by Petrodollar » Thu 08 Jun 2006, 13:37:53
Anyone have the figure for Russia's current oil exports in mb/d?
I know that total oil production is around 9.2 mb/d (circa late 2005), but I was curious what their export numbers are. I seem to recall approx. 5.1 mb/d, but I think that is 2004 CIA-sourced data.
So, here's some quick math. The projected drop in demand for dolllars/petrodollars at today's $70 per barrel would be approx:
5,100,000 mb/d X $70 dollars = $357,000,000 x 45 days (contract life) = $16,065,000,000 per cycle of Russian oil exports.
Now, assuming approx. 250 trading days per year (5.5 cycles) = $88,357,500,000 per year in Russian petrodollar sales. (for the decimally impaired, that's $88 billion per year)
So, we can deduct that ultimately (when Russia's oil is traded via this new exchange - assuming roubles are the unit of account and transaction currency) that customer's of Russia's oil exports (i.e. principally the EU) will not need those $88 billion petrodollars which they are currently using for those transactions.
Will Russia attempt to price its Urals against the dollar-based Brent crude or will they attempt to follow the euro's more stable valuation? I predict the euro due to its overwhelming stabilty and relative value over the dollar, and Russia has already stated its intentions:
$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', '[')b]Russia ends de facto dollar peg and moves to align rouble with euro
By Steve Johnson in London (sourced from the Financial Times)
Published: February 5, 2005
Link 1...and more recently...
$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', '[')b]The threat to a fistful of petrodollars
By Liam Halligan (Filed: 23/04/2006)
Link 2I think next month's meeting of the G8 in St. Peterburg with Putin as the host will be a tense event given the unfolding erosion of petrodollar hegemony and its associated macroeconomic and geopolitical ramifications...
FWIW, Iran's oil exports are about half that of Russia (2.4 or 2.5 mb/d), so assuming the oil bourse opens next month using euros, in time (say 2007), the drop in demand for petrodollars could be another $44 billion - based on
today's oil prices. This does not account for various Caspian oil exporters and other OPEC producers such as Venezuela who will likely utlize a euro-based oil transaction option, nor does that include the potential impact on dollar denominated petroleum based products and natural gas sales, etc.
Given that petrodollar flows are currently funding about 45% of the US current account deficit (
$1 billion per day, every day), this is going to become a very big problem in the not too distant future. My question? Who is going to loan the US an extra $88 to $132 billion in 2007 and beyond in order to prop up the $805+ billlion US current account deficit once Russian and Iranian oil exports are not under petrodollar hegemony? Hint: I doubt it is going to be China, I think at $200 billion per year they'd had enough, and their #2 oil exporter is of course Iran.
Me thinks the results of upcoming Federal Reserve auctions will be important factor to watch. What happens if you hold an auction for several billlion in Treasury-bills - and not many people show up to buy them? Well, Bernanke may be glad that the pesky M3 statisitic was discontinued back in March...
$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', 'I')t has begun.
Indeed, it appears that a "basket of currencies" for international oil trades is beginning to emerge, and I'll take this opportunity to post this little excerpt from one of many documents revealed in David Spiro's book about internal US Treasury discussions circa 1978:
$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', '"')...confidence in the dollar remains fragile. Recent and more frequent news reports regarding OPEC's growing disenchantment with use of [the] dollar for oil pricing further disturb the market.
If OPEC changed the unit of accounting for oil pricing it could precipitate a major market reaction which would be in the interest neither of the Saudis, other OPEC members, nor the US."-- Assistant US Treasury Secretary C. Fred Bergsten to Treasury Secretary W. Michael Blumenthal, in a Treasury department internal memorandum entitled, "Briefing for your Meeting with Ambassador to Saudi Arabia, John C. West", 10 March 1978, P. 1-2.
In his conclusion, Dr. Spiro's ground-breaking research offered some prophetic words on the macroeconomics of petrodollar recycling:
. Yet insofar as the oil shocks were a symptom of US hegemonic decline, similar shocks can be expected in the future. International institutions do not have the capability to handle such threats to stability, and US unilateralism will prevent the strengthening of multilateral cooperative regimes.
Although the relative decline of US hegemony has led to an increase in observable power outcomes, the result ultimately will be worldwide economic instability.
.
— David E. Spiro,