Donate Bitcoin

Donate Paypal


PeakOil is You

PeakOil is You

Traders' Corner

Discussions about the economic and financial ramifications of PEAK OIL

Where will WTI close on December 31st, 2005?

Poll ended at Tue 03 Jan 2006, 04:44:43

less than $60
10
No votes
around $60
12
No votes
around $65
23
No votes
around $70
12
No votes
more than $70
15
No votes
 
Total votes : 72

Re: Traders' Corner

Unread postby CARVER » Thu 10 Nov 2005, 19:24:09

Thanks for the lesson MrBill. I'm also curious if there are some great stories/myths of people that claim to have found the perfect (Technical) Analysis, one that defies the laws of the market. The point where greed takes over common sense, and even some of the properly educated professionals start to believe, because they want to believe it so much. Such stories exist in the field of physics and computer science/math for example. There must be one here too? (I vaguely remember hearing something about some belgium trader that claimed to have figured out the market?)
User avatar
CARVER
Lignite
Lignite
 
Posts: 396
Joined: Thu 19 May 2005, 03:00:00
Location: Holland

Re: Traders' Corner

Unread postby ubercynicmeister » Thu 10 Nov 2005, 20:10:49

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('tdrive', '')$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', 'T')hus we're all forced to prop up this rather odius way of a few people making obscene amounts of money


Errrmmm... pardon me, but the futures market is a zero sum game, so someone else is LOSING obscene amounts of money.

Wake up.

Cheers,


And cheers to you, tdrive.

The problem is that the persons losing the money are the "ordinary Joes" at the fuel pump. That stockmarket where fortunes are won and lost really is supported at some point by someone actually buying some commodity they can pick up / pump / physically handle / touch / use in some way, shape or form. And hence has to purchased in some way, shape or form. The price that the Ordinary Joe pays is determined by the stockmarket, either directly or indirectly. It seems that we all need to wake up to that.

Note: I'll probably see this post get shifted to somewhere else.

Thanks to all those who are supplying info for/ from the market, though. It's nice to know how much one is going to be shafted by.

No, I don't know why that's a comfort.
User avatar
ubercynicmeister
Tar Sands
Tar Sands
 
Posts: 640
Joined: Sun 25 Jul 2004, 03:00:00
Location: Hunter Valley, New South Wales, Australia

Re: Traders' Corner

Unread postby tdrive » Thu 10 Nov 2005, 20:38:10

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', 'T')he problem is that the persons losing the money are the "ordinary Joes" at the fuel pump. That stockmarket where fortunes are won and lost really is supported at some point by someone actually buying some commodity they can pick up / pump / physically handle / touch / use in some way, shape or form. And hence has to purchased in some way, shape or form. The price that the Ordinary Joe pays is determined by the stockmarket, either directly or indirectly. It seems that we all need to wake up to that.


No, actually, half of the commodity exchange traders are actually losing money on the other side of the contract. Futures trading is a zero-sum game. Average Joe losing money on the gas pump can hedge his physical losses by simply entering into an offsetting transaction on NYMEX.

Remember, for everyone out there buying on the comodity market there is someone selling. Those prices do not go up and down in thin air.

The price Joe pays is determined by the commodity market, not stock market. Also, Joe's buying does not support any futures contracts, since they are settled in cash among the counter-parties.

Cheers,
User avatar
tdrive
Lignite
Lignite
 
Posts: 334
Joined: Sun 11 Jul 2004, 03:00:00

Re: Traders' Corner

Unread postby tdrive » Thu 10 Nov 2005, 20:43:50

From VALEATOR.COM:

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', '.')..TOTAL 82.735 MBBL OF OIL AND 426.426 BCF OF GAS SHUT IN SO FAR. IN OTHER NEWS... COLD EAST COST WEATHER FORECAST AUGMENTED AND REITERATED FOR SECOND HALF OF NOVEMBER. OPEC OIL EXPORTS BY SEA EXPECTED TO RISE BY 140,000 BPD TO 25 MBPD IN THE FOUR WEEKS TO NOV. 26 COMPARED WITH 24.86 MBPD IN THE FOUR WEEKS TO OCT. 29 ACCORDING TO OIL MOVEMENTS. EXPORTS UP SEASONALLY AS WELL AS DUE TO RECOVERING U.S. REFINING CAPACITY. EASTBOUND SAILINGS ALSO INCREASE AS DEMAND RISES DURING WINTER. CHINA MAY IMPORT OIL FOR SPR AND ALSO BUILD COMMERCIAL PRODUCT STOCKS ACCORDING TO CHINESE OFFICIALS THUS REVERSING RECENT HOLD UP POLICIES. ALSO CHINA CUSTOMS ANNOUNCED 21.3% INCREASE IN CRUDE IMPORTS IN OCTOBER Y-O-Y SHARPLY REVERSING PREVIOUS TREND. ACCORDING TO IEA WORLD AND CHINESE DEMAND DESTRUCTION CLAIMS OVERSTATED.


I cannot believe in this environment and bullish news the crude dropped so low today.

Any takes on that?

Cheers,
User avatar
tdrive
Lignite
Lignite
 
Posts: 334
Joined: Sun 11 Jul 2004, 03:00:00

Re: Traders' Corner

Unread postby MrBill » Fri 11 Nov 2005, 04:00:37

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('CARVER', 'T')hanks for the lesson MrBill. I'm also curious if there are some great stories/myths of people that claim to have found the perfect (Technical) Analysis, one that defies the laws of the market. The point where greed takes over common sense, and even some of the properly educated professionals start to believe, because they want to believe it so much. Such stories exist in the field of physics and computer science/math for example. There must be one here too? (I vaguely remember hearing something about some belgium trader that claimed to have figured out the market?)


Sure. Now that commodities are back in the headlines you hear outrageous claims all the time. Here in Cyprus there was one broker advertising on the radio with claims like, Investor Morse, he's not a financial advisor, he's a money manager. 80% of his predictions this year have been correct. His overall capital growth has been over 60%. etc. What were his predictions? The sun will rise tomorrow? I think I will have lunch at noon? I am sure I will make more money than my clients? 60% capital appreciation? What from $100 to $160? Where's the baseline? :) I am pretty sure he has not legit because I don't hear his radio commericals anymore, so someone must have complained to the CySEC about him?

In any case, people do regression analysis and back testing all the time and find models that fit past price action and therefore they think their model works. A lot of academic egg heads for instance. However, mostly their models optimize past performance and are poor indicators of future price movements. It depends whether you are in a bull market or a bear market. Whether the market is trending or sideways and choppy. Whether there is high volatility or rather quiet conditions. It is hard to build a model to fit all market conditions.

Usually these academics fail to take into considerations transaction costs and bid/offer spreads. The most famous example being the Noble prize winners who invented the Black-Scholes option pricing model (actually the mathmetics was borrowed from a dust/heat particle expansion model from engineering) but ran Long Term Credit Corporation into bankruptcy when they tried to manage a hedge fund based on their models. As they put it, they were going to vacuum up nickels from the bottom of the swimming pool that no one knew were even there. :oops:

Take a simple set of moving averages. If you would have used a weekly chart and a 30-day moving average you could have easily caught the entire move from $15 to $70 with a buy & hold strategy. You would be quite rich. In hindsight it is quite plain. However, when you look at week to week volatility you would have had moves of up to 10% during those weeks and it would have taken brass balls to hang on. For instance the top of the channel was at $70.85, but the bottom just broke under $60, so that is a move of 15% before the uptrend was broken. But in hindsight a brilliant trade.

If you use short term moving averages. Say an hourly chart and a 14-period average, you will catch every single move. However, you may have to buy/sell, buy/sell, buy/sell 2-3 times per day. The transaction costs will be very high. Also you will miss the peaks and the lows, so you may end up just paying away spread during the day. But, if you follow this strategy religiously, you will catch any larger, trending moves.

So, yes, there are strategies that work, but they all have their trade-offs. :)
The organized state is a wonderful invention whereby everyone can live at someone else's expense.
User avatar
MrBill
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 5630
Joined: Thu 15 Sep 2005, 03:00:00
Location: Eurasia
Top

Re: Traders' Corner

Unread postby MrBill » Fri 11 Nov 2005, 04:23:11

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('ubercynicmeister', '')$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('tdrive', '')$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', 'T')hus we're all forced to prop up this rather odius way of a few people making obscene amounts of money


Errrmmm... pardon me, but the futures market is a zero sum game, so someone else is LOSING obscene amounts of money.

Wake up.

Cheers,


And cheers to you, tdrive.

The problem is that the persons losing the money are the "ordinary Joes" at the fuel pump. That stockmarket where fortunes are won and lost really is supported at some point by someone actually buying some commodity they can pick up / pump / physically handle / touch / use in some way, shape or form. And hence has to purchased in some way, shape or form. The price that the Ordinary Joe pays is determined by the stockmarket, either directly or indirectly. It seems that we all need to wake up to that.

Note: I'll probably see this post get shifted to somewhere else.

Thanks to all those who are supplying info for/ from the market, though. It's nice to know how much one is going to be shafted by.

No, I don't know why that's a comfort.



Gasoline, basic produce and metals are obscenely cheap. That is why we take them for granted and waste them like we do. There is no incentive to conserve them or save them. Look at how much needless driving/commuting gets done; how often people eat out or buy prepared meals instead of cooking from scratch at home; or the kind of consumer appliances that never get used or thrown away after a short lifespan? Even cars are on average replaced before they are even 10-years old. Never before in history did Average Joes have so much. They should stop complaining. They live better than Medieval Kings. Of course, post-Peak Oil it may all look completely different? :oops:

Take gasoline. How much do you drive? Maybe 15.000 miles per year? If your car gets 30 mpg and there are 42 gallons in a drum then that works out to about 12 barrels of oil per year. At $60 per barrel of crude or $63 for refined unleaded gasoline (42 x $1.5000) that is $756 wholesale or perhaps $2.15 retail $1084 (without taxes). What is to complain about? I really doubt that I could go out discover oil, drill for it, extract it, refine it and transport it home to put in my car for less than $1084 per year? I am thankful that oil cos. exist to make sure that I can drive and have that convenience to concentrate on other activities rather than spend my whole year either walking or searching for oil in the Canadian Arctic.

The problem with Average Joes is they never appreciate what they have. :)
The organized state is a wonderful invention whereby everyone can live at someone else's expense.
User avatar
MrBill
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 5630
Joined: Thu 15 Sep 2005, 03:00:00
Location: Eurasia
Top

Re: Traders' Corner

Unread postby MrBill » Fri 11 Nov 2005, 04:47:22

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('tdrive', 'F')rom VALEATOR.COM:

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', '.')..TOTAL 82.735 MBBL OF OIL AND 426.426 BCF OF GAS SHUT IN SO FAR. IN OTHER NEWS... COLD EAST COST WEATHER FORECAST AUGMENTED AND REITERATED FOR SECOND HALF OF NOVEMBER. OPEC OIL EXPORTS BY SEA EXPECTED TO RISE BY 140,000 BPD TO 25 MBPD IN THE FOUR WEEKS TO NOV. 26 COMPARED WITH 24.86 MBPD IN THE FOUR WEEKS TO OCT. 29 ACCORDING TO OIL MOVEMENTS. EXPORTS UP SEASONALLY AS WELL AS DUE TO RECOVERING U.S. REFINING CAPACITY. EASTBOUND SAILINGS ALSO INCREASE AS DEMAND RISES DURING WINTER. CHINA MAY IMPORT OIL FOR SPR AND ALSO BUILD COMMERCIAL PRODUCT STOCKS ACCORDING TO CHINESE OFFICIALS THUS REVERSING RECENT HOLD UP POLICIES. ALSO CHINA CUSTOMS ANNOUNCED 21.3% INCREASE IN CRUDE IMPORTS IN OCTOBER Y-O-Y SHARPLY REVERSING PREVIOUS TREND. ACCORDING TO IEA WORLD AND CHINESE DEMAND DESTRUCTION CLAIMS OVERSTATED.


I cannot believe in this environment and bullish news the crude dropped so low today.

Any takes on that?

Cheers,


I believe at the moment we are seeing falls in prices due to excess supply which is keeping storage, refineries, ships and other storage facilities full to capacity at the moment. Like an over flowing bathtub with a blocked drain, you need to refine products to create more room for the supply that is downstream. This may not happen in December and if the front month is cheap, it pays for producers to fill-up facilities and play the carry trade. However, there is a limit to physical storage. This may take months to unwind.

On the China front you have to treat all Chinese import numbers with a grain of salt. They import crude, but also export refined products. The domestic price is cheaper than the world price, so they refine crude into diesel and gasoline and then sell internationally in Asia to subsidize their loss making production which has to be sold on the local market at government fixed prices. Therefore, you have to look at the net number, which is imports of crude minus exports of products. I will look for it and post it when I find it. Thanks.

p.s. S. Korea is also a big importer of crude, exporter of products.

China has previously indicated that they would prefer to build their SPR from their own domestic production rather than pay world prices. I don't understand the logic as oil is fungible, but there you go. I think they would rather fill their reserves slowly in offpeak season and not rush out and take crude which is afterall just 19% shy of its all time highs and some 22% above the year's lows? However, they may be on the bid for some cheap cargos of oil without a home. But, at the moment, freight rates are quite high for oil tankers, so from what I have read it is not easy to find spare capacity due to the volumes being exported from Europe and the ME to the USA to make up for supply disruptions in the wake of Katerina/Rita? Will check around and try to find some hard numbers.
The organized state is a wonderful invention whereby everyone can live at someone else's expense.
User avatar
MrBill
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 5630
Joined: Thu 15 Sep 2005, 03:00:00
Location: Eurasia
Top

Re: Traders' Corner

Unread postby MrBill » Fri 11 Nov 2005, 05:43:21

Today's news brought to you by Refco Overseas London (soon to be part of Man Financial).

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', 'N')ews:
· Iraqi oil exports from two southern terminals were suspended for two days due to rough seas.

· Oil Movements report OPEC exports are seen up 140,000-bpd to 25-mbpd in the four weeks ending Nov 26 from 24.86-mbpd in the four weeks through Oct 29. The rise was attributed to a seasonal up tick as well as recovering US refining capacity.

· US House Republicans dropped a provision in the budget bill authorizing drilling in ANWR. However the Senate already passed such a measure last week so the bills will need to be reconciled.

· MMS update reports 736,279-bpd or 49.09% of US Gulf oil output still shut-in with cumulative lost production since 8/26 of 82.736 million barrels or 15.112% of annual Gulf output. There were also 190 platforms and 5 rigs evacuated, or 23.20% of 819 manned platforms and 3.73% of 134 rigs currently operating in the Gulf.

Refinery news:
· Exxon Mobil’s 350,000-bpd Beaumont TX refinery restored normal rates after restarting Oct 18. It shut Sep 23 ahead of Rita.

· Pasadena Refining shut a 56,000-bpd FCC unit at its 100,000-bpd Pasadena, TX refinery due to low lube oil pressure causing the wet gas compressor to trip off.
The organized state is a wonderful invention whereby everyone can live at someone else's expense.
User avatar
MrBill
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 5630
Joined: Thu 15 Sep 2005, 03:00:00
Location: Eurasia
Top

Re: Traders' Corner

Unread postby cube » Fri 11 Nov 2005, 14:04:10

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('MrBill', 'T')he problem with Average Joes is they never appreciate what they have. :)
Until they lose it.

I think our grandkids will be in utter disbelief that "back in the days" gasoline was cheap enough that the average Joe could afford to drive an SUV. Similar to how today we look back in complete awe knowing the fact that our grandparents paid their home mortgages on a single income. 8)
cube
Intermediate Crude
Intermediate Crude
 
Posts: 3909
Joined: Sat 12 Mar 2005, 04:00:00
Top

Re: Traders' Corner

Unread postby Typhoon » Fri 11 Nov 2005, 14:47:48

This is just ridiculous. HUZ briefly fell below $1.48, and has been trading below $1.50 for almost the whole day. Is it the weather? As I have said, this mild weather is short-lived. Aren't traders paying attention to forecasts?

Could it be demand? The latest EIA report showed that the four-week moving average of gasoline demand is approaching the year-ago level. Meanwhile, I would have thought that the IEA report was bullish overall.

Do traders even realize that the shipments from Europe are ending, and that we won't be drawing down from the SPR forever? Stockpiles look healthy, but it just seems that could change quickly. Even when talking about normal crude imports, rumors have been that OPEC production has fallen, especially from Iran but also a bit from Iraq and Saudi Arabia. It takes awhile for these things to show up in inventory numbers. I'm also wondering whether there is good global inventory data -- so much attention is paid to the weekly EIA reports.

I sense a good opportunity to go long, although I don't know how one could confirm when prices have bottomed. One could cautiously wait, but risk missing out on a strong move upward. I guess that's the challenge of trading!
User avatar
Typhoon
Peat
Peat
 
Posts: 176
Joined: Tue 27 Sep 2005, 03:00:00

Re: Traders' Corner

Unread postby tdrive » Sun 13 Nov 2005, 20:14:14

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', 'I') sense a good opportunity to go long, although I don't know how one could confirm when prices have bottomed. One could cautiously wait, but risk missing out on a strong move upward. I guess that's the challenge of trading!


According to VALEATOR.COM:

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', 'A')S A RESULT THE PRICE OF WTI CRUDE WILL OSCILLATE ABOUT $58/BBL THROUGHOUT THE WEEK WITH THE SHORT TERM RISK BEING EVEN ON THE UPSIDE AND DOWNSIDE. NONE OF THE EXPECTED EVENTS ARE STRONG ENOUGH TO SIGNIFICANTLY INFLUENCE THE MARKET OPINION. IT IS POSSIBLE THAT THE PRICE MAY TOUCH $55/BBL HOWEVER THIS WILL ONLY TEMPORARILY SINCE THE PRICE OF PHYSICAL BASKET WILL DROP TO $50/BBL WHICH IS CONSIDERED A FLOOR BY MANY OPEC PRODUCERS. THE EXPECTED RANGE FOR CRUDE FOR THE WEEK IS BETWEEN $60 TO $56 IN THE TAILS OF THE DISTRIBUTION WITH THE MAXIMUM AVERAGE AROUND $58/BBL WITH EVEN DISTRIBUTION BUT FAT TAILS. THE VOLATILITY WILL BE SAME AS LAST WEEK DUE TO LACK OF EVENTS AND FORECASTED COLDER WEATHER.


You can read the rest of the weekly forecast there. Sound interesting to me.

Cheers,
User avatar
tdrive
Lignite
Lignite
 
Posts: 334
Joined: Sun 11 Jul 2004, 03:00:00
Top

Re: Traders' Corner

Unread postby MrBill » Mon 14 Nov 2005, 06:38:04

RE bottom picking

Most traders had expected some sort of bottom formation on Friday. After dropping 6-sessions in a row for $6 or 10% many expected a new low followed by a strong close on short-covering and taking profit which would have been a classic signal and sign of at least a short-term correction? A minimum short-term correction of 0.382 would have been about $59 in the DEC expiring tomorrow or $60 in the JAN. However, we did make a new low in all the products on Friday, but we did not have a strong rally. Not strong enough to indicate a correction. Therefore, it would be a high risk buy to go long at these levels until further confirmation. Maybe we see this today, but so far in European trading we have seen a tepid challenge of the daily highs, but no break through Friday's interday highs. Therefore the bears will be emboldened. They may still want to probe the downside targets before hibernating ahead of the next cold spell?
The organized state is a wonderful invention whereby everyone can live at someone else's expense.
User avatar
MrBill
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 5630
Joined: Thu 15 Sep 2005, 03:00:00
Location: Eurasia

Re: Traders' Corner

Unread postby SupaNova » Mon 14 Nov 2005, 09:00:41

for the record...

Brent Crude is off tomorrow, WTi is not off until Friday.
User avatar
SupaNova
Wood
Wood
 
Posts: 10
Joined: Wed 19 Oct 2005, 03:00:00
Location: London

Re: Traders' Corner

Unread postby MrBill » Mon 14 Nov 2005, 09:14:08

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('SupaNova', 'f')or the record...

Brent Crude is off tomorrow, WTi is not off until Friday.



Sorry, my mistake. Crude building a nice little base of support here, but still have not taken out Friday's highs, so too early to call it a short term bottom and the start of a reversal? Still, scared out of my long too early here this morning. Could have seen better levels to exit or been long if and when it pops higher?
The organized state is a wonderful invention whereby everyone can live at someone else's expense.
User avatar
MrBill
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 5630
Joined: Thu 15 Sep 2005, 03:00:00
Location: Eurasia
Top

Re: Traders' Corner

Unread postby Silverharp » Tue 15 Nov 2005, 17:21:26

On financialsense.com newshour recently they did a few segements on oil, and they are forecasting much higher oil prices this winter based on severe winter in US, apparently years with extreme hurracaine seasons have had extreme winters (havnt had time to confirm this obserservation), has anyone come across this, and even if likely does this make an easy futures trade for 3 to 6 mths.
I like the technical situation for the COT reports, the dumb money is short and the commercials are long and given that non commercial shorts cant deliver to the market they will have to cash in
User avatar
Silverharp
Wood
Wood
 
Posts: 13
Joined: Tue 15 Nov 2005, 04:00:00
Location: Dublin

Re: Traders' Corner

Unread postby MrBill » Wed 16 Nov 2005, 07:58:37

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', 'N')ews:
· Iraqi oil minister, Ibrahim Bahr al-Ulum, said that October crude oil exports fell to 1.345 mbd due to poor weather. He hoped that full export rates of 1.6 mbd would be reached by in November and by yearend he was aiming for exports to be 1.8 mbd. Bahr al-Ulum said that ports were unable to load for four days due to inclement weather.

· Venezuela’s Energy Minister Rafael Ramirez said that OPEC would probably need to discuss a cut in oil production as US output in the Gulf of Mexico comes back on line.

· MMS update reports 725,423-bpd or 48.36% of US Gulf oil output still shut-in with cumulative lost production since 8/26 of 86.395 million barrels or 15.780% of annual Gulf output. There were also 149 platforms and 5 rigs evacuated, or 18.19% of 819 manned platforms and 3.73% of 134 rigs currently operating in the Gulf.

· DOE estimates: Crude up 1.8 million barrels, Distillate up 600K barrels, Gasoline up 1.5 million barrel
Refinery news:

· Delek US Holdings will shut a FCC unit at its 55K bpd refinery in Tyler Texas on November 28th.



RE cold winter

Okay, point taken, but when is it going to begin? It is not just absolute temperature, but duration? Number of below normal heating days? The longer we wait for winter, the more product goes into storage. And, theoretically April showers will bring May flowers after fewer months of the cold stuff?

Just back of the envelope stuff here, but the concepts are important. 85 mio barrels of crude have been lost so far due to Katerina/Rita, about the same amount as last year. That is one day's world consumption or about 4-days in the USA. However, due to mild temperatures crude storage is still 13% ahead of last year while high prices have resulted in demand about 2% lower. You cannot compare storage to demand precisely, but combined you have lower demand, higher storage of let us say for argument of +15% over last year. If the US uses 25 mpbd that is 3.75 mbpd slack capacity. Not the knife's edge we were trading on during last summer when it looked like demand would outstrip supply and refiners would have to choose between making gasoline or heating oil.

Also, worldwide, anecdotal evidence is that high prices have dampened demand. The stronger US dollar, now 1.1700 against the euro and looking like it may test 1.1500 in the coming days due to high interest rate differentials is a completely other dynamic than 2000-2004 when you had a weak dollar stimulating demand for cheaper oil and lower interest rates fuelling the world economy. That has all changed. Oil prices are higher, interest rates are higher, world growth is weaker and the dollar is making oil more expensive for those buying in euros and yen.

We very well may see oil at $50 by year end? The physical traders are not worried about supply. Their storage is almost full and before they buy more they would like to see their flat price decline. Sours are even cheaper and trading at nasty discounts. Therefore they will try to push oil prices lower before buying ahead of their Q1'06 needs. It all makes for sloppy trading in the days or weeks ahead. :)
The organized state is a wonderful invention whereby everyone can live at someone else's expense.
User avatar
MrBill
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 5630
Joined: Thu 15 Sep 2005, 03:00:00
Location: Eurasia
Top

Re: Traders' Corner

Unread postby Typhoon » Wed 16 Nov 2005, 17:03:55

MrBill, if you're a professional oil and gas trader, you must trade frequently. Do you have any long or short positions right now?

Crude inventories are indeed about 12 percent above last year's level. However, it's an illusion created by the shutdowns of the refineries knocked out by the hurricanes. The refineries have been starting up just as the emergency European imports are ending. This means that there was never a sharp fall in refined product stockpiles, but it means that we are likely to have more crude draws like the one we saw this week. BP's huge Texas City refinery, which is still not running, can alone process over 3,000,000 barrels per week. I'm not very impressed by the crude builds we've had, given all the refineries that were knocked out.

As far as I see, the demand destruction is not as dramatic as the market perceives. The four-week moving averages of U.S. gasoline demand and distillate demand are now both above last year's levels. True, perhaps demand destruction has been more significant in other countries, but I just don't think $60-$70 crude will prove to be enough to close the gap when the supply squeeze becomes noticeable.

I think it's dangerous to assume that oil is headed below $50 by the end of the year. You know more about the oil market than I do, but I think I have a good grasp of the supply situation. I think there will be another run for the highs. The highs probably won't be exceeded the first time around, but I think they will be surpassed sometime in 2006.

Continue to pay attention to the weather! The pattern change that I said would take time is finally coming. There is a cold front moving through the Eastern U.S. this afternoon. Temperatures on the East Coast are mild, but look at temperatures behind the front. In places like Columbus, Ohio, the temperature barely got above freezing. The Upper Midwest is even chillier. There will be several cold fronts coming through as the trough digs deeper. A negative NAO will reinforce the cold air mass. It's hard to tell what the weather will be like past Thanksgiving, but it appears that a block will form northeast of Newfoundland to keep the cold air in the eastern U.S. in place until at least December 10th. A weather pattern can't last forever, so some parts of the winter will be very cold while others will be mild. Every winter has fluctuations like this. Overall, though, this winter will be colder than last winter, and there is a good chance that it will be colder than normal over much of the U.S.

I find it very odd that the market has already decided in mid-November that there is no reason to worry. If that's the case, traders might be in for a shock.
User avatar
Typhoon
Peat
Peat
 
Posts: 176
Joined: Tue 27 Sep 2005, 03:00:00

Re: Traders' Corner

Unread postby MrBill » Thu 17 Nov 2005, 08:44:57

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', 'N')ews:
· OPEC’s monthly oil market report raised its estimate for US demand growth to 83.3-mbpd this year and 84.8-mbpd next year. This ended six months of downward revisions to world oil demand expectations. Members need to pump 30.32-mbpd this quarter, up 276,000-bpd from last month’s forecast and above the October production level of 30-mbpd. OPEC disputes demand destruction following the US hurricanes and rising energy prices, pointing to “vigorous preliminary growth data from developing countries, a brighter outlook for the world economy particularly for the USA and OECD Pacific countries, and a rebound in Chinese apparent demand.”

· Iraq resumed Basra crude exports following bad weather and a pipeline leak that caused a four-day delay last week. However the flow rate at Basra remains at 1.44-mbpd, down from 1.68-mbpd before the latest problems.

· Chinese oil product exports rose by 33.3% on year to 12.11 million metric tons in the first 10 months of the year.

· Workers at Petrobras accepted a wage offer and averted a potential strike

· MMS update reports 725,423-bpd or 48.35% of US Gulf oil output still shut-in with cumulative lost production since 8/26 of 87.119 million barrels or 15.912% of annual Gulf output. There were also 149 platforms and 5 rigs evacuated, or 18.19% of 819 manned platforms and 3.73% of 134 rigs currently operating in the Gulf.
The organized state is a wonderful invention whereby everyone can live at someone else's expense.
User avatar
MrBill
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 5630
Joined: Thu 15 Sep 2005, 03:00:00
Location: Eurasia
Top

Re: Traders' Corner

Unread postby MrBill » Thu 17 Nov 2005, 09:00:33

Hello Typhoon, thanks for those great comments. It is so much appreciated. Here I am on my island exile and my only contact to the outside world is through shreds of information fed to me by kind souls like yourself. Helps a lot.

Well, indeed we did see a short reversal yesterday after what appeared to be a superficially bearish report. Heating oil inventory was up 2.6 mio bbls vs. a f/c of 700K, but the market chose instead to focus on crude surprise draw of 2.2 mio bbls vs. a f/c increase of 2.0 mio and the 900K bbl decrease in unleaded gasoline vs. an add f/c of at least 1.5 mio bbls. That plus colder weather forecasts seemed to draw a line under the free fall in the crude and products, but realistically, one up day does not a reversal make, so we will need to see follow through buying outta NYC before we can claim we have seen the lows ahead of Christmas?

Yes, I am long. I have been defending a long since last Friday at least. Missed some key sell areas, sometimes by as little at 3-8 pts. only to see the market drop 50-100 pts. afterwards, so have spent most of my time coming back from a loss position. A couple of times I got faked out and bought into a bogus rally only to see it reverse early in NY trading. Yesterday, I cut part of my long ahead of the nos. as EVERYONE was bearish and I thought I might be able to pick some up 50 bps. lower after the expected stock build? I was wrong so ended up long, but at a worse average than I would have liked. At the moment, I am long Brent and heating oil. I will try to keep this long and improve my average by day trading, but key is today and what kind of follow through buying we see?

I think you are spot on with your demand destruction comments. Some cash traders have been waiting in the wings for better levels to buy inventory ahead of winter. The Chinese may double their buying of heating oil from 500K tonnes per month to 1 mio tonnes in the next month to stockpile ahead of Lunar New Year in January. That might stick some fire under this rally. Seems to be the same story everywhere. No pressing need to buy, so traders were taking their time, hoping for lower levels? Now if they all rush to pick the bottom now it might alleviate the surplus sloshing around the physical market and we'll see the futures firm up?

However, I try not to have a strong view on price. It can be too dangerous if you convince yourself you are right and the market is wrong. Last summer I just could not believe the rally we were in so I fought against it like a salmon swimming against the current only to die exhausted having reach their goal. I prefer to be a seashell in the surf. Just go with the flow instead of resisting it. But, it is not easy as I am by nature a contrarian. Therefore, only through discipline can I follow my technicals and know when I am wrong and it is time to get out! I wish I was smarter than the market, but I am not :!:

Thanks again for your comments. Take care. :)
The organized state is a wonderful invention whereby everyone can live at someone else's expense.
User avatar
MrBill
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 5630
Joined: Thu 15 Sep 2005, 03:00:00
Location: Eurasia

Re: Traders' Corner

Unread postby Typhoon » Thu 17 Nov 2005, 13:41:23

There was quite a large NG injection of 53 bcf.
User avatar
Typhoon
Peat
Peat
 
Posts: 176
Joined: Tue 27 Sep 2005, 03:00:00

PreviousNext

Return to Economics & Finance

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 58 guests