by Itch » Fri 24 Dec 2004, 01:35:31
$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', 'T')he best part of the video was when he showed a list of things that grow population and reduce it. He said that nature will choose from the right side of the list one day no matter what we do. Fortunately, it is possible for us to make the choice from that list. I think it's time to stop guessing at how the future will be and start thinking about what to choose from the list of ways that populations go down. Do we want abortions, forced contraception, war, disease, famine, or anything from that list? Surely, we can add to the list in discussion, but the day that the human race as a whole can decide how it wants to reduce population will mark a huge point in human achievement on par with the invention of the wheel. Up until now, we have almost always let nature choose from the list for us. Will we ever have the wisdom to make our own choice from the list?
Right. I thought this was one of the most interesting parts of the video. Everything our society strives for contributes to the population problem. Unfortunately, I don't think people will accept this, because the longevity fetish doesn't seem to be losing style at this time. It would also be very difficult to encourage something from the list, which he acknowledged.
In my opinion, the most effective way to reduce the population is disease, which would spread quite quickly due to intercontinental travel. Of course, the public would not approve of a campaign for disease, but, in my opinion, I think that we'll be due for another epidemic soon, so maybe nature, the government, or whoever, is already at the plate. I still think it would be funny to have a marathon that encourages people to contract AIDS.
We have plenty of weapons at our disposal, but, like disease, I think these will also be used voluntarily. We've used nuclear weapons before when we were in a winning situation, so I think we'll see plenty of interesting actions when we lose.
I think the most humane thing to do would be to abstain from sex that produces babies. This would automatically fail since people apparently think it is a right to breed. Encouraging blowing and gobbling might work, but this type of sex requires precise communication. If people can take some time to learn about their partners' anatomy, and casually practice what their partner desires, then that would be great.
I sure would love to see some pro-smoking commercials. It'd be easy to market; just do the usual "hot chicks will beg to blow you if you use our product" for the guys, and "you're ugly, but you can become less ugly by using our product" for the girls.
Realistically, though, I think physics will make the choice.