Donate Bitcoin

Donate Paypal


PeakOil is You

PeakOil is You

peakoildebunked retires

What's on your mind?
General interest discussions, not necessarily related to depletion.

Re: peakoildebunked retires

Unread postby rwwff » Wed 10 May 2006, 10:15:51

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Zardoz', '
')Beats me, although as a Southern Californucopian, I can say that a reduction in traffic around here will be an indication that the suffering has begun. If we're not in our damned cars, it will only be because we're hurting..


Then, I think we have a pretty simple sliding scale...
basex = number of vehicle miles driven in 2000
cx = number of vehicle miles driven in a particular year

pain index = 200 - [(100 * cx) /basex]
User avatar
rwwff
Intermediate Crude
Intermediate Crude
 
Posts: 2601
Joined: Fri 28 Apr 2006, 03:00:00
Location: East Texas

Re: peakoildebunked retires

Unread postby Corpsicle » Wed 10 May 2006, 12:29:41

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Peak_Plus', '.').. do you want to offer an objective "index" on how to measure the PAIN of PO?


A pertinent question.

I can only offer my uneducated take on it, as the management of this "pain" may become pro-active, in the form of subsidies, or coercive, in the form of threathening boycotts (in some form or another) of nations wanting to decrease their oil-production.

In any case, I offer the comparative perspective of demand-destruction, or as economists would coin it, "long-term flexibility", as a starting-point for consideration.

For example, comparing Norway's gas-prices with that of the US, with the perspective that oil is a globally fungible good, hints that with 80% taxes for gas delivered to the consumer in Norway, and a flexibility of 0.01, a 5% reduction in gas-supplies increases the price in Norway much less than that in America, relatively speaking.

So with calculations basing themselves on that (and on the European continent plus China), I suggest that when the annual increase in fuel-consumption for America - being in my view the most vulnerable of the industrialized countries - that is the point of inflection, or if you will, the POINT OF PAYNE.

Thank you and have a nice day.
User avatar
Corpsicle
Wood
Wood
 
Posts: 39
Joined: Wed 25 Jan 2006, 04:00:00

Re: peakoildebunked retires

Unread postby sameu » Wed 10 May 2006, 13:35:34

and it only seems like yesterday I've read JD's goodbuy topic :roll:

the wole problem here is the fact that people tend to believe that everyone else acts and thinks like themself

Maybe the next example can increase your empathy
I don't drive a car either, so rising gasprices don't bother me at all
but let's say when oilprice hits $80 they will cut off your internet
If it falls under that price it's back on, above, cut off again

for some people their car is like your and mine internetconnection

will they die, no, but they will suffer
User avatar
sameu
Tar Sands
Tar Sands
 
Posts: 579
Joined: Thu 18 Aug 2005, 03:00:00
Location: Belgium, Europe

Re: peakoildebunked retires

Unread postby Wildwell » Wed 10 May 2006, 14:11:01

I’m afraid this is where people get their calculations wrong again.

You see the cost of motoring is not the cost of fuel: It’s the cost of the car, spare parts, servicing and MPG…because obviously the more efficient the car, the lower the cost of motoring per mile. Fuel may have gone up, but it has to be inflation adjusted, and the cost of other things, plus MPG has to be taken into account.

I hear people say 'You know what in 1975 fuel was only 10p a litre'. Well boo-hoo it's called inflation. You could buy a family house for £30,000 then, now the cost is nearer £200,000.

Obviously every country is different, but for the UK the cost of motoring is this:

Per car

Link
Which seems expensive in some cases, such as 50p a mile for a typical Ford Mondeo…but when we adjust for inflation and disposable income we get a different picture.

Chart
Last edited by Wildwell on Thu 11 May 2006, 06:29:23, edited 1 time in total.
User avatar
Wildwell
Heavy Crude
Heavy Crude
 
Posts: 1962
Joined: Thu 03 Feb 2005, 04:00:00
Location: UK

Re: peakoildebunked retires

Unread postby Peak_Plus » Wed 10 May 2006, 15:45:08

Right.
As y'all can see, it's not such an easy thing to quantify. We might all know that it will be worse for us all, but how do we measure it???
Definitely not in price, and I think this is the value of JD's 300 posts.

Where is the pain going to be???

Ok, I sold my car (well, basically just threw it away cause the repairs were getting too expensive) and now I use my bike and public trans and hitch a ride from work with a colleague, even though I make good money. Now I'm going to buy a car with a neighbor - we've got all the details of the contract for Car Sharing worked out.

I NEED a car, partially to get rid of all the trash that a 5-head family produces:

Sorting trash is the law in Germany. And it's not picked up by something with four wheel and flies - you have to take it to the recycling center yourself. Isn't that just A PURE WASTE OF EFFICIENCY and FUEL????

So, what I'm saying is, is that JD IS RIGHT. There will be millions of solutions for our everyday situations. So where's the pain?

Not in fewer miles driven.
Not in higher energy prices.
Not in United Airline's bankruptcy.
Not in fewer strawberries in winter.

I was thinking of saying "calories consumed by the average American", but that can be cut by about 40% without causing one person pain. (late 18th century European consumption was less than 2000 per head. US is almost 4000 right now.)

Where is the Pain!!!?

Unemployment hurts.
Lower disposable income hurts (remained the same in the US from about 1974 to 1994, for instance).
No heating in the winter hurts.
Being in jail hurts.
War hurts.
Losing your house hurts.
Going bankrupt hurts.

Which of these can be more than indirectly attributed to Peak Oil???
Which of these can we index (measure) so that I can even bet with JD?

Come on, Sameu, defend yourself! Dollar won't crash? Who cares! What does that have to do with PO?
This is the way the world ends,
Not with a bang but a wimper!
T.S. Eliot
User avatar
Peak_Plus
Lignite
Lignite
 
Posts: 212
Joined: Fri 01 Oct 2004, 03:00:00
Location: Germany/Ohio

Re: peakoildebunked retires

Unread postby Zardoz » Wed 10 May 2006, 15:49:52

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Peak_Plus', 'W')here is the Pain!!!?

Unemployment hurts.
Lower disposable income hurts (remained the same in the US from about 1974 to 1994, for instance).
No heating in the winter hurts.
Being in jail hurts.
War hurts.
Losing your house hurts.
Going bankrupt hurts.

Which of these can be more than indirectly attributed to Peak Oil???


Every single one of them could be, of course. What are you talking about?
"Thank you for attending the oil age. We're going to scrape what we can out of these tar pits in Alberta and then shut down the machines and turn out the lights. Goodnight." - seldom_seen
User avatar
Zardoz
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 6323
Joined: Fri 02 Dec 2005, 04:00:00
Location: Oil-addicted Southern Californucopia

Re: peakoildebunked retires

Unread postby fafhrd » Wed 10 May 2006, 16:01:42

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('JohnDonner', 'I') eat dweebs like you for breakfast


I think I'm starting to understand JD's PO survival strategy.
User avatar
fafhrd
Wood
Wood
 
Posts: 44
Joined: Thu 04 May 2006, 03:00:00

Re: peakoildebunked retires

Unread postby sameu » Wed 10 May 2006, 17:06:47

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Peak_Plus', '
')Come on, Sameu, defend yourself! Dollar won't crash? Who cares! What does that have to do with PO?


are you talking to me?

if so, please rephrase because you make no sense
User avatar
sameu
Tar Sands
Tar Sands
 
Posts: 579
Joined: Thu 18 Aug 2005, 03:00:00
Location: Belgium, Europe
Top

Re: peakoildebunked retires

Unread postby MonteQuest » Wed 10 May 2006, 19:59:53

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('JohnDenver', '')$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('MonteQuest', 'E')xponential growth is not a fairy tale. Reality is that things look good until the 29th day. It appears you have time. You don't. Overnight, things go from ok to untenable.


Really? So are you predicting that things will become untenable overnight? When is this going to happen?

It seems like you're a little mixed up Monte. On the one hand, you keep talking about a "slow decline" which takes decades or even centuries, and yet here you're talking about things going haywire "overnight". Which is it?


As usual, he distorts my postion. LOL!

Exponential growth always makes things untenable overnight; it is the nature of the beast.

The question is: are we at the 29th day?

As I have been on record as stating:

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Montequest', 'B')ut I think the scenario will be a long drawn out affair due to our precarious economic climate which will induce some major demand destruction long before peak oil hits. One caveat; if peak oil is already here, Katy bar the door.


Predictions? From Dec 2004:

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Montequest', 'S')ince virtually all commodities use petroleum fuel to move from production to consumption, as fuel prices rise whether by market forces or by currency decisions by OPEC to offset the loss in revenue as the dollar declines due to our trade imbalance, all commodity prices must also rise. This will create inflation. To curb the inflation, the Fed will raise interest rates. And as the price of food and other essential commodities rise--along with house payments tied to variable rate mortgages--luxuries and dispensable goods and services will drop out of the family budgets and the standard of living will decline and unemployment will rise.


Underway as we speak. What will be the tipping point?
A Saudi saying, "My father rode a camel. I drive a car. My son flies a jet-plane. His son will ride a camel."
User avatar
MonteQuest
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 16593
Joined: Mon 06 Sep 2004, 03:00:00
Location: Westboro, MO
Top

Re: peakoildebunked retires

Unread postby Novus » Wed 10 May 2006, 20:35:22

JD, does have one point here and that is we lack a way to quantify a decline in perceptable life. I propose that we look at electricity interuption rates because it represents much of modern day civilization. You can't do much without electricity: no TV, no radio, no computer, no Internet, no light bulbs, no washer/drier, no electric tooth brush, ect. Without electricity your life would be significanly different. In the US electricity is available on demand 99.99% of the time. This means that if you pay your electric bill you will have electricty interupted only 0.01% of the time or for one hour out of every 10,000 hours. If this interuption rate doubled it would be one hour out of every 5,000 hours.

At what point would this be a serious event? No power for one out of every 100hrs? No power for one out of every 10hrs? Or would it not be considered a real problem until power was cut off more then 50% of the time? It is hard to say and I am not about to make predictions of when these things will take place. A prediction I am willing to make is that electricity will decline from here on out becoming less and less available over time.
User avatar
Novus
Intermediate Crude
Intermediate Crude
 
Posts: 2450
Joined: Tue 21 Jun 2005, 03:00:00

Re: peakoildebunked retires

Unread postby Zardoz » Wed 10 May 2006, 20:55:44

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Novus', '.')..we lack a way to quantify a decline in perceptable life. I propose that we look at electricity interuption rates because it represents much of modern day civilization.


Absolutely, but to come up with this "Pain-O-Meter", wouldn't we have to factor in everything else that cheap fossil-fueled energy, or the lack of it, affects?

I'll respectfully attempt to start the list of factors, and invite all to add to it:

Energy costs

Economic indicators ( http://www.gpoaccess.gov/indicators/06janbro.html )

Unemployment rate (although that's "iffy" because of the bogus information the government publishes)

Electrical service (or the lack of it)

Crime rate

Demand for services from charitable organizations

Vehicular traffic levels (but how do you measure it?)

Etc., etc.

I'll leave it to somebody a lot brighter than me to come up with the formula that puts all this together and spits out a level-of-pain number...
"Thank you for attending the oil age. We're going to scrape what we can out of these tar pits in Alberta and then shut down the machines and turn out the lights. Goodnight." - seldom_seen
User avatar
Zardoz
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 6323
Joined: Fri 02 Dec 2005, 04:00:00
Location: Oil-addicted Southern Californucopia
Top

Re: peakoildebunked retires

Unread postby rwwff » Wed 10 May 2006, 20:57:04

Hard to say. Any interuptions of an hour or so are only moderately annoying, even if its every couple of weeks. We had a bit of rolling blackout a few weeks back when it got unexpectedly warm and they had some generating plants offline in the middle of their maintenance schedule. A three hour offline, even once a year would really, REALLY, irritates me. (unless caused by hurricane, I accept that as part of the price of living within 60 miles of the gulf coast.) I do have a generator, as well as a 750 watt inverter that a car can run, so its not hideous, but it would be very annoying.

So, I'd measure it more along the lines of the maximum daily interuption over the course of any 12 month period.
User avatar
rwwff
Intermediate Crude
Intermediate Crude
 
Posts: 2601
Joined: Fri 28 Apr 2006, 03:00:00
Location: East Texas

Re: peakoildebunked retires

Unread postby JohnDenver » Wed 10 May 2006, 23:34:54

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Aaron', '
')A non-event?

Tell that to my countrymen who will perish in Iraq today fighting for pole-position in the oil-rich middle east.


I measure events in terms of objective criteria like body count. There simply aren't enough troops dying in Iraq to constitute an "event".

It just seems like an event due to all the media obsession and hype. Objectively speaking, GI Joe getting killed in Iraq is no more significant than Average Joe getting killed on the freeway.
JohnDenver
Intermediate Crude
Intermediate Crude
 
Posts: 2145
Joined: Sun 29 Aug 2004, 03:00:00
Top

Re: peakoildebunked retires

Unread postby Zardoz » Wed 10 May 2006, 23:48:31

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('JohnDenver', 'I') measure events in terms of objective criteria like body count. There simply aren't enough troops dying in Iraq to constitute an "event".

It just seems like an event due to all the media obsession and hype. Objectively speaking, GI Joe getting killed in Iraq is no more significant than Average Joe getting killed on the freeway.


Ban this nasty little sociopath, Aaron. Run his rotten ass out of here.
"Thank you for attending the oil age. We're going to scrape what we can out of these tar pits in Alberta and then shut down the machines and turn out the lights. Goodnight." - seldom_seen
User avatar
Zardoz
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 6323
Joined: Fri 02 Dec 2005, 04:00:00
Location: Oil-addicted Southern Californucopia
Top

Re: peakoildebunked retires

Unread postby JoeCoal » Wed 10 May 2006, 23:57:25

I second Zardoz's motion.

I wonder if JD would count it as an "event" if HE got killed on the highway. Perhaps that could be arranged...
Good night, and good luck...
JoeCoal
Lignite
Lignite
 
Posts: 293
Joined: Thu 02 Feb 2006, 04:00:00

Re: peakoildebunked retires

Unread postby Free » Thu 11 May 2006, 00:05:54

Come on people please...

We discuss potential die off on a daily basis here, and you pretend to be upset about an (admittedly very low class) remark like this?

As long it doesn't get personal and against the COC, it would be horrible to ban anyone, IMHO.

Other than that I think JD is full of it, and quite frequently a %/($(/$$%&§$&§
"Democracy means the opportunity to be everyone's slave."
Karl Kraus
User avatar
Free
Heavy Crude
Heavy Crude
 
Posts: 1280
Joined: Sun 28 Nov 2004, 04:00:00
Location: Europe

Re: peakoildebunked retires

Unread postby JohnDenver » Thu 11 May 2006, 03:07:33

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('JoeCoal', 'I') wonder if JD would count it as an "event" if HE got killed on the highway.


Yes, that would count as an event for me. It would be a non-event for everybody else, except maybe a few friends and relatives.

It's the same for GI Joe getting killed in Iraq. That's certainly an event for that person, and the friends and relatives. For everybody else, it's just a media event.

Look... the raw fact of the matter is this: I can remove the Iraq war from my life at any time, simply by pressing the "OFF" button on the TV. I can ignore it with impunity. It's like "American Idol" or "The Simpsons". If I don't want to hear about it, I can turn it off. It's just a TV show.

Yes, it's true that soldiers are actually dying in Iraq, but so what? People are dying everyday, and they all have value as human beings. The only thing that makes a soldier's death any more "important" than the death of anybody else is the fact that the media is drumming it up and making it into a media event -- i.e. a TV show.
JohnDenver
Intermediate Crude
Intermediate Crude
 
Posts: 2145
Joined: Sun 29 Aug 2004, 03:00:00
Top

Re: peakoildebunked retires

Unread postby PolestaR » Thu 11 May 2006, 03:18:03

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Zardoz', '')$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('JohnDenver', 'I') measure events in terms of objective criteria like body count. There simply aren't enough troops dying in Iraq to constitute an "event".

It just seems like an event due to all the media obsession and hype. Objectively speaking, GI Joe getting killed in Iraq is no more significant than Average Joe getting killed on the freeway.


Ban this nasty little sociopath, Aaron. Run his rotten ass out of here.


Can we do what Zardoz wants but instead perform it on him? His religious like tightness and rigidness to replies is getting crazy.

On a different note, give JohnDenver a break, he *is* a doomer. Read between the lines on his posts to find it. On face value of his words he is simply defending a position for his pride. Let him have it, everyone is wrong sometimes.
Bringing sexy back..... to doom
PolestaR
Tar Sands
Tar Sands
 
Posts: 955
Joined: Tue 21 Jun 2005, 03:00:00
Top

Re: peakoildebunked retires

Unread postby Doly » Thu 11 May 2006, 03:32:06

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('PolestaR', '
')On a different note, give JohnDenver a break, he *is* a doomer. Read between the lines on his posts to find it. On face value of his words he is simply defending a position for his pride.


I agree. In fact, I suspect John Denver is being a devil's advocate. He doesn't really think that peak oil isn't happening, he just wants to make discussions more interesting.
User avatar
Doly
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 4370
Joined: Fri 03 Dec 2004, 04:00:00
Top

PreviousNext

Return to Open Topic Discussion

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest

cron