 'D')eadly toxic chemical hazard warning by Sigma Chemical Co. on tiny 25mg bottles of AZT supplied to research laboratories. You obviously don’t find this advice on GlaxoSmithKline's AZT label, or in its package insert recommending a daily dose of up to sixty times as much. Or let’s face it: who would swallow it?

whos for AZT ?
$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', 'A')ZT is a cytotoxic chemical, a "DNA chain terminator." It interferes with DNA replication, by substituting itself for thymine, one of the base components in the DNA chain. This, theoretically, interferes with the reproduction of HIV. But it also interferes with the reproduction of the T-cell, the basis of the immune system, and the T-cell dies. The doctors who tested AZT for its effectiveness against HIV claimed they found that AZT was one thousand times as toxic to HIV reproduction as it was to the T-cells that were involved in that reproduction.
$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', ' ')But for some time it appeared that some symptoms of AIDS had been reduced: AZT was so toxic that it killed any bacteria in its path, so it appeared to kill opportunistic infections, the main cause of death among AIDS patients. AZT was quickly approved, one of the few drugs given such quick approval. No one waited to find out that AZT kills the immune system so that opportunistic infections take over permanently. Questions over the trial results on the FDA committee were overcome by political clout of Burroughs Wellcome through its supporters and cheerleaders.
Last edited by Ferretlover on Thu 19 Feb 2009, 13:03:34, edited 1 time in total.
Reason: Converted [img] to [url].
User avatar
dukey
Intermediate Crude
Intermediate Crude
 
Posts: 2248
Joined: Sun 20 Feb 2005, 04:00:00

Re: HIV probably isn't the cause of AIDS

Unread postby Newsseeker » Tue 20 Mar 2007, 10:35:50

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('MacG', '')$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Newsseeker', 'U')mm... homosexuality? Not prevalent in Africa but definitely in the West.


Not prevalent in Africa? Are you really sure about that? I'm not. Please provide arguments. As I stated, I'm not sure, so I will listen to arguments.


There is the tribe of the Etoro that believe semen is the life force and so boys and other men need to orally ingest this. There is another tribe close by that practices homosexuality but both of these tribes are not the norm in Africa where heterosexuality is.
Newsseeker
Heavy Crude
Heavy Crude
 
Posts: 1126
Joined: Thu 12 May 2005, 03:00:00
Top

Re: HIV probably isn't the cause of AIDS

Unread postby MacG » Tue 20 Mar 2007, 11:15:31

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Newsseeker', '')$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('MacG', '')$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Newsseeker', 'U')mm... homosexuality? Not prevalent in Africa but definitely in the West.


Not prevalent in Africa? Are you really sure about that? I'm not. Please provide arguments. As I stated, I'm not sure, so I will listen to arguments.


There is the tribe of the Etoro that believe semen is the life force and so boys and other men need to orally ingest this. There is another tribe close by that practices homosexuality but both of these tribes are not the norm in Africa where heterosexuality is.


If you say so... But I got the impression that northern Africa, where Muslim faith restrict access to women, is a little different...
User avatar
MacG
Heavy Crude
Heavy Crude
 
Posts: 1137
Joined: Sat 04 Jun 2005, 03:00:00
Top

Re: HIV probably isn't the cause of AIDS

Unread postby smallpoxgirl » Tue 20 Mar 2007, 11:52:04

There are a number of problems with the AZT causes AIDS theory.

If that were true:
1. AIDS shouldn't predate the use of AZT, which it doesn't.
2. There should be a high degree of correlation between who takes AZT and who gets AIDS. There isn't.
3. Starting AZT should make AIDS worse. It doesn't. AZT can suppress the bone marrow. When that happens, what you get is something called pancytopenia. All of the blood cell lines are suppressed. The red cells are suppressed, so you get anemia. All of the white blood cell lines are suppressed. The immune system dysfunction in AIDS is a very unusual and specific type of immune system dysfunction. Only the helper T cells are affected. The macrophages, the B cells, the cytotoxic T cells, the Natural Killer cells, basophils, eosinophils, monocytes....they're all fine. No one has ever shown AZT causing that kind of a specific cell line suppression.
4. Starting AZT shouldn't make AIDS better. In fact it does. When patients are started on AZT, their helper T cell counts go up not down.

AZT is certainly a very toxic substance. Many medicines are. Warfarin was originally developed as a rat poison. Now we give it to patients as a blood thinner. Nitrogen mustard chemotherapeutics are derived from mustard gas.
"We were standing on the edges
Of a thousand burning bridges
Sifting through the ashes every day
What we thought would never end
Now is nothing more than a memory
The way things were before
I lost my way" - OCMS
User avatar
smallpoxgirl
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 7258
Joined: Mon 08 Nov 2004, 04:00:00

Re: HIV probably isn't the cause of AIDS

Unread postby dukey » Tue 20 Mar 2007, 12:59:39

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', 'T')he macrophages, the B cells, the cytotoxic T cells, the Natural Killer cells, basophils, eosinophils, monocytes....they're all fine. No one has ever shown AZT causing that kind of a specific cell line suppression.


AZT destroys everything. It makes no distiction. It also crosses the blood brain barrier.
User avatar
dukey
Intermediate Crude
Intermediate Crude
 
Posts: 2248
Joined: Sun 20 Feb 2005, 04:00:00
Top

Re: HIV probably isn't the cause of AIDS

Unread postby smallpoxgirl » Tue 20 Mar 2007, 13:02:31

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('dukey', 'A')ZT destroys everything. It makes no distiction. It also crosses the blood brain barrier.
So then how can it cause a disease that is characterized by a specific deficiency of helper T cells where all the rest of the cell lines are fine?
"We were standing on the edges
Of a thousand burning bridges
Sifting through the ashes every day
What we thought would never end
Now is nothing more than a memory
The way things were before
I lost my way" - OCMS
User avatar
smallpoxgirl
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 7258
Joined: Mon 08 Nov 2004, 04:00:00
Top

Re: HIV probably isn't the cause of AIDS

Unread postby dukey » Tue 20 Mar 2007, 13:05:26

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', 'A')ZT is a cytotoxic chemical, a "DNA chain terminator." It interferes with DNA replication, by substituting itself for thymine, one of the base components in the DNA chain. This, theoretically, interferes with the reproduction of HIV. But it also interferes with the reproduction of the T-cell, the basis of the immune system, and the T-cell dies. The doctors who tested AZT for its effectiveness against HIV claimed they found that AZT was one thousand times as toxic to HIV reproduction as it was to the T-cells that were involved in that reproduction.


get it ?
..
User avatar
dukey
Intermediate Crude
Intermediate Crude
 
Posts: 2248
Joined: Sun 20 Feb 2005, 04:00:00
Top

Re: HIV probably isn't the cause of AIDS

Unread postby smallpoxgirl » Tue 20 Mar 2007, 13:27:14

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('dukey', 'g')et it ?..


Yeah. It interferes with DNA replication. Lots of meds do that. Such meds interfere with any cells that are rapidly turning over. That's the gut lining and ALL of the bone marrow cells. They cause pancytopenia, not a specific deficiency of helper T cells.
"We were standing on the edges
Of a thousand burning bridges
Sifting through the ashes every day
What we thought would never end
Now is nothing more than a memory
The way things were before
I lost my way" - OCMS
User avatar
smallpoxgirl
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 7258
Joined: Mon 08 Nov 2004, 04:00:00
Top

Re: HIV probably isn't the cause of AIDS

Unread postby Kingcoal » Tue 20 Mar 2007, 16:06:58

Neither Smallpoxgirl or EnergyUnlimited has watched the video obviously, yet they have gone off on some strange tangent. Maybe I missed something (I sat through the whole thing), but where did they say that "there is no HIV, nobody's ever seen it"? The video explains that HIV or HLTV retrovirus is probably common and harmless, shows pictures of it and tells you how you probably inherited it from your mother.

Both SPG and EU have gone on and on with inflammatory comments about the intelligence of someone WHO WOULD EVEN BOTHER TO WATCH THIS VIDEO. EU said something like "watching something that is stupid is stupid" or something to that effect.

Well I watched the video, the whole thing. Do you know why I watched the whole thing SPG/EU? Because that’s what I do, I like to hear opinions, even seemingly wacky ones. I learned a long time ago that the path to intelligence is listening and understanding. I’ve seen people with decades of education and little experience go off on tangents costing thousands, even millions of dollars irrationally defending their original ideas in vain. Scientists are people too; they are petty, covetous and vain, just like everyone else. They become possessed with being right, that’s why the scientific method includes this thing called peer review.

I didn't see and conspiracy theory in this video. I just saw a viewpoint being presented and a case being made. The point was simple; AIDS probably isn't caused by HIV. They presented evidence to that effect and presented a theory that AIDS might have something to do with recreational drug use. They did imply that the medical community was not following standard scientific procedures when it came to AIDS, such as peer review before press conference.

We have been told that HIV causes AIDS and more research was needed. What this video is trying to say is the same thing - minus the claim that HIV causes AIDS, as the authors don’t think that claim has been sufficiently proven yet. They attempt to demonstrate that there is not a very strong case for that assertion and that we need more open, unbiased research. They put forth a hypothesis that drug abuse may actually cause the disease, however, they don't claim to have proven anything.

So what is wrong with having a dissenting opinion, backing it up with evidence and pissing people off? Has the current 25 year search for a cure been that successful? The video describes how scurvy and other conditions were once thought to be caused by a pathogen and how those scientists fought tooth and nail – in vain, to discredit the theory that scurvy might be a nutritional deficiency. Why can’t we have some open thinking on the AIDS front?
"That's the problem with mercy, kid... It just ain't professional" - Fast Eddie, The Color of Money
User avatar
Kingcoal
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 2149
Joined: Wed 29 Sep 2004, 03:00:00
Location: Pennsylvania, USA

Re: HIV probably isn't the cause of AIDS

Unread postby dukey » Tue 20 Mar 2007, 16:17:08

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', 'W')hy can’t we have some open thinking on the AIDS front?


because a lot of people make too much money off it.
User avatar
dukey
Intermediate Crude
Intermediate Crude
 
Posts: 2248
Joined: Sun 20 Feb 2005, 04:00:00
Top

Re: HIV probably isn't the cause of AIDS

Unread postby MacG » Tue 20 Mar 2007, 16:27:58

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Kingcoal', ' ')Why can’t we have some open thinking on the AIDS front?


That, Sir, is a VERY interesting question indeed.

I think it's a rabbit hole that goes pretty deep in human nature and the construct of our societies.

When people start screaming, name-calling and send up a barrage of guilt-by-association and ad-hominems, I'm pretty sure it's because you have happened to threat a memeplex which just start to defend itself. Nothing wrong with memes, the ability to carry memes is probably what makes us human in the first place, and they usually bring fantastic benefits to the host. Sometimes though, those memes take on a life of their own, without benefiting the host. In those cases it's necessary with violent and broad-spectrum defenses.

I don't believe in intentional conspiracies, but I believe very much in fundamental human limitations and shortcomings.
User avatar
MacG
Heavy Crude
Heavy Crude
 
Posts: 1137
Joined: Sat 04 Jun 2005, 03:00:00
Top

Re: HIV probably isn't the cause of AIDS

Unread postby smallpoxgirl » Tue 20 Mar 2007, 17:25:21

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Kingcoal', 'N')either Smallpoxgirl or EnergyUnlimited has watched the video obviously, yet they have gone off on some strange tangent.


I have only so much tolerance for people telling lies and making inflamatory untrue statements about me and my profession. I watched 20 minutes of the video. I saw not a single useful true statement and a whole laundry list of inflammatory lies. No I'm not going to waste another 1:40 of my life watching more of it.

I've spent at least a good hour thumbing through Duesberg's book. It too has little if any truth and hundreds of pages of misconstrued inflammatory crap.

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', 'M')aybe I missed something (I sat through the whole thing), but where did they say that "there is no HIV, nobody's ever seen it"?


This video: http://www.peakoil.com/post433692.html#433692
Time 2:15 to 2:35 talks about the idea that it doesn't exist. The specific statement that "no one has ever seen HIV" is at 2:23.

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', 'S')o what is wrong with having a dissenting opinion, backing it up with evidence and pissing people off?


What's wrong with it is that a whole lot of lives are on the line. There a lot of people in the gay male community that engage in some shady crap sexually as it is. If you are going to tell people, that "You know what, don't worry about that condom, just don't take AZT and you'll be fine", you'd better damned well be right and be sure you're right because if you're wrong, people are going to die. If you're going to go out and make statements like the medical community is killing people, accuse hundreds of thousands of smart conscientious people of negligence, you'd better have some damned good proof to back that up. They don't have proof because there is no proof. It's just a whole river of disjointed BS.

If Duesberg wanted to settle this here and now, it'd be pretty easy. If he really believes HIV is harmless, he should inoculate himself with it and show the world. The truth is he doesn't do that because he knows damned well that it kills people. He just wants to run his mouth and sell books and doesn't really give a crap how many people die as a result.
"We were standing on the edges
Of a thousand burning bridges
Sifting through the ashes every day
What we thought would never end
Now is nothing more than a memory
The way things were before
I lost my way" - OCMS
User avatar
smallpoxgirl
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 7258
Joined: Mon 08 Nov 2004, 04:00:00
Top

Re: HIV probably isn't the cause of AIDS

Unread postby MacG » Tue 20 Mar 2007, 17:34:00

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('smallpoxgirl', 'I')f Duesberg wanted to settle this here and now, it'd be pretty easy. If he really believes HIV is harmless, he should inoculate himself with it and show the world.


That is the single strongest argument I've ever seen against Duesberg. I know he has been confronted with it, but I dont remember the answer. It's always on my mind though.
User avatar
MacG
Heavy Crude
Heavy Crude
 
Posts: 1137
Joined: Sat 04 Jun 2005, 03:00:00
Top

Re: HIV probably isn't the cause of AIDS

Unread postby MacG » Tue 20 Mar 2007, 17:52:58

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('smallpoxgirl', 'I')f you are going to tell people, that "You know what, don't worry about that condom, just don't take AZT and you'll be fine", you'd better damned well be right and be sure you're right because if you're wrong, people are going to die.


Oh-ho... Here comes the barrage! This accusation is really complex and it would take a looong post to deconstruct it. Almost nobody would care to read such a long post. Memeplexes at their best!

In short: You touch a LOT of "triggers" and accuse everyone who even dare to ask questions of the most horrific things, which nobody here have even hinted about.

Who have suggested that unprotected male homosexual intercourse should be inherently "safe" if you just avoid taking AZT afterwards? Not me. Not any poster I've read here.

Some facts maybe? I know it's disturbing, and I apology for it, but anyhow:

I have only had access to statistics from Sweden, and we are pretty backwards and left behind and such, but from a population of 9 mil we had 20 deaths from "HIV" in 2004. More people die from falls from stairs every year here. There are quite significant risks for infections inherent in unprotected male homosexual intercourse, like gonorrhea, syphilis, hepatitis-A and just about ANY infection you could imagine. NOBODY have EVER suggested that it's in any way "safe" for gay males to engage in sexual encounters without condom.

Still you claim that somebody said it.

I'm not mad, irritated or in any way emotionally engaged in this discussion, I just find it immensely interesting.
User avatar
MacG
Heavy Crude
Heavy Crude
 
Posts: 1137
Joined: Sat 04 Jun 2005, 03:00:00
Top

Re: HIV probably isn't the cause of AIDS

Unread postby smallpoxgirl » Tue 20 Mar 2007, 18:06:03

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('MacG', 'a')ccuse everyone who even dare to ask questions of the most horrific things


Those videos do not just "dare to ask questions". They accuse the entire medical establishment of mass murder. That's a huge accusation, and one that you'd better darned well be able to substantiate if you're going to make it.

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', 'T')here are quite significant risks for infections inherent in unprotected male homosexual intercourse, like gonorrhea, syphilis, hepatitis-A and just about ANY infection you could imagine.


None of those things is fatal and in gay male circles they don't count for much. AIDS does. Duesberg may not being saying "go have unprotected sex", but it doesn't take a genius to figure out that is what's going to happen if you tell gay men "AIDS isn't contagious". Duesberg is the patron saint of all the HIV negative males that are in relationships with HIV positive partners. There are people right now killing themselves because they've believed what he says. This in not theoretical. I've met these people.

No way is he that clueless about the public health implications of what he says. He knows darned well he's killing people.
"We were standing on the edges
Of a thousand burning bridges
Sifting through the ashes every day
What we thought would never end
Now is nothing more than a memory
The way things were before
I lost my way" - OCMS
User avatar
smallpoxgirl
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 7258
Joined: Mon 08 Nov 2004, 04:00:00
Top

Re: HIV probably isn't the cause of AIDS

Unread postby MacG » Tue 20 Mar 2007, 18:38:57

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('smallpoxgirl', ' ')Duesberg may not being saying "go have unprotected sex", but it doesn't take a genius to figure out that is what's going to happen if you tell gay men "AIDS isn't contagious". Duesberg is the patron saint of all the HIV negative males that are in relationships with HIV positive partners. There are people right now killing themselves because they've believed what he says. This in not theoretical. I've met these people.

No way is he that clueless about the public health implications of what he says. He knows darned well he's killing people.


Gahhh! Another barrage! I don't belive in Duesberg and I dont condemn you, but it's incredibly interesting all of it.

Would it be possible for you to share my curiosity? At least from a retarded Swedish perspective? With 20 "HIV" deaths a year (down from 137 in 95') it is hardly a main health issue. It's a major health issue for those who die prematurely, but it's not an epidemiological issue. About the same number of people who die every year because they fall out of their beds. (I'm not joking in any way, this is official statistics).
User avatar
MacG
Heavy Crude
Heavy Crude
 
Posts: 1137
Joined: Sat 04 Jun 2005, 03:00:00
Top

Re: HIV probably isn't the cause of AIDS

Unread postby NEOPO » Tue 20 Mar 2007, 18:49:42

Thank you Sir! I am not worthy...
No I do not believe many actually click the links and/or watch the videos initially nor subsequentally.
A distinction should be drawn between gazing in relative disdain through goggles of preconceived notions and seeing with an open mind.

Mr Russell a potential Enigma for the initiate.
Alot of wool yet I taut I taw a pooty tat!
I did !! I did!! I did taw a pooty tat !!

I regretfully believe that this may be where "it" occurred : The Royal Society
$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', 'O')n the words of no one


$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', 'N')othing is true and all is allowed


Adam Weishaupt

An enthusiastic philanthropist.
Thomas Jefferson...

"Forget about winning and losing; forget about pride and pain. Let your opponent graze your skin and you smash into his flesh; let him smash into your flesh and you fracture his bones; let him fracture your bones and you take his life. Do not be concerned with escaping safely - lay your life before him." or her....
Image

Uhmmm Adolf Foster? 8)
It is easier to enslave a people that wish to remain free then it is to free a people who wish to remain enslaved.
User avatar
NEOPO
Permanently Banned
 
Posts: 3588
Joined: Sun 15 May 2005, 03:00:00
Location: THE MATRIX
Top

Re: HIV probably isn't the cause of AIDS

Unread postby PrairieMule » Tue 20 Mar 2007, 18:58:28

A man walks through a park and sees 2 drug addicts sharing a dirty needle.

"Hey you better stop that our you'll end up with AIDS!"

"Don't worry Mister," replies the first junkie, "we are both wearing condoms."
Last edited by PrairieMule on Tue 20 Mar 2007, 19:09:19, edited 1 time in total.
If you give a man a fish you will have kept him from hunger for a day. If you teach a man to fish he will sit in a boat and drink beer all day.
User avatar
PrairieMule
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 2927
Joined: Fri 02 Sep 2005, 03:00:00
Location: In a Nigerian compound surrounded by mighty dignataries

Re: HIV probably isn't the cause of AIDS

Unread postby smallpoxgirl » Tue 20 Mar 2007, 18:59:44

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('MacG', 'W')ould it be possible for you to share my curiosity?


Sure. I can do curiosity. What are you curious about?
"We were standing on the edges
Of a thousand burning bridges
Sifting through the ashes every day
What we thought would never end
Now is nothing more than a memory
The way things were before
I lost my way" - OCMS
User avatar
smallpoxgirl
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 7258
Joined: Mon 08 Nov 2004, 04:00:00
Top

PreviousNext

Return to Medical Issues Forum

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest

cron